Leaf trait dissimilarities between Dutch elm hybrids with a contrasting tolerance to Dutch elm disease

Annals of Botany

Volumn 111, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 215-227

  Ďurkovič, Jaroslav ^a   Čaňová, Ingrid ^a   Lagana, Rastislav ^a   Kučerová, Veronika ^a   Moravčík, Michal ^a   Priwitzer, Tibor ^b   Urban, Josef ^c   Dvořák, Milon ^c   Krajňáková, Jana ^c  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN ZVOLEN   (Slovakia)

^b FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Slovakia)

^c MENDEL UNIVERSITY IN BRNO   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Atomic force microscopy; Gas exchange; Leaf mass per area; Modulus of elasticity; Ophiostoma novo ulmi; Tracheary element

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BREEDING; CHLOROPHYLL A; DISEASE; DISSIPATION; ELASTICITY; FLUORESCENCE; FUNGUS; GAS EXCHANGE; GERMPLASM; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; LEAF MORPHOLOGY; NUTRIENT; TOLERANCE; XYLEM;

CHLOROPHYLL; CHLOROPHYLL A;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CHIMERA; DISEASE RESISTANCE; ELM; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; FLUOROMETRY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; IMMUNOLOGY; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; OPHIOSTOMA; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT DISEASE; PLANT LEAF; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TREE; WOOD; XYLEM;

CHIMERA; CHLOROPHYLL; DISEASE RESISTANCE; FLUOROMETRY; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OPHIOSTOMA; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT DISEASES; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; TREES; ULMUS; WOOD; XYLEM;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84877619522     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcs274     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Bartlett MK, Scoffoni C, Sack L. 2012. The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: a global meta-analysis. Ecology Letters 15: 393-405.
2. Binz T, Canevascini G. 1996a. Xylanases from the Dutch elm disease pathogens Ophiostoma ulmi and O. novo-ulmi. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 49: 159-175.
3. Binz T, Canevascini G. 1996b. Differential production of extracellular laccase in the Dutch elm disease pathogens Ophiostoma ulmi and O novo-ulmi. Mycological Research 100: 1060-1064.
4. Bosu PP, Wagner MR. 2007. Effects of induced water stress on leaf trichome density and foliar nutrients of three elm (Ulmus) species: implications for resistance to the elm leaf beetle. Environmental Entomology 36: 595-601.
5. Bosu PP, Wagner MR. 2008. Anatomical and nutritional factors associated with susceptibility of elms (Ulmus spp.) to the elm leaf beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 101: 944-954.
6. Brasier CM, Kirk SA. 2001. Designation of the EAN and NAN races of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi as subspecies. Mycological Research 105: 547-554.
7. Brasier CM, Kirk SA. 2010. Rapid emergence of hybrids between the two subspecies of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi with a high level of pathogenic fitness. Plant Pathology 59: 186-199.
8. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM. 2005. Leaf physiology does not predict leaf habit; examples from tropical dry forest. Trees 19: 290-295.
9. Campbell DR, Galen C, Wu CA. 2005. Ecophysiology of first and second generation hybrids in a natural plant hybrid zone. Oecologia 144: 214-225.
10. Canova I, D urkovic J, Hladka D, Lukacik I. 2012. Changes in stomatal characteristics and photochemical efficiency during leaf development in six species of Sorbus. Photosynthetica 50: 635-640.
11. Cassol D, De Silva FSP, Falqueto AR, Bacarin MA. 2008. An evaluation of non-destructive methods to estimate total chlorophyll content. Photosynthetica 46: 634-636.
12. Clausen CA. 2010. Biodeterioration of wood. In: Forest Products Laboratory. Wood handbook-wood as an engineering material. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Centennial edn. Madison, WI: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 14-1-14-16.
13. Corredoira E, Vieitez AM, Ballester A. 2002. Somatic embryogenesis in elm. Annals of Botany 89: 637-644.
14. Derjaguin BV, Muller VM, Toporov YP. 1975. Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 53: 314-326.
15. Dunbar-Co S, Sporck MJ, Sack L. 2009. Leaf trait diversification and design in seven rare taxa of the Hawaiian Plantago radiation. International Journal of Plant Sciences 170: 61-75.
16. D urkovic J, Kardosova M, Canova I, et al. 2012. Leaf traits in parental and hybrid species of Sorbus (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany 99: 1489-1500.
17. Dvorak M, Tomsovsky M, Jankovsky L, Novotny D. 2007. Contribution to identify the causal agents of Dutch elm disease in the Czech Republic. Plant Protection Science 43: 142-145.
18. Dvorak M, Jankovsky L, Krajnakova J. 2009. Characterisation of Czech Ophiostoma novo-ulmi isolates. Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Forestry Journal A: 233-237.
19. de Farias Viegas Aquije GM, Zorzal PB, Buss DS, Ventura JA, Fernandes PMB, Fernandes AAR. 2010. Cell wall alterations in the leaves of fusariosis-resistant and susceptible pineapple cultivars. Plant Cell Reports 29: 1109-1117.
20. Fenning TM, Tymens SS, Gartland JS, Brasier CM, Gartland KMA. 1996. Transformation and regeneration of English elm using wild-type Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Science 116: 37-46.
21. Heybroek HM. 1983. Resistant elms for Europe. In: Burdekin DA. ed. Research on Dutch elm disease in Europe. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 108-113.
22. Jacobsen AL, Ewers FW, Pratt RB, Paddock WA III, Davis SD. 2005. Do xylem fibers affect vessel cavitation resistance? Plant Physiology 139: 546-556.
23. Janmey PA, Winer JP, Murray ME, Wen Q. 2009. The hard life of soft cells. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 66: 597-605.
24. Kern KA, Ewers FW, Telewski FW, Koehler L. 2005. Mechanical perturbation affects conductivity, mechanical properties and aboveground biomass of hybrid poplars. Tree Physiology 25: 1243-1251.
25. Konrad H, Kirisits T, Riegler M, Halmschlager E, Stauffer C. 2002. Genetic evidence for natural hybridization between the Dutch elm disease pathogens Ophiostoma novo-ulmi ssp. novo-ulmi and O. novo-ulmi ssp. americana. Plant Pathology 51: 78-84.
26. Krajnakova J, Longauer R. 1996. Culture initiation, multiplication and identification of in vitro regenerants of resistant hybrid elms. Lesnictv?-Forestry 42: 261-270.
27. Kruger EL, Volin JC. 2006. Reexamining the empirical relation between plant growth and leaf photosynthesis. Functional Plant Biology 33: 421-429.
28. Lacayo CI, Malkin AJ, Holman H-YN, et al. 2010. Imaging cell wall architecture in single Zinnia elegans tracheary elements. Plant Physiology 154: 121-133.
29. Lux A. 1981. A rapid method for staining semi-thin sections of plant material. Biologia 36: 753-757 [In Slovak].
30. Nakashima J, Mizuno T, Takabe K, Fujita M, Saiki H. 1997. Direct visualization of lignifying secondary wall thickenings in Zinnia elegans cells in culture. Plant and Cell Physiology 38: 818-827.
31. Nasmith C, Jeng R, Hubbes M. 2008. A comparison of in vivo targeted gene expression during fungal colonization of DED-susceptible Ulmus americana. Forest Pathology 38: 104-112.
32. Niinemets U . 1999. Components of leaf dry mass per area-thickness and density-alter leaf photosynthetic capacity in reverse directions in woody plants. New Phytologist 144: 35-47.
33. Oliveira H, Sousa A, Alves A, Nogueira AJA, Santos C. 2012. Inoculation with Ophiostoma novo-ulmi subsp. americana affects photosynthesis, nutrition and oxidative stress in in vitro Ulmus minor plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany 77: 146-155.
34. Ouellette GB, Rioux D, Simard M, Cherif M. 2004. Ultrastuctural and cytochemical studies of host and pathogens in some fungal wilt diseases: retro-and introspection towards a better understanding of DED. Investigacion Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13: 119-145.
35. Pasquet-Kok J, Creese C, Sack L. 2010. Turning over a new 'leaf': multiple functional significances of leaves versus phyllodes in Hawaiian Acacia koa. Plant, Cell and Environment 33: 2084-2100.
36. Pijut PM, Domir SC, Lineberger RD, Schreiber LR. 1990. Use of culture filtrates of Ceratocystis ulmi as a bioassay to screen for disease tolerant Ulmus americana. Plant Science 70: 191-196.
37. Pomerleau R, Mehran AA. 1966. Distribution of spores of Ceratocystis ulmi labelled with phosphorus-32 in green shoots and leaves of Ulmus americana. Le Naturaliste Canadien 93: 577-582.
38. Poorter H, Niinemets U , Poorter L, Wright IJ, Villar R. 2009. Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. New Phytologist 182: 565-588.
39. Poorter L, Bongers F. 2006. Leaf traits are good predictors of plant performance across 53 rain forest species. Ecology 87: 1733-1743.
40. Preston KA, Cornwell WK, DeNoyer JL. 2006. Wood density and vessel traits as distinct correlates of ecological strategy in 51 California coast range angiosperms. New Phytologist 170: 807-818.
41. Qiu H, Zhu Y, Sun Z, et al. 2010. Vascular smooth muscle cell stiffness as a mechanism for increased aortic stiffness with aging. Circulation Research 107: 615-619.
42. Sack L, Cowan PD, Jaikumar N, Holbrook NM. 2003. The 'hydrology' of leaves: co-ordination of structure and function in temperate woody species. Plant, Cell and Environment 26: 1343-1356.
43. Sack L, Holbrook NM. 2006. Leaf hydraulics. Annual Review of Plant Biology 57: 361-381.
44. Sack L, Tyree MT, Holbrook NM. 2005. Leaf hydraulic architecture correlates with regeneration irradiance in tropical rainforest trees. New Phytologist 167: 403-413.
45. Shipley B. 2002. Trade-offs between net assimilation rate and specific leaf area in determining relative growth rate: relationship with daily irradiance. Functional Ecology 16: 682-689.
46. Smalley EB, Guries RP. 1993. Breeding elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology 31: 325-352.
47. Solla A, Bohnens J, Collin E, et al. 2005. Screening European elms for resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Forest Science 51: 134-141.
48. Sterck FJ, Poorter L, Schieving F. 2006. Leaf traits determine the growth-survival trade-off across rain forest tree species. American Naturalist 167: 758-765.
49. Sticklen MB, Bolyard MG, Hajela RK, Duchesne LC. 1991. Molecular and cellular aspects of Dutch elm disease. Phytoprotection 72: 1-13.
50. Strobel G, Van Alfen N, Hapner KD, McNeil M, Albersheim P. 1978. Some phytotoxic glycopeptides from Ceratocystis ulmi, the Dutch elm disease pathogen. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 538: 60-75.
51. Svaldi R, Elgersma DM. 1982. Further studies on the activity of cell wall degrading enzymes of aggressive and non-aggressive isolates of Ophiostoma ulmi. European Journal of Forest Pathology 12: 29-36.
52. Temple B, Horgen PA, Bernier L, Hintz WE. 1997. Cerato-ulmin, a hydrophobin secreted by the causal agents of Dutch elm disease, is a parasitic fitness factor. Fungal Genetics and Biology 22: 39-53.
53. Tombesi S, Johnson RS, Day KR, DeJong TM. 2010. Relationships between xylem vessel characteristics, calculated axial hydraulic conductance and size-controlling capacity of peach rootstocks. Annals of Botany 105: 327-331.
54. Tracqui P, Broisat A, Toczek J, Mesnier N, Ohayon J, Riou L. 2011. Mapping elasticity moduli of atherosclerotic plaque in situ via atomic force microscopy. Journal of Structural Biology 174: 115-123.
55. Van Alfen NK. 1989. Reassessment of plant wilt toxins. Annual Review of Phytopathology 27: 533-550.
56. Van Alfen NK, Turner NC. 1975. Influence of a Ceratocystis ulmi toxin on water relations of elm (Ulmus americana). Plant Physiology 55: 312-316.
57. Vendramini F, D?az S, Gurvich DE, Wilson PJ, Thompson K, Hodgson JG. 2002. Leaf traits as indicators of resource-use strategy in floras with succulent species. New Phytologist 154: 147-157.
58. Webber JF. 2004. Experimental studies on factors influencing the transmission of Dutch elm disease. Investigacion Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 13: 197-205.
59. Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ. 2002. Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 125-159.
60. Woodrum CL, Ewers FW, Telewski FW. 2003. Hydraulic, biomechanical, and anatomical interactions of xylem from five species of Acer (Aceraceae). American Journal of Botany 90: 693-699.
61. Wright IJ, Reich PB,Westoby M, et al. 2004. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428: 821-827.
62. Young CE, Hall RW. 1986. Factors influencing suitability of elms for elm leaf beetle, Xanthogaleruca luteola (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environmental Entomology 15: 843-849.
63. Zanne AE, Westoby M, Falster DS, et al. 2010. Angiosperm wood structure: global patterns in vessel anatomy and their relation to wood density and potential conductivity. American Journal of Botany 97: 207-215.
64. Zimmermann MH. 1983. Xylem structure and the ascent of sap. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.