Patient-Reported Outcomes Accurately Measure the Value of an Enhanced Recovery Program in Liver Surgery Poster abstract presented at the 123rd Annual Western Surgical Association Meeting, Napa Valley, CA, November 2015.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 221, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1023-1030.e2

  Day, Ryan W ^a   Cleeland, Charles S ^a   Wang, Xin S ^a   Fielder, Sharon ^a   Calhoun, John ^a   Conrad, Claudius ^a   Vauthey, Jean Nicolas ^a   Gottumukkala, Vijaya ^b   Aloia, Thomas A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Abbreviations and Acronyms ER enhanced recovery; ERLS Enhanced Recovery in Liver Surgery; GI gastrointestinal; MDASI GI MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, gastrointestinal version; PRO patient reported outcomes; RIOT return to intended oncologic therapy

Indexed keywords

NARCOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA; ANESTHESIA; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONFERENCE PAPER; DEMOGRAPHY; DIET; DRAIN; ENHANCED RECOVERY PROGRAM; FEMALE; FLUID INTAKE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; LIVER RESECTION; LIVER SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MD ANDERSON SYMPTOM INVENTORY; MOBILIZATION; PATIENT EDUCATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUBE; CLINICAL PATHWAY; CONVALESCENCE; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; REHABILITATION; SELF REPORT; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CRITICAL PATHWAYS; EARLY AMBULATION; FEMALE; HEPATECTOMY; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SELF REPORT;

EID: 84962241652     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: 18791190     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.09.011     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. H. Kehlet, and D.W. Wilmore Fast-track surgery Br J Surg 92 2005 3 4
2. H. Kehlet Future perspectives and research initiatives in fast-track surgery Langenbecks Arch Surg 391 2006 495 498
3. M.J. Hughes, S. McNally, and S.J. Wigmore Enhanced recovery following liver surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis HPB (Oxford) 16 2014 699 706
4. M.M. Coolsen, R.M. van Dam, A.A. van der Wilt, and et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery with particular emphasis on pancreaticoduodenectomies World J Surg 37 2013 1909 1918
5. M. Greco, G. Capretti, L. Beretta, and et al. Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials World J Surg 38 2014 1531 1541
6. S. Connor, A. Cross, M. Sakowska, and et al. Effects of introducing an enhanced recovery after surgery programme for patients undergoing open hepatic resection HPB (Oxford) 15 2013 294 301
7. P. di Sebastiano, L. Festa, A. De Bonis, and et al. A modified fast-track program for pancreatic surgery: a prospective single-center experience Langenbecks Arch Surg 396 2011 345 351
8. Z. Serclova, P. Dytrych, J. Marvan, and et al. Fast-track in open intestinal surgery: prospective randomized study (Clinical Trials Gov Identifier no. NCT00123456) Clin Nutr 28 2009 618 624
9. D.X. Lin, X. Li, Q.W. Ye, and et al. Implementation of a fast-track clinical pathway decreases postoperative length of stay and hospital charges for liver resection Cell Biochem Biophys 61 2011 413 419
10. T. Takamoto, T. Hashimoto, K. Inoue, and et al. Applicability of enhanced recovery program for advanced liver surgery World J Surg 38 2014 2676 2682
11. F.J. McNicol, R.H. Kennedy, R.K. Phillips, and S.K. Clark Laparoscopic total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis (IRA), supported by an enhanced recovery programme in cases of familial adenomatous polyposis Colorectal Dis 14 2012 458 462
12. N.A. Schultz, P.N. Larsen, B. Klarskov, and et al. Evaluation of a fast-track programme for patients undergoing liver resection Br J Surg 100 2013 138 143
13. M. Alcantara-Moral, X. Serra-Aracil, M.J. Gil-Egea, and et al. Observational cross-sectional study of compliance with the fast track protocol in elective surgery for colon cancer in Spain Int J Colorectal Dis 29 2014 477 483
14. T.A. Aloia, G. Zimmitti, C. Conrad, and et al. Return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT): a novel metric for evaluating the quality of oncosurgical therapy for malignancy J Surg Oncol 110 2014 107 114
15. R.P. Merkow, K.Y. Bilimoria, J.S. Tomlinson, and et al. Postoperative complications reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use in resectable pancreatic cancer Ann Surg 260 2014 372 377
16. R.P. Merkow, D.J. Bentrem, M.F. Mulcahy, and et al. Effect of postoperative complications on adjuvant chemotherapy use for stage III colon cancer Ann Surg 258 2013 847 853
17. L. Lee, T. Dumitra, J.F. Fiore Jr., N.E. Mayo, and L.S. Feldman How well are we measuring postoperative "recovery" after abdominal surgery? Qual Life Res 24 2015 2583 2590
18. X.S. Wang, L.A. Williams, C. Eng, and et al. Validation and application of a module of the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory for measuring multiple symptoms in patients with gastrointestinal cancer (the MDASI-GI) Cancer 116 2010 2053 2063
19. A. Andreou, J.N. Vauthey, D. Cherqui, and et al. Improved long-term survival after major resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter analysis based on a new definition of major hepatectomy J Gastrointest Surg 17 2013 66 77 discussion 77
20. Y.Y. Pang The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2000;2:333-39 HPB (Oxford) 4 2002 99 author reply 100
21. R.M. van Dam, P.O. Hendry, M.M. Coolsen, and et al. Initial experience with a multimodal enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing liver resection Br J Surg 95 2008 969 975
22. J.H. Stoot, R.M. van Dam, O.R. Busch, and et al. The effect of a multimodal fast-track programme on outcomes in laparoscopic liver surgery: a multicentre pilot study HPB (Oxford) 11 2009 140 144
23. H. Awdeh, K. Kassak, P. Sfeir, and et al. The SF-36 and 6-minute walk test are significant predictors of complications after major surgery World J Surg 39 2015 1406 1412
24. S. Ahmed, N. Iqbal, S. Yadav, and et al. Time to adjuvant therapy and other variables in localized gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer (IJGC-D-13-00162) J Gastrointest Cancer 45 2014 284 290
25. M. Gagliato Dde, A.M. Gonzalez-Angulo, X. Lei, and et al. Clinical impact of delaying initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer J Clin Oncol 32 2014 735 744
26. J.J. Biagi, M.J. Raphael, W.J. Mackillop, and et al. Association between time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis JAMA 305 2011 2335 2342