Assessing the effects of participant preference and demographics in the usage of web-based survey questionnaires by women attending screening mammography in British Columbia

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Mlikotic, Rebecca ^a   Parker, Brent ^b   Rajapakshe, Rasika ^a,c,d  

^a BRITISH COLUMBIA CANCER AGENCY   (Canada)

^b Interior Health Authority   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Breast cancer screening; Internet; Patient preference; Patient reported outcome measures; Patient reported outcomes; Questionnaires; Survey methods; Web based system

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; BRITISH COLUMBIA; CANADA; DEMOGRAPHY; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ETHNIC GROUP; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; POSTAL MAIL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TELEPHONE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; BRITISH COLUMBIA; CANADA; COMMUNICATION; DEMOGRAPHY; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; POSTAL SERVICE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TELEPHONE;

EID: 84962109388     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5068     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Gwaltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. Value Health 2008;11:322-333. [doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00231.x] [Medline: 18380645]
2. Ashley L, Jones H, Thomas J, Newsham A, Downing A, Morris E, et al. Integrating patient reported outcomes with clinical cancer registry data: a feasibility study of the electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes From Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) system. J Med Internet Res 2013;15:e230 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2764] [Medline: 24161667]
3. Garcia I, Portugal C, Chu L, Kawatkar AA. Response rates of three modes of survey administration and survey preferences of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2014;66:364-370. [doi: 10.1002/acr.22125] [Medline: 23982942]
4. Greene J, Speizer H, Wiitala W. Telephone and web: mixed-mode challenge. Health Serv Res 2008;43(Pt 1):230-248 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00747.x] [Medline: 18211527]
5. Sinclair M, O'Toole J, Malawaraarachchi M, Leder K. Comparison of response rates and cost-effectiveness for a community-based survey: postal, internet and telephone modes with generic or personalised recruitment approaches. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012;12:132 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-132] [Medline: 22938205]
6. Cooper CJ, Cooper SP, del Junco DJ, Shipp EM, Whitworth R, Cooper SR. Web-based data collection: detailed methods of a questionnaire and data gathering tool. Epidemiol Perspect Innov 2006;3:1 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1742-5573-3-1] [Medline: 16390556]
7. Schleyer TK, Forrest JL. Methods for the design and administration of web-based surveys. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000;7:416-425 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 10887169]
8. van Gelder MM, Bretveld RW, Roeleveld N. Web-based questionnaires: the future in epidemiology? Am J Epidemiol 2010;172:1292-1298 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq291] [Medline: 20880962]
9. Choi BC. Computer assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) for health surveys in public health surveillance: methodological issues and challenges ahead. Chronic Dis Can 2004;25(2):21-27. [Medline: 15554608]
10. Bergeson SC, Gray J, Ehrmantraut LA, Laibson T, Hays RD. Comparing Web-based with Mail Survey Administration of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS(®)) Clinician and Group Survey. Prim Health Care 2013;3:1-15 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.4172/2167-1079.1000132] [Medline: 24078901]
11. Brøgger J, Nystad W, Cappelen I, Bakke P. No increase in response rate by adding a web response option to a postal population survey: a randomized trial. J Med Internet Res 2007;9:e40 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.5.e40] [Medline: 18174120]
12. Fleming CM, Bowden M. Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods. J Environ Manage 2009;90:284-292. [doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.09.011] [Medline: 18082316]
13. Harewood GC, Yacavone RF, Locke GR, Wiersema MJ. Prospective comparison of endoscopy patient satisfaction surveys: e-mail versus standard mail versus telephone. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:3312-3317. [doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.05331.x] [Medline: 11774942]
14. Zuidgeest M, Hendriks M, Koopman L, Spreeuwenberg P, Rademakers J. A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients' experiences with breast care. J Med Internet Res 2011;13:e68 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1241] [Medline: 21946048]
15. Hohwü L, Lyshol H, Gissler M, Jonsson SH, Petzold M, Obel C. Web-based versus traditional paper questionnaires: a mixed-mode survey with a Nordic perspective. J Med Internet Res 2013;15:e173 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2595] [Medline: 23978658]
16. Smyth JD, Olson K, Millar MM. Identifying predictors of survey mode preference. Soc Sci Res 2014;48:135-144. [doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.002] [Medline: 25131280]
17. Clay MG, Hislop TG, Kan L, Olivotto IA, Burhenne LJ. Screening mammography in British Columbia: 1988-1993. Am J Surg 1994;167(5):490-492. [Medline: 8185033]
18. Jacobi CE, de Bock GH, Siegerink B, van Asperen CJ. Differences and similarities in breast cancer risk assessment models in clinical practice: which model to choose? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009;115:381-390. [doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0070-x] [Medline: 18516672]
19. Powell M, Jamshidian F, Cheyne K, Nititham J, Prebil LA, Ereman R. Assessing breast cancer risk models in Marin County, a population with high rates of delayed childbirth. Clin Breast Cancer 2014;14:212-220.e1. [doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2013.11.003] [Medline: 24461459]
20. Weisstock CR, Rajapakshe R, Bitgood C, McAvoy S, Gordon PB, Coldman AJ, et al. Assessing the breast cancer risk distribution for women undergoing screening in British Columbia. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2013;6:1084-1092 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0027] [Medline: 23963801]
21. BC Cancer Agency - Centre for the Southern Interior. Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Project URL: http://www.breastcancerrisk.ca/ [accessed 2015-08-07] [WebCite Cache ID 6ac7gJKhE]
22. Evans DG, Warwick J, Astley SM, Stavrinos P, Sahin S, Ingham S, et al. Assessing individual breast cancer risk within the U.K. National Health Service Breast Screening Program: a new paradigm for cancer prevention. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2012;5:943-951 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0458] [Medline: 22581816]
23. Olson K, Smyth JD, Wood HM. Does Giving People Their Preferred Survey Mode Actually Increase Survey Participation Rates? An Experimental Examination. Public Opinion Quarterly 2012;76:611-635. [doi: 10.1093/poq/nfs024]
24. Porter CE, Donthu N. Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics. Journal of Business Research 2006;59:999-1007. [doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.003]
25. Pew Research Center. Internet Use Over Time URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/internet-use-over-time/ [accessed 2015-08-06] [WebCite Cache ID 6ac9FFk2i]
26. Pew Research Center. Internet User Demographics URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/latest-stats/ [accessed 2015-08-05] [WebCite Cache ID 6ac9X0H14]
27. Horevoorts NJ, Vissers PA, Mols F, Thong MS, van de Poll-Franse LV. Response rates for patient-reported outcomes using web-based versus paper questionnaires: comparison of two invitational methods in older colorectal cancer patients. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e111 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.3741] [Medline: 25953059]
28. Klovning A, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. Web-based survey attracted age-biased sample with more severe illness than paper-based survey. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:1068-1074. [doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.015] [Medline: 19246177]
29. Berry DL, Blonquist TM, Patel RA, Halpenny B, McReynolds J. Exposure to a patient-centered, Web-based intervention for managing cancer symptom and quality of life issues: impact on symptom distress. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e136 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.4190] [Medline: 26041682]
30. Barentsz MW, Wessels H, van Diest PJ, Pijnappel RM, Haaring C, van der Pol CC, et al. Tablet, web-based, or paper questionnaires for measuring anxiety in patients suspected of breast cancer: patients' preferences and quality of collected data. J Med Internet Res 2014;16:e239 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.3578] [Medline: 25364951]
31. Allen M. Insights on Canadian Society: Consumption of culture by older Canadians on the internet URL: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-006-x/2013001/article/11768-eng.htm [accessed 2015-08-10] [WebCite Cache ID 6agiLwMmH]
32. Sykes LL, Walker RL, Ngwakongnwi E, Quan H. A systematic literature review on response rates across racial and ethnic populations. Can J Public Health 2010;101:213-219. [Medline: 20737812]
33. Statistics Canada. The Daily: Canada's Population Estimates: Age and Sex, July 1, 2015 URL: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/150929/dq150929b-eng.pdf [accessed 2015-11-28] [WebCite Cache ID 6dNzHf4V4]
34. Onega T, Beaber EF, Sprague BL, Barlow WE, Haas JS, Tosteson AN, et al. Breast cancer screening in an era of personalized regimens: a conceptual model and National Cancer Institute initiative for risk-based and preference-based approaches at a population level. Cancer 2014;120:2955-2964 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1002/cncr.28771] [Medline: 24830599]
35. Statistics Canada. Population and Demography URL: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-402-x/2012000/chap/pop/pop-eng.htm?fpv=3867 [accessed 2015-11-27] [WebCite Cache ID 6dNzQ1lu2]