The future of mechanical circulatory support for advanced heart failure

Current Opinion in Cardiology

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 321-328

  Marinescu, Karolina K ^a   Uriel, Nir ^a   Adatya, Sirtaz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Battery; Biventricular; Hemocompatibility; Hemodynamics; LVAD; Mechanical circulatory support; Smart pump

Indexed keywords

ASSISTED CIRCULATION; ENERGY RESOURCE; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HEART FAILURE; HEART TRANSPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATION; LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; THROMBOEMBOLISM; TOTAL ARTIFICIAL HEART; DEVICES; TRENDS;

ASSISTED CIRCULATION; HEART FAILURE; HUMANS;

EID: 84961912068     PISSN: 02684705     EISSN: 15317080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000287     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Cowie MR, Wood DA, Coats AJ, et al. Survival of patients with a new diagnosis of heart failure: a population based study. Heart 2000; 83:505-510.
2. Heidenreich PA, Albert NM, Allen LA, et al. Forecasting the impact of heart failure in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Heart Fail 2013; 6:606-619.
3. John R, Kamdar F, Liao K, et al. Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-totransplant therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86:1227-1234.
4. Long JW, Kfoury AG, Slaughter MS, et al. Long-term destination therapy with the HeartMate XVE left ventricular assist device: improved outcomes since the REMATCH study. Congest Heart Fail 2005; 11:133-138.
5. Uriel N, Adatya S, Mehra MR. Evolution in mechanical circulatory support: are we at the precipice of a disruptive innovation? J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66:2590-2593.
6. Cheng DC, Martin J, Lal A, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional open mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Innovations (Phila) 2011; 6:84-103.
7. HeartMate 3TM Left Ventricular Assist System. Available at: http://www.thoratec.com/medical-professionals/vad-product-information/heartmate3.aspx. [Accessed 12 December 2015]
8. Fujii Y, Ferro G, Kagawa H, et al. Is continuous flow superior to pulsatile flow in single ventricle mechanical support? Results from a large animal pilot study. ASAIO J 2015; 61:443-447.
9. Farrar DJ, Bourque K, Reichenbach SH, et al. Innovation update. In: Kyo S, editor. Ventricular assist devices in advanced-stage heart failure. Japan: Springer; 2014. pp. 131-142.
10. Aaronson KD, Slaughter MS, Miller LW, et al. Use of an intrapericardial, continuous-flow, centrifugal pump in patients awaiting heart transplantation. Circulation 2012; 125:3191-3200.
11. Slaughter MS, Pagani FD, McGee EC, et al. HeartWare ventricular assist system for bridge to transplant: combined results of the bridge to transplant and continued access protocol trial. J Heart Lung Transplant 2013; 32:675-683.
12. Larose JA, Tamez D, Ashenuga M, Reyes C. Design concepts and principle of operation of the HeartWare ventricular assist system. ASAIO J 2010; 56:285-289.
13. McGee E Jr, Chorpenning K, Brown MC, et al. In vivo evaluation of the HeartWare MVAD pump. J Heart Lung Transplant 2014; 33:366-371.
14. ClinicalTrials.gov. A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the HeartWare MVAD System (MVAdvantage). http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT018315144?term= Heartware&rank=4. [Accessed 23 December 2015]
15. Chiu WC, Girdhar G, Xenos M, et al. Thromboresistance comparison of the HeartMate II ventricular assist device with the device thrombogenicity emulation-optimized HeartAssist 5 VAD. J Biomech Eng 2014; 136:021014.
16. The Next Generation LVAD. Meet HeartAssist51. Available at: http://relian theart.com/heartassist5/new-heart-assist-5/the-next-generation-lvad. [Accessed 12 December 2015]
17. Mallidi HR, Anand J, Cohn WE. State of the art of mechanical circulatory support. Tex Heart Inst J 2014; 41:115-120.
18. Nestler F, Bradley AP, Wilson SJ, Timms DL.Modeling of a rotary blood pump. Artif Organs 2014; 38:182-190.
19. Karimov JH, Moazami N, Kobayashi M, et al. First report of 90-day support of 2 calves with a continuous-flow total artificial heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 150:687-693.
20. Horvath D, Karimov JH, Byram N, et al. Sensorless suction recognition in the self-regulating Cleveland Clinic continuous-flow total artificial heart. ASAIO J 2015; 61:726-728.
21. Carpentier A, Latremouille C, Cholley B, et al. First clinical use of a bioprosthetic total artificial heart: report of two cases. Lancet 2015; 386:1556-1563.
22. Pelletier B, Spiliopoulos S, Finocchiaro T, et al. System overview of the fully implantable destination therapy-ReinHeart-total artificial heart. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 47:80-86.
23. Cohn WE, Winkler JA, Parnis S, et al. Ninety-day survival of a calf implanted with a continuous-flow total artificial heart. ASAIO J 2014; 60:15-18.
24. Goldstein DJ, Naftel D, Holman W, et al. Continuous-flow devices and percutaneous site infections: clinical outcomes. J Heart Lung Transplant 2012; 31:1151-1157.
25. Topkara VK, Kondareddy S, Malik F, et al. Infectious complications in patients with left ventricular assist device: etiology and outcomes in the continuousflow era. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 90:1270-1277.
26. Slaughter MS, Rogers JG, Milano CA, et al. Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:2241-2251.
27. Cagliostro B, Levin AP, Fried J, et al. Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices and usefulness of a standardized strategy to reduce drive-line infections. J Heart Lung Transplant 2016; 35:108-114.
28. Karalis AJ, John D, Soljacic M. Efficient wireless nonradiative mid-range energy transfer. Ann Phys 2008; 323:34-48.
29. Wang JX, Smith JR, Bonde P. Energy transmission and power sources for mechanical circulatory support devices to achieve total implantability. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97:1467-1474.
30. Adatya S, Bennett MK. Anticoagulation management in mechanical circulatory support. J Thorac Dis 2015; 7:2129-2138.
31. Schmitto JD, Hanke JS, Rojas SV, et al. First implantation in man of a new magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device (HeartMate III). J Heart Lung Transplant 2015; 34:858-860.
32. Netuka I, Sood P, Pya Y, et al. Fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist system for treating advanced HF: a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66:2579-2589.
33. Uriel N, Sayer G, Addetia K, et al. Hemodynamic ramp tests in patients with left ventricular assist devices. JACC Heart Failure 2015; 4:208-217.
34. Burkhoff D, Sayer G, Doshi D, Uriel N. Hemodynamics of mechanical circulatory support. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 66:2663-2674.
35. Abraham WT, Adamson PB, Bourge RC, et al. Wireless pulmonary artery haemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011; 377:658-666.
36. Feldman D, Naka Y, Cabuay B, et al. A wireless hemodynamic pressure sensor before and after ventricular assist device placement: a sub-study of the CHAMPION trial [abstract 241]. J Heart Lung Transplant 2011; 30:S86.
37. Pektok E, Demirozu ZT, Arat N, et al. Remote monitoring of left ventricular assist device parameters after HeartAssist-5 implantation. Artif Organs 2013; 37:820-825.
38. Hubbert L, Baranowski J, Delshad B, Ahn H. First implantation in human of a wireless miniaturized intracardiac pressure sensor in a patient with a Heart-Mate II. J Heart Lung Transplant 2014; 33:S13.
39. ISS' wireless left-heart implantable hemodynamic monitoring system for patients with congestive heart failure. Exhibition at HFSA 19th annual scientific meeting. http://www.prweb.com/releases/2015/09/prweb12977512.htm. [Accessed 2 February 2016]
40. Dierckx R, Goethals M, Vanderheyden M. Continuous invasive hemodynamic monitoring with an implantable device during biventricular mechanical support. J Heart Lung Transplant 2013; 32:375-376.
41. Hoppe UC, Vanderheyden M, Sievert H, et al. Chronic monitoring of pulmonary artery pressure in patients with severe heart failure: multicentre experience of the monitoring Pulmonary Artery Pressure by Implantable device Responding to Ultrasonic Signal (PAPIRUS) II study. Heart 2009; 95:1091-1097.