Clinical modeling-A critical analysis

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 57-69

  Blobel, Bernd ^a   Goossen, William ^b   Brochhausen, Mathias ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b WINDESHEIM UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Architectural framework; Clinical models; Data elements; Knowledge representation; Ontologies

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL FRAMEWORKS; DATA ELEMENTS; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING; ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY VIEWS; EVOLUTIONARY POTENTIAL; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; ONTOLOGY;

MODELS;

ARTICLE; BIOCHEMISTRY; BIOMEDICINE; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH SERVICE; INTEGRATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEANINGFUL USE CRITERIA; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ARCHITECTURAL FRAMEWORK; CLINICAL MODELS; DATA ELEMENTS; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; ONTOLOGIES;

COMMUNICATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SAFETY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84888440335     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Blobel B. Architectural approach to eHealth for enabling paradigm changes in health. Methods Inf. Med. 2010, 49(2):123-134.
2. OMG The CORBA Security Specification 1995, OMG, (Doc.No. 95-12-01).
3. Bertalanffy L. General Systems Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications 1968, Braziller, New York.
4. Smith B., Klagges B.R.E. Philosophy and biomedical research. Allg. Z. Philos. 2005, 30(1):5-26. (in German) www.ontology.buffalo.edu/bio/Lebensformen.pdf (accessed 30.12.12).
5. Arp R., Smith B. Function, role and disposition in basic formal ontology. Nat. Precedings 2012, hdl:10101/npre.2008.1941.1 (posted 02.06.08; accessed: 30.12.12).
6. Smith B. Introduction to Biomedical Ontologies. Training Course 2008, University at Buffalo, (accessed 30.12.12). http://ontology.buffalo.edu/08/TrainingCourse/Slides.pdf.
7. Herre H., Heller B., Burek P., Hoehndorf R., Loebe F., Michalek H. General formal ontology (GFO) - Part I: Basic principles 2006, Technical Report 8, Onto-Med, University of Leipzig.
8. Smith B. Beyond concepts: ontology as reality representation. Proceedings of FOIS 2004.
9. Blobel B., Brochhausen M., Gonzalez Serrano C., Lopez D., Oemig F. A system-theoretical, architecture-based approach to ontology management. Quality of Life through Quality of Information, Series Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 180 2012, 1087-1089. IOS Press, Amsterdam, Berlin, Oxford, Tokyo, Washington. J. Mantas, S.K. Andersen, M.C. Mazzoleni, B. Blobel, S. Quaglini, A. Moen (Eds.).
10. Blobel B. Assessment of middleware concepts using a generic component model. Proceedings of the Conference "Toward An Electronic Health Record Europe'97" 1997, 221-228.
11. Blobel B. Application of the component paradigm for analysis and design of advanced health system architectures. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2000, 60(3):281-301.
12. Blobel B. Standards and solutions for architecture based, ontology driven and individualized pervasive health. pHealth 2012, Series Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 177 2012, 147-157. IOS Press, Amsterdam, Berlin, Oxford, Tokyo, Washington. B. Blobel, P. Pharow, F. Sousa (Eds.).
13. Smith B., Ashburner M., Rosse C., et al. The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25(11):1251-1255.
14. BFO2: http://code.google.com/p/bfo/.
15. Schulz S., Stenzhorn H., Boeker M., Smith B. Strengths and limitations of formal ontologies in the biomedical domain. Rev. Electron. Comun. Inf. Inov. Saude 2009, 3(1):31-45.
16. Goossen W., Goossen-Baremans A., van der Zel M. Detailed clinical models: a review. Healthc. Inform. Res. 2010, 16(4):201-214. http://pdf.medrang.co.kr/Hir/2010/016/Hir016-04-01.pdf (accessed 30.12.12). 10.4258/hir.2010.16.4.201.
17. Blobel B. About the mechanism of information processing and energy transformation in bioreceptors - a general and membrane structure related transducer model 1976, Technische Hochschule "Otto von Guericke" Magdeburg, Magdeburg, (in German, Ph.D. Thesis).
18. Akerman A., Tyree J. Using ontology to support development of software architectures. IBM Syst. J. 2006, 45(4):813-815.
19. Health Level 7 International Inc. Reference Information Model (RIM). (accessed 30.06.13). http://www.hl7.org/.
20. ISO 13606 Health informatics - EHR communication. (accessed 30.06.13). http://www.iso.org/.
21. openEHR Foundation. (accessed 30.06.13). http://www.openehr.org/.
22. Health Level 7 International. HL7 Clinical Templates. (accessed: 30.06.13). http://www.hl7.org/.
23. CIMI Reference Model Report, Draft V 0.3, May 2012.
24. ISO 13972 Health informatics - Requirements and methodology for Detailed Clinical Models. (accessed 16.07.13). http://www.iso.org/.
25. Lankhorst M., et al. Enterprise Architecture at Work, The Enterprise Engineering Series 2009, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.
26. ISO/IEC 10746 Information technology - Reference Model Open Distributed Processing. (accessed: 30.12.12). http://www.iso.org/.
27. Blobel B., Ontologies Knowledge representation, artificial intelligence - hype or prerequisite for International pHealth Interoperability?. e-Health Across Borders Without Boundaries. E-salus trans confinia sine finibus. Series Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 165 2011, 11-20. IOS Press, Amsterdam, Berlin, Oxford, Tokyo, Washington. L. Stoicu-Tivadar, B. Blobel, T. Marčun, A. Orel (Eds.).
28. Fielding J.M., Simon J., Ceusters W., Smith B. Ontological theory for ontological engineering: biomedical systems information integration. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR2004) 2004.
29. Rosse C., Kumar A., Mejino J.L.V., Cook D.L., Detwiler L.T., Smith B. A strategy for improving and integrating biomedical ontologies. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2005, 2005:639-643.
30. Freriks G., de Moore G., Kalra D. White paper: Archetype paradigm: an ICT revolution is needed. The EPR of the future demands flexible plug-and-play exchange between ICT systems. Version 1.0, UCL 2007 2007.
31. Beale T. openEHR Archetype Query Language Description 2012, (accessed: 30.12.12). http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/spec/Archetype+Query+Language+Description.
32. IHTSDO: SNOMED CT. (accessed: 30.06.13). http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct/.
33. Beale T. openEHR ADL & AOM 1. 5 - Templates and Specialised Archetypes 2012, openEHR Foundation, (accessed: 30.12.12). http://www.openehr.org/.
34. Blobel B. Ontology driven health information systems architectures enable pHealth for empowered patients. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2011, 80:e17-e25.
35. Dolin R.H., Alschuler L., Boyer S., Beebe C., Behlen F.M., Biron P.V., Shabo A. HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2006, 13:30-39.
36. Health Level 7 Inc. SOA Workgroup. (accessed: 30.1212). http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/.
37. Beale T. Archetype Object Model AOM 2.1 2012, openEHR Foundation, (accessed: 30.12.12). http://www.openehr.org/.
38. Beale T., Heard S. Archetype Definition Language ADL 1.5 2012, openEHR Foundation, (accessed: 30.12.12). http://www.openehr.org/.
39. Object Management Group Inc. Unified Modeling Language (UML) 2.0 2012, (accessed: 30.12.12). http://www.omg.org/.
40. Object Management Group Inc. Object Constraint Language (OCL) 2.2 2012, (accessed: 30.12.12). http://www.omg.org/spec/OCL/2.2.
41. The Open Group Service-Oriented Architecture Ontology 2010, (accessed: 30.12.12). http://www.opengroup.org/.
42. Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC®). (accessed: 30.12.12). http://www.loinc.org/.
43. Goossen W.T.F. Using detailed clinical models to bridge the gap between clinicians and HIT. Collaborative Patient Centred eHealth. Proceedings of the HIT@Healthcare 2008 2008, 3-10. IOS Press, Amsterdam. E. De Clercq (Ed.).
44. Goossen W.T.F., Goossen-Baremans A.T.M. Bridging the HL7 Template - 13606 Archetype gap with Detailed Clinical Models. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2010, 160(Pt 2):932-936.
45. van der Zel M., Goossen W. Bridging the gap between software developers and healthcare professionals. Model Driven Application Development. Hosp. Inform. Technol. Eur. 2010, 3(2):20-22.
46. Blobel B. Architectural Interoperability Framework. Proceedings of the 12th International HL7 Interoperability Conference IHIC 2011 "The TomorrowLand of Health" 2011, http://www.hl7.org/events/ihic2011/papers/IHIC_Blobel.
47. Smith B., Brochhausen M. Putting biomedical ontologies to work. Methods Inf. Med. 2008, 49(March (2)):135-140.
48. Brochhausen M., Blobel B. Architectural approach for providing relations in biomedical terminologies and ontologies. User Centred Networked Health Care - Proceedings of MIE 2011. Series Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 169 2011, 739-743. IOS Press, Amsterdam, Berlin, Oxford, Tokyo, Washington. A. Moen, S.K. Andersen, J. Aarts, P. Hurlen (Eds.).