Separation of mesenchymal stem cells through a strategic centrifugation protocol

Tissue Engineering - Part C: Methods

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 348-359

  Ferlin, Kimberly M ^a   Kaplan, David S ^b   Fisher, John P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL ADHESION; CELL ENGINEERING; CELL MEMBRANES; CELLS; CENTRIFUGATION; CYTOLOGY; FLOWCHARTING; SEPARATION; STEM CELLS; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

CELL SURFACE MARKER; CELL THERAPY PRODUCTS; CENTRIFUGAL FORCES; CHONDROGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; CHONDROGENIC MARKERS; DEVELOPMENT PHASIS; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; POPULATION HETEROGENEITY;

CELL CULTURE;

5' NUCLEOTIDASE; ENDOGLIN; POLYSTYRENE; THY 1 ANTIGEN; DIFFERENTIATION ANTIGEN;

ARTICLE; BONE MARROW; CARTILAGE CELL; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL ISOLATION; CELL SEPARATION; CENTRIFUGATION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FORCE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; BIOSYNTHESIS; BONE MARROW CELL; CHONDROGENESIS; CYTOLOGY; MESENCHYMAL STROMA CELL; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES;

ANTIGENS, DIFFERENTIATION; BONE MARROW CELLS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL SEPARATION; CENTRIFUGATION; CHONDROGENESIS; HUMANS; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS;

EID: 84963850088     PISSN: 19373384     EISSN: 19373392     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tec.2015.0408     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Lv F.J, et al. Concise review: the surface markers and identity of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 32, 1408, 2014.
2. Dominici M, et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 8, 315, 2006.
3. Baksh D, Song L, and Tuan R.S. Adult mesenchymal stem cells: characterization, differentiation, and application in cell and gene therapy. J Cell Mol Med. 8, 301, 2004.
4. Bara J.J, et al. Concise review: bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells change phenotype following in vitro culture: implications for basic research and the clinic. Stem Cells. 32, 1713, 2014.
5. Pittenger M.F, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 284, 143, 1999.
6. Muraglia A, Cancedda R, and Quarto R. Clonal mesenchymal progenitors from human bone marrow differentiate in vitro according to a hierarchical model. J Cell Sci 113(Pt 7), 1161, 2000.
7. Lo Surdo J, and Bauer S.R. Quantitative approaches to detect donor and passage differences in adipogenic potential and clonogenicity in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 18, 877, 2012.
8. Lo Surdo J.L, Millis B.A, and Bauer S.R. Automated microscopy as a quantitative method to measure differences in adipogenic differentiation in preparations of human mesenchymal stromal cells. Cytotherapy. 15, 1527, 2013.
9. Russell K.C, et al. In vitro high-capacity assay to quantify the clonal heterogeneity in trilineage potential of mesenchymal stem cells reveals a complex hierarchy of lineage commitment. Stem Cells. 28, 788, 2010.
10. Seiler C, et al. Time-lapse microscopy and classification of 2D human mesenchymal stem cells based on cell shape picks up myogenic from osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 8, 737, 2014.
11. Sekiya I, et al. Expansion of human adult stem cells from bone marrow stroma: conditions that maximize the yields of early progenitors and evaluate their quality. Stem Cells. 20, 530, 2002.
12. Gronthos S, et al. Molecular and cellular characterisation of highly purified stromal stem cells derived from human bone marrow. J Cell Sci 116(Pt 9), 1827, 2003.
13. Kaplan D.S, et al. Centrifugation assay for measuring adhesion of serially-passaged bovine chondrocytes to polystyrene surfaces. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 18, 537, 2012.
14. Garcia A.J, and Gallant N.D. Stick and grip: measurement systems and quantitative analyses of integrinmediated cell adhesion strength. Cell Biochem Biophys. 39, 61, 2003.
15. Singh A, et al. Adhesion strength-based, label-free isolation of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Methods. 10, 438, 2013.
16. LaPointe V.L, Verpoorte A, and Stevens M.M. The changing integrin expression and a role for integrin beta8 in the chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS One. 8, e82035, 2013.
17. Frith J.E, et al. Tailored integrin-extracellular matrix interactions to direct human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Stem Cells Dev. 21, 2442, 2012.
18. Chen Q, et al. An osteopontin-integrin interaction plays a critical role in directing adipogenesis and osteogenesis by mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 32, 327, 2014.
19. Yeatts A.B, and Fisher J.P. Tubular perfusion system for the long-Term dynamic culture of human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 17, 337, 2011.
20. Reyes C.D, and Garcia A.J. A centrifugation cell adhesion assay for high-Throughput screening of biomaterial surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A. 67, 328, 2003.
21. Ferlin K.M, et al. Development of a dynamic stem cell culture platform for mesenchymal stem cell adhesion and evaluation. Mol Pharm. 11, 2172, 2014.
22. Mareschi K, et al. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal stem cell expansion by plating whole bone marrow at a low cellular density: a more advantageous method for clinical use. Stem Cells Int 2012, 920581, 2012.
23. Sista S, et al. Expression of cell adhesion and differentiation related genes in MC3T3 osteoblasts plated on titanium alloys: role of surface properties. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 33, 1573, 2013.
24. Mathieu P.S, and Loboa E.G. Cytoskeletal and focal adhesion influences on mesenchymal stem cell shape, mechanical properties, and differentiation down osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic pathways. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 18, 436, 2012.
25. Szabo E, et al. Cell adhesion and spreading affect adipogenesis from embryonic stem cells: the role of calreticulin. Stem Cells. 27, 2092, 2009.
26. Kilian K.A, et al. Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107, 4872, 2010.
27. McBeath R, et al. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell. 6, 483, 2004.
28. Gregoire F.M, Smas C.M, and Sul H.S. Understanding adipocyte differentiation. Physiol Rev. 78, 783, 1998.
29. Yoon D.M, and Fisher J.P. Chondrocyte signaling and artificial matrices for articular cartilage engineering. Adv Exp Med Biol. 585, 67, 2006.
30. Marlovits S, et al. Changes in the ratio of type-I and type-II collagen expression during monolayer culture of human chondrocytes. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 86, 286, 2004.
31. Yang Z, Schmitt J.F, and Lee E.H. Immunohistochemical analysis of human mesenchymal stem cells differentiating into chondrogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic lineages. Methods Mol Biol. 698, 353, 2011.