Long-term impact of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi on leaf traits and transpiration of branches in the Dutch elm hybrid 'Dodoens'

Tree Physiology

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 335-344

  Plichta, Roman ^a   Urban, Josef ^a   Gebauer, Roman ^a   Dvořák, Miloň ^a   Ďurkovič, Jaroslav ^b  

^a MENDEL UNIVERSITY IN BRNO   (Czech Republic)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN ZVOLEN   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

anatomy; Huber value; LMA; petiole; potential transpiration; sap flow; water potential gradient

Indexed keywords

CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; DISEASE RESISTANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENT; FUNGAL DISEASE; HYBRID; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; LEAF; LONG-TERM CHANGE; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; SAP FLOW; SHRUB; TOLERANCE; TRANSPIRATION;

OPHIOSTOMA NOVO-ULMI; ULMUS;

WATER;

ELM; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; HYBRIDIZATION; MICROBIOLOGY; OPHIOSTOMA; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT DISEASE; PLANT LEAF; PLANT STEM; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; TIME FACTOR; XYLEM;

HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; OPHIOSTOMA; PLANT DISEASES; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT STEMS; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; TIME FACTORS; ULMUS; WATER; XYLEM;

EID: 84964330634     PISSN: 0829318X     EISSN: 17584469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpv144     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, Rome.
2. B auerle WL, Hinckley TM, Cermak J, Kucera J, Bible K (1999) The canopy water relations of old-growth Douglas-fir trees. Trees 13:211-217.
3. Binz T, Canevascini G (1996) Xylanases from the Dutch elm disease pathogens Ophiostoma ulmi and Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 49:159-175.
4. Brasier CM (2000) Intercontinental spread and continuing evolution of the Dutch elm disease pathogens. In: Dunn CP (ed) The elms: Breeding, conservation and disease management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 61-72.
5. Bréda N, Huc R, Granier A, Dreyer E (2006) Temperate forest trees and stands unde r severe drought: A review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences. Ann For Sci 63:625-644.
6. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM (2003) Stomatal closure during leaf dehydration, correlation with other leaf physiological traits. Plant Physiol 132:2166-2173.
7. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM (2005 a) Wa ter stress deforms tracheids peripheral to the leaf vein of a tropical conifer. Plant Physiol 137:1139-1146.
8. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM (2005 b ) Leaf physiology does not predict leaf habit; examples from tropical dry forest. Trees 19:290-295.
9. Cȩrmák J, Jiménez SM, González-Rodríguez AM, Morales D (2002) Laurel forests in Tenerife, Canary Islands. Trees 16:538-546.
10. Cochard H, Froux F, Ma yr S, Coutand C (2004a ) Xylem wall collapse in water-stressed pine needles. Plant Physiol 134:401-408.
11. Cochard H, Nardini A, Coll L (2004b ) Hydraulic architecture of leaf blades: Where is the main resistance? Plant Cell Environ 27:1257-1267.
12. Cruiziat P, Cochard H, Am églio T (2002) Hydraulic architecture of trees: Main concepts and results. Ann For Sci 59:723-752.
13. Dias MC, Oliveira H, Costa A, Santos C (2014) Improving elms performance under drought stress: The pretreatment with abscisic acid. Environ Exp Bot 100:64-73.
14. Donovan LA, Maherali H, Caruso CM, Huber H, de Kroon H (2011) The evolution of the worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Trends Ecol Evol 26:88-95.
15. Duchesne L (1993) Mechanisms of resistance: Can they help save susceptible elms? In: Sticklen M, Sherald J (eds) Dutch elm disease research: Cellular and molecular approaches. Springer, New York, pp 239-254.
16. D?urkovic? J, Kardo? ováM, C? an?ováI, Lagan?a R, Priwitzer T, Chorvát D Jr, Cicák A, Pichler V (2012 ) Leaf traits in parental and hybrid species of Sorbus (Rosaceae). Am J Bot 99:1489-1500.
17. Ďurkovič J, ČaňováI, Lagaňa R, KučerováV, Moravčík M, Priwitzer T, Urban J, Dvořák M, KrajňákováJ (2013) Leaf trait dissimilarities between Dutch elm hybrids with a contrasting tolerance to Dutch elm disease. Ann Bot 111:215-227.
18. Ďurkovič J, Kačík F, Olčák D, KučerováV, KrajňákováJ (2014) Host responses and metabolic p rofiles of wood components in Dutch elm hybrids with a contrasting tolerance to Dutch elm disease. Ann Bot 114:47-59.
19. Ďurkovič J, Kačík F, Olčák D (2015) An evaluation of cellulose degradation affected by Dutch elm disease. Bio-protocol 5:e1535.
20. Dvořák M, Tomovský M, Jankovský L, Novotný D (2007) Contribution to identify the causal agents of Dutch elm disease in the Czech Republic. Plant Prot Sci 43:142-145.
21. Ghelardini L, Santini A (2009) Avoidance by early flushing: A new perspective on Dutch elm disease research. iForest 2:143-153.
22. Guyot G, Scoffoni C, Sack L (2012) Combined impacts of irradiance and dehydration on leaf hydraulic conductance: Insights into vulnerability and stomatal contro l. Plant Cell Environ 35:857-871.
23. Hacke UG Sperry JS Pockman WT Davis SD McCulloh KA 2001. Trends in wood density and structure are linked to prevention of xylem implosion by negative pressure. Oecologia. 126. 457-461.
24. Hubbes M (2004) Induced resistance for the control of Dutch elm disease. Investig Agrar Sist Recur For 13:185-196.
25. Klein T (2014) The variability of stom atal sensitivity to leaf water potential across tree species indicates a continuum between isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. Funct Ecol 28:1313-1320.
26. Konrad H, Kirisits T, Riegler M, Halmschlager E , Stauffer C (2002) Genetic evidence for natural hybridization between the Dutch elm disease pathogens Ophiostoma novo-ulmi ssp. novo-ulmi and O. novo-ulmi ssp. americana. Plant Pathol 51:78-84.
27. Larcher W (2003 ) Physiological plant ecology: Ecophysiology and stress physiology of functional groups, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin, 513 pp.
28. Lewis MA, Boose ER (1995) Estimating volume flow rates through xylem conduits. Am J Bot 82:1112-1116.
29. Limousin JM, Longepierre D, Huc R, Rambal S (2010) Change in hydraulic traits of Mediterranean Quercus ilex subjected to long-term throughfall exclusion. Tree Physiol 30:1026-1036.
30. Martín JA, Solla A, Woodward S, Gil L (2007) Detection of differential changes in lignin composition of elm xylem tissues inoculated with Ophiostoma novo-ulmi using Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy. For Pathol 37:1 87-191.
31. Martínez-Vilalta J, Poyatos R, AguadéD, Retana J, Mencuccini M (2014) A new look at water transport regulation in plants. New Phytol 204:105-115.
32. Martre P, Durand JL, Cochard H (2000) Changes in axial hydraulic conductivity along elongating leaf blades in relation to xylem maturation in tall fescue. New Phytol 146:235-247.
33. McDowell N, Barnard H, Bond B et al. (2002) The relationship between tree height and leaf area: Sapwood area ratio. Oecologia 132:12-20.
34. Mencuccini M, Grace J (1995) Climate influences the leaf area/sapwood area ratio in Scots pine. Tree Physiol 15:1-10.
35. Nardini A, Pedà G, La Rocca N (2012) Trade-offs between leaf hydraulic capacity and drought vulnerability: Morpho-anatomical bases, carbon costs and ecological consequences. New Phytol 196:788-798.
36. Newbanks D, Bosch A, Zimmermann MH (1983) Evidence for xylem dysfunction by embolization in Dutch elm disease. Phytopathology 73:1060-1063.
37. Nobel PS (2005) Physicochemical and environmental plant physiology, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Burlington, MA, 567 pp.
38. Otieno DO, Schmidt MWT, Adiku S, Tenhunen J (2005) Physiological and morphological responses to water stress in two Acacia species from contrasting habitats. Tree Physiol 25:361-371.
39. Ouellette GB, Rioux D (1992) Anatomical and physiological aspects of resistance to Dutch elm disease. In: Blanchette RA, Biggs AR (eds) Defense mechanisms of woody plants against fungi. Springer, Berlin, pp 257-307.
40. Ouellette GB, Rioux D, Simard M, Cherif M (2004) Ultrastructural and cytochemical studies of host and pathogens in some fungal wilt diseases: Retro-and introspection towards a better understanding of DED. Invest Agrar Sist Recur For 13:119-145.
41. Poorter H, Niinemets Ü, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Villar R (2009) Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): A meta-analysis. New Phytol 182:565-588.
42. R Development Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/(26 January 2016, date last accessed).
43. Riceter H (1973) Frictional potential losses and total water potential in plants: A re-evaluation. J Exp Bot 24:983-994.
44. Sack L, Holbrook NM (2006) Leaf hydraulics. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57:361-381.
45. Sack L Cowan PD Jaikumar N Holbrook NM(2003) The 'hydrology' of leaves: Co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant Cell Environ 26 1343-1356.
46. Sack L, Tyree MT, Holbrook NM (2005) Leaf hydraulic architecture correlates with regeneration irradiance in tropical rainforest trees. New Phytol 167:403-413.
47. Smalley EB, Guries RP (1993) Breeding elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Annu Rev Phytopathol 31:325-352.
48. Solla A, Bohnens J, Collin E et al. (2005) Screening European elms for resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. For Sci 51:134-141.
49. Sperry JS (2003) Evolution of water transport and xylem structure. Int J Plant Sci 164:S115-S127.
50. Sperry JS, Adler FR, Campbell GS, Comstock JP (1998) Limitation of plant water use by rhizosphere and xylem conductance: Results from a model. Plant Cell Environ 21:347-359.
51. Sperry JS, Meinzer FC, McCulloh KA (2008) Safety and efficiency conflicts in hydraulic architecture: Scaling from tissues to trees. Plant Cell Environ 31:632-645.
52. Svaldi R, Elgersma DM (1982) Further studies on the activity of cell wall degrading enzymes of aggressive and non-aggressive isolates of Ophiostoma ulmi. Eur J For Pathol 12:29-36.
53. Takai S, Richards WC (1978) Cerato-ulmin, a wilting toxin of Ceratocystis ulmi: Isolation and some properties of cerato-ulmin from the culture of C. ulmi. J Phytopathol 91:129-146.
54. Tyree MT (1997) The Cohesion-Tension theory of sap ascent: Current controversies. J Exp Bot 48:1753-1765.
55. Tyree MT, Zimmermann MH (2002) Xylem structure and the ascent of sap, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, 283 pp.
56. Urban J, Dvořák M (2014) Sap flow-based quantitative indication of progression of Dutch elm disease after inoculation with Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Trees 28:1599-1605.
57. Van Alfen NK, Turner NC (1975) Influence of a Ceratocystis ulmi toxin on water relations of elm (Ulmus americana). Plant Physiol 55:312-316.
58. Venturas M, López R, GascóA, Gil L (2 013) Hydraulic properties of European elms: Xylem safety-efficiency tradeoff and species distribution in the Iberian Peninsula. Trees 27:1691-1701.
59. Venturas M, López R, Martín JA, GascóA, Gil L (20 14) Heritability of Ulmus minor resistance to Dutch elm disease and its relationship to vessel size, but not to xylem vulnerability to drought. Plant Pathol 63:500-509.
60. Woodruff DR, Meinzer FC, Lachenbruch B (2008) Height-related trends in leaf xylem anatomy and shoot hydraulic characteristics in a tall conifer: Safety versus efficiency in water transport. New Phytol 180:90-99.
61. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M et al. (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821-827.
62. Yang S, Tyree MT (1993) Hydraulic resistance in Acer saccharum shoots and its influence on leaf water potential and transpiration. Tree Physiol 12:231-242.
63. Zimmermann MH (1978) Hydraulic architecture of some diffuse-porous trees. Can J Bot 56:2286-2295.