Proton dissociation is important to understanding structure-activity relationships of gallic acid antioxidants

Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters

Volumn 16, Issue 15, 2006, Pages 4095-4098

  Ji, Hong Fang ^a   Zhang, Hong Yu ^a   Shen, Liang ^a  

^a SHANDONG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Antioxidant; Bond dissociation enthalpy; Density functional theory; Gallic acid derivatives; Ionization potential; Structure activity relationships

Indexed keywords

ANTIOXIDANT; GALLIC ACID; PROTON;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BOND; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; DISSOCIATION; DRUG STRUCTURE; ENTHALPY; IONIZATION; NEUROPROTECTION; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

EID: 84962385280     PISSN: 0960894X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.04.096     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Barnham K.J., Masters C.L., and Bush A.I. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 3 (2004) 205
2. Grundman M., and Delaney P. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 61 (2002) 191
3. Zhang H.-Y. FEBS Lett. 579 (2005) 5260
4. Rice-Evans C.A., Miller N.J., and Paganga G. Free Radical Biol. Med. 20 (1996) 933
5. Lu Z., Nie G., Belton P.S., Tang H., and Zhao B. Neurochem. Int. 48 (2006) 263
6. 4 it cannot interpret the differences between gallic acids and gallic acid esters, such as 1 and 5, because both of them have similar side chains.
7. 6b
8. Hansch C., Leo A., and Taft R.W. Chem. Rev. 91 (1991) 165
9. Zhang H.-Y. Curr. Comput. Aided Drug Des. 1 (2005) 257
10. Litwinienko G., and Ingold K.U. J. Org. Chem. 68 (2003) 3433
11. Kong L., Sun Z.-L., Wang L.-F., Zhang H.-Y., and Yao S.-D. Helv. Chim. Acta 87 (2004) 511
12. Zhang H.-Y., and Ji H.-F. New J. Chem. 30 (2006) 503
13. Burton G.W., Doba T., Gabe E.J., Hughes L., Lee F.L., Prasad L., and Ingold K.U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107 (1985) 7053
14. de Heer M.I., Mulder P., Korth H.G., Ingold K.U., and Lusztyk J.N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 (2000) 2355
15. Wright J.S., Johnson E.R., and DiLabio G.A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) 1173
16. Zhang H.-Y., Sun Y.-M., and Wang X.-L. Chem. Eur. J. 9 (2003) 502
17. Jovanovic S.V., Steenken S., Tosic M., Marjanovic B., and Simic M.G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116 (1994) 4846
18. Jovanovic S.V., Steenken S., Hara Y., and Simic M.G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 (1996) 2497
19. Hohenberg P., and Kohn W. Phys. Rev. 136 (1964) B864
20. Kohn W., and Sham L.J. Phys. Rev. 140 (1965) A1133
21. Dewar M.J.S., Zoebisch E.G., Healy E.F., and Stewart J.J.P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107 (1985) 3902
22. Lee C., Yang W., and Parr R.G. Phys. Rev. B. 37 (1988) 785
23. Becke A.D. J. Chem. Phys. 98 (1993) 1372
24. Lithoxoidou A.T., and Bakalbassis E.G. J. Phys. Chem. A 109 (2005) 366
25. Zhang H.-Y., and Wang L.-F. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 22 (2005) 483
26. Miertus S., Scrocco E., and Tomasi J. Chem. Phys. 55 (1981) 117
27. Miertus S., and Tomasi J. Chem. Phys. 65 (1982) 239
28. Cossi M., Barone V., and Cammi J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 255 (1996) 327
29. In vacuo data were also calculated to compare with the in solvent results (see in Supporting information for detail).
30. Ji H.-F., Zhang H.-Y., and Shen L. Nat. Prod. Commun. 1 (2006) 229
31. A high-level approach, labeled as (RO)B3LYP/6-311 + G(2d,2p)//(RO)B3LYP/6-31 + G(d)/(RO) B3LYP/6-31 + G(d) (which means that (RO)B3LYP/6-31 + G(d) was used to optimize molecular structures (in solvent) and obtain vibrational frequencies and then (RO)B3LYP/6-311 + G(2d,2p) was employed to give SPE (also in solvent)), was used to calculate O-H BDEs and IPs of GADs 1 (including anion) and 5. Both methods give very similar O-H BDEs and IPs for the GADs, which partially arises from the fact that AM1 behaves as good as (RO)B3LYP/6-31 + G(d) in optimizing molecular structures (see Supporting information for detail).
32. DiLabio G.A., Pratt D.A., LoFaro A.D., and Wright J.S. J. Phys. Chem. A 103 (1999) 1653
33. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Baboul, A. G.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaroni, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Gonzalez, C.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. 'Gaussian 98, Revision A.11', Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 2001.
34. As Gaussian 98 failed to optimize the structures of some GADs by (RO)B3LYP/6-31 + G(d) in ethanol, Gaussian 03 program was resorted to do calculations for these GADs (see Supporting information for detail).
35. 27b
36. Mahoney L.R., Mendenhall G.D., and Ingold K.U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 95 (1973) 8610
37. i (-1417.960021 hartree) is the energy of initial molecule.
38. The big difference between in solvent and in vacuo IPs highlights the necessity of taking solvent effect into consideration in SAR study of antioxidants.
39. Zhang H.-Y. Sci. China Ser. B 42 (1999) 106
40. Ji H.-F., and Zhang H.-Y. New J. Chem. 29 (2005) 535
41. 4
42. 6b
43. Shen L., Ji H.-F., and Zhang H.-Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 1414