The independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts

Justice Quarterly

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-27

  Doerner, Jill K ^a   Demuth, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Age; Disparity; Gender; Race ethnicity; Sentencing

Indexed keywords

EID: 74349117518     PISSN: 07418825     EISSN: 17459109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07418820902926197     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Albonetti, C. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38(2), 247-266.
2. Albonetti, C. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendants characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law and Society Review, 31(4), 789-822.
3. Albonetti, C. (1998). Direct and indirect effects of case complexity, guilty pleas, and offender characteristics on sentencing for offenders convicted of a white-collar offense prior to sentencing guidelines. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14(4), 353-379.
4. Anderson, D. (1995). Crime and the politics of hysteria. New York: Random House.
5. Belknap, J. (1996). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and criminal justice. Belmont CA: Wadsworth.
6. Berk, R. A. (1983). An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review, 48(3), 386-398.
7. Bickle, G., & Peterson, R. (1991). The impact of gender-based family roles on criminal sentencing. Social Problems, 38(3), 372-394.
8. Blumstein, A. (1982). On the racial disproportionality of United States' prison populations. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 73, 1259-1281.
9. Bushway, S., Johnson, B., & Slocum, L. (2007). Is the magic still there? The use of the Heckman two-step correction for selection bias in criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23(2), 151-178.
10. Champion, D. J. (1987). Elderly felons and sentencing severity: Interregional variations in leniency and sentencing trends. Criminal Justice Review, 12(2), 7-14.
11. Chiricos, T., & Crawford, C. (1995). Race and imprisonment: A contextual assessment of the evidence. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.
12. Clear, T. R. (2002). The problem with 'addition by subtraction': The prison-crime relationship in low-income communities. In M. Mauer & M. Chesney-Lind (Eds.), Invis-ible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment (pp. 181-194). New York: New Press.
13. Clear, T. R., Rose, D. R., Waring, E., & Scully, K. (2003). Coercive mobility and crime: A preliminary examination of concentrated incarceration and social disorganization. Justice Quarterly, 20(1), 33-64.
14. Daly, K. (1987). Discrimination in the criminal courts: Family, gender, and problems of equal treatment. Social Forces, 66, 152-175.
15. Daly, K., & Bordt, R. (1995). Sex effects and sentencing: A review of the statistical literature. Justice Quarterly, 12, 143-177.
16. Demuth, S. (2002). The effect of citizenship status on sentencing outcomes in drug cases. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 14(5), 271-275.
17. Demuth, S. (2003). Racial and ethnic differences in pretrial release decisions and outcomes: A comparison of Hispanic, Black, and White felony arrestees. Criminology, 41(3), 873-907.
18. Demuth, S., & Steffensmeier, D. (2004). Ethnicity effects on sentence outcomes in large urban courts: Comparisons among White, Black, and Hispanic defendants. Social Science Quarterly, 85(4), 994-1011.
19. Dixon, J. (1995). The organization context of criminal sentencing. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1157-1198.
20. Engen, R. J., & Gainey, R. R. (2000). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extrale-gal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. Criminology, 38(4), 1207-1230.
21. Everett, R. S., & Wojtkiewicz, R. A. (2002). Difference, disparity and race/ethnic bias in federal sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(2), 189-211.
22. Farrell, R. A., & Holmes, M. D. (1991). The social and cognitive structure of legal decision-making. Sociological Quarterly, 32, 529-542.
23. Farrell, R. A., & Swigert, V. L. (1978). Prior offense record as a self-fulfilling prophecy. Law and Society Review, 12, 437-453.
24. Foote, C. (1954). Compelling appearance in court: Administration of bail in Philadelphia. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 102, 1031-1079.
25. Gibbs, J. T. (1988). Young, black, and male in America: An endangered species. Dover MA: Auburn House.
26. Goldkamp, J. S. (1979). Two classes of accused: A study of bail and detention in American justice. Cambridge MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
27. Gottfredson, M. R., & Gottfredson, D. M.(1990). Decision making in criminal justice: Toward the rational exercise of discretion(2nd ed.). New York: Plenum.
28. Griffin, T., & Wooldredge, J. (2006). Sex-based disparities in felony dispositions before versus after sentencing reform in Ohio. Criminology, 44(4), 893-923.
29. Kautt, P. M. (2002). Location, location, location: Interdistrict and intercircuit variation in sentencing outcomes for federal drug-trafficking offenses. Justice Quarterly, 19(4), 633-671.
30. Klein, D., & Kress, J. (1976). Any women's blues: A critical overview of women, crime, and the criminal justice system. Crime and Social Justice, 5, 34-59.
31. Koons-Witt, B. (2002). The effects of gender on the decision to incarcerate before and after the introduction of sentencing guidelines. Criminology 40, 297-328.
32. Kramer, J., & Steffensmeier, D. (1993). Race and imprisonment decisions. Sociological Quarterly, 34(2), 357-376.
33. Kruttschnitt, C., & Green, D. (1984). The sex sanctioning issue: Is it history? American Sociological Review, 49, 541-551.
34. Lopoo, L. M., & Western, B. (2005). Incarceration and the formation and stability of marital unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(3), 721-734.
35. Majors, R. G., & Gordon, J. U. (1994). The American black male: His present status and his future. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
36. Mata, A. G. (1998). Stereotyping by politicians: Immigrant bashing and nativist political movements. In C. R. Mann and M. S. Zatz (Eds.), Images of color, images of crime (pp. 145-155). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
37. Miethe, T. D., & Moore, C. A. (1985). Socioeconomic disparities under determinate sentencing systems: A comparison of preguideline and postguideline practices in Minnesota. Criminology, 23, 337-363.
38. Miethe, T. D., & Moore, C. A. (1986). Racial differences in criminal processing: The consequences of model selection on conclusions about differential treatment. Sociological Quarterly, 27, 217-237.
39. Mitchell, O. (2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(4), 439-466.
40. Oboler, S. (1995). Ethnic labels, Latino lives: Identity and the politics of (re)presentation in the United States. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.
41. Provine, D. M. (2006). Creating racial disadvantage: The case of crack cocaine. In R. D. Peterson, L. J. Krivo, & John Hagan (Eds.), The many colors of crime (pp. 277-294). New York: New York University Press.
42. Rossi, P. H., & Berk, R. A. (1997). Just punishments: Federal guidelines and public views compared. New York NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
43. Sampson, R. J., & Lauritsen, J. L. (1997). Racial and ethnic disparities in crime and criminal justice in the United States. Crime and Justice, 21, 311-374.
44. Savelsberg, J. J. (1992). Law that does not fit society: Sentencing guidelines as aneoclassical reaction to the dilemmas of substantivized law. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1346-1381.
45. Smith, H., Rodriguez, N., & Zatz, M. S. (2006). No place for girls to go: How juvenile court officials respond to substance abuse among girls and boys. In K. Heimer and C. Kruttschnitt (Eds.), Gender and crime (pp. 67-90). New York: New York University Press.
46. Spohn, C. C. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Criminal Justice: The National Institute of Justice Journal, 3, 427-501.
47. Spohn, C. C. (2002). How do judges decide: The search for fairness and justice in punishment. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
48. Spohn, C. C., & Holleran, D. (2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed Black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38(1), 281-306.
49. Spohn, C. C., Welch, S., & Gruhl, J. (1985). Women defendants in court: The interaction between sex and race in convicting and sentencing. Social Science Quarterly, 66, 178-185.
50. Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review, 65(5), 705-729.
51. Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2001). Ethnicity and judges' sentencing decision: Hispanic-Black-White comparisons. Criminology, 39(1), 145-178.
52. Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2006). Does gender modify the effects of race-ethnicity on criminal sanctioning? Sentences for male and female White, Black, and Hispanic defendants. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241-261.
53. Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., & Streifel, C. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31, 411-446.
54. Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., & Ulmer, J.(1995). Age differences in sentencing. Criminal Justice Quarterly, 12, 701-719.
55. Steffensmeier, D., & Motivans, M. (2000). Older men and older women in the arms of criminal law: Offending patterns and sentencing outcomes. Journal of Gerontology, 55, 141-151.
56. Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-797.
57. Stolzenberg, R. M., & Relles, D. A. (1997). Tools for intuition about sample selection bias and its correction. American Sociological Review, 62(3), 494-507.
58. Tonry, M. (1996). Sentencing matters. New York: Oxford University Press.
59. Uggen, C., & Manza, J. (2002). Democratic contraction? Political consequences of felon disenfranchisement in the United States. American Sociological Review, 67(6), 777-803.
60. Ulmer, J. T. (1997). Social worlds of sentencing: Court communities under sentencing guidelines. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.
61. Ulmer, J. T. (2000). The rules have changes - so proceed with caution: A comment on Engen and Gainey's method for modeling sentencing outcomes under guidelines. Criminology, 38(4), 1231-1243.
62. Ulmer, J. T., & Johnson, B.(2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42(1),137-177.
63. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Census 2000 brief. k.
64. USSC (United States Sentencing Commission). (2004). Fifteen years of guidelines sentencing: An assessment of how well the federal criminal justice system is achiev-ing the goals of sentencing reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Sentencing Commission.
65. Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
66. Western, B., & McLanahan, S. (2000). Fragile families: Young father with incarceration experiences. In G. L. Fox & M. L. Benson (Eds.), Families, crime and criminal justice (pp. 309-324). New York: JAI Press.
67. Zatz, M. S. (1984). Race, ethnicity, and determinate sentencing: A new dimension to an old controversy. Criminology, 22, 147-171.
68. Zatz, M. S. (1987). The changing forms of racial/ethnic biases in sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24(1), 69-92.
69. Zatz, M. S. (2000). The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender and class on court decision making: Looking toward the 21st century. Criminal Justice: The National Institute of Justice Journal, 3, 503-552.
70. Zatz, M. S., & Rodriguez, N. (2006). Conceptualizing race and ethnicity in studies of crime and criminal justice. In R. D. Peterson, L. J. Krivo, & J. Hagan (Eds.), The many colors of crime (pp. 39-53). New York: New York University Press.