CT-Colonography vs. colonoscopy for detection of high-risk sessile serrated polyps

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 111, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 516-522

  Ijspeert, J E G ^a   Tutein Nolthenius, C J ^a   Kuipers, E J ^b   Van Leerdam, M E ^c   Nio, C Y ^a   Thomeer, M G J ^b   Biermann, K ^b   Van De Vijver, M J ^a   Dekker, E ^a   Stoker, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c NETHERLANDS CANCER INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; GLUCAGON; MEGLUMINE IOXITALAMATE PLUS SODIUM IOXITALAMATE; MIDAZOLAM MALEATE; SCOPOLAMINE BUTYL BROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE SURVEILLANCE; ENDOSCOPIC INSUFFLATOR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM ADENOMA; SESSILE SERRATED POLYP; COLONIC POLYPS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; PROCEDURES; RISK FACTOR;

AGED; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84961878045     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.58     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 2013; 63: 11-30
2. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-Term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 67: 355-6
3. Bettington M, Walker N, Clouston A, et al. The serrated pathway to colorectal carcinoma: current concepts and challenges. Histopathology 2013; 62: 367-86
4. Jass JR. Classifi cation of colorectal cancer based on correlation of clinical, morphological and molecular features. Histopathology 2007; 50: 113-30
5. Toyota M, Ahuja N, Ohe-Toyota M, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 8681-6
6. Rex DK, Ahnen DJ, Baron J. a, et al. Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 1315-29. quiz 1314, 1330
7. Snover DC, Ahnen DJ, Burt RW, et al. Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum and serrated polyposis. In: Bosman T, Carneiro F, Hruban R, et al. (eds) WHO Classifi cation of Tumours of the Digestive System Lyon, 2010, 160-5
8. IJspeert JEG, Vermeulen L, Meijer GA, et al. Serrated neoplasia-role in colorectal carcinogenesis and clinical implications. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 12: 401-9
9. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 844-57
10. Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau J-M, et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 842-51
11. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008; 134: 1570-95
12. Spada C, Stoker J, Alarcon O, et al. Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline. Eur Radiol 2014; 25: 331-45
13. Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, et al. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection-systematic review and meta-Analysis. Radiology 2011; 259: 393-405
14. De Wijkerslooth TR, de Haan MC, Stoop EM, et al. Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterol 2010; 10: 47
15. Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR, et al. Participation and yield of colonoscopy vs. non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 55-64
16. De Haan MC, Nio CY, Th omeer M, et al. Comparing the diagnostic yields of technologists and radiologists in an invitational colorectal cancer screening program performed with CT colonography. Radiology 2012; 264: 771-8
17. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 873-85
18. Rostom A, Jolicoeur E. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 482-6
19. Schlemper RJ. The Vienna classifi cation of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000; 47: 251-5
20. De Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM, et al. Differences in proximal serrated polyp detection among endoscopists are associated with variability in withdrawal time. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 617-23
21. East JE, Vieth M, Rex DK. Serrated lesions in colorectal cancer screening: detection, resection, pathology and surveillance. Gut 2015; 64: 991-1000
22. Bouwens MWE, van Herwaarden YJ, Winkens B, et al. Endoscopic characterization of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps with and without dysplasia. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 225-35
23. Rosty C, Hewett DG, Brown IS, et al. Serrated polyps of the large intestine: current understanding of diagnosis, pathogenesis, and clinical management. J Gastroenterol 2013; 48: 287-302
24. Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL. Meta-Analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 635-50
25. Neri E, Halligan S, Hellstrom M, et al. The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 720-9
26. Seong HP, So YK, Seung SL, et al. Sensitivity of CT colonography for nonpolypoid colorectal lesions interpreted by human readers and with computer-Aided detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 70-8
27. Togashi K. Laterally spreading tumors: Limitations of computed tomography colonography. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 17552-7
28. Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Robbins JB, et al. Lesions identifi ed at CT colonography in a U.S. screening population. Acad Radiol 2010; 17: 784-90
29. Johnson CD, Chen M-H, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1207-17
30. Bertoni G, Sassatelli R, Conigliaro R, et al. Visual ?disappearing phenomenon? can reliably predict the nonadenomatous nature of rectal and rectosigmoid diminutive polyps at endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40: 588-91
31. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Nonadenomatous polyps at CT colonography: prevalence, size distribution, and detection rates. Radiology 2004; 232: 784-90
32. Hazewinkel Y, de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, et al. Prevalence of serrated polyps and association with synchronous advanced neoplasia in screening colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 219-24
33. Tadepalli US, Feihel D, Miller KM, et al. A morphologic analysis of sessile serrated polyps observed during routine colonoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1360-8
34. Kim DH, Hinshaw JL, Lubner MG, et al. Contrast coating for the surface of flat polyps at CT colonography: A marker for detection. Eur Radiol 2014; 24: 940-6
35. O?Connor SD, Summers RM, Choi JR, et al. Oral contrast adherence to polyps on CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006; 30: 51-7
36. Sali L, Mascalchi M, Falchini M, et al. Reduced and full-preparation CT colonography, fecal immunochemical test, and colonoscopy for population screening of colorectal cancer: a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016; 108: djv319