The impact of freedom on fertility decline

Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 44-50

  Campbell, Martha M ^a   Prata, Ndola ^a   Potts, Malcolm ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABORTION; CONCEPTION; CONTRACEPTION; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DEMOGRAPHY; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; FAMILY PLANNING; FAMILY SIZE; FERTILITY; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH BELIEF; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW; SEXUAL EDUCATION; SEXUAL INTERCOURSE; SOCIOECONOMICS; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; FREEDOM; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; INDUCED ABORTION; MALE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; STATISTICS; WOMEN'S HEALTH; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

ABORTION, INDUCED; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; CULTURE; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; FREEDOM; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; MALE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; WOMEN'S HEALTH; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84874414259     PISSN: 14711893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jfprhc-2012-100405     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Becker GS. A Treatise on the Family (Enlarged Edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991
2. Leibenstein HM. Economic Backwardness and Economic Growth. New York, NY: Wiley, 1957
3. Pritchett LH. Desired fertility and the impact of population policies. Popul Dev Rev 1994;20:1-55. (Pubitemid 24391371)
4. Potts M, Short RV, Mace R. Ever Since Adam and Eve: The Evolution of Human Sexuality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999
5. Haaga JG, Maru R. The effect of operations research on program changes in Bangladesh. Stud Fam Plann 1996;27:76-87.
6. Vining DR. Social versus reproductive success: the central theoretical problem of human sociobiology. Behav Brain Sci 1986;9:167-187.
7. Potts M. Sex and the birth rate: human biology, demographic change, and access to fertility-regulation methods. Popul Dev Rev 1997;23:1-39.
8. Potts M, Campbell M. History of contraception. In: Sciarra JJ, Dooley S, Depp R, et al. (eds). Gynecology and Obstetrics. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002;1-23.
9. Potts M, Campbell M. The origins and future of patriarchy: the biological background of gender politics. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2008;34:171-174. (Pubitemid 351976279)
10. Cleland J. Marital fertility decline in developing countries: theories and the evidence. In: Cleland JG, Hobcraft J (eds). Reproductive Change in Developing Countries: Insights from the World Fertility Survey. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1985;227.
11. Robinson W, Cleland J. The influence of contraceptive costs on the demand for children. In: Phillips JF, Ross JA (eds). Family Planning Programmes and Fertility. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1992;106-122.
12. Caldwell J. Direct economic costs and benefits of children. In: Bulatao R, John B (eds). Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries Supply and Demand for Children. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1983;458-493.
13. Curtis SL, Westoff CF. Intention to use contraceptives and subsequent contraceptive behavior in Morocco. Stud Fam Plann 1996;27:239-250. (Pubitemid 126619974)
14. Magnani RJ, Hotchkiss DR, Florence CS, et al. The impact of the family planning supply environment on contraceptive intentions and use in Morocco. Stud Fam Plann 1999;30:120-132. (Pubitemid 29429457)
15. Mason K. Gender and family systems in the fertility transition. In: Bulatao RA, Casterline JB (eds). Global Fertility Transition. New York, NY: Population Council, 2001;160-176.
16. Farooq GM, Adeokun LA. Impact of a rural family planning program in Ishan, Nigeria, 1969-72. Stud Fam Plann 1976;7:158-169.
17. Phillips JF, Hossain MB, Arends-Kuenning M. The long-term demographic role of community-based family planning in rural Bangladesh. Stud Fam Plann 1996;27:204-219.
18. Konje JC, Ladipo OA. Barriers to uptake and use of modern methods of contraception in developing countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999;65:287-294. (Pubitemid 29281584)
19. United Nations. Social Aspects of Sustainable Development in Bangladesh. New York, NY: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2003
20. Caldwell JC, Caldwell P. What does the Matlab fertility experience really show? Stud Fam Plann 1992;23:292-310. (Pubitemid 23369090)
21. Bertrand JT, Seiber E, Escudero G. Contraceptive dynamics in Guatemala: 1978-1998. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2001;27:112-136.
22. Bertrand J, de Salazar SG, Mazariegos L, et al. Promoting birthspacing among the Maya-Quiche of Guatemala. Int Fam Plan Perspect 1999;25:160-167.
23. Chacko E. Women's use of contraception in rural India: a village-level study. Health Place 2001;7:197-208. (Pubitemid 32611708)
24. Shelton JD, Bradshaw L, Hussein B, et al. Putting unmet need to the test: community-based distribution of family planning in Pakistan. Int Fam Plan Perspect 1999;25:191-195.
25. Debpuur C, Phillips JF, Jackson EF, et al. The impact of the Navrongo Project on contraceptive knowledge and use, reproductive preferences, and fertility. Stud Fam Plann 2002;33:141-164. (Pubitemid 34801292)
26. Noble J, Potts M. The fertility transition in Cuba and the Federal Republic of Korea: the impact of organised family planning. J Biosoc Sci 1996;28:211-225. (Pubitemid 26125321)
27. D'Agnes T. From Condoms to Cabbages. Bangkok, Thailand: Bangkok Post Books, 2001
28. Bhatia S. Contraceptive intentions and subsequent behavior in rural Bangladesh. Stud Fam Plann 1982;13:24-31.
29. Campbell M. Consumer behaviour and contraceptive decisions: resolving a decades-long puzzle. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2006;32:241-244. (Pubitemid 44620751)
30. Sheth J. Models of Buyer Behavior. New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1974
31. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations (3rd edn). New York, NY: Free Press, 1983
32. Casterline JB, Sathar ZA, ul Haque M. Obstacles to contraceptive use in Pakistan: a study in Punjab. Stud Fam Plann 2001;32:95-110. (Pubitemid 32657188)
33. United Nations Population Fund. Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population & Development (ICPD). Part One, Section VII: Reproductive Rights and Reproductive Health, B. Family Planning: Actions, 1994. http://www.unfpa.org/public/home/sitemap/icpd/International-Conference-on- Population-and-Development/ICPD-Programme#ch7b [accessed 17 August 2012].
34. Sahin-Hodoglugil N, Swift L, Campbell M, et al. Why sterilized so young? A mixed methods analysis of perceived contraceptive options and family planning experiences in Uttar Pradesh (Poster). American Public Health Association Meeting, Denver, CO, USA, 7-10 November 2010.
35. Swift L, Sahin-Hodoglugil N, Campbell M, et al. Role of fear and misinformation about contraceptives in unmet need: are we measuring it correctly? A case study from Uttar Pradesh (Poster). American Public Health Association Meeting, Denver, CO, USA, 7-10 November 2010
36. Campbell M, Sahin-Hodoglugil NN, Potts M. Barriers to fertility regulation: a review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann 2006;37:87-98. (Pubitemid 43905632)
37. Prata N, Gessessew A, Cartwright A, et al. Provision of injectable contraceptives in Ethiopia through community-based reproductive health agents. Bull World Health Organ 2011;89:556-564.
38. Casterline JB, Perez AE, Biddlecom AE. Factors underlying unmet need for family planning in the Philippines. Stud Fam Plann 1997;28:173-191.
39. El-Zanaty F, Way A, Kishor S, et al. Egypt Indepth Study on the Reasons for Nonuse of Family Planning: Results of a Panel Survey in Upper Egypt. Cairo, Egypt: National Population Council, 1999
40. Stash S. Explanations of unmet need for contraception in Chitwan, Nepal. Stud Fam Plann 1999;30:267-287. (Pubitemid 30132570)
41. Viswanathan H, Godfrey S, Yinger N. Reaching Women: A Study of Unmet Need in Uttar Pradesh, India. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women, 1998
42. Yinger NV. Unmet Need for Family Planning: Reflecting Women's Perceptions. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women, 1998
43. Hashmi SS, Alam K, Sheraz A. Non-Users and Unmet Need for Contraception. Islamabad, Pakistan: National Institute of Population Studies, 1993
44. Shah NM, Shah MA. From non-use to use: prospects of contraceptive adoption. In: Alam I, Dinesen B (eds). Fertility in Pakistan: A Review of Findings from the Pakistan Fertility Survey. The Hague, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute, 1984;149-162.
45. Casterline JB, Sinding SW. Unmet need for family planning in developing countries and implications for population policy. Popul Dev Rev 2000;26:691-723. (Pubitemid 32376191)
46. Grubb GS. Women's perceptions of the safety of the pill: a survey in 8 developing-countries. J Biosoc Sci 1987;19:313-321.
47. Potts M, Hunt WL. Over-the-counter availability of oral contraceptives. Infertility Reprod Med Clin North Am 2000;11:531-544.
48. Åhman E, Shah IH, Organization WH, et al. Unsafe Abortion: Global and Regional Estimates of the Incidence of Unsafe Abortion and Associated Mortality in 2008. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2011
49. Tietze C, Bongaarts J. Fertility rates and abortion rates: simulations of family limitation. Stud Fam Plann 1975;6:114-120.
50. Van der Tak J, David HP. Abortion, Fertility, and Changing Legislation: An International Review. Lexington, MA: Health and Company, 1974
51. David HP, Skilogianis J. From Abortion to Contraception. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1999
52. Kulczycki A. The Abortion Debate in the World Arena. New York, NY: Routledge, 1999
53. Potts DM. Family spacing and limitation - acceptable and effective techniques - still in future. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1977;199:129-144. (Pubitemid 8200821)
54. Montagu D, cited in, Campbell M, Bedford K. The theoretical and political framing of the population factor in development. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2009;364:3101-3113.
55. Campbell M, Bedford K. The theoretical and political framing of the population factor in development. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2009;364:3101-3113.
56. Davis K. Population policy: will current programs succeed? Grounds for skepticism concerning the demographic effectiveness of family planning are considered. Science 1967;158:730-739.
57. Ngo TD, Park MH, Shakur H, et al. Comparative effectiveness, safety and acceptability of medical abortion at home and in a clinic: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ 2011;89:360-370.
58. Prata N, Gessessew A, Campbell M, et al. 'A new hope for women': medical abortion in a low-resource setting in Ethiopia. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2011;37:196-197.
59. Rowlands S. Abortion pills: under whose control? J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2012;38:117-122.
60. Potts M, Diggory P, Peel J. Abortion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1970
61. Caldwell JC. The globalization of fertility behavior. In: Bulatao RA, Casterline JB (eds). Global Fertility Transition. New York, NY: Population Council, 2001;93-115.
62. Lichter I. (2012). Iran's war on women students may backfire. The Huffington Post, 30 August 2012. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ida-lichter-md/ iran-war-on-women-students-may-backfire-b-1833513.html [accessed 2 September 2012].
63. Bruce J, Bongaarts J. The new population challenge. In: Mazur LA (ed.). A Pivotal Moment: Population, Justice, and the Environmental Challenge. Covelo, CA: Island Press, 2010;260-275.
64. Lesthaeghe RJ. The Decline of Belgian Fertility, 1800-1970. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977
65. Axinn WG, Barber JS. Mass education and fertility transition. Am Sociol Rev 2001;66:481-505. (Pubitemid 32804556)
66. Choice not chance: family planning returns to the international development agenda. Economist 2012;404:53-54. http://www.economist.com/node/ 21558564 [accessed 17 August 2012].