Minimally invasive versus conventional open mitral valve surgery: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 84-103

  Cheng, Davy C H ^a,b   Martin, Janet ^a,b   Lal, Avtar ^a   Diegeler, Anno ^c   Folliguet, Thierry A ^d   Nifong, L Wiley ^e   Perier, Patrick ^c   Raanani, Ehud ^f   Smith, J Michael ^g   Seeburger, Joerg ^h   Falk, Volkmar ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

^c Klinik GmbH Bad Neustadt   (Germany)

^d INSTITUT MUTUALISTE MONTSOURIS   (France)

^e EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^g Vascular and Thoracic Surgeons Inc ^*  (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG HEART CENTER   (Germany)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Meta analysis; Minimally invasive surgery; Mitral valve surgery; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

FRESH FROZEN PLASMA;

ARTICLE; ASSISTED VENTILATION; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CRYOPRECIPITATE; ERYTHROCYTE TRANSFUSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; META ANALYSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE CARDIAC SURGERY; MITRAL VALVE REPAIR; MORTALITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REOPERATION; STERNOTOMY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THROMBOCYTE TRANSFUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79955631551     PISSN: 15569845     EISSN: 15590879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IMI.0b013e3182167feb     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Modi P, Hassan A, Chitwood WR Jr. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;34:943-952.
2. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Lancet. 1994;354:1896-1900.
3. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000; 283:2008 -2012. (Pubitemid 30214957)
4. Aklog L, Adams DH, Couper GS, et al. Techniques and results of direct-access minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: A paradigm for the future. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;116:705-715. (Pubitemid 28499165)
5. Bolotin G, Kypson AP, Reade CC, et al. Should a video-assisted mini-thoracotomy be the approach of choice for reoperative mitral valve surgery? J Heart Valve Dis. 2004;13:155-158; discussion 158.
6. Burfeind WR, Glower DD, Davis RD, et al. Mitral surgery after prior cardiac operation: Port-access versus sternotomy or thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:S1323-S1325. (Pubitemid 35176787)
7. Chaney MA, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Fluder EM, et al. Port-access minimally invasive cardiac surgery increases surgical complexity, increases operating room time, and facilitates early postoperative hospital discharge. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:1637-1645. (Pubitemid 30412483)
8. Chitwood WR Jr, Wixon C, Elbeery J, et al. Video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;114: 773-782. (Pubitemid 27495866)
9. Cohn LH, Adams DH, Couper GS, et al. Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair. Ann Surg. 1997;226:421-428. (Pubitemid 28049664)
10. Cosgrove DM III, Sabik JF, Navia JL. Minimally invasive valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:1535-1539.
11. de Vaumas C, Philip I, Daccache G, et al. Comparison of minithoracotomy and conventional sternotomy approaches for valve surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003;17:325-328. (Pubitemid 36775848)
12. Dogan S, Aybek T, Risteski PS, et al. Minimally invasive port access versus conventional mitral valve surgery: Prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:492-498. (Pubitemid 40186545)
13. El-Fiky MM, El-Sayegh T, El-Beishry AS, et al. Limited right anterolateral thoracotomy for mitral valve surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17:710-713. (Pubitemid 30364950)
14. Felger JE, Chitwood WR Jr, Nifong L, Holbert D. Evolution of mitral valve surgery: Toward a totally endoscopic approach. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:1203-1209. (Pubitemid 32938007)
15. Folliguet T, Vanhuyse F, Constantino X, et al. Mitral valve repair robotic versus sternotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29:362-366. (Pubitemid 43207577)
16. Galloway AC, Schwartz CF, Ribakove GH, et al. A decade of minimally invasive mitral repair: Long-term outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88: 1180-1184.
17. Gersak B, Sostaric M, Kalisnik J, Blumauer R. The preferable use of port access surgical technique for right and left atrial procedures. Heart Surg Forum. 2005;8:282-291. (Pubitemid 46622362)
18. Glower DD, Landolfo KP, Clements F, et al. Mitral valve operation via port access versus median sternotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;14 (suppl 1):S143-S147. (Pubitemid 28480273)
19. Grossi EA, LaPietra A, Ribakove GH, et al. Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approaches for mitral reconstruction: Comparison of intermediate- term results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121:708-713.
20. Grossi EA, Galloway AC, Ribakove GH, et al. Impact of minimally invasive valvular heart surgery: A case-control study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:807-810. (Pubitemid 32210380)
21. Karagoz HY, Bayazit K, Battaloglu B, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: The subxiphoid approach. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67: 1328-1333. (Pubitemid 29323962)
22. McCreath BJ, Swaminathan M, Booth JV, et al. Mitral valve surgery and acute renal injury: Port access versus median sternotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:812-819. (Pubitemid 36298348)
23. Mohr FW, Falk V, Diegeler A, et al. Minimally invasive port-access mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115:567-576. (Pubitemid 28158073)
24. Nikolic A, Huskic R, Javovic LJ, et al. Our experience of minimally invasive surgery. Cor Europaeum. 1999;8:57-58. (Pubitemid 30179586)
25. Onnasch JF, Schneider F, Falk V, et al. Minimally invasive approach for redo mitral valve surgery: A true benefit for the patient. J Card Surg. 2002;17:14-19. (Pubitemid 35176639)
26. Raanani E, Spiegelstein D, Sternik L, et al. Quality of mitral valve repair: Median sternotomy versus port-access approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140:86-90.
27. Reichenspurner H, Boehm DH, Gulbins H, et al. Three-dimensional video and robot-assisted port-access mitral valve operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1176-1182. (Pubitemid 30259382)
28. Ruttmann E, Laufer G, Muller LC. Development of a minimally invasive mitral valve surgery program: The Innsbruck experience. Eur Surg. 2006;38:320-325. (Pubitemid 44787121)
29. Schneider F, Onnasch JF, Falk V, et al. Cerebral microemboli during minimally invasive and conventional mitral valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:1094-1097.
30. Shinfeld A, Kachel E, Paz Y, et al. Minimally invasive video-assisted mitral and aortic valve surgery-our initial clinical experience. Isr Med Assoc J. 2003;5:482-484. (Pubitemid 36992227)
31. Srivastava AK, Garg SK, Ganjoo AK. Approach for primary mitral valve surgery: Right anterolateral thoracotomy or median sternotomy. J Heart Valve Dis. 1998;7:370-375. (Pubitemid 28351301)
32. Suri RM, Schaff HV, Meyer SR, Hargrove WC III. Thoracoscopic versus open mitral valve repair: A propensity score analysis of early outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:1185-1190.
33. Walther T, Falk V, Metz S, et al. Pain and quality of life after minimally invasive versus conventional cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999; 67:1643-1647. (Pubitemid 29301304)
34. Wang D, Wang Q, Yang X, et al. Mitral valve replacement through a minimal right vertical infra-axillary thoracotomy versus standard median sternotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:704-708.
35. Woo YJ, Nacke EA. Robotic minimally invasive mitral valve reconstruction yields less blood product transfusion and shorter length of stay. Surgery. 2006;140:263-267. (Pubitemid 44176074)
36. Ryan WH, Brinkman WT, Dewey TM, et al. Mitral valve surgery: Comparison of outcomes in matched sternotomy and port access groups. J Heart Valve Dis. 2010;19:51-58.
37. Gammie JS, Zhao Y, Peterson ED, et al. Maxwell Chamberlain Memorial Paper for adult cardiac surgery. Less-invasive mitral valve operations: Trends and outcomes from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1401-1408, 1410.e1; discussion 1408-1410.
38. Mihaljevic T. Robotic mitral valve repair versus conventional approaches: Potential realized. Presented at: AATS 90th Annual Meeting, May 1-5, 2010, Toronto, ON Canada.
39. Adams DH, Rosenhek R, Falk V. Degenerative mitral valve regurgitation: Best practice revolution. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1958 -1966.
40. EC/IC Bypass Study Group. Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke: Results of an international randomized trial. N Engl J Med 1985;313:1191-1200.