Transformer fault diagnosis using continuous sparse autoencoder

SpringerPlus

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Wang, Lukun ^a   Zhao, Xiaoying ^b   Pei, Jiangnan ^c   Tang, Gongyou ^a  

^a OCEAN UNIVERSITY OF CHINA   (China)

^b TAISHAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c SHANDONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Continuous sparse autoencoder; Deep belief network; Deep learning; Dissolved gas analysis; Transformer fault

Indexed keywords

EID: 84963740039     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21931801     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2107-7     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andrew NG (2012) Autoencoders and sparsity. http://ufldl.stanford.edu/wiki/index.php/Au-toencoders_and_Sparsity
2. Arakelian VG (2004) The long way to the automatic chromatographic analysis of gases dissolved in insulating oil. IEEE Electr Insul Mag 20(6):8–25. doi:10.1109/MEI.2004.1367506
3. Ballal MS, Ballal DM, Suryawanshi HM, Choudhari BN (2013) Computational intelligence algorithm based condition monitoring system for power transformer. In: IEEE 1st international conference on condition assessment techniques in electrical systems, IEEE CATCON 2013, pp 154–159. doi:10.1109/CATCON.2013.6737538
4. Bengio Y, Lamblin P, Popovici D, Larochelle H (2006) Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks. In: 20th annual conference on neural information processing systems, NIPS 2006, pp 153–160
5. Bhalla D, Bansal RK, Gupta HO (2012) Function analysis based rule extraction from artificial neural networks for transformer incipient fault diagnosis. Int J Electr Power 43(1):1196–1203. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.06.042
6. Chen W, Pan C, Yun Y, Liu Y (2009) Wavelet networks in power transformers diagnosis using dissolved gas analysis. IEEE Trans Power Deliver 24(1):187–194. doi:10.1109/TPWRD.2008.2002974
7. Cottrell GW (2006) New life for neural networks. Science 313(5786):454–455. doi:10.1126/science.1129813
8. Dahl GE, Yu D, Deng L, Acero A (2012) Context-dependent pre-trained deep neural networks for large-vocabulary speech recognition. IEEE Trans Audio Speech 20(1):30–42. doi:10.1109/TASL.2011.2134090
9. Dhote NK, Helonde JB (2012) Diagnosis of power transformer faults based on five fuzzy ratio method. WSEAS Trans Power Syst 7(3):114–125
10. Duval M (2003) New techniques for dissolved gas-in-oil analysis. IEEE Electr Insul M 19(2):6–15. doi:10.1109/MEI.2003.1192031
11. Duval M, DePablo A (2001) Interpretation of gas-in-oil analysis using new IEC publication 60599 and IEC TC 10 databases. IEEE Electr Insul Mag 17(2):31–41. doi:10.1109/57.917529
12. Glorot X, Bordes A, Bengio Y (2011) Domain adaptation for large-scale sentiment classification: a deep learning approach. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on machine learning, ICML 2011, pp 513–520
13. Hinton GE, Salakhutdinov RR (2006) Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313(5786):504–507. doi:10.1126/science.1127647
14. Hsu C, Lin C (2002) A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines. IEEE Trans Neural Network 13(2):415–425. doi:10.1109/72.991427
15. Kullback S, Leibler RA (1951) On Information and Sufficiency. Ann Math Stat 22(1):79–86. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694
16. Le Roux N, Bengio Y (2010) Deep belief networks are compact universal approximators. Neural Comput 22(8):2192–2207. doi:10.1162/neco.2010.08-09-1081
17. Miranda V, Castro ARG, Lima S (2012) Diagnosing faults in power transformers with autoassociative neural networks and mean shift. IEEE Trans Power Deliver 27(3):1350–1357. doi:10.1109/TPWRD.2012.2188143
18. Mirowski P, LeCun Y (2012) Statistical machine learning and dissolved gas analysis: a review. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 27(4):1791–1799. http://www.mirowski.info/pub/dga
19. Nguyeny TD, Tranyz T, Phungy D, Venkateshy S (2013) Learning parts-based representations with nonnegative restricted boltzmann machine. In: 5th Asian conference on machine learning, ACML 2013, pp 133–148
20. Olshausen BA, Field DJ (1996) Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature 381(6583):607–609. doi:10.1038/381607a0
21. Patel NK, Khubchandani RK (2004) ANN based power transformer fault diagnosis. J Inst Eng (India) Electr Eng Div 85:60–63
22. Ren X, Zhang F, Zheng L, Men X (2010) Application of quantum neural network based on rough set in transformer fault diagnosis. In: Proceedings of the power and energy engineering conference (APPEEC), 2010 Asia-Pacific, 28–31 March 2010, pp 1–4. doi:10.1109/APPEEC.2010.5448911
23. Saha TK (2003) Review of modern diagnostic techniques for assessing insulation condition in aged transformers. IEEE Trans Dielectr El In 10(5):903–917. doi:10.1109/TDEI.2003.1237337
24. Souahlia S, Bacha K, Chaari A (2012) MLP neural network-based decision for power transformers fault diagnosis using an improved combination of Rogers and Doernenburg ratios DGA. Int J Electr Power 43(1):1346–1353. doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.05.067
25. Vincent P, Larochelle H, Bengio Y, Manzagol P-A (2008) Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on machine learning, pp 1096–1103
26. Vincent P, Larochelle H, Lajoie I, Bengio Y, Manzagol P-A (2010) Stacked denoising autoencoders: learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion. J Mach Learn Res 11:3371–3408
27. Vinje WE, Gallant JL (2000) Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. Science 287(5456):1273–1276. doi:10.1126/science.287.5456.1273
28. Wilcoxon F (1945) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom Bull 1(6):80–83
29. Yang HT, Liao CC, Chou JH (2001) Fuzzy learning vector quantization networks for power transformer condition assessment. IEEE Trans Dielect Electr Insul 8(1):143–149. doi:10.1109/94.910437