Tablet, web-based, or paper questionnaires for measuring anxiety in patients suspected of breast cancer: Patients' preferences and quality of collected data

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 16, Issue 10, 2014, Pages

  Barentsz, Maarten W ^a   Wessels, Hester ^a   Van Diest, Paul J ^a   Pijnappel, Ruud M ^a   Haaring, Cees ^a   Van Der Pol, Carmen C ^a   Witkamp, Arjen J ^a   Van Den Bosch, Maurice A ^a   Verkooijen, Helena M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Electronic questionnaires; Paper questionnaires; Quality of collected data

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANXIETY DISORDERS; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; MICROCOMPUTER; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANXIETY DISORDERS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MICROCOMPUTERS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84964315948     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3578     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Fritz F, Balhorn S, Riek M, Breil B, Dugas M. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of EHR-integrated mobile patient questionnaires regarding usability and cost-efficiency. Int J Med Inform 2012 May;81(5):303-313. [doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.12.008] [Medline: 22236957].
2. Aiello EJ, Taplin S, Reid R, Hobbs M, Seger D, Kamel H, et al. In a randomized controlled trial, patients preferred electronic data collection of breast cancer risk-factor information in a mammography setting. J Clin Epidemiol 2006 Jan;59(1):77-81. [doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.007] [Medline: 16360564].
3. Duracinsky M, Lalanne C, Goujard C, Herrmann S, Cheung-Lung C, Brosseau JP, et al. Electronic versus paper-based assessment of health-related quality of life specific to HIV disease: Reliability study of the PROQOL-HIV questionnaire. J Med Internet Res 2014;16(4):e115 [FREE Full text] [doi:10.2196/jmir.3330] [Medline: 24769643].
4. Chalil Madathil K, Koikkara R, Obeid J, Greenstein JS, Sanderson IC, Fryar K, et al. An investigation of the efficacy of electronic consenting interfaces of research permissions management system in a hospital setting. Int J Med Inform 2013 Sep;82(9):854-863 [FREE Full text] [doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.04.008] [Medline: 23757370].
5. George P, Dumenco L, Doyle R, Dollase R. Incorporating iPads into a preclinical curriculum: A pilot study. Med Teach 2013;35(3):226-230. [doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.735384] [Medline: 23425119].
6. Dorr M, Lesmes LA, Lu ZL, Bex PJ. Rapid and reliable assessment of the contrast sensitivity function on an iPad. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013 Nov;54(12):7266-7273. [doi:10.1167/iovs.13-11743] [Medline: 24114545].
7. Glaser D, Jain S, Kortum P. Benefits of a physician-facing tablet presentation of patient symptom data: comparing paper and electronic formats. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013;13:99 [FREE Full text] [doi:10.1186/1472-6947-13-99] [Medline: 24004844].
8. Mayfield CH, Ohara PT, O'Sullivan PS. Perceptions of a mobile technology on learning strategies in the anatomy laboratory. Anat Sci Educ 2013;6(2):81-89. [doi:10.1002/ase.1307] [Medline: 22927203].
9. Geraedts AS, Kleiboer AM, Twisk J, Wiezer NM, van Mechelen W, Cuijpers P. Long-Term results of a web-based guided self-help intervention for employees with depressive symptoms: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2014;16(7):e168 [FREE Full text] [doi:10.2196/jmir.3539] [Medline: 25008127].
10. Lalloo C, Kumbhare D, Stinson JN, Henry JL. Pain-QuILT: clinical feasibility of a web-based visual pain assessment tool in adults with chronic pain. J Med Internet Res 2014;16(5):e127 [FREE Full text] [doi:10.2196/jmir.3292] [Medline: 24819478].
11. Hanberger L, Ludvigsson J, Nordfeldt S. Use of a web 2.0 portal to improve education and communication in young patients with families: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2013;15(8):e175 [FREE Full text] [doi:10.2196/jmir.2425] [Medline: 23973555].
12. Partin MR, Malone M, Winnett M, Slater J, Bar-Cohen A, Caplan L. The impact of survey nonresponse bias on conclusions drawn from a mammography intervention trial. J Clin Epidemiol 2003 Sep;56(9):867-873. [Medline: 14505772].
13. Hohwü L, Lyshol H, Gissler M, Jonsson SH, Petzold M, Obel C. Web-based versus traditional paper questionnaires: A mixed-mode survey with a Nordic perspective. J Med Internet Res 2013;15(8):e173 [FREE Full text] [doi:10.2196/jmir.2595] [Medline: 23978658].
14. Kongsved SM, Basnov M, Holm-Christensen K, Hjollund NH. Response rate and completeness of questionnaires: A randomized study of Internet versus paper-And-pencil versions. J Med Internet Res 2007;9(3):e25 [FREE Full text] [doi:10.2196/jmir.9.3.e25] [Medline: 17942387].
15. Leece P, Bhandari M, Sprague S, Swiontkowski MF, Schemitsch EH, Tornetta P, et al. Internet versus mailed questionnaires: A controlled comparison. J Med Internet Res 2004 Oct 29;6(4):e39 [FREE Full text] [doi:10.2196/jmir.6.4.e39] [Medline: 15631963].
16. Marteau TM, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol 1992 Sep;31 ( Pt3):301-306. [Medline: 1393159].
17. van der Bij AK, de Weerd S, Cikot RJ, Steegers EA, Braspenning JC. Validation of the Dutch short form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: considerations for usage in screening outcomes. Community Genet 2003;6(2):84-87. [Medline: 14560068].
18. van Gelder MM, Bretveld RW, Roeleveld N. Web-based questionnaires: The future in epidemiology? Am J Epidemiol 2010 Dec 1;172(11):1292-1298 [FREE Full text] [doi:10.1093/aje/kwq291] [Medline: 20880962].
19. McDonnell CH, Seidenwurm DJ, McDonnell DE, Bobolis KA. Self administered screening for hereditary cancers in conjunction with mammography and ultrasound. Fam Cancer 2013 Dec;12(4):651-656. [doi:10.1007/s10689-013-9641-z] [Medline: 23584879].