What do men want? Re-examining whether men benefit from higher fertility than is optimal for women

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 371, Issue 1692, 2016, Pages

  Moya, Cristina ^a   Snopkowski, Kristin ^b   Sear, Rebecca ^c  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptive sexual strategies; Costs of reproduction; Female autonomy; Optimal family size; Sexual conflict

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; FEMALE; FERTILITY; MALE; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL CONFLICT;

IBIS;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DECISION MAKING; FAMILY SIZE; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR; SURVIVAL RATE; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR; SURVIVAL RATE; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 84961878228     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0149     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. McDonald P. 2000 Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. J. Popul. Res. 17, 1-16.
2. Campbell MM, Prata N, Potts M. 2013 The impact of freedom on fertility decline. J. Fam. Plann. Reprod. Health Care 39, 44-50. (doi:10.1136/jfprhc-2012-100405)
3. Folbre N. 1983 Of patriarchy born: the political economy of fertility decisions. Fem. Stud. 9, 261-284. (doi:10.2307/3177490)
4. McDonald P. 2000 Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Popul. Dev. Rev. 26, 427-439. (doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00427.x)
5. Riley N. 1997 Gender power and population change. Popul. Bull. 52, 2-48.
6. Mason K, Taj A. 1987 Differences between women’s and men’s reproductive goals in developing countries. Popul. Dev. Rev. 13, 611-638. (doi:10.2307/1973025)
7. Bankole A, Singh S. 1998 Couples’ fertility and contraceptive decision-making in developing countries: hearing the man’s voice. Int. Fam. Plan. Perspect. 24, 15-24. (doi:10.2307/2991915)
8. Mason K, Smith H. 2000 Husbands’ versus wives’ fertility goals and use of contraception: the influence of gender context in five Asian countries. Demography 37, 299-311. (doi:10.2307/2648043)
9. Nii-Amoo Dodoo F, Luo Y, Panayotova E. 1997 Do male reproductive preferences really point to a need to refocus fertility policy? Popul. Res. Policy Rev. 16, 447-455. (doi:10.1023/A:1005762323535)
10. Borgerhoff Mulder M, Rauch K. 2009 Sexual conflict in humans: variations and solutions. Evol. Anthropol. 18, 201-214. (doi:10.1002/evan.20226)
11. Leonetti DL, Nath DC, Hemam NS. 2007 In-law conflict: women’s reproductive lives and the roles of their mothers and husbands among the matrilineal khasi. Curr. Anthropol. 48, 861-890. (doi:10.1086/520976)
12. Snopkowski K, Sear R. 2012 Kin influences on fertility in Thailand: effects and mechanisms. Evol. Hum. Behav. 34, 130-138. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.11.004)
13. Henrich J, Boyd R, Richerson P. 2012 The puzzle of monogamous marriage. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 657-669. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0290)
14. Tertilt M. 2006 Polygyny, women’s rights, and development. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 4, 523-530. (doi:10.1162/jeea.2006.4.2-3.523)
15. Jejeebhoy J. 1991 Women’s status and fertility: successive cross-sectional evidence from Tamil Nadu, India, 1970-80. Stud. Fam. Plann. 22, 217-230. (doi:10.2307/1966478)
16. McAllister L, Gurven M, Kaplan H, Stieglitz J. 2012 Why do women have more children than they want? Understanding differences in women’s ideal and actual family size in a natural fertility population. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 24, 786-799. (doi:10.1002/ajhb.22316)
17. Borgerhoff Mulder M. 2009 Tradeoffs and sexual conflict over women’s fertility preferences in Mpimbwe. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 21, 478-487. (doi:10.1002/ajhb.20885)
18. Chapais B. 2013 Monogamy, strongly bonded groups, and the evolution of human social structure. Evol. Anthropol. Issues News Rev. 22, 52-65. (doi:10.1002/evan.21345)
19. Pettay JE, Rotkirch A, Courtiol A, Jokela M, Lummaa V. 2013 Effects of remarriage after widowhood on long-term fitness in a monogamous historical human population. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 68, 135-143. (doi:10.1007/s00265-013-1630-6)
20. Penn D. 1999 Explaining the human demographic transition. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 5347. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01455-4)
21. Sear R, Moya C, Mathew P. 2013 Kin influences on fertility: a theoretical framework tested with a review of the literature. Paper presented at the IUSSP International Population Conference; Busan, South Korea, 26-31 August 2013.
22. Sear R, Mace R, McGregor IA. 2003 The effects of kin on female fertility in rural Gambia. Evol. Hum. Behav. 24, 25-42. (doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00105-8)
23. Voland E, Beise J. 2005 ‘The husband’s mother is the devil in house’ data on the impact of the mother-inlaw on stillbirth mortality in historical krummhorn and some thoughts on the evolution of postgenerative female life. In Grandmotherhood: the evolutionary significance of the second half of female life (eds E Voland, A Chasiotis, W Schiefenhovel), pp. 239-253. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
24. Colleran H. In preparation. Kin and non-kin effects on fertility: a multilevel approach.
25. Snopkowski K, Moya C, Sear R. 2013 The interplay of individual- and community-level postnuptial residence on fertility outcomes: do community norms or individual decisions matter more? Paper presented at the Human Behavior and Evolution Society Meeting; Miami, FL, 17-20 July 2013.
26. Pebley A, Mbugua W, Goldman N. 1988 Polygyny and fertility in Sub-Saharan Africa. Fertil. Determ. Res. Notes 21, 6-10.
27. Borgerhoff Mulder M. 1989 Marital status and reproductive performance in kipsigis women: reevaluating the polygyny-fertility hypothesis. Popul. Stud. (NY). 43, 285-304. (doi:10.1080/0032472031000144126)
28. Tertilt M. 2005 Polygyny, fertility, and savings. J. Polit. Econ. 113, 1341-1371. (doi:10.1086/498049)
29. Lawson D, James S, Ngadaya E, Ngowi B, Mfinanga SGM, Borgerhoff Borgerhoff M. 2015 No evidence that polygynous marriage is a harmful cultural practice in northern Tanzania. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 13827-13832. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1507151112)
30. Upadhyay UD, Gipson JD, Withers M, Lewis S, Ciaraldi EJ, Fraser A, Huchko MJ, Prata N. 2014 Women’s empowerment and fertility: a review of the literature. Soc. Sci. Med. 115C, 111-120. (doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.014)
31. Upadhyay UD, Karasek D. 2012 Women’s empowerment and ideal family size: an examination of DHS empowerment measures in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int. Perspect. Sex. Reprod. Health 39, 78-89. (doi:10.1363/371)
32. Penn D, Smith K. 2007 Differential fitness costs of reproduction between the sexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 553-558. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0609301103)
33. Potts M. 2005 Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Obstet. Gynecol. 106, 1065-1070. (doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000186156.64486.7e)
34. Potts M, Campbell M. 2008 The origins and future of patriarchy: the biological background of gender politics. J. Fam. Plan. Reprod. Heal. Care 34, 171-174. (doi:10.1783/147118908784734792)
35. Morita M, Ohtsuki H, Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M. In press. Does sexual conflict between mother and father lead to fertility decline? A questionnaire survey in a modern developed society. Hum. Nat.
36. Colleran H, Jasienska G, Nenko I, Galbarczyk A, Mace R. 2014 Community-level education accelerates the cultural evolution of fertility decline. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20132732. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2732)
37. Snopkowski K, Kaplan H. 2014 A synthetic biosocial model of fertility transition: testing the relative contribution of embodied capital theory, changing cultural norms, and women’s labor force participation. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 154, 322-333. (doi:10.1002/ajpa.22512)
38. Snopkowski K, Towner MC, Shenk MK, Colleran H. 2016 Pathways from education to fertility decline: a multi-site comparative study. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150156. (doi:10/1098.rstb.2015.0156)
39. Huber S, Bookstein FL, Fieder M. 2010 Socioeconomic status, education, and reproduction in modern women: an evolutionary perspective. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 22, 578-587. (doi:10.1002/ajhb.21048)
40. Bolund E, Bouwhuis S, Pettay JE, Lummaa V. 2011 Divergent selection on, but no genetic conflict over, female and male timing and rate of reproduction in a human population. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20132002. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2002)
41. Wilson M, Daly M. 1985 Competitiveness, risk taking, and violence: the young male syndrome. Ethol. Sociobiol. 6, 59-73. (doi:10.1016/0162-3095(85)90041-X)
42. Tertilt M, Field E, Molitor V. 2015 Gender gaps in completed fertility. Beitrage zur Jahrestagung des Vereins fu¨r Socialpolitik 2015: Okonomische Entwicklung - Theorie und Politik - Session: Labor - Gender Issues, No. E16-V3.
43. Kokko H, Jennions M. 2008 Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. J. Evol. Biol. 21, 919-948. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01540.x)
44. Dixon R. 1971 Explaining cross-cultural variations in age at marriage and proportions never marrying. Popul. Stud. (NY) 25, 215-233.
45. Arnqvist G, Rowe L. 2005 Sexual conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46. Holland B, Rice WR. 1999 Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5083-5088. (doi:10.1073/pnas.96.9.5083)
47. Partridge L, Hurst L. 1998 Sex and conflict. Science 281, 2003-2008. (doi:10.1126/science.281.5385.2003)
48. Palloni A, Millman S. 1986 Effects of inter-birth intervals and breastfeeding on infant and early childhood mortality. Popul. Stud. (NY). 40, 215-236. (doi:10.1080/0032472031000142036)
49. DaVanzo J, Razzaque A, Rahman M, Hale L (with Ahmed K, Khan M, Mustafa G, Gausia K). 2004 The effects of birth spacing on infant and child mortality, pregnancy outcomes, and maternal morbidity and mortality in Matlab, Bangladesh. Working Paper 198, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
50. Menken J, Trussell J, Larsen U. 1986 Age and infertility. Science 233, 1389-1394. (doi:10.1126/science.3755843)
51. Hrdy S. 1979 Infanticide among animals: a review, classification, and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females. Ethol. Sociobiol. 1, 13-40. (doi:10.1016/0162-3095(79)90004-9)
52. Daly M, Wilson M. 1996 Violence against stepchildren. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 5, 77-81.
53. Haig D. 2014 Interbirth intervals: intrafamilial, intragenomic and intrasomatic conflict. Evol. Med. Public Heal. 2014, 12-17. (doi:10.1093/emph/eou002)
54. Barkow J, Burley N. 1980 Human fertility, evolutionary biology, and the demographic transition. Ethol. Sociobiol. 1, 163-180. (doi:10.1016/0162-3095(80)90006-0)
55. Brown G, Laland K, Borgerhoff-Mulder M. 2009 Bateman’s principles and human sex roles. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 297-304. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.005)
56. Lundeberg MA, Fox PW, Punccohar J. 1994 Highly confident but wrong: gender differences and similarities in confidence judgements. J. Educ. Psychol. 86, 114-121. (doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.114)
57. Kaptijn R, Thomese F, van Tilburg TG, Liefbroer AC. 2010 How grandparents matter: support for the cooperative breeding hypothesis in a contemporary Dutch population. Hum. Nat. 21, 393-405. (doi:10.1007/s12110-010-9098-9)
58. Bereczkei T. 1998 Kinship network, direct childcare, and fertility among Hungarians and Gypsies. Evol. Hum. Behav. 19, 283-298. (doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00027-0)
59. Johow J, Voland E. 2012 Conditional grandmother effects on age at marriage, age at first birth, and completed fertility of daughters and daughtersin- law in historical Krummhorn. Hum. Nat. 23,341-359. (doi:10.1007/s12110-012-9147-7)
60. Sear R, Mace R. 2009 Family matters: kin, demography and child health in a rural Gambian population. In Substitute parents: biological and social perspective on alloparenting across human societies (eds G Bentley, R Mace), pp. 50-76. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
61. Pennington R, Harpending H. 1988 Fitness and fertility among Kalahari Kung. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 77, 303-319.
62. Lawson D, Alvergne A, Gibson M. 2012 The lifehistory trade-off between fertility and child survival. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 4755-4764. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1635)
63. Hill K, Hurtado A. 1996 Ache life history: the ecology and demography of a foraging people. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
64. Strassmann BI, Gillespie B. 2002 Life-history theory, fertility and reproductive success in humans. Proc. R. Soc. B 269, 553-562. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1912)
65. Mason K. 1985 The status of women: conceptual and methodological issues in demographic studies. Sociological Forum 1, 284-300. (doi:10.1007/BF01115740)
66. Fischer L. 1983 Mothers and mothers-in-law. J. Marriage Fam. 45, 187-192. (doi:10.2307/351307)
67. Kandiyoti D. 1988 Bargaining with patriarchy. Gend. Soc. 2, 274-290.
68. Johnstone RA, Cant MA. 2010 The evolution of menopause in cetaceans and humans: the role of demography. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 3765-3771. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0988)
69. Masood Kadir M, Fikree FF, Khan A, Sajan F. 2003 Do mothers-in-law matter? Family dynamics and fertility decision-making in urban squatter settlements of Karachi, Pakistan. J. Biosoc. Sci. 35, 545-558. (doi:10.1017/S0021932003005984)
70. Smith JE, Kunz PR. 1976 Polygyny and fertility in nineteenth-century America. Popul. Stud. (NY). 30, 465-480. (doi:10.1080/00324728.1976.10410417)
71. Winking J, Stieglitz J, Kurten J, Kaplan H, Gurven M. 2013 Polygyny among the Tsimane of Bolivia: an improved method for testing the polygyny-fertility hypothesis. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20123078. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.3078)
72. Bean LL, Mineau GP. 1986 The polygyny-fertility hypothesis: a re-evaluation. Popul. Stud. (NY). 40, 67-81. (doi:10.1080/0032472031000141846)
73. Chojnacka H. 1980 Polygyny and the rate of population growth. Popul. Stud. 34, 91-107. (doi:10.1080/00324728.1980.10412838)
74. Allal N, Sear R, Mace R, Prentice AM, Mace R. 2004 An evolutionary model of stature, age at first birth and reproductive success in Gambian women. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 465-470. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2623)
75. Aghajanian A. 1981 Age at first birth and completed family size in West Malaysia. J. Biosoc. Sci. 13, 197-201. (doi:10.1017/S0021932000013365)
76. Liu J, Lummaa V. 2011 Age at first reproduction and probability of reproductive failure in women. Evol. Hum. Behav. 32, 433-443. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.10.007)
77. Mulder M. 1989 Early maturing Kipsigis women have higher reproductive success than late maturing women and cost more to marry. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24, 145-153. (doi:10.1007/BF00292097)
78. Kaar P, Jokela J, Helle T, Kojola I. 1996 Direct and correlative phenotypic selection on life-history traits in three pre-industrial human populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 1475-1480. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0215)
79. Skolnick M, Bean L, May D, Arbon V, De Nevers K, Cartwright P. 1978 Mormon demographic history I. Nuptiality and fertility of once-married couples. Popul. Stud. (NY). 32, 5-19. (doi:10.1080/00324728.1978.10412788)
80. Goodman A, Koupil I, Lawson D. 2012 Low fertility increases descendant socioeconomic position but reduces long-term fitness in a modern postindustrial society. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 4342-4351. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1415)
81. Kaplan HS, Lancaster JB, Bock JA, Johnson SE. 1995 Does observed fertility maximize fitness among New Mexican Men? A test of an optimality model and a new theory of parental investment in the embodied capital of offspring. Hum. Nat. 6, 325-360. (doi:10.1007/BF02734205)
82. Smuts B. 1995 The evolutionary origins of patriarchy. Hum. Nat. 6, 1-32. (doi:10.1007/BF02734133)
83. Shenk M, Towner M. 2013 A model comparison approach shows stronger support for economic models of fertility decline. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 8045-8050. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1217029110)
84. Harts AMF, Schwanz LE, Kokko H. 2014 Demography can favour female-advantageous alleles. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20140005. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0005)