The Australian general public's perceptions of having a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR)

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 83, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 889-900

  Andrews, Lynda ^a   Gajanayake, Randike ^a   Sahama, Tony ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Attitude; Australia; E service; Electronic health records; Personal; Technology acceptance

Indexed keywords

EHEALTH; FACTOR ANALYSIS; RECORDS MANAGEMENT; SURVEYS;

ATTITUDE; AUSTRALIA; E- SERVICES; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; PERSONAL; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE;

RISK PERCEPTION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; AUSTRALIAN; CONSUMER; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MIDDLE AGED; MINICOMPUTER; MOBILE PHONE; MOTIVATION; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIVACY; PUBLIC OPINION; SELF CONCEPT; THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR; TRUST; YOUNG ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AUSTRALIA; COMPUTER SECURITY; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; MEDICAL RECORD; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT RIGHT; PERCEPTION; UTILIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTER SECURITY; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH RECORDS, PERSONAL; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCESS TO RECORDS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERCEPTION; QUEENSLAND; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84919394777     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Greenhalgh T., Morris L., Wyatt J.C., Thomas G., Gunning K. Introducing a nationally shared electronic patient record: case study comparison of Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2013, 82(May):125-138.
2. Tang P.C., Ash J.S., Bates D.W., Overhage J.M., Sands D.Z. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2006, 13:121-126.
3. Saparova D. Motivating, influencing, and persuading patients through personal health records: a scoping review. Perspect Health. Inf. Manage. 2012, 9(Summer).
4. Archer N., Fevrier-Thomas U., Lokker C., McKibbon K., Straus S. Personal health records: a scoping review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2011, 18:515-522.
5. Kim J., Jung H., Bates D.W. History and trends of 'personal health records' research in PubMed. Healthc. Inform. Res. 2011, 17(1):3-17.
6. Morrison Z., Robertson A., Cresswell K., Crowe S., Sheikh A. Understanding contrasting approaches to nationwide implementations of electronic health record systems: England, the USA and Australia. J. Healthc. Eng. 2011, 2(1):25-42.
7. Bowden T., Coiera E. Comparing New Zealand's 'Middle Out' health information technology strategy with other OECD nations. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2012, 82(May):87-95.
8. Coiera E. Building a national health IT system from the middle out. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2009, 16:271-273.
9. Pyper C., Amery J., Watson M., Crook C. Patients' experiences when accessing their on-line electronic patient records in primary care. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2004, 54(498):38.
10. Winkelman W.J., Leonard K.J., Rossos P.G. Patient-perceived usefulness of online electronic medical records: employing grounded theory in the development of information and communication technologies for use by patients living with chronic illness. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2005, 12:306-314.
11. Kim J., Bates D.W. Analysis of the definition and utility of personal health records using Q methodology. J. Med. Internet Res. 2011, 13(4):105.
12. Day K., Gu Y. Influencing factors for adopting personal health record (PHR). Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2012, 178:39-44.
13. Agarwal R., Anderson C., Zarate J., Ward C. If we offer it, will they accept? Factors affecting patient use intentions of personal health records and secure messaging. J. Med. Internet Res. 2013, 15(3):43.
14. Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1993, 38(3):475-487.
15. Emani S., Yamin C.K., Peters E., Karson A.S., Lipsitz S.R., Wald J.S., Williams D.H., Bates D.W. Patient perceptions of a personal health record: a test of the diffusion of innovation model. J. Med. Internet Res. 2012, 14(6):150.
16. Moore G.C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Syst. Res. 1991, 2(3):192-222.
17. Schuster L., Drennan J.C., Lings I. Consumer acceptance of m-wellbeing services: a social marketing perspective. Eur. J. Mark. 2013, 47(9):1439-1457.
18. Hsu M.-H., Chiu C.-M. Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decis. Support Syst. 2004, 38(3):369-381.
19. McDonald K. Half a Million PCEHR Registrations Still Achievable: DoHA, Pulse+IT 2013, Available from: http://www.pulseitmagazine.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1317:half-a-million-pcehr-registrations-still-achievable-doha&catid=16:australian-ehealth&Itemid=328%5C (cited 23.07.13).
20. McDonald K. PCEHR Registrations Hit 250, 000 as Hospitals Come Online. Pulse+IT 2013, Available from: http://www.pulseitmagazine.com.au/index.php?.option=com_content&view=article&id=1458:pcehr-registrations-hit-250000-as-hospitals-come-online&catid=16:australian-ehealth&Itemid=328 (cited 23.07.13).
21. Cresswell K., Sheikh A. Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: an interpretative review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2012, 82(May):73-86.
22. Holden R.J., Karsh B.-T. Methodological review: the technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J. Biomed. Inf. 2010, 43(1):159-172.
23. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Org. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50(2):179-211.
24. Andrews L., Cacho-Elizondo S., Drennan J., Tossan V. Consumer acceptance of an SMS-assisted smoking cessation intervention: a multicountry study. Health Mark. Q. 2013, 30(1):47-62.
25. Schaper L., Pervan G. ICT and OTs: a model of information and communication technology acceptance and utilisation by occupational therapists. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007, 76(June):212-221.
26. Andrews L., Kiel G., Drennan J., Boyle M.V., Weerawardena J. Gendered perceptions of experiential value in using web-based retail channels. Eur. J. Mark. 2007, 41(5/6):640-658.
27. Bianchi C., Andrews L. Risk, trust, and consumer online purchasing behaviour: a Chilean perspective. Int. Mark. Rev. 2012, 29(3):253-275.
28. Queensland Government Queensland Population Counter 2013, Available from: http://www.oesr.qld.gov.au/products/briefs/pop-growth-qld/qld-pop-counter.php (cited 24.04.13).
29. Queensland Government Advantages of Bringing An e-Health Business to Queensland 2013, Available from: http://www.business.qld.gov.au/invest/investing-queenslands-industries/investing-queenslands-ict-industries/investing-e-health-industry/advantages-bringing-e-health-business (cited 24.04.13).
30. McCole P., Ramsey E., Williams J. Trust considerations on attitudes towards online purchasing: the moderating effect of privacy and security concerns. J. Bus. Res. 2010, 63(9):1018-1024.
31. Oliver R.L., Bearden W.O. Crossover effects in the theory of reasoned action: a moderating influence attempt. J. Consum. Res. 1985, 12(3):324-340.
32. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 2012, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.
33. King T., Brankovic L., Gillard P. Perspectives of Australian adults about protecting the privacy of their health information in statistical databases. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2012, 81(April):279-289.
34. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 51(6):1173-1182.
35. Kerai P., Wood P., Martin M. A pilot study on the views of elderly regional Australians of personally controlled electronic health records. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2014, 83(March):201-209.
36. Whiddett R., Hunter I., Engelbrecht J., Handy J. Patients' attitudes towards sharing their health information. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2006, 75(July):530-541.
37. Hyppönen H., Saranto K., Vuokko R., Mäkelä-Bengs P., Doupi P., Lindqvist M., Mäkelä M. Impacts of structuring the electronic health record: a systematic review protocol and results of previous reviews. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2014, 83(March):159-169.