Evaluating Model-Driven Development for large-scale EHRs through the openEHR approach

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 89, Issue , 2016, Pages 43-54

  Christensen, Bente ^a,b   Ellingsen, Gunnar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH NORWAY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Archetypes; Electronic health records; Model Driven Development; OpenEHR; Users

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE; STANDARDIZATION;

ARCHETYPES; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; MODEL DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT; OPENEHR; USERS;

PROCESS CONTROL;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EVALUATION STUDY; HEALTH CARE PRACTICE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCALE UP; STANDARDIZATION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORD; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84961873012     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Silsand L., Ellingsen G. Generification by translation: designing generic systems in context of the local. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2014, 15:177-196.
2. Pollock N., Williams R. e-Infrastructures: how do we know and understand them? strategic ethnography and the biography of artefacts. Comput. Support. Coop. Work CSCW 2010, 19:521-556. 10.1007/s10606-010-9129-4.
3. Lyytinen K. Different perspectives on information systems: problems and solutions. ACM Comput. Surv. 1987, 19:5-46. 10.1145/28865.28867.
4. Selic B. The pragmatics of model-driven development. IEEE Softw. 2003, 20:19-25. 10.1109/MS.2003.1231146.
5. Raghupathi W., Umar A. Exploring a model-driven architecture (MDA) approach to health care information systems development. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2008, 77:305-314.
6. Blobel B., Goossen W., Brochhausen M. Clinical modeling-a critical analysis. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2014, 83:57-69. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.09.003.
7. Beale, T and S Heard, Archetype Definitions and Principles in The openEHR foundation release 1 .0., in: Proc MedInfo, 2007.
8. Martínez-Costa C., Menárguez-Tortosa M., Fernández-Breis J.T., Maldonado J.A. A model-driven approach for representing clinical archetypes for Semantic Web environments. J. Biomed. Inform. 2009, 42:150-164. 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.05.005.
9. Lopez D.M., Blobel B.G.M.E. A development framework for semantically interoperable health information systems. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2009, 78:83-103. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.05.009.
10. H. Leslie S. Heard S. Garde I. McNicoll, Engaging clinicians in clinical content: herding cats or piece of cake? in: MIE (accessed 02.07.15.). 2009 125-129. http://person.hst.aau.dk/ska/MIE2009/papers/MIE2009p0125.pdf.
11. Schloeffe P. openEHR Archetypes: Putting the Clinician Back in the Driver's Seat (accessed 06.02.15). http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=931933150416511;res=IELHEA.
12. Evans E. Domain-Driven Design: Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software 2003, Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston. 1 edn.
13. Hutchinson J., Whittle J., Rouncefield M. Model-driven engineering practices in industry: social, organizational and managerial factors that lead to success or failure. Sci. Comput. Program. 2014, 89:144-161. (Part B). 10.1016/j.scico.2013.03.017.
14. Gremy and Bonnin Evaluation of automatic health information systems what and how?. Assessment and Evaluation of Information Technologies in Medicine 1995, IOS Press. E.M.S.J.V. Gennip, J.L. Talmon (Eds.).
15. Aarts J. Towards safe electronic health records: a socio-technical perspective and the need for incident reporting. Health Policy Technol. 2012, 1:8-15. 10.1016/j.hlpt.2012.01.008.
16. Aarts J., Ash J., Berg M. Extending the understanding of computerized physician order entry: implications for professional collaboration, workflow and quality of care. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2007, 76(Suppl. 1):S4-S13. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.009.
17. Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach. Int. J. Med. Inf. 1999, 55:87-101. 10.1016/S1386-5056(99) 00011-8.
18. Ellingsen G., Monteiro E., Røed K. Integration as interdependent workaround. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2013, 82:e161-e169. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.09.004.
19. Bird L., Goodchild A., Tun Z.Z. Experiences with a two-level modelling approach to electronic health records. J. Res. Pract. Inf. Technol. 2003, 35:121-138.
20. S. Garde, C.M., Hullin, R., Chen, T., Schuler, J., Granz, P. Knaup, et al. Towards sustainability of health information systems: how can we define, measure and achieve it?, in: Medinfo 2007 Proc. 12th World Congr. Health Med. Inform. Build. Sustain. Health Syst., IOS Press, 2007: p. 1179. (accessed 28.03.14.). http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=783646278953621;res=IELHSS.
21. Kopanitsa G., Veseli H., Yampolsky V. Development, implementation and evaluation of an information model for archetype based user responsive medical data visualization. J. Biomed. Inform. 2015, 55:196-205. 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.04.009.
22. Wollersheim D., Sari A., Rahayu W. Archetype-based electronic health records: a literature review and evaluation of their applicability to health data interoperability and access. Health Inf. Manag. J. 2009, 38:7-17.
23. S. Sachdeva S. Bhalla Semantic Interoperability in Healthcare Information for EHR Databases S. Kikuchi S. Sachdeva S. Bhalla Databases Networked Inf. Syst, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010: 157-173. (accessed 08.04.15). http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-12038-1_11.
24. Beale T. Archetypes: Constraint-based domain models for future-proof information systems, in: OOPSLA 2002 Workshop Behav. Semant. (accessed 04.04.14). http://gpo.asu.tusur.ru/p/MIS/export/35/%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B4/archetypes_beale_oopsla_2002.pdf.
25. Z. Tun, L.J., Bird, A. Goodchild, Validating Electronic Health Records Using Archetypes and XML, 2002.
26. Kelly S., Tolvanen J.-P. Domain-Specific Modeling: Enabling Full Code Generation 2008, Wiley-IEEE Computer Society Press, Hoboken, N.J. 1 edn.
27. Martínez-Costa C., Menárguez-Tortosa M., Fernández-Breis J.T. An approach for the semantic interoperability of ISO EN 13606 and OpenEHR archetypes. J. Biomed. Inform. 2010, 43:736-746. 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.05.013.
28. Lycett M., Marcos E., Storey V. Model-driven systems development: an introduction. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2007, 16:346-348. 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000684.
29. Martínez Costa C., Menárguez-Tortosa M., Fernández-Breis J.T. Clinical data interoperability based on archetype transformation. J. Biomed. Inform. 2011, 44:869-880. 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.05.006.
30. van der Zel M., Goossen W. Bridging the gap between software developers and healthcare professionals. Model Driven Application Development. Hosp. Inf. Technol. Eur. 2010, 3:20-22.
31. Rector A.L. Clinical terminology: why is it so hard?. Methods Inf. Med. 1999, 38:239-252.
32. Johnson M., Mozaffar H., Campagnolo G.M., Hyysalo S., Pollock N., Williams R. The managed prosumer: evolving knowledge strategies in the design of information infrastructures. Inf. Commun. Soc. 2013, 1-19. 10.1080/1369118X.2013.830635.
33. Meizoso García M., Iglesias Allones J.L., Martínez Hernández D., Taboada Iglesias M.J. Semantic similarity-based alignment between clinical archetypes and SNOMED CT: an application to observations. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2012, 81:566-578. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.007.
34. Pahl C., Zare M., Nilashi M., de Faria Borges M.A., Weingaertner D., Detschew V., et al. Role of OpenEHR as an open source solution for the regional modelling of patient data in obstetrics. J. Biomed. Inform. 2015, 55:174-187. 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.04.004.
35. Andrews L., Gajanayake R., Sahama T. The Australian general public's perceptions of having a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR). Int. J. Med. Inf. 2014, 83:889-900. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.08.002.
36. Garde S., Knaup P., Hovenga E., Heard S. Towards semantic interoperability for electronic health records. Methods Inf. Med. 2007, 46:332-343. 10.1160/ME5001.
37. Buck J., Garde S., Kohl C.D., Knaup-Gregori P. Towards a comprehensive electronic patient record to support an innovative individual care concept for premature infants using the openEHR approach. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2009, 78:521-531. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.03.001.
38. Späth M.B., Grimson J. Applying the archetype approach to the database of a biobank information management system. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2011, 80:205-226. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.11.002.
39. Wollersheim D., Sari A., Rahayu W. Archetype-based electronic health records: a literature review and evaluation of their applicability to health data interoperability and access. HIM J. 2009, 38:7-17.
40. Atalag K., Kingsford D., Paton C., Warren J. Putting health record interoperability standards to work. Electron. J. Health Inform. 2009, 5:1.
41. Chen C., Garrido T., Chock D., Okawa G., Liang L. The kaiser permanente electronic health record: transforming and streamlining modalities of care. Health Aff. Proj. Hope. 2009, 28:323-333. 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.323.
42. Baxter G., Sommerville I. Socio-technical systems: from design methods to systems engineering. Interact. Comput. 2011, 23:4-17. 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.003.
43. K. Bernstein, I., Tvede, J., Petersen, K. Bredegaard, Can openEHR archetypes be used in a national context? The Danish archetype proof-of-concept project., in: MIE, 2009: pp. 147-151. (accessed 07.04.14.). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/26803547_Can_openEHR_archetypes_be_used_in_a_national_context_The_Danish_archetype_proof-of-concept_project/file/e0b4952bb72a6811f0.pdf.
44. Christensen B., Silsand L., Wynn R., Ellingsen G. The biography of participation. Proc. 13th Particip. Des. Conf. Short Pap. Ind. Cases Workshop Descr. Dr. Consort. Pap. Keynote Abstr 2014, 71-74. 10.1145/2662155.2662183.
45. Ash J.S., Sittig D.F., Dykstra R.H., Guappone K., Carpenter J.D., Seshadri V. Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2007, 76(Suppl. 1):S21-S27. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.017.
46. Ash J., Berg M. Report of conference Track 4: socio-technical issues of HIS. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2003, 69:305-306. 10.1016/S1386-5056(02) 00180-6.
47. Klein H.K., Myers M.D. A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q. 1999, 67-93.
48. Walsham G. Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 1995, 4:74-81. 10.1057/ejis.1995.9.
49. Forsythe D.E. It's just a matter of common sense: ethnography as invisible work. Comput. Support. Coop. Work CSCW. 1999, 8:127-145. 10.1023/A:1008692231284.
50. Leonardi P.M. Crossing the implementation line: the mutual constitution of technology and organizing across development and use activities. Commun. Theory 2009, 19:278-310. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01344.x.
51. Mackay H., Carne C., Beynon-Davies P., Tudhope D. Reconfiguring the user: using rapid application development. Soc. Stud. Sci. 2000, 30:737-757. 10.1177/030631200030005004.
52. Edwards P.N., Jackson S.J., Bowker G.C., Knobel C.P. Understanding Infrastructure: Dynamics, Tensions and Design (accessed 11.02.14.). http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/49353.
53. Hanseth O., Lyytinen K. Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet. J. Inf. Technol. 2010, 25:1-19. 10.1057/jit.2009.19.
54. Ellingsen G. Tightrope walking standardisation meets local work-practice in a hospital. Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res. IJITSR 2004, 2:1-22.
55. NHS Interoperability Handbook (accessed 21.09.2015). https://www.england.nhs.uk/digitaltechnology/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2015/09/interoperabilty-handbk.pdf.
56. Microsoft Microsoft Health Framework, part 1 (accessed 23.03.2015). http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/health/solutions/connected-health-framework/default.aspx#fbid=6rRHfIq1tzU.
57. National ICT Service-based architecture for specialized health services (Action 12). (accessed 04.11.14. arxiv:/www.nasjonalikt.no.
58. National ICT Use of archetype methodology for definingmaking available and using clinical information models in health information systems (Action 41) (accessed 04.11.14). arxiv:/www.nasjonalikt.no.
59. (accessed 04.11.2015). http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#.
60. ISO TS 13972:2015. Technical Specification. Health informatics-Detailed clinical models, characteristics and processes. Geneva, I nternational Organization for Standardization, Technical Committee 215Health Informatics. (accessed 23.01.16.). http://www.iso.org.