Randomized controlled clinical study on the accuracy of two-stage putty-and-wash impression materials

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 296-302

  Haim, Manuela ^a   Luthardt, Ralph G ^b   Rudolph, Heike ^b   Koch, Rainer ^a   Walter, Michael H ^a   Quaas, Sebastian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CARL GUSTAV CARUS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CALCIUM SULFATE; DIMETICONE; MDX 4 4210; MDX 4-4210; OV 225; OV-225; SILASTIC; SILICONE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; GINGIVA; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; PILOT STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARD; SURFACE PROPERTY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH;

CALCIUM SULFATE; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL CASTING INVESTMENT; DENTAL CASTING TECHNIQUE; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL MODELS; DIMETHYLPOLYSILOXANES; GINGIVA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SILICONE ELASTOMERS; SILICONES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH;

EID: 70249122096     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Noack T, Balkenhol M, Ferger P, Wöstmann B. Accuracy of different polyvinylsiloxanes [in German]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 2004; 59: 590-592.
2. Siemer A, Balkenhol M, Trost M, Ferger P, Wöstmann B. Accuracy of one-step v. two-step putty-wash impressions-A 3-D in-vitro evaluation [in German]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 2004; 59: 585-589.
3. Luthardt RG. Randomized controlled trial of impression techniques-Accuracy of the three-dimensional reproduction of the relation of prepared tooth to adjacent teeth [in German]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 2003; 58: 337-342.
4. Lee IK, DeLong R, Pintado MR, Malik R. Evaluation of factors affecting the accuracy of impressions using quantitative surface analysis. Oper Dent 1995; 20: 246-252.
5. Wichmann M, Borchers L, Limmroth E. Measuring the accuracy of various elastomeric impression materials using a CNC coordinate measuring device (Part 1) [in German]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1990; 45: 499-502.
6. Carrotte PV, Winstanley RB, Green JR. A study of the quality of impressions for anterior crowns received at a commercial laboratory. Br Dent J 1993; 174: 235-240.
7. Luthardt RG, Koch R, Rudolph H, Walter MH. Qualtative computer aided evaluation of dental impressions in vivo. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 69-76.
8. Rudolph H, Quaas S, Koch M, Preissler J, Koch R, Luthardt RG. Randomized, controlled, clinical trial on timing versus 3D-accuracy of different impression materials [in German]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 2005; 60: 695-701.
9. Quaas S, Rudolph H, Preissler J, Koch M, Koch R, Luthardt RG. Preliminary results of a randomised controlled trial of the threedimensional accuracy of impression techniques [in German]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 2006; 61: 43-47.
10. Luthardt RG. Precision of dental impressions for fixed restorations [in German]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 2004; 59: 372-380.
11. Stewardson DA. Trends in indirect dentistry: 5. Impression materials and techniques. Dent Update 2005; 32: 374-376, 379-380, 382-374.
12. Lu H, Nguyen B, Powers JM. Mechanical properties of 3 hydrophilic addition silicone and polyether elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 151-154.
13. Thongthammachat S, Moore BK, Barco MT 2nd, Hovijitra S, Brown DT, Andres CJ. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: Influence of tray material, impression material, and time. J Prosthodont 2002; 11: 98-108.
14. Mandikos MN. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: An update on clinical use. Aust Dent J 1998; 43: 428-434.
15. Habib AN, Shehata MT. The effect of the type and technique used for impression making on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials. Egypt Dent J 1995; 41: 1409-1416.
16. Blatz MB. Impression techniques and their relation to material properties. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2003; 15: 512.
17. Brown D. Materials for impressions-2003. Dent Update 2004; 31: 40-45.
18. Bader F, Setz J. Wettability and accuracy of reproduction of impression materials [in German]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1991; 46: 346-348.
19. Saunders WP, Sharkey SW, Smith GM, Taylor WG. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material. J Dent 1991; 19: 283-289.
20. EN ISO 14155-1. Clinical Investigation of Medical Devices for Human Subjects-Part 1: General Requirements, German version. Berlin: Beuth Verlag, 2003.
21. EN ISO 14155-2. Clinical Investigation of Medical Devices for Human Subjects-Part 2: Clinical Investigation plans, German version. Berlin: Beuth Verlag, 2003.
22. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980; 30: 347-358.
23. Lampé I, Marton S, Hegedüs C. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 590.
24. Di Felice R, Scotti R, Belser UC. The influence of the mixing technique on the content of voids in two polyether impression materials. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2002; 112: 12-16.
25. Soh G, Chong YH. Relationship between critical convergence angle and surface defects in stone casts. Quintessence Int 1990; 21: 675-679.
26. Wöstmann B, Höing M, Ferger P. Hand-mixed versus automixed (Pentamix system) impression materials [in German]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1998; 53: 753-756.
27. Rudolph H, Quaas S, Luthardt RG. Matching point clouds: Limits and possibilities. Int J Comput Dent 2002; 5: 155-164.
28. Kaindl K, Steipe B. Metric properties of the root-mean square deviation of vector sets. Acta Cryst 1997: 809.
29. Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1799-1807.
30. Peters MC, Delong R, Pintado MR, Pallesen U, Qvist V, Douglas WH. Comparison of two measurement techniques for clinical wear. J Dent 1999; 27: 479-485.