Demography can favour female-advantageous alleles

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 281, Issue 1790, 2014, Pages

  Harts, Anna M F ^a   Schwanz, Lisa E ^a,b   Kokko, Hanna ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Demography; Intralocus sexual conflict; Multiple equilibria; Source sink dynamics; Temperature dependent sex determination

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ALLELE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISPERSAL; DEMOGRAPHY; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; MALE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEX RATIO; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ALLELES; ANIMAL DISTRIBUTION; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DEMOGRAPHY; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX RATIO;

EID: 84904676804     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0005     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Crowley PH. 2000 Sexual dimorphism with female demographic dominance: age, size, and sex ratio at maturation. Ecology81, 2592-2605. (doi: 10. 1890/ 0012-9658(2000)081[2592: SDWFDD]2. 0. CO; 2)
2. Arnqvist G, Nilsson T. 2000 The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60, 145-164. (doi: 10. 1006/ anbe. 2000. 1446)
3. Rankin DJ, Kokko H. 2007 Do males matter? The role of males in population dynamics. Oikos116, 335-348. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 2006. 0030-1299. 15451. x)
4. Freedberg S, Taylor DR. 2007 Sex ratio variance and the maintenance of environmental sex determination. J. Evol. Biol. 20, 213-220. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1420-9101. 2006. 01209. x)
5. Arnqvist G. 2004 Sexual conflict and sexual selection: lost in the chase. Evolution58, 1383-1388. (doi: 10. 1554/03-449)
6. Kokko H, Jennions MD. In press. The relationship between sexual selection and sexual conflict. InThe genetics and biology of sexual conflict (eds S Gavrilets, WR Rice). Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Press.
7. Kawecki TJ. 1995 Demography of source-sink populations and the evolution of ecological niches. Evol. Ecol. 9, 38-44. (doi: 10. 1007/BF01237695)
8. Cox RM, Calsbeek R. 2009 Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am. Nat. 173, 176-187. (doi: 10. 1086/595841)
9. Foerster K, Coulson T, Sheldon BC, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH, Kruuk LEB. 2007 Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer. Nature447, 1107-1110. (doi: 10. 1038/ nature05912)
10. Fedorka KM, Mousseau TA. 2004 Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness. Nature429, 65-67. (doi: 10. 1038/ nature02492)
11. Prassad NG, Bedhomme S, Day T, Chippendale AK. 2007 An evolutionary cost of separate genders revealed by male-limited evolution. Am. Nat. 169, 29-37. (doi: 10. 1086/509941)
12. Bull JJ. 1980 Sex determination in reptiles. Q. Rev. Biol. 55, 3-21. (doi: 10. 1086/411613)
13. Girondot M. 1999 Statistical description of temperature-dependent sex determination using maximum likelihood. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1, 479-486.
14. Mayr E. 1963Animal species and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
15. Kirkpatrick M, Barton NH. 1997 Evolution of a species' range. Am. Nat. 150, 1-23. (doi: 10. 1086/ 286054)
16. Ronce O, Kirkpatrick M. 2001 When sources become sinks: migrational meltdown in heterogeneous habitats. Evolution 55, 1520-1531. (doi: 10. 1554/ 0014-3820(2001)055[1520: WSBSMM]2. 0. CO; 2)
17. Kawecki TJ, Ebert D. 2004 Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 7, 1225-1241. (doi: 10. 1111/ j. 1461-0248. 2004. 00684. x)
18. Kisdi E. 2002 Dispersal: risk spreading versus local adaptation. Am. Nat. 159, 579-596. (doi: 10. 1086/ 339989)
19. Hendry AP, Day T, Taylor EB. 2001 Population mixing and the adaptive divergence of quantitative traits in discrete populations: a theoretical framework for empirical tests. Evolution55, 459-466. (doi: 10. 1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0459: PMATAD]2. 0. CO; 2)
20. Caswell H, Weeks DE. 1986 Two-sex models: chaos, extinction, and other dynamic consequences of sex. Am. Nat. 128, 707-735. (doi: 10. 1086/284598)
21. Ronce O. 2007 How does it feel to be a rolling stone? Ten questions about dispersal evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38, 231-253. (doi: 10. 1146/annurev. ecolsys. 38. 091206. 095611)
22. Aresco MJ. 2005 The effect of sex-specific terrestrial movements and roads on the sex ratio of freshwater turtles. Biol. Conserv. 123, 37-44. (doi: 10. 1016/j. biocon. 2004. 10. 006)
23. Donald PF. 2007 Adult sex ratios in wild bird populations. Ibis 149, 671-692. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1474-919X. 2007. 00724. x)
24. Lambertucci SA, Carrete M, Donazar JA, Hiraldo F. 2012 Large-scale age-dependent skewed sex ratio in a sexually dimorphic avian scavenger. PLoS ONE7, e46347. (doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0046347)
25. Greenwood PJ. 1980 Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim. Behav. 28, 1140-1162. (doi: 10. 1016/S0003-3472(80) 80103-5)
26. Meier CM, Starrfelt J, Kokko H. 2011 Mate limitation causes sexes to coevolve towards more similar dispersal kernels. Oikos120, 1459-1468. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1600-0706. 2011. 19487. x)
27. Ingleby FC, Hunt J, Hosken DJ. 2010 The role of genotype-by-environment interactions in sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 2031-2045. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1420-9101. 2010. 02080. x)
28. Billiard S, Lenormand T. 2005 Evolution of migration under kin selection and local adaptation. Evolution 59, 13-23. (doi: 10. 1554/04-232)
29. Legendre S, Clobert J, Møller AP, Sorci G. 1999 Demographic stochasticity and social mating system in the process of extinction of small populations: the case of passerines introduced to New Zealand. Am. Nat. 153, 449-463. (doi: 10. 1086/303195)
30. Débarre F, Gandon S. 2011 Evolution in heterogeneous environments: between soft and hard selection. Am. Nat. 177, E84-E97. (doi: 10. 1086/658178)
31. McNamara JM, Dall SRX. 2011 The evolution of unconditional strategies via the 'multiplier effect'. Ecol. Lett. 14, 237-243. (doi: 10. 1111/j. 1461-0248. 2010. 01576. x)
32. Bull JJ, Charnov EL. 1988 How fundamental are Fisherian sex ratios?Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 5, 96-135.
33. Charnov EL, Bull JJ. 1989 The primary sex ratio under environmental sex determination. J. Theor. Biol. 139, 431-436. (doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5193(89) 80063-3)
34. Hulin V, Girondot M, Godfrey MH, Guillon J-M. 2008 Mixed and uniform brood sex ratio strategy in turtles: the facts, the theory, and their consequences. InBiology of turtles(eds J Wyneken, MH Godfrey, V Bels), pp. 279-300. Chicago, IL: University Press of Chicago.
35. Freedberg S, Wade MJ. 2001 Cultural inheritance as a mechanism for population sex-ratio bias in reptiles. Evolution55, 1049-1055. (doi: 10. 1554/ 0014-3820(2001)055[1049: CIAAMF]2. 0. CO; 2)