Reduced-form modeling of public health impacts of inorganic PM2.5 and precursor emissions

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 137, Issue , 2016, Pages 80-89

  Heo, Jinhyok ^a   Adams, Peter J ^a   Gao, H Oliver ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Cornell University   (United States)

Author keywords

Air quality; CAMx; Chemical transport model; Intake fraction; Marginal social costs; PM2.5; Public health; Risk analysis

Indexed keywords

AIR INTAKES; AIR QUALITY; CARBON; COST ESTIMATING; COSTS; HEALTH; HEALTH RISKS; NITROGEN OXIDES; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SULFUR DIOXIDE;

ATMOSPHERIC VARIABLES; CAMX; CHEMICAL TRANSPORT MODELS; FINE PARTICULATE MATTER; INTAKE FRACTION; REDUCED-FORM MODELING; SOCIAL COST; STATISTICAL REGRESSION;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84964414135     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: 18732844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.026     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1974, 19:716-723. 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705.
2. Ansari A.S., Pandis S.N. Response of inorganic PM to precursor concentrations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32:2706-2714. 10.1021/es971130j.
3. 2.5 from aircraft emissions during landing and takeoff. Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45:3294-3300. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.029.
4. Bennett D.H., McKone T.E., Evans J.S., Nazaroff W.W., Margni M.D., Jolliet O., Smith K.R. Defining intake fraction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:206A-211A. 10.1021/es0222770.
5. 2.5 from individual power plants. Environ. Int. 2014, 68:200-208. 10.1016/j.envint.2014.03.031.
6. Byun D., Schere K.L. Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the models-3 community multiscale air quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Appl. Mech. Rev. 2006, 59:51-77. 10.1115/1.2128636.
7. Dunker A.M., Yarwood G., Ortmann J.P., Wilson G.M. The decoupled direct method for sensitivity analysis in a three-dimensional air quality model implementation, accuracy, and efficiency. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:2965-2976. 10.1021/es0112691.
8. ENVIRON CAMx User's Guide Version 5.41 2012, Environ International Corporation, Novato, CA.
9. 2.5-related health benefits of emission reductions for 17 industrial, area and mobile emission sectors across the U.S. Environ. Int. 2012, 49:141-151. 10.1016/j.envint.2012.08.017.
10. Fann N., Fulcher C.M., Hubbell B.J. The influence of location, source, and emission type in estimates of the human health benefits of reducing a ton of air pollution. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2009, 2:169-176. 10.1007/s11869-009-0044-0.
11. Grell G.A., Dudhia J., Stauffer D.R. A Description of the Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5) 1994, NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-398 + STR. http://dx.doi.org/10.5065/D60Z716B.
12. Hakami A., Henze D.K., Seinfeld J.H., Singh K., Sandu A., Kim S., Byun, Li Q. The adjoint of CMAQ. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:7807-7817. 10.1021/es070944p.
13. Henze D.K., Hakami A., Seinfeld J.H. Development of the adjoint of GEOS-chem. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2007, 7:2413-2433. 10.5194/acp-7-2413-2007.
14. 2.5 precursor emissions in the United States 2016, Manuscript submitted for publication.
15. Hubbell B.J., Hallberg A., McCubbin D.R., Post E. Health-related benefits of attaining the 8-Hr ozone standard. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113:73-82. 10.1289/ehp.7186.
16. Karydis V.A., Tsimpidi A.P., Pandis S.N. Evaluation of a three-dimensional chemical transport model (PMCAMx) in the eastern United States for all four seasons. J. Geophys. Res. 2007, 112:D14211. 10.1029/2006JD007890.
17. Koo B., Dunker A.M., Yarwood G. Implementing the decoupled direct method for sensitivity analysis in a particulate matter air quality model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:2847-2854. 10.1021/es0619962.
18. Koo B., Wilson G.M., Morris R.E., Dunker A.M., Yarwood G. Comparison of source apportionment and sensitivity analysis in a particulate matter air quality model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:6669-6675.
19. Krewski D., Burnett R.T., Goldberg M.S., Hoover B.K., Siemiatycki J., Jerrett M., Abrahamowicz M., White W.H. Overview of the reanalysis of the Harvard six cities study and American cancer society study of particulate air pollution and mortality. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2003, 66:1507-1551. 10.1080/15287390306424.
20. Krewski, et al. Extended Follow-up and Spatial Analysis of the American Cancer Society Study Linking Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality 2009, Health Effects Institute, Boston, MA, (Research Report 140).
21. 3 source apportionment. Geosci. Model Dev. 2015, 8:99-114. 10.5194/gmd-8-99-2015.
22. Latimer D.A. Particulate Matter Source-receptor Relationships between All Point and Area Sources in the United States and PSD Class I Area Receptors (VI-A-2 A-95-83) 1996, (Prepared for U.S. EPA, OAQPS, Research Triangle Park, NC).
23. Lelieveld J., Evans J.S., Fnais M., Giannadaki D., Pozzer A. The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 2015, 525:367-371. 10.1038/nature15371.
24. Lepeule J., Laden F., Dockery D., Schwartz J. Chronic exposure to fine particles and mortality: an extended follow-up of the Harvard six cities study from 1974 to 2009. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120:965-970. 10.1289/ehp.1104660.
25. Levy J.I., Baxter L.K., Schwartz J. Uncertainty and variability in health-related damages from coal-fired power plants in the United States. Risk Anal. 2009, 29:1000-1014. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01227.x.
26. Lim, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet 2012, 380:2224-2260. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8.
27. Morris R.E., McNally D.E., Tesche T.W., Tonnesen G., Boylan J.W., Brewer P. Preliminary evaluation of the community multiscale air quality model for 2002 over the southeastern United States. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2005, 55:1694-1708.
28. Muller N.Z. Linking policy to statistical uncertainty in air pollution damages. BE J. Econ. Anal. Policy 2011, 11. 1935-1682. 10.2202/1935-1682.2925.
29. Muller N.Z., Mendelsohn R. Efficient pollution regulation: getting the prices right. Am. Econ. Rev. 2009, 99:1714-1739. 10.1257/aer.99.5.1714.
30. National Research Council Hidden Costs of Energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use 2010, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
31. 2.5 nitrate to emission reductions-part I: derivation of the adjusted gas ratio and applicability at regulatory-relevant time scales. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42:1275-1286. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.10.039.
32. Pope C.A., Dockery D.W. Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2006, 56:709-742.
33. Punger E.M., West J.J. The effect of grid resolution on estimates of the burden of ozone and fine particulate matter on premature mortality in the USA. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2013, 6:563-573. 10.1007/s11869-013-0197-8.
34. Robinson A.L., Donahue N.M., Shrivastava M.K., Weitkamp E.A., Sage A.M., Grieshop A.P., Lane T.E., Pierce J.R., Pandis S.N. Rethinking organic aerosols: semivolatile emissions and photochemical aging. Science 2007, 315:1259-1262. 10.1126/science.1133061.
35. Thompson T.M., Saari R.K., Selin N.E. Air quality resolution for health impact assessment: influence of regional characteristics. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14:969-978. 10.5194/acp-14-969-2014.
36. US Burden of Disease Collaborators The state of US health, 1990-2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA 2013, 310:591-606. 10.1001/jama.2013.13805.
37. U.S.EPA Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program - Community Edition (BenMAP-CE) Version 1.1 2015, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency., Research Triangle Park, NC. http://www2.epa.gov/benmap/.
38. U.S.EPA 2011 National Emissions Inventory 2015, (accessed Nov 1, 2015). http://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/national-emissions-inventory.
39. U.S.EPA Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Proposed Carbon Pollution Guidelines for Existing Power Plants and Emission Standards for Modified and Reconstructed Power Plants (EPA-452/R-14-002) 2014, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Health & Environmental Impacts Division. Air Economics Group, Research Triangle Park, NC.
40. U.S.EPA User's Manual for the Co-benefits Risk Assessment (COBRA) Screening Model Version: 2.61 2013, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
41. U.S.EPA The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act from 1990 to 2020 2011, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air and Radiation, Washington, DC.
42. U.S.EPA Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Federal Implementation Plans to Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone in 27 States; Correction of SIP Approvals for 22 States (EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491) 2011, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation.
43. U.S.EPA Air Quality Modeling Final Rule Technical Support Document 2011, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Air Quality Assessment Division.
44. U.S.EPA Emissions Inventory Final Rule TSD (EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491) 2011, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air and Radiation. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Air Quality Assessment Division.
45. U.S.EPA Technical Support Document for the Proposed PM NAAQS Rule, Response Surface Modeling 2006, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC.
46. U.S.EPA The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act, 1990 to 2010, EPA Report to Congress (EPA-410-R-99-001) 1999, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air and Radiation. Office of Policy, Washington, DC.
47. Wagstrom K.M., Pandis S.N., Yarwood G., Wilson G.M., Morris R.E. Development and application of a computationally efficient particulate matter apportionment algorithm in a three-dimensional chemical transport model. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42:5650-5659. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.03.012.
48. 2.5: nonlinear aerosol mass response to sulfate reductions in the eastern United States. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 1999, 49:1415-1424.