Changing the environment to improve population health: A framework for considering exposure in natural experimental studies

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Volumn 70, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 941-946

  Humphreys, David K ^a,b   Panter, Jenna ^b   Sahlqvist, Shannon ^b,c   Goodman, Anna ^b,d   Ogilvie, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; OPTIMIZATION; PUBLIC HEALTH;

EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; EXPOSURE; HUMAN; POPULATION EXPOSURE; SCIENTIST; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; HEALTH PROMOTION; METHODOLOGY; POPULATION HEALTH;

HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; POPULATION HEALTH; RESEARCH DESIGN; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 84964328431     PISSN: 0143005X     EISSN: 14702738     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2015-206381     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Craig P, Cooper C, Gunnell D, et al. Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance. J Epidemiol Community Health 2012;66:1182-6.
2. Petticrew M, Cummins S, Ferrell C, et al. Natural experiments: an underused tool for public health? Public Health 2005;119:751-7.
3. Franco M, Bilal U, Diez-Roux AV. Preventing non-communicable diseases through structural changes in urban environments. J Epidemiol Community Health 2015;69:509-11.
4. Rose G. Strategy of prevention: lessons from cardiovascular disease. BMJ 1981;282:1847-51.
5. Angrist JD, Pischke J-S. Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist's companion. 1st edn. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.
6. Viehbeck SM, Petticrew M, Cummins S. Old myths, new myths: challenging myths in public health. Am J Public Health 2015;105:665-9.
7. Craig P, Cooper C, Gunnell D, et al. Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: guidance for producers and users of evidence. London: Medical Research Council (MRC), 2011.
8. Thomson H. A dose of realism for healthy urban policy: lessons from area-based initiatives in the UK. J Epidemiol Community Health 2008;62:932-6.
9. Burgoine T, Forouhi NG, Griffin SJ, et al. Associations between exposure to takeaway food outlets, takeaway food consumption, and body weight in Cambridgeshire, UK: population based, cross sectional study. BMJ 2014;348:g1464.
10. Chaix B, Kestens Y, Perchoux C, et al. An interactive mapping tool to assess individual mobility patterns in neighborhood studies. Am J Prev Med 2012;43:440-50.
11. Perchoux C, Chaix B, Cummins S, et al. Conceptualization and measurement of environmental exposure in epidemiology: accounting for activity space related to daily mobility. Health Place 2013;21:86-93.
12. Wikström P-OH, Ceccato V, Hardie B, et al. Activity fields and the dynamics of crime. J Quant Criminol 2010;26:55-87.
13. Diez Roux AV. Conceptual approaches to the study of health disparities. Annu Rev Public Health 2012;33:41-58.
14. Levins R. Ten propositions on science and antiscience. Soc Text 1996;46/47:101-11.
15. Burgoine T, Monsivais P. Characterising food environment exposure at home, at work, and along commuting journeys using data on adults in the UK. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2013;10:85.
16. Cummins S. Commentary: investigating neighbourhood effects on health-avoiding thee 'Local Trap'. Int J Epidemiol 2007;36:355-7.
17. Diez Roux AV, Mair C. Neighborhoods and health. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010;1186:125-45.
18. Cummins S. Improving population health through area-based social interventions: generating evidence in a complex world. In: Killoran A, Kelly MP, eds. Evidencebased public health: effectiveness and efficiency. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009:287-97.
19. Ogilvie D, Panter J, Guell C, et al. Health impacts of the Cambridgeshire Guided Busway: a natural experimental study. Public Health Res 2016;4: ISSN 2050-4381.
20. Morgan SL, Winship C. Counterfactuals and causal inference: methods and principles for social research. 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
21. Branas CC, Kastanaki AE, Michalodimitrakis M, et al. The impact of economic austerity and prosperity events on suicide in Greece: a 30-year interrupted time-series analysis. BMJ Open 2015;5:e005619.
22. Ling T. Evaluating complex and unfolding interventions in real time. Evaluation 2012;18:79-91.
23. Funnell SC, Rogers PJ. Purposeful program theory: effective use of theories of change and logic models. Pap/Psc edition. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
24. Basta LA, Richmond TS, Wiebe DJ. Neighborhoods, daily activities, and measuring health risks experienced in urban environments. Soc Sci Med 2010;71:1943-50.
25. Widener MJ, Shannon J. When are food deserts? Integrating time into research on food accessibility. Health Place 2014;30:1-3.
26. Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, et al. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ 2006;332:413-6.
27. Pawson R, Tilly N. Realistic evaluation. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 1997.
28. Shadish WR, Cook TD. The renaissance of field experimentation in evaluating interventions. Annu Rev Psychol 2009;60:607-29.
29. Vanderweele TJ. Ignorability and stability assumptions in neighborhood effects research. Stat Med 2008;27:1934-43.
30. Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J. Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of California's Tobacco Control Program. J Am Stat Assoc 2010;105:493-505.
31. Merom D, Bauman A, Vita P, et al. An environmental intervention to promote walking and cycling-the impact of a newly constructed Rail Trail in Western Sydney. Prev Med 2003;36:235-42.
32. Bowers KJ, Johnson SD, Guerette RT, et al. Spatial displacement and diffusion of benefits among geographically focused policing initiatives: a meta-analytical review. J Exp Criminol 2011;7:347-74.
33. Freisthler B, Kepple NJ, Sims R, et al. Evaluating medical marijuana dispensary policies: spatial methods for the study of environmentally-based interventions. Am J Community Psychol 2013;51:278-88.
34. Ogilvie D, Mitchell R, Mutrie N, et al. Evaluating health effects of transport interventions: methodologic case study. Am J Prev Med 2006;31:118-26.
35. Cummins S, Flint E, Matthews SA. New neighborhood grocery store increased awareness of food access but did not alter dietary habits or obesity. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33:283-91.
36. Ogilvie D, Bull F, Cooper A, et al. Evaluating the travel, physical activity and carbon impacts of a 'natural experiment' in the provision of new walking and cycling infrastructure: methods for the core module of the iConnect study. BMJ Open 2012;2:e000694.
37. Goodman A, Sahlqvist S, Ogilvie D. new walking and cycling routes and increased physical activity: one-and 2-year findings from the UK iConnect study. Am J Public Health 2014;104:e38-46.
38. Heinen E, Panter J, Dalton A, et al. Sociospatial patterning of the use of new transport infrastructure: walking, cycling and bus travel on the Cambridgeshire guided busway. J Transp Health 2015;2:199-211.
39. Frank LD, Saelens BE, Powell KE, et al. Stepping towards causation: do built environments or neighborhood and travel preferences explain physical activity, driving, and obesity? Soc Sci Med 2007;65:1898-914.
40. Krenn PJ, Titze S, Oja P, et al. Use of global positioning systems to study physical activity and the environment: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2011;41:508-15.
41. MacKerron G, Mourato S. Happiness is greater in natural environments. Glob Environ Change 2013;23:992-1000.
42. Chaix B, Méline J, Duncan S, et al. GPS tracking in neighborhood and health studies: a step forward for environmental exposure assessment, a step backward for causal inference? Health Place 2013;21:46-51.
43. Dunning T. Natural experiments in the social sciences: a design-based approach. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.