Density functional theory methods as powerful tools to elucidate amino acid oxidation mechanisms. A case study on methionine model peptide

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 111, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 485-489

  Ji, Wen Fang ^a   Li, Zong Ang ^b   Shen, Liang ^a   Kong, De Xin ^a   Zhang, Hong Yu ^a  

^a SHANDONG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b SHANDONG NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; OXIDATION; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; PROTONS; REACTION KINETICS; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

METHIONINE MODEL PEPTIDE; PEPTIDES; PROTONATION;

AMINO ACIDS;

EID: 84962449685     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp066443s     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. (a) Stadtman, E. R. Free Radical Biol. Med. 1990, 9, 315-325.
2. (b) Stadtman, E. R. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1993, 62, 797-821.
3. (c) Berlett, B. S.; Stadtman, E. R. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 20313-20316.
4. (d) Stadtman, E. R.; Levine, R. L. Amino Acids 2003, 25, 207-218.
5. Shen, L.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Ji, H.-F. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 243-246.
6. Vogt, W. Free Radical Biol. Med. 1995, 18, 93-105.
7. (a) Schöneich, C. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1703, 111-119.
8. (b) Butterfield, D. A.; Boyd-Kimball, D. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1703, 149-156.
9. (c) Butterfield, D. A.; Bush, A. I. Neurobiol. Aging 2004, 25, 563-568.
10. (d) Butterfield, D. A.; Kanski, J. Peptides 2002, 23, 1299-1309.
11. Breydo, L.; Bocharova, O. V.; Makarava, N.; Salnikov, V. V.; Anderson, M.; Baskakov, I. V. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 15534-15543.
12. Glaser, C. B.; Yamin, G.; Uversky, V. N.; Fink, A. L. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1703, 157-169.
13. Schöneich, C.; Pogocki, D.; Hug, G. L.; Bobrowski, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13700-13713.
14. (a) Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Phys. Rev. 1964, 136, B864-B871.
15. (b) Kohn, W.; Sham, L. J. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A1133-A1138.
16. (a) Fukui, K.; Yonezawa, T.; Shingu, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1952, 20, 722-725.
17. (b) Fukui, K.; Yonezawa, T.; Nagata, C.; Shingu, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1954, 22, 1433-1442.
18. (c) Fukui, K.; Yonezawa, T.; Nagata, C. J. Chem. Phys. 1957, 27, 1247-1259.
19. (a) Wright, J. S.; Johnson, E. R.; DiLabio, G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1173-1183.
20. (b) Zhang, H.-Y.; Sun, Y. M.; Wang, X. L. Chem.-Eur. J. 2003, 9, 502-508.
21. (a) Zhang, H.-Y.; Sun, Y. M.; Wang, X. L. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2709-2712.
22. (b) Zhang, H.-Y.; Ji, H.-F. J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 2003, 663, 167-174.
23. (a) Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B. 1988, 37, 785-789.
24. (b) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 1372-1377.
25. (c) Stephens, P. J.; Devlin, F. J.; Chabalowski, C. F.; Frisch, M. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 11623-11627.
26. (d) Uchimaru, T.; Tsuzuki, S.; Sugie, M.; Tokuhashi, K.; Sekiya, A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2005, 408, 216-220.
27. (a) Miertus, S.; Scrocco, E.; Tomasi, J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 55, 117-129.
28. (b) Miertus, S.; Tomasi, J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 65, 239-241.
29. (c) Cossi, M.; Barone, V.; Cammi, J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 255, 327-335.
30. (a) Kong, L.; Sun, Z. L.; Wang, L. F.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Yao, S. D. Helv. Chim. Acta 2004, 87, 511-515.
31. (b) Wang, L.-F.; Zhang, H.-Y. Bioorg. Chem. 2005, 33, 108-115.
32. (c) Ji, H.-F.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Shen, L. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2006, 1, 229-236.
33. (d) Zhang, H.-Y.; Ji, H.-F. New J. Chem. 2006, 30, 503-504.
34. (e) Ji, H.-F.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Shen, L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 4095-4098.
35. Lide, D. R., Ed. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2002.
36. (a) Barone, S. B.; Turnipseed, A. A.; Ravishankara, A. R. Faraday Discuss. 1995, 100, 39-54.
37. (b) Barone, S. B.; Turnipseed, A. A.; Ravishankara, A. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 14694-14702.
38. Hynes, A. J.; Stoker, R. B.; Pounds, A. J.; McKay, T.; Bradshaw, J. D.; Nicovich, J. M.; Wine, P. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 16967-16975.
39. Bobrowski, K.; Hug, G. L.; Marciniak, B.; Schöneich, C.; Wisniowski, P. Res. Chem. Intermed. 1999, 25, 285-297.
40. Scott, A. P.; Radom, L. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16502-16513.
41. (a) Bauernschmitt, R.; Ahlrichs, R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 256, 454-464.
42. (b) Stratmann, R. E.; Scuseria, G. E.; Frisch, M. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 8218-8224.
43. (c) Casida, M. E.; Jamorski, C.; Casida, K. C.; Salahub, D. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 4439-4449.
44. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Baboul, A. G.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaroni, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Gonzalez, C.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, revision A.11, Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 2001.
45. The Gaussian 03 program was also employed to do calculations. Both programs give identical energetic parameters and similar absorption spectra. For instance, the Gaussian 03-derived absorption peaks for 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 12 are 278, 405, 446, 440, 395, 266 (and 312) nm, respectively. However, Gaussian 03 failed to calculate spectra of molecules 2 and 5. Therefore, Gaussian 98 is preferentially selected.
46. The addition reaction of 1 is thermodynamically favored with a ΔH value of -10.29 kcal/mol.
47. The overlap electronic density was calculated according to the second term of the right part of eq 1.
48. In fact, the structures containing the S-N bond cannot be optimized.
49. The cyclization processes are exoergic, with ΔH values of -8.07 and -9.48 kcal/mol for reactions 3 → 6 and 3 → 9, respectively.
50. 27b
51. (b) Pogocki, D.; Serdiuk, K.; Schöneich, C. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 7032-7042.
52. It should be pointed out that in 11, a S-O bond still exists (although is rather weak), with an overlap electronic density of 0.02, which is weaker than the S-N bond, which holds an overlap electronic density of 0.06.
53. Schöneich, C.; Pogocki, D.; Wisniowski, P.; Hug, G. I.; Bobrowski, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10224-10225.
54. Bobrowski, K.; Holcman, J. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1987, 52, 139-144.
55. 31c
56. (b) Rauk, A.; Yu, D.; Taylor, J.; Shustov, G. V.; Block, D. A.; Armstrong, D. A. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 9089-9096.
57. (c) Luo, Y.-R., Ed. Handbook of Bond Dissociation Energies in Organic Compounds. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2003.
58. Simic, M.; Neta, P.; Hayon, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 4763-4768.