The impact of peer review on creative self-efficacy and learning performance in Web 2.0 learning activities

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 286-297

  Liu, Chen Chung ^a   Lu, Kuan Hsien ^a   Wu, Leon Yufeng ^b   Tsai, Chin Chung ^c  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Creative self efficacy; Field; Storytelling; System model of creativity; Web 2.0 learning activity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84964446398     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A Consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013
2. Amabile, T. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58
3. Andersen, S. M., & Chen, S. (2002). The Relational self: An Interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109(4), 619
4. Aragon, R. C., Poon, S. P., Monroy-Hernández, A., & Aragon, D. (2009). A Tale of two online communities: Fostering collaboration and creativity in scientists and children. In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 9-18). New York, NY: ACM
5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman
6. Bennett, S., Bishop, A., Dalgarno, B., Waycott, J., & Kennedy, G. (2012). Implementing Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: A Collective case study. Computers & Education, 59(2), 524-534
7. Choi, J. N. (2004). Individual and contextual predictors of creative performance: The Mediating role of psychological processes. Creativity Research Journal, 16(2-3), 187-199
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313-335). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
10. Falchikov, N. (1988). Self and peer assessment of a group project designed to promote the skills of capability. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 25(4), 327-339
11. Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, E. J. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38, 246-259
12. Hemmi, A., Bayne, S., & Land, R. (2009). The Appropriation and repurposing of social technologies in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 19-30
13. Hung, S. P. (2003). A Social cognitive model of significant other's feedback, creative self-efficacy, internal motivation and external motivation on creative behavior: A Structure equation modeling study (Unpublished master thesis). National Chiao-Tung University, Taiwan
14. Hung, S. P., Huang, H. Y., & Lin, S. S. J. (2008). Do significant others' feedback influence one's creative behavior? Using structural equation modeling to examine creativity self-efficacy and creativity motivation mediation effect. Bulletin of Education Psychology, 40(2), 303-322
15. Hurlburt, S. (2008). Defining tools for a new learning space: Writing and reading class blogs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 182-189
16. Jimoyiannis, A., Tsiotakis, P., Roussinos, D., & Siorenta, A. (2013). Preparing teachers to integrate Web 2.0 in school practice: Toward a framework for Pedagogy 2.0. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 248-267
17. Lassig, C. J. (2009). Promoting creativity in education-From policy to practice: An Australian perspective. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition: Everyday Creativity (pp. 229-238). New York, NY: ACM
18. Laru, J., Näykki, P., & Järvelä, S. (2012). Supporting small-group learning using multiple Web 2.0 tools: A Case study in the higher education context. Internet and Higher Education, 15, 29-38
19. Liu, C. C., Chen, S. L., Shih, J. L., Huang, G. T., & Liu, B. J. (2011a). An Enhanced concept map approach to improving children's storytelling ability. Computers & Education, 56, 873-884
20. Liu, C. C., Liu, K. P., Chen, W. H., Lin, C. P., & Chen, G. D. (2011b). Collaborative storytelling experiences in social media: Influence of peer-assistance mechanisms. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1544-1556
21. Liu, C. C., Wu, L. Y., Chen, Z. M., Tsai, C. C., & Lin, H. M. (2014). The Effect of story grammars on creative self-efficacy and digital storytelling. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30, 450-464
22. Mao, J. (2014). Social media for learning: A Mixed methods study on high school students' technology affordances and perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 213-223
23. McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). Personalised and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28-43
24. O'Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software [Article]. Retrieved from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
25. Ravenscroft, A. (2009). Social software, Web 2.0 and learning: Status and implications of an evolving paradigm. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 1-5
26. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2002). Peer assessment training in teacher education: Effects on performance and perceptions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 443-454
27. Smith, L. R. K., Michael, B. W., & Hocevar, D. (1990). Performance on creativity measures with examination-taking instructions intended to induce high or low levels of test anxiety. Creativity Research Journal, 3(4), 265-280
28. Sternberg, R., & Williams, W. M. (1996). (1996). How to develop student creativity. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
29. Sternberg, R. J. (2012). The Assessment of creativity: An Investment-based approach. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 3-12
30. Tess, A. P. (2013). The Role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)-A Literature review. Computers in Human Behavior , 29, 60-68
31. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148
32. Tsai, C. C., & Liang, J. C. (2009). The Development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: The Role of scientific epistemological views. Instructional Science, 37(3), 293-310
33. U.S. Department of Education (2010). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. Alexandria, VA: Education Publications Center. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/netp2010.pdf
34. van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R. & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 41-54
35. Via, S. (2002). Digital storytelling evaluation rubric [Form]. Retrieved from http://its.ksbe.edu/dst/PDFs/Rubrics/rubric.pdf
36. Windham C. (2007). Reflecting, writing and responding: Reasons students blog. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eli3010.pdf