Interbirth intervals Intrafamilial, intragenomic and intrasomatic conflict

Evolution, Medicine and Public Health

Volumn 2014, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 12-17

  Haig, David ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Genomic imprinting; Interbirth interval; Microchimerism; Parent offspring conflict; Secondary infertility

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIRTH CONTROL; BIRTH SPACING; DD GENE; FAMILY CONFLICT; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE FERTILITY; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOSS; GENOME IMPRINTING; HOMOZYGOTE; HUMAN; MATING; MICROCHIMERISM; NATURAL SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; WAKEFULNESS;

EID: 84908546151     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20506201     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/emph/eou002     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Hobcraft JN, McDonald JW, Rutstein SO. Demographic determinants of infant and early child mortality: a comparative analysis. Pop Stud 1985;39:363-85.
2. DaVanzo J, Hale L, Razzaque A et al. The effects of pregnancy spacing on infant and child mortality in Matlab, Bangladesh: how they vary by the type of pregnancy outcome that began the interval. Pop Stud 2008;62:131-54.
3. Fotso JF, Cleland J, Mberu B et al. Birth spacing and child mortality: an analysis of prospective data from the Nairobi urban health and demographic surveillance system. J Biosoc Sci 2013;45:779-98.
4. Evers JHL. Female subfertility. Lancet 2002;360:151-9.
5. Hill K, Kaplan H. Life history traits in humans: theory and empirical studies. Annu Rev Anthropol 1999;28: 397-430.
6. Smith CC, Fretwell SD. The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am Nat 1974;108:499-506.
7. Trivers RL. Parent-offspring conflict. Am Zool 1974;14: 249-64.
8. Blurton Jones NG, da Costa E. A suggested adaptive value of toddler night waking: delaying the birth of the next sibling. Ethol Sociobiol 1987;8:135-42.
9. Haig D. Troubled sleep: night waking, breastfeeding, and parent-offspring conflict. Evol Med Pub Health 2014, in press.
10. Nelson JL. The otherness of self: microchimerism in health and disease. Trends Immunol 2012;33:421-7.
11. Haig D. Genomic imprinting and the theory of parentoffspring conflict. Semin Dev Biol 1992;3:153-60.
12. Nicholls RD, Knepper JL. Genome organization, function, and imprinting in Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2001;2:153-75.
13. Cassidy SB, Driscoll DJ. Prader-Willi syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet 2008;17:3-13.
14. Pelc K, Cheron G, Boyd SG et al. Are there distinctive sleep problems in Angelman syndrome? Sleep Med 2008;9: 434-41.
15. Haig D, Wharton R. Prader-Willi syndrome and the evolution of human childhood. Am J Hum Biol 2003;15:320-9. 16.U beda F. Evolution of genomic imprinting with biparental care: implications for Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes. PLoS Biol 2008;6:e208.
16. Úbeda F. Evolution of genomic imprinting with biparental care: implications for Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes. PLoS Biol 2008;6:e208.
17. Haig D. Transfers and transitions: parent-offspring conflict, genomic imprinting, and the evolution of human life history. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:1731-35.
18. Bianchi DW, Zickwolf GK, Weil GJ et al. Male fetal progenitor cells persist in maternal blood for as long as 27 years postpartum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:705-8.
19. Haig D. What is a marmoset?AmJ Primat 1999;49:285-96.
20. Haig D. The social gene. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds). Behavioural Ecology, 4th edn. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1997, 284-304.
21. Johnson KL, Samura O, Nelson JL et al. Significant fetal cell microchimerism in a nontransfused woman with hepatitis C: evidence of long-term survival and expansion. Hepatology 2002;36:1295-7.
22. Kara RJ, Bolli P, Karakikes I et al. Fetal cells traffic to injured maternal myocardium and undergo cardiac differentiation. Circ Res 2012;110:82-93.
23. Gammill HS, Guthrie KA, Aydelotte TM et al. Effect of parity on fetal and maternal microchimerism: interactions of grafts within a host? Blood 2010;116:2706-12.
24. Gammill HS, Waldorf KMA, AydelotteTMet al. Pregnancy, microchimerism, and the maternal grandmother. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e24101.
25. Dhimolea E, Denes V, Lakk M et al. High male chimerism in the female breast shows quantitative links with cancer. Int J Cancer 2013;133:835-42.
26. Gadi VK. Fetal microchimerism in breast from women with and without breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;121:241-4.
27. Kamper-Jørgensen M, Biggar RJ, Tjønneland A et al. Opposite effects of microchimerism on breast and colon cancer. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:2227-35.
28. Russo J, Moral R, Balogh GA et al. The protective role of pregnancy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2005;7: 131-42.
29. Hromadnikova I, Kotlabova K, Pirkova P et al. The occurrence of fetal microchimeric cells in endometrial tissues is a very common phenomenon in benign uterine disorders, and the lower prevalence of fetal microchimerism is associated with better uterine cancer prognoses. DNA Cell Biol 2014;33:40-8.
30. Taylor HS. Endometrial cells derived from donor stem cells in bone marrow transplant recipients. JAMA 2004; 292:81-5.
31. Khosrotehrani K, Johnson KL, Lau J et al. The influence of fetal loss on the presence of fetal cell microchimerism. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:3237-41.
32. Haig D. Gestational drive and the green-bearded placenta. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:6547-51.
33. Haig D. Maternal-fetal interactions and MHC polymorphism. J Reprod Immunol 1997;35:101-9.
34. Nielsen HS, Steffensen R, Lund M et al. Frequency and impact of obstetric complications prior and subsequent to unexplained secondary recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1543-52.
35. Nielsen HS, Mortensen L, Nygaard U et al. Brothers and reduction of the birth weight of later-born siblings. Am J Epidemiol 2007;167:480-4.
36. Bogaert AF. Biological versus nonbiological older brothers and men's sexual orientation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:10771-44.
37. Nielsen HS. Secondary recurrent miscarriage and H-Y immunity. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:558-74.