Oral contrast adherence to polyps on CT colonography

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 51-57

  O'Connor, Stacy D ^a   Summers, Ronald M ^a   Choi, J Richard ^b,c   Pickhardt, Perry J ^b,c,d  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^c WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

CT colonography; Oral contrast; Polyps; Virtual colonoscopy

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPY;

CONTRAST AGENT; CT COLONOGRAPHY; CT-SCAN; HIGH RATE; OPTICAL COLONOSCOPY; ORAL CONTRAST; POLYP; VIRTUAL COLONOSCOPY;

HISTOLOGY;

BARIUM SULFATE; BISACODYL; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIATRIZOATE; MEGLUMINE DIATRIZOATE; SODIUM DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE;

ADENOMATOUS POLYP; ADHESION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FECES; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTESTINE VILLUS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SUPINE POSITION;

EID: 30144439196     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000191686.35968.f1     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:10-30.
2. Johnson CD, Dachman AH. CT colonography: the next colon screening examination? Radiology. 2000;216:331-341.
3. Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC3rd, et al. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. [published erratum appears in N Engl J Med 2000;342(7):524.] N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1496-1503.
4. Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, et al. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology. 2001;219:685-692.
5. Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X, et al. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology. 2002;224:383-392.
6. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2191-2200.
7. Pickhardt PJ. Translucency rendering in 3D endoluminal CT colonography: a useful tool for increasing polyp specificity and decreasing interpretation time. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:429-436.
8. Fidler JL, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, et al. Understanding interpretive errors in radiologists learning computed tomography colonography. Acad Radiol. 2004;11:750-756.
9. Macari M, Megibow AJ. Pitfalls of using three-dimensional CT colonography with two-dimensional imaging correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:137-143.
10. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, et al. CT colonography: potential pitfalls and problem-solving techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:1271-1278.
11. Lefere PA, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J, et al. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology. 2002;224:393-403.
12. Thomeer M, Carbone I, Bosmans H, et al. Stool tagging applied in thin-slice multidetector computed tomography colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003;27:132-139.
13. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JH. Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls with primary three-dimensional evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:799-805.
14. Sistrom CL, Garvan CW. Proportions, odds, and risk. Radiology. 2004;230:12-19.
15. Bewick V, Cheek L, Ball J. Statistics review 11: assessing risk. Crit Care. 2004;8:287-291.
16. Cummings OW. Pathology of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence: from aberrant crypt focus to invasive carcinoma. Semin Gastrointest Dis. 2000;11:229-237.
17. Bond JH. Clinical evidence for the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, and the management of patients with colorectal adenomas. Semin Gastrointest Dis. 2000;11:176-184.
18. Morson B. President's address. The polyp-cancer sequence in the large bowel. Proc R Soc Med. 1974;67:451-457.
19. Kim EC, Lance P. Colorectal polyps and their relationship to cancer. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1997;26:1-17.
20. Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer. 1975;36:2251-2270.
21. O'Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, et al. The National Polyp Study. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology. 1990;98:371-379.
22. Nusko G, Mansmann U, Altendorf-Hofmann A, et al. Risk of invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas assessed by size and site. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997;12:267-271.
23. Nicoloff DM, Ellis CM, Humphrey EW. Management of villous adenomas of the colon and rectum. Arch Surg. 1968;97:254-260.
24. Aldridge AJ, Simson JN. Histological assessment of colorectal adenomas by size. Are polyps less than 10 mm in size clinically important? Eur J Surg. 2001;167:777-781.
25. Gschwantler M, Kriwanek S, Langner E, et al. High-grade dysplasia and invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas: a multivariate analysis of the impact of adenoma and patient characteristics. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;14:183-188.
26. Byrd JC, Bresalier RS. Mucins and mucin binding proteins in colorectal cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2004;23:77-99.
27. Baldus SE, Hanisch FG. Biochemistry and pathological importance of mucin-associated antigens in gastrointestinal neoplasia. Adv Cancer Res. 2000;79:201-248.
28. Dahiya R, Itzkowitz SH, Byrd JC, et al. Mucin oligosaccharide biosynthesis in human colonie cancerous tissues and cell lines. Cancer. 1992;70:1467-1476.
29. Culling CF, Reid PE, Dunn WL, et al. The relevance of the histochemistry of colonic mucins based upon their PAS reactivity. Histochem J. 1981;13:889-903.
30. Shamsuddin AM, Elsayed AM. A test for detection of colorectal cancer. Hum Pathol. 1988;19:7-10.
31. Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL, et al. Significance of missed polyps at CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:127-134.
32. Dachman AH, Yoshida H. Virtual colonoscopy: past, present, and future. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003;41:377-393.
33. Pickhardt PJ. By-patient performance characteristics of CT colonography: importance of polyp size threshold data. Radiology. 2003;229:291-293.