Estimation of Directed Effective Connectivity from fMRI Functional Connectivity Hints at Asymmetries of Cortical Connectome

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Gilson, Matthieu ^a   Moreno Bote, Ruben ^a,b,c   Ponce Alvarez, Adrián ^a   Ritter, Petra ^d,e,f,g   Deco, Gustavo ^a,h  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b PARC SANITARI SANT JOAN DE DÉU   (Spain)

^c CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN BIOMÉDICA EN RED DE SALUD MENTAL CIBERSAM   (Spain)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^e CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^f BERNSTEIN CENTER FOR COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE   (Germany)

^g HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^h UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; COMPLEX NETWORKS; DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS;

COMPLEX RELATIONSHIPS; CONNECTOMES; CORTICAL AREAS; CORTICAL MODELS; EFFECTIVE CONNECTIVITIES; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; NETWORK CONNECTIVITY; NEURAL DYNAMICS; SPATIOTEMPORAL PATTERNS; TIME SHIFTS;

INVERSE PROBLEMS;

BRAIN CORTEX; COVARIANCE; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; NOISE; REST; THEORETICAL MODEL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONNECTOME; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONNECTOME; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NERVE NET; SPATIO-TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84962081973     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004762     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Deco G, Jirsa V, McIntosh A, Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12:43–56. doi: 10.1038/nrn296121170073
2. McIntosh A, Grady C, Ungerleider L, Haxby J, Rapoport S, Horwitz B, Network analysis of cortical visual pathways mapped with PET. J Neurosci. 1994;14:655–666. 8301356
3. Harrison L, Penny W, Friston K, Multivariate autoregressive modeling of fMRI time series. Neuroimage. 2003;19:1477–1491. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00160-512948704
4. James G, Kelley M, Craddock R, Holtzheimer P, Dunlop B, Nemeroff C, et al. Exploratory structural equation modeling of resting-state fMRI: applicability of group models to individual subjects. Neuroimage. 2009;45:778–787. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.04919162206
5. Friston K, Functional and effective connectivity: A review. Brain Connect. 2011;1:8. doi: 10.1089/brain.2011.0008
6. Friston K, Causal modelling and brain connectivity in functional magnetic resonance imaging. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e33. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.100003319226186
7. Roebroeck A, Formisano E, Goebel R, The identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: Model selection, causality and deconvolution. Neuroimage. 2011;58:296–302. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.03619786106
8. Valdes-Sosa P, Roebroeck A, Daunizeau J, Friston K, Effective connectivity: Influence, causality and biophysical modeling. Neuroimage. 2011;58:339–361. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.05821477655
9. Ostojic S, Brunel N, Hakim V, How connectivity, background activity, and synaptic properties shape the cross-correlation between spike trains. J Neurosci. 2009;29:10234–10253. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1275-09.200919692598
10. Gerhard F, Pipa G, Lima B, Neuenschwander S, Gerstner W, Extraction of network topology from multi-electrode recordings: is there a small-world effect?Front Comput Neurosci. 2011;5:4.
11. Trousdale J, Hu Y, Shea-Brown E, Jośic K, Impact of network structure and cellular response on spike time correlations. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8:e1002408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100240822457608
12. Deco G, Ponce-Alvarez A, Hagmann P, Romani G, Mantini D, Corbetta M, How local excitation-inhibition ratio impacts the whole brain dynamics. J Neurosci. 2014;34:7886–7898. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5068-13.201424899711
13. Pillow J, Ahmadian Y, Paninski L, Model-based decoding, information estimation, and change-point detection techniques for multi-neuron spike trains. Neural Comput. 2011;23:1–45. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_0005820964538
14. Kim S, Putrino D, Ghosh S, Brown E, A Granger causality measure for point process models of ensemble neural spiking activity. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7:e1001110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100111021455283
15. Smith S, Miller K, Salimi-Khorshidi G, Webster M, Beckmann C, Nichols T, et al. Network modelling methods for fMRI. NeuroImage. 2011;54:875–891. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.06320817103
16. Timme M, Casadiego J, Revealing networks from dynamics: An introduction. J Phys A Math Gen. 2014;47:343001. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/47/34/343001
17. Schelter B, Winterhalder M, Dahlhaus R, Kurths J, Timmer J, Partial phase synchronization for multivariate synchronizing systems. Phys Rev Lett. 2006;96:208103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.20810316803212
18. Ren J, Wang WX, Li B, Lai YC, noise bridges dynamical correlation and topology in coupled oscillator networks. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;104:058701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.05870120366800
19. Ching E, Lai PY, Leung C, Extracting connectivity from dynamics of networks with uniform bidirectional coupling. Phys Rev E. 2013;88:042817. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.042817
20. Storkey A, Simonotto E, Whalley H, Lawrie S, Murray L, Mcgonigle D, Schölkopf B, Platt J, Hoffman T, Learning Structural Equation Models for fMRI. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19. MIT Press; 2007. p. 1329–1336.
21. Kaplan D, Structural equation modeling: foundations and extensions (2nd revised edition). Sage Publications (CA); 2008.
22. Zaytsev Y, Morrison A, Deger M, Reconstruction of recurrent synaptic connectivity of thousands of neurons from simulated spiking activity. J Comput Neurosci. 2015;39:77–103. doi: 10.1007/s10827-015-0565-526041729
23. Gerhard F, Kispersky T, Gutierrez G, Marder E, Kramer M, Eden U, Successful reconstruction of a physiological circuit with known connectivity from spiking activity alone. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9:e1003138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100313823874181
24. Stetter O, Battaglia D, Soriano J, Geisel T, Model-free reconstruction of excitatory neuronal connectivity from calcium imaging signals. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8:e1002653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100265322927808
25. Pernice V, Rotter S, Reconstruction of sparse connectivity in neural networks from spike train covariances. J Stat Mech. 2013;2013:P03008. doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2013/03/P03008
26. Luensmann B. Reconstruction of physical interactions in stationary stochastic network dynamics [MSc Thesis]. University of Göttingen; 2015. Available from: http://www.nld.ds.mpg.de/publications/mastersthesisreference.2015-06-10.5857567117/at_download/publication_pdf.
27. Deco G, Ponce-Alvarez A, Mantini D, Romani G, Hagmann P, Corbetta M, Resting-state functional connectivity emerges from structurally and dynamically shaped slow linear fluctuations. J Neurosci. 2013;33:11239–11252. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1091-13.201323825427
28. Robinson P, Sarkar S, Pandejee G, Henderson J, Determination of effective brain connectivity from functional connectivity with application to resting state connectivities. Phys Rev E. 2014;90:012707. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.012707
29. Friston K, Mechelli A, Turner R, Price C, Nonlinear responses in fMRI: the Balloon model, Volterra kernels and other hemodynamics. NeuroImage. 2000;12:466–477. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.063010988040
30. Fornito A, Zalesky A, Breakspear M, Graph analysis of the human connectome: Promise, progress, and pitfalls. Neuroimage. 2013;80:426–444. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.08723643999
31. Messé A, Rudrauf D, Benali H, Marrelec G, Relating structure and function in the human brain: relative contributions of anatomy, stationary dynamics, and non-stationarities. PLoS COmput Biol. 2014;10:e1003530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100353024651524
32. Goebel R, Roebroeck A, Kim D, Formisano E, Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;21:1251–1261. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2003.08.02614725933
33. Rodriguez R, Tuckwell H, Statistical properties of stochastic nonlinear dynamical models of single spiking neurons and neural networks. Phys Rev E. 1996;54:5585–5590. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.54.5585
34. Bernstein D, Matrix mathematics: Theory, facts, and formulas (second edition). PUP; 2009.
35. Schirner M, Rothmeier S, Jirsa V, McIntosh A, Ritter P, An automated pipeline for constructing personalised virtual brains from multimodal neuroimaging data. Neuroimage. 2015;117:343–357. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.05525837600
36. Ritter P, Villringer A, Simultaneous EEG-fMRI. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30:823–838. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.00816911826
37. Schultze-Kraft M, Becker R, Breakspear M, Ritter P, Exploiting the potential of three dimensional spatial wavelet analysis to explore the nesting of oscillations and spatial variance in simultaneous EEG-fMRI data. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2011;105:67–79. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.11.00321094179
38. Grytskyy D, Tetzlaff T, Diesmann M, Helias M, A unified view on weakly correlated recurrent networks. Front Comput Neurosci. 2013;18:131.
39. Mitra A, Snyder A, Hacker C, Raichle M, Lag structure in resting-state fMRI. J Neurophysiol. 2014;111:2374–2391. doi: 10.1152/jn.00804.201324598530
40. Mitra A, Snyder A, Blazey T, Raichle M, Lag threads organize the brain’s intrinsic activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112:E2235–E2244. doi: 10.1073/pnas.150396011225825720
41. Heeger D, Ress D, What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity?Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:142–151. 11836522
42. Mantini D, Perrucci M, Del Gratta C, Romani G, Corbetta M, Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104:13170–13175. doi: 10.1073/pnas.070066810417670949
43. Ekstrom A, How and when the fMRI BOLD signal relates to underlying neural activity: the danger in dissociation. Brain Res Rev. 2010;62:233–244. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.12.00420026191
44. Gotts S, Chow C, Martin A, Repetition priming and repetition suppression: A case for enhanced efficiency through neural synchronization. Cogn Neurosci. 2012;3:227–237. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2012.67061723144664
45. Bartsch A, Homola G, Biller A, Solymosi L, Bendszus M, Diagnostic functional MRI: illustrated clinical applications and decision-making. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;23:921–932. doi: 10.1002/jmri.2057916649199
46. Garrett D, Samanez-Larkin G, MacDonald S, Lindenberger U, McIntosh A, Grady C, Moment-to-moment brain signal variability: A next frontier in brain mapping?Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37:610–624. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.02.01523458776
47. Patel R, Bowman F, Rilling J, A Bayesian approach to determining connectivity of the human brain. Hum Brain Mapp. 2006;27:267–276. doi: 10.1002/hbm.2018216092131
48. Kötter R, Online retrieval, processing, and visualization of primate connectivity data from the CoCoMac Database. Neuroinformatics. 2004;2:127–144. doi: 10.1385/NI:2:2:12715319511
49. Bakker R, Wachtler T, Diesmann M, CoCoMac 2.0 and the future of tract-tracing databases. Front Neuroinform. 2012;6:30. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2012.0003023293600