Laparoscopic total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis (IRA), supported by an enhanced recovery programme in cases of familial adenomatous polyposis

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 458-462

  Mcnicol, F J ^a   Kennedy, R H ^a   Phillips, R K S ^a   Clark, S K ^a  

^a ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

FAP; Ileorectal anastomosis; Laparoscopic colectomy

Indexed keywords

ADENOMATOUS POLYP; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAMILIAL ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS; FAMILIAL DISEASE; FEMALE; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; ILEORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MORTALITY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL COLON RESECTION;

ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS COLI; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; CHILD; COLECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILEUM; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RECTUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84857948909     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02683.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Church J. In which patients do I perform IRA, and why? Fam Cancer 2006; 5: 237-40; discussion 262-2.
2. Vasen HF, Möslein G, Alonso A et al. Guidelines for the clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Gut 2008; 57: 704-13.
3. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991; 1: 144-50.
4. Milsom JW et al. Laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 675-8.
5. Lumley J et al. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: intermediate to long-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 867-72; discussion 872-5.
6. King PM et al. Detailed evaluation of functional recovery following laparoscopic or open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008; 23: 795-800.
7. Marks JH et al. Redefining contraindications to laparoscopic colorectal resection for high-risk patients. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1899-904.
8. Delaney CP. Outcome of discharge within 24 to 72hours after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 181-5.
9. Motson RW. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 519-20.
10. Ng CS et al. Is minimal access surgery for cancer associated with immunologic benefits? World J Surg 2005; 29: 975-81.
11. Dowson HM et al. Reduced adhesion formation following laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 909-14.
12. Rosin D et al. Low incidence of adhesion-related bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2007; 17: 604-7.
13. Duepree HJ et al. Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 197: 177-81.
14. Laurent C et al. Long-term wound advantages of the laparoscopic approach in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 903-8.
15. Pickleman J. (1997) Small bowel obstruction. In: Maingot's Abdominal Operations, 10th Edition (ed. Zinner MJ), pp. 1159-72. Prentice Hall, London.
16. Weese JL, Ottery FD, Emoto SE. Do operations facilitate tumor growth? An experimental model in rats. Surgery 1986; 100: 273-7.
17. Vogel JD, Church JM, Laguardia L. Minimally invasive pouch surgery predisposes to desmoid tumor formation in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 662-3.
18. King PM et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 300-8.
19. Whiteley MS et al. An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 812-5.
20. Fearon KC et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 2005; 24: 466-77.
21. Delaney CP et al. Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index >30? A case-matched comparative study with open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 975-81.
22. Pokala N et al. Laparoscopic vs open total colectomy: a case-matched comparative study. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 531-5.
23. Athanasakis H et al. Laparoscopically assisted subtotal colectomy for slow-transit constipation. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 1090-2.
24. Eu KW et al. Clinical outcome and bowel function following total abdominal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in the oriental population. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 215-8.
25. Ho YH et al. Laparoscopic-assisted compared with open total colectomy in treating slow transit constipation. Aust N Z J Surg 1997; 67: 562-5.
26. Wexner SD et al. Laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy. A prospective trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1992; 35: 651-5.