Quantitative proteomics-based reconstruction and identification of metabolic pathways and membrane transport proteins related to sugar accumulation in developing fruits of pear (Pyrus communis)

Plant and Cell Physiology

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 505-518

  Reuscher, Stefan ^a   Fukao, Yoichiro ^b   Morimoto, Reina ^a   Otagaki, Shungo ^a   Oikawa, Akira ^c,d   Isuzugawa, Kanji ^e   Shiratake, Katsuhiro ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b RITSUMEIKAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c YAMAGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science   (Japan)

^e Yamagata Integrated Agricultural Research Center   (Japan)

Author keywords

Pear fruit; Proteomics; Pyrus communis; Sugar accumulation; Transport proteins

Indexed keywords

AQUAPORIN; CARRIER PROTEIN; ETHYLENE; ETHYLENE DERIVATIVE; PLANT PROTEIN;

CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; FRUIT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; METABOLOMICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES; PROTEOMICS; PYRUS; QUALITY CONTROL;

AQUAPORINS; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; ETHYLENES; FRUIT; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT PROTEINS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; METABOLOMICS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; PLANT PROTEINS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; PYRUS; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84963957208     PISSN: 00320781     EISSN: 14719053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcw004     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Abeles F.B, Morgan P.W, and Saltveit M.E. (1992). Ethylene in Plant Biology. Academic Press, San Diego
2. Bairoch A. (2000). The ENZYME database in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 304-305.
3. Berüter J. (1985). Sugar accumulation and changes in the activities of related enzymes during development of the apple fruit. J. Plant Physiol. 121: 331-341.
4. Berüter J, Studer Feusi M.E, and Rüedi P. (1997). Sorbitol and sucrose partitioning in the growing apple fruit. J. Plant Physiol. 151: 269-276.
5. Cai Y, Li G, Nie J, Lin Y, Nie F, Zhang J, et al. (2010). Study of the structure and biosynthetic pathway of lignin in stone cells of pear. Sci. Hort. 125: 374-379.
6. Chagné, D, Crowhurst R.N, Pindo M, Thrimawithana A, Deng C, Ireland H, et al. (2014). The draft genome sequence of European pear (Pyrus communis L. Bartlett). PLoS One. 9: e92644.
7. Chen L.Q, Qu X.Q, Hou B.H, Sosso D, Osorio S, Fernie A.R, et al. (2012). Sucrose efflux mediated by SWEET proteins as a key step for phloem transport. Science. 335: 207-211.
8. DAoust M.-A, Yelle S, and Nguyen-Quoc B. (1999). Antisense inhibition of tomato fruit sucrose synthase decreases fruit setting and the sucrose unloading capacity of young fruit. Plant Cell. 11: 2407-2418.
9. Dai M, Shi Z, and Xu C. (2015). Genome-wide analysis of sorbitol dehydrogenase (SDH) genes and their differential expression in two sand pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) fruits. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16: 13065-13083.
10. Davey M.W, van Montagu M, Inzé, D, Sanmartin M, Kanellis A, Smirnoff N, et al. (2000). Plant L-Ascorbic acid: chemistry, function, metabolism, bioavailability and effects of processing. J. Sci. Food Agric. 80: 825-860.
11. Dong J.G, Fernández-Maculet J.C, and Yang S.F. (1992). Purification and characterization of 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase from apple fruit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 89: 9789-9793.
12. Falchi R, Cipriani G, Marrazzo T, Nonis A, Vizzotto G, and Ruperti B. (2010). Identification and differential expression dynamics of peach small GTPases encoding genes during fruit development and ripening. J. Exp. Bot. 61: 2829-2842.
13. Fernie A.R, Willmitzer L, and Trethewey R.N. (2002). Sucrose to starch: a transition in molecular plant physiology. Trends Plant Sci. 7: 35-41.
14. Fonseca S, Hackler L, Zvara, Á , Ferreira S, Baldé, A, Dudits D, et al. (2004). Monitoring gene expression along pear fruit development, ripening and senescence using cDNA microarrays. Plant Sci. 167: 457-469.
15. Fridman E, Carrari F, Liu Y.-S, Fernie A.R, and Zamir D. (2004). Zooming in on a quantitative trait for tomato yield using interspecific introgressions. Science. 305: 1786-1789.
16. Fry S.C. (1998). Oxidative scission of plant cell wall polysaccharides by ascorbate-induced hydroxyl radicals. Biochem. J. 332: 507-515.
17. Hackel A, Schauer N, Carrari F, Fernie A.R, Grimm B, and Kühn C. (2006). Sucrose transporter LeSUT1 and LeSUT2 inhibition affects tomato fruit development in different ways. Plant J. 45: 180-192.
18. Ishihama Y. (2005). Exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI) for estimation of absolute protein amount in proteomics by the number of sequenced peptides per protein. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 4: 1265-1272.
19. Janssen B.J, Thodey K, Schaffer R.J, Alba R, Balakrishnan L, Bishop R, et al. (2008). Global gene expression analysis of apple fruit development from the floral bud to ripe fruit. BMC Plant Biol. 8: 16.
20. Jiang D, Jarrett H.W, and Haskins W.E. (2009). Methods for proteomic analysis of transcription factors. J. Chromatogr A 1216: 6881-6889.
21. Jung B, Ludewig F, Schulz A, Meiβner G, Wöstefeld N, Flügge U.-I, et al. (2015). Identification of the transporter responsible for sucrose accumulation in sugar beet taproots. Nat. Plants. 1: 14001.
22. Karpievitch Y.V, Dabney A.R, and Smith R.D. (2012). Normalization and missing value imputation for label-free LC-MS analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 13: S5.
23. Klann E.M, Hall B, and Bennett A.B. (1996). Antisense acid invertase (TIV1) gene alters soluble sugar composition and size in transgenic tomato fruit. Plant Physiol. 112: 1321-1330.
24. Li L, Song J, Kalt W, Forney C, Tsao R, Pinto D, et al. (2013). Quantitative proteomic investigation employing stable isotope labeling by peptide dimethylation on proteins of strawberry fruit at different ripening stages. J. Proteomics. 94: 219-239.
25. Loescher W.H. (1987). Physiology and metabolism of sugar alcohols in higher plants. Physiol. Plant. 70: 553-557.
26. Ludewig F, and Flügge U.-I. (2013). Role of metabolite transporters in source-sink carbon allocation. Front. Plant Sci. 4: 231.
27. Lunn D, Gaddipati S.R, Tucker G.A, and Lycett G.W. (2013). Null mutants of individual RABA genes impact the proportion of different cell wall components in stem tissue of Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One. 8: e75724.
28. Lycett G. (2008). The role of Rab GTPases in cell wall metabolism. J. Exp. Bot. 59: 4061-4074.
29. Maeshima M. (2001). Tonoplast transporters: organization and function. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52: 469-497.
30. Manning K, Davies C, Bowen H.C, and White P.J. (2001). Functional characterization of two ripening-related sucrose transporters from grape berries. Ann. Bot. 87: 125-129.
31. Moing A, Carbonne F, Zipperlin B, Svanella L, and Gaudillere J.-P. (1997). Phloem loading in peach: symplastic or apoplastic?. Physiol. Plant. 101: 489-496.
32. Nashima K, Shimizu T, Nishitani C, Yamamoto T, Takahashi H, Nakazono M, et al. (2013). Microarray analysis of gene expression patterns during fruit development in European pear (Pyrus communis). Sci. Hort. 164: 466-473.
33. Nashima K, Takahashi H, Nakazono M, Shimizu T, Nishitani C, Yamamoto T, et al. (2013). Transcriptome analysis of giant pear fruit with fruit-specific DNA reduplication on a mutant branch. J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 82: 301-311.
34. Nishitani C, Shimizu T, Fujii H, Hosaka F, Terakami S, Nakamura Y, et al. (2010). Oligoarray analysis of gene expression in ripening Japanese pear fruit. Sci. Hort. 124: 195-203.
35. Ntchobo H, Dali N, Nguyen-Quoc B, Foyer C.H, and Yelle S. (1999). Starch synthesis in tomato remains constant throughout fruit development and is dependent on sucrose supply and sucrose synthase activity. J. Exp. Bot. 50: 1457-1463.
36. Oikawa A, Otsuka T, Nakabayashi R, Jikumaru Y, Isuzugawa K, Murayama H, et al. (2015). Metabolic profiling of developing pear fruits reveals dynamic variation in primary and secondary metabolites, including plant hormones. PLoS One. 10: e0131408.
37. Osorio S, Alba R, Damasceno C.M.B, Lopez-Casado G, Lohse M, Zanor M.I, et al. (2011). Systems biology of tomato fruit development: combined transcript, protein, and metabolite analysis of tomato transcription factor (nor, rin) and ethylene receptor (Nr) mutants reveals novel regulatory interactions. Plant Physiol. 157: 405-425.
38. Oura Y, Yamada K, Shiratake K, and Yamaki S. (2000). Purification and characterization of a NAD+-dependent sorbitol dehydrogenase from Japanese pear fruit. Phytochemistry. 54: 567-572.
39. Perkins D.N, Pappin D.J, Creasy D.M, and Cottrell J.S. (1999). Probabilitybased protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis. 20: 3551-3567.
40. Potters G, de Gara L, Asard H, and Horemans N. (2002). Ascorbate and glutathione: guardians of the cell cycle, partners in crime?. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 40: 537-548.
41. Reuscher S, Isuzugawa K, Kawachi M, Oikawa A, and Shiratake K. (2014). Comprehensive elemental analysis of fruit flesh from European pear La France and its giant fruit bud mutant indicates specific roles for B and Ca in fruit development. Sci. Hort. 176: 255-260.
42. Sanchez G, Venegas-Caleron M, Salas J.J, Monforte A, Badenes M.L, and Granell A. (2013). An integrative omics approach identifies new candidate genes to impact aroma volatiles in peach fruit. BMC Genomics. 14: 343.
43. Schulz A, Beyhl D, Marten I, Wormit A, Neuhaus H.E, Poschet G, et al. (2011). Proton-driven sucrose symport and antiport are provided by the vacuolar transporters SUC4 and TMT1/2. Plant J. 68: 129-136.
44. Shiratake K (2007). Genetics of Sugar Transporters. G3 1: 73-80.
45. Shiratake K. (2008). Sugar and polyol transporters in plants. In Plant Membrane and Vacuolar Transporters. Edited by Jaiwal P.K, Singh R.P, and Dhankher O.P. pp. 239-266. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon
46. Shiratake K, and Suzuki M. (2016). Omics studies of citrus, grape and rosaceae fruit trees. Breed. Sci. (in press
47. Taverner T, Karpievitch Y.V, Polpitiya A.D, Brown J.N, Dabney A.R, Anderson G.A, et al. (2012). DanteR: an extensible R-based tool for quantitative analysis of -omics data. Bioinformatics. 28: 2404-2406.
48. Thimm O, Blasing O, Gibon Y, Nagel A, Meyer S, Kruger P, et al. (2004). MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J. 37: 914-939.
49. Usadel B, Nagel A, Steinhauser D, Gibon Y, Blasing O.E, Redestig H, et al. (2006). PageMan: an interactive ontology tool to generate, display, and annotate overview graphs for profiling experiments. BMC Bioinformatics. 7: 535.
50. Velasco R, Zharkikh A, Affourtit J, Dhingra A, Cestaro A, Kalyanaraman A, et al. (2010). The genome of the domesticated apple (Malus domestica Borkh.). Nat. Genet. 42: 833-839.
51. Veltman R.H, Sanders M.G, Persijn S.T, Pemppelenbos H.W, and Oosterhaven J. (1999). Decreased ascorbic acid levels and brown core development in pears (Pyrus communis L. cv. Conference). Physiol. Plant. 107: 39-45.
52. Vimolmangkang S, Zheng D, Han Y, Khan M.A, Soria-Guerra R.E, and Korban S.S. (2014). Transcriptome analysis of the exocarp of apple fruit identifies light-induced genes involved in red color pigmentation. Gene. 534: 78-87.
53. Watari J, Kobae Y, Yamaki S, Yamada K, Toyofuku K, Tabuchi T, et al. (2004). Identification of sorbitol transporters expressed in the phloem of apple source leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 45: 1032-1041.
54. Wu H.-x, Jia H.-m, Ma X.-w, Wang S.-b, Yao Q.-s, Xu W.-T, et al. (2014). Transcriptome and proteomic analysis of mango (Mangifera indica Linn) fruits. J. Proteomics. 105: 19-30.
55. Wu J, Wang Z, Shi Z, Zhang S, Ming R, Zhu S, et al. (2013). The genome of the pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.). Genome Res. 23: 396-408.
56. Xie M, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Wang X, Yang H, Yu O, et al. (2013). Transcriptome profiling of fruit development and maturation in Chinese white pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd). BMC Genomics. 14: 823.
57. Xu J, Pascual L, Aurand R, Bouchet J.-P, Valot B, Zivy M, et al. (2013). An extensive proteome map of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruit pericarp. Proteomics. 13: 3059-3063.
58. Yamaki S, and Ino M. (1992). Alteration of cellular compartmentation and membrane permeability to sugars in immature and mature apple fruit. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 117: 951.
59. Yoshii H, and Imaseki H. (1981). Biosynthesis of auxin-induced ethylene. Effects of indole-3-Acetic acid, benzyladenine and abscisic acid on endogenous levels of 1-Aminocyclopropane-l-carboxylic acid (ACC) and ACC synthase. Plant Cell Physiol. 22: 369-379.
60. Yun Z, Jin S, Ding Y, Wang Z, Gao H, Pan Z, et al. (2012). Comparative transcriptomics and proteomics analysis of citrus fruit, to improve understanding of the effect of low temperature on maintaining fruit quality during lengthy post-harvest storage. J. Exp. Bot. 63: 2873-2893.
61. Zanor M.I, Osorio S, Nunes-Nesi A, Carrari F, Lohse M, Usadel B, et al. (2009). RNA Interference of LIN5 in tomato confirms its role in controlling Brix content, uncovers the influence of sugars on the levels of fruit hormones, and demonstrates the importance of sucrose cleavage for normal fruit development and fertility. Plant Physiol. 150: 1204-1218.
62. Zhang L.-Y, Peng Y.-B, Pelleschi-Travier S, Fan Y, Lu Y.-F, Lu Y.-M, et al. (2004). Evidence for apoplasmic phloem unloading in developing apple fruit. Plant Physiol. 135: 574-586.
63. Zheng Q, Song J, Campbell-Palmer L, Thompson K, Li L, Walker B, et al. (2013) A proteomic investigation of apple fruit during ripening and in response to ethylene treatment. J. Proteomics. 93: 276-294.