Disproportional Imprisonment of Black and Hispanic Males: Sentencing Discretion, Processing Outcomes, and Policy Structures

Justice Quarterly

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 642-681

  Ulmer, Jeffery ^a   Painter Davis, Noah ^b   Tinik, Leigh ^c  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^c Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing   (United States)

Author keywords

discretion; imprisonment; racial disparity; sentencing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84962349396     PISSN: 07418825     EISSN: 17459109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07418825.2014.958186     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. C.Albonetti, (1998). The role of gender and departures in the sentencing of defendants convicted of a white collar offense under the Federal sentencing Guidelines. In J.T.Ulmervol (Ed.), Sociology of crime, law, and deviance (Vol. 1, pp. 3-48). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2. M.Alexander, (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York, NY: The New Press.
3. E.P.Baumer, (2013). Reassessing and redirecting research on race and sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 30, 231-261.10.1080/07418825.2012.682602
4. M.H.Bergstrom,, C.A.Kempinen,, B.Ruback,, & L.Tinik, (2009). A study on the use and impact of mandatory minimum sentences: House Resolution 12 Session of 2007 (Report to the Pennsylvania House of Representatives). State College, PA: The Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing.
5. S.Bontrager,, W.Bales,, & T.Chiricos, (2005). Race, ethnicity, threat and the labeling of convicted felons. Criminology, 43, 589-622.10.1111/crim.2005.43.issue-3
6. A.Blumstein, (1993). Racial disproportionality of US prison populations revisited. University of Colorado Law Review, 64, 743-760.
7. Bureau of Justice Statistics (2011). Prison Inmates at Midyear—Statistical Tables. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
8. S.Bushway,, & B.Forst, (2013). Studying discretion in the processes that generate criminal justice sanctions. Justice Quarterly, 30, 199-222.10.1080/07418825.2012.682604
9. S.Bushway,, & A.M.Piehl, (2001). Judging judicial discretion: Legal factors and racial discrimination in sentencing. Law and Society Review, 35, 733-764.10.2307/3185415
10. S.Bushway,, & A.M.Piehl, (2011). Location, location, location: The impact of guideline grid location on the value of sentencing enhancements. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8, 222-238.10.1111/jels.2011.8.issue-s1
11. J.K.Doerner,, & S.Demuth, (2010, June). The independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in US federal courts. Justice Quarterly, 27, 1-27.
12. R.Engen, (2009). Assessing determinate and presumptive sentencing: Making research relevant. Criminology and Public Policy, 8, 323-336.10.1111/cpp.2009.8.issue-2
13. J.Eisenstein,, R.Flemming,, & P.Nardulli, (1988). The contours of justice: Communities and their courts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
14. B.Feldmeyer,, & J.T.Ulmer, (2011). Racial/ethnic threat and federal sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48, 238-270.10.1177/0022427810391538
15. J.Fischman,, & M.Schanzenbach, (2012). Racial disparities under the federal sentencing guidelines: The role of judicial discretion and mandatory minimums. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 9, 729-764.10.1111/jels.2012.9.issue-4
16. R.Frase, (2013). Research on race and sentencing: goals, methods, and topics. Justice Quarterly, 30, 262-269.10.1080/07418825.2012.687512
17. L.Hannon,, P.Knapp,, & R.DeFina, (2005). Racial similarity in the relationship between poverty and homicide rates: Comparing retransformed coefficients. Social Science Research, 34, 893-914.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.01.004
18. C.Harris,, D.Steffensmeier,, J.T.Ulmer,, & N.Painter-Davis, (2009). Are blacks and Hispanics disproportionately incarcerated relative to their arrests? Racial and ethnic disproportionality between arrest and incarceration. Race and Social Problems, 1, 187-199.10.1007/s12552-009-9019-x
19. B.D.Johnson, (2006). The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge and county level influences in the study of courtroom decision making. Criminology, 44, 259-298.10.1111/crim.2006.44.issue-2
20. B.Johnson,, J.Ulmer,, & J.Kramer, (2008). The social contexts of guideline circumvention: The case of federal district courts. Criminology, 46, 711-783.
21. J.H.Kramer,, & J.T.Ulmer, (2009). Sentencing guidelines: Lessons from Pennsylvania. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
22. M.C.Kurlychek,, & B.D.Johnson, (2004). The juvenile penalty: A comparison of juvenile and young adult sentencing outcomes in criminal court. Criminology, 42, 485-515.10.1111/crim.2004.42.issue-2
23. M.T.Light, (2013). Punishing the ‘Others’: Citizenship and state social control in the United States and Germany (PhD dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University.
24. M.T.Light,, M.Massoglia,, & R.D.King, (In press). Citizenship and punishment: The salience of national membership in US. Criminal Courts. American Sociological Review.
25. O.Mitchell, (2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21, 439-466.10.1007/s10940-005-7362-7
26. M.M.Rehavi,, & S.S.Starr, (2012). Racial disparity in federal criminal charging and its sentencing consequences (University of Michigan Law and Economics Working Paper). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
27. A.K.Reitler,, C.Sullivan,, & J.Frank, (2013). The effects of legal and extralegal factors on detention decisions in US district courts. Justice Quarterly, 30, 340-368.10.1080/07418825.2012.668925
28. J.Savelsberg, (1992). Law that does not fit society: Sentencing guidelines as a neoclassical reaction to the dilemmas of substantivized law. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1346-1381.10.1086/ajs.1992.97.issue-5
29. E.L.Sevigny, (2009). Excessive uniformity in federal drug sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 155-180.10.1007/s10940-009-9064-z
30. L.O.Shermer,, & B.Johnson, (2010). Criminal prosecutions: Examining prosecutorial discretion and charge reductions in US federal district courts. Justice Quarterly, 27, 394-430.10.1080/07418820902856972
31. C.Spohn, (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. In Policies, processes and decisions of the criminal justice system. Criminal justice 2000 (Vol. 3, pp. 427-501). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
32. S.Starr,, & M.M.Rehavi, (2013). Mandatory sentencing and racial disparity: Assessing the role of prosecutors and the effects of Booker. Yale Law Journal, 123, 2-80.
33. S.Steen,, R.Engen,, & R.Gainey, (2005). Images of danger and culpability: Racial stereotyping, case processing, and criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43, 435-468.10.1111/crim.2005.43.issue-2
34. D.Steffensmeier,, J.Ulmer,, & J.Kramer, (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-798.10.1111/crim.1998.36.issue-4
35. K.Stith, (2008). The arc of the pendulum: Judges, prosecutors, and the exercise of discretion. The Yale Law Journal, 117, 1420-1497.10.2307/20454685
36. M.Tonry, (1992). Mandatory penalties. In M.Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 16, pp. 243-273). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37. M.Tonry,, & M.Melewski, (2008). The malign effects of drug control policies on black Americans. Crime and Justice, 37(1), 1-44.10.1086/588492
38. J.T.Ulmer, (1997). Social worlds of sentencing: Court communities under sentencing guidelines. Albany: State University of New York Press.
39. J.T.Ulmer, (2012). Recent developments and new directions in sentencing research. Justice Quarterly, 29(1), 1-40.10.1080/07418825.2011.624115
40. J.T.Ulmer,, J.Eisenstein,, & B.D.Johnson, (2010). Trial penalties in federal sentencing: Extra-guidelines factors and district variation. Justice Quarterly, 27, 560-592.10.1080/07418820902998063
41. J.T.Ulmer,, & J.H.Kramer, (1996). Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemmas of formal rationality and sentencing disparity. Criminology, 34, 383-408.10.1111/crim.1996.34.issue-3
42. J.T.Ulmer,, M.Light,, & J.Kramer, (2011a). The “Liberation” of federal judges’ discretion in the wake of the Booker/Fanfan decision: Is there increased disparity and divergence between courts?. Justice Quarterly, 28, 799-837.10.1080/07418825.2011.553726
43. J.T.Ulmer,, M.Light,, & J.Kramer, (2011b). Racial disparity in the wake of the Booker/Fanfan decision. Criminology and Public Policy, 10, 1077-1118.10.1111/capp.2011.10.issue-4
44. US Sentencing Commission. (2013). Report to Congress on the Continuing Impact of US v. Booker on Federal Sentencing. Retrieved from http://www.ussc.gov/Legislative_and_Public_Affairs/Congressional_Testimony_and_Reports/Booker_Reports/2012_Booker/index.cfm