Measurement of outflow facility using iPerfusion

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Sherwood, Joseph M ^a   Reina Torres, Ester ^a   Bertrand, Jacques A ^a   Rowe, Barnaby ^b   Overby, Darryl R ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; AQUEOUS HUMOR OUTFLOW; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED COMPUTERIZED INTERFACE; AUTOMATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONDUCTANCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMPIRICAL POWER LAW MODEL; ERROR; EX VIVO STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FLOW KINETICS; FLOW PRESSURE RELATIONSHIP; FLOW RATE; HYDRODYNAMIC CONDUCTANCE; INTERINDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY; INTRAINDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MOUSE; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; OCULAR PERFUSION; ORGAN PERFUSION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSOR; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; STEADY STATE; THERMAL FLOW SENSOR; TREATMENT VARIABILITY; UNCERTAINTY; VALIDATION PROCESS; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; GLAUCOMA; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERFUSION; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; GLAUCOMA; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; PERFUSION;

EID: 84961652510     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150694     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. The AGIS investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS):7. The Relationship Between Control of Intraocular Pressure and Visual Field Deterioration. American Journal of Opthalmology. 2000;130(4):429-440. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394 (00) 00538-9
2. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Hussein M. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2002;120(10):1268-1279. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.10.1268 PMID: 12365904
3. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Komaroff E, et al. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment-The Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2003;121(1):48-56. doi: 10.1001/archopht.121.1.48 PMID: 12523884
4. Grant WM. Clinical measurements of aqueous outflow. AMA Archives of Ophthalmology. 1951;46(2):113-131. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1951.01700020119001 PMID: 14856471
5. Quigley HA. Glaucoma. Lancet. 2011;377(9774):1367-1377. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736 (10) 61423-7 PMID: 21453963
6. Weinreb RN, Khaw PT. Primary open-angle glaucoma. The Lancet. 2004;363(9422):1711-1720. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736 (04) 16257-0
7. Kaufman PL, Rasmussen CA. Advances in glaucoma treatment and management: outflow drugs. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2012;53(5):2495-2500. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9483m
8. Stamer WD, Acott TS. Current understanding of conventional outflow dysfunction in glaucoma. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 2012;23(2):135-143. PMID: 22262082
9. Overby DR, Bertrand J, Schicht M, Paulsen F, Stamer WD, Lütjen-Drecoll E. The structure of the trabecular meshwork, its connections to the ciliary muscle, and the effect of pilocarpine on outflow facility in mice. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2014;55(6):3727-3736. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13699
10. Smith RS, Zabaleta A, Savinova O V, John SW. The mouse anterior chamber angle and trabecular meshwork develop without cell death. Biomed Central Developmental Biology. 2001;1:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-1-3 PMID: 11228591
11. Boussommier-Calleja A, Bertrand J, Woodward DF, Ethier CR, Stamer WD, Overby DR. Pharmacologic manipulation of conventional outflow facility in ex vivo mouse eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2012;53(9):5838-5845. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9923
12. Crowston JG, Aihara M, Lindsey JD, Weinreb RN. Effect of latanoprost on outflow facility in the mouse. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2004;45(7):2240-2245. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-0990
13. Millar JC, Clark AF, Pang IH. Assessment of aqueous humor dynamics in the mouse by a novel method of constant-flow infusion. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2011;52(2):685-694. doi: 10. 1167/iovs.10-6069
14. Whitlock NA, McKnight B, Corcoran KN, Rodriguez LA, Rice DS. Increased intraocular pressure in mice treated with dexamethasone. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2010;51(12):6496-6503. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5430
15. Dai Y, Lindsey JD, Duong-Polk X, Nguyen D, Hofer A, Weinreb RN. Outflow facility in mice with a targeted type I collagen mutation. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2009;50(12):5749-5753. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3367
16. Kumar S, Shah S, Tang HM, Smith M, Borrás T, Danias J. Tissue plasminogen activator in trabecular meshwork attenuates steroid induced outflow resistance in mice. PLoSONE. 2013;8(8):e72447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072447 PMID: 23977299
17. Shepard AR, Millar JC, Pang IH, Jacobson N, Wang WH, Clark AF. Adenoviral gene transfer of active human transforming growth factor-/32 elevates intraocular pressure and reduces outflow facility in rodent eyes. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2010;51(4):2067-10. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4567
18. Stamer WD, Lei Y, Boussommier-Calleja A, Overby DR, Ethier CR. eNOS, a pressure-dependent regulator of intraocular pressure. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2011;52(13):9438-9444. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7839
19. Zhang D, Vetrivel L, Verkman AS. Aquaporin deletion in mice reduces intraocular pressure and aqueous fluid production. The Journal of General Physiology. 2002;119(6):561-569. doi: 10.1085/jgp. 20028597 PMID: 12034763
20. Zhang Y, Davidson BR, Stamer WD, Barton JK, Marmorstein LY, Marmorstein AD. Enhanced inflow and outflow rates despite lower IOP in bestrophin-2-deficient mice. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2009;50(2):765-770. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2501
21. Aihara M, Lindsey JD, Weinreb RN. Aqueous humor dynamics in mice. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2003;44(12):5168-5173. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-0504
22. Gabelt BT, Kaufman PL. Aqueous humor hydrodynamics. In: Kaufman PL, Alm A, editors. Adler's Physiology of the Eye. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011. p. 237-289.
23. Brubaker RF. Goldmann's equation and clinical measures of aqueous dynamics. Experimental Eye Research. 2004;78(3):633-637. PMID: 15106943
24. Barany EH. Simultaneous measurement of changing intraocular pressure and outflow facility in the vervet monkey by constant pressure infusion. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 1964;3:135-143.
25. Lei Y, Overby DR, Boussommier-Calleja A, Stamer WD, Ethier CR. Outflow physiology of the mouse eye: pressure dependence and washout. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2011;52(3):1865-1871. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6019
26. Boussommier-Calleja A, Overby DR. The influence of genetic background on conventional outflow facility in mice. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2013;54(13):8251-8258. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13025
27. Johnson M, Erickson K. Mechanisms and routes of aqueous humor drainage. In: Albert DM, Jakobiec FA, editors. Principles and Practice of Opthalmology. Saunders; 2000. p. 2577-2595.
28. Yablonski ME. Letterto the editor: some thoughts on the pressure dependence of uveoscleral flow. Current Eye Research. 2003;12(1):90-92.
29. Ko MK, Yelenskiy A, Gonzalez JMJ, Tan JCH. Feedback-controlled constant-pressure anterior chamberperfusion in live mice. Molecular Vision. 2014;20:163-170. PMID: 24520185
30. Mermoud A, Baerveldt G, Minckler DS, Prata JA, Rao NA. Aqueous humor dynamics in rats. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 1996;234 Suppl 1:S198-203. doi: 10.1007/BF02343072 PMID: 8871174
31. Camras LJ, Sufficool KE, Camras CB, Fan S, Liu H, Toris CB. Duration of anesthesia affects intraocular pressure, but not outflow facility in mice. Current Eye Research. 2010;35(9):819-827. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2010.494241 PMID: 20795864
32. Wood GA. Data smoothing and differentiation procedures in biomechanics. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 1982;10(1):308-362. PMID: 6749517
33. Ethier CR, Ajersch P, Pirog R. An improved ocular perfusion system. Current Eye Research. 1993;12(8):765-770. doi: 10.3109/02713689308995773 PMID: 8222738
34. Kee C, Hong TM, Choi K. A sensitive ocular perfusion apparatus measuring outflow facility. Current Eye Research. 1997;16(12):1198-1201. doi: 10.1076/ceyr.16.12.1198.5023 PMID: 9426951
35. Limpert E, Stahel W, Abbt M. Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues. BioScience. 2001;51(5):341-352. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568 (2001) 051%5B0341:LNDATS%5D2.0. CO;2
36. Limpert E, Stahel WA. Problems with using the normal distribution- and ways to improve quality and efficiency of data analysis. PLoSONE. 2011;6(7):e21403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021403 PMID: 21779325
37. Leys C, Ley C, Klein O, Bernard P, Licata L. Detecting outliers: do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2013;49(4):764-766. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp. 2013.03.013
38. Pederson JE, Gaasterland DE, MacLellan HM. Uveoscleral aqueous outflow in the rhesus monkey: importance of uveal reabsorption. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 1977;16(11):1008-1007.
39. Brubaker RF. The effect of intraocular pressure on conventional outflow resistance in the enucleated human eye. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 1975;14(4):286-292.
40. Johnson MC, Kamm RD. The role of Schlemm's canal in aqueous outflow from the human eye. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 1983;24(3):320-325.
41. Boussommier-Calleja A, Li G, Wilson A, Ziskind T, Elena O, Ashpole NE et al. Physical factors affecting outflow facility measurements in mice. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2015;56(13):8331-8339. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17106
42. Moses RA. The effect of intraocular pressure on resistance to outflow. Survey of Opthalmology. 1977;22(2):88-100. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257 (77) 90088-1
43. Razali NM, Wah YB. Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics. 2011;2(1):21-33.
44. 4 receptor in the regulation of human outflow facility. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2011;52(6):3506-3508. doi: 10. 1167/iovs.10-6510
45. Woodward DF, Nilsson SFE, Toris CB, Kharlamb AB, Nieves AL, Krauss AHP. Prostanoid EP4 receptor stimulation produces ocular hypotension by a mechanism that does not appear to involve uveoscleral outflow. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2009;50(7):3320-3328. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3031
46. Chang JYH, Folz SJ, Laryea SN, Overby DR. Multi-scale analysis of segmental outflow patterns in human trabecular meshwork with changing intraocular pressure. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2014;30(2-3):213-223. doi: 10.1089/jop. 2013.0182 PMID: 24456518
47. Swaminathan SS, Oh DJ, Kang MH, Rhee DJ. Aqueous outflow: segmental and distal flow. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2014;40(8):1263-1272. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.020 PMID: 25088623
48. Ellingsen BA, Grant WM. The relationship of pressure and aqueous outflow in enucleated human eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 1971;10(6):430-437.
49. Alm A, Nilsson SFE. Uveoscleral outflow-A review. Experimental Eye Research. 2009;88:760-768. PMID: 19150349
50. Avila MY, Carre DA, Stone RA, Civan MM. Reliable measurement of mouse intraocular pressure by a servo-null micropipette system. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2001;42(8):1841-1846.
51. Burke JA, Potter DE. The ocular effects of xylazine in rabbits, cats, and monkeys. Journal of ocular pharmacology. 1986;2(1):9-21. doi: 10.1089/jop. 1986.2.9 PMID: 3503099
52. Cone FE, Steinhart MR, Oglesby EN, Kalesnykas G, Pease ME, Quigley HA. The effects of anesthesia, mouse strain and age on intraocular pressure and an improved murine model of experimental glaucoma. Experimental Eye Research. 2012;99:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2012.04.006 PMID: 22554836
53. Reitsamer HA, Kiel AW. A rabbit model to study orbital venous pressure, intraocular pressure, and ocular hemodynamics simultaneously. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2002;43(12):3728-3734.
54. Zamora DO, Kiel JW. Topical proparacaine and episcleral venous pressure in the rabbit. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2009;50(6):2949-2952. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3048
55. Sperber GO, Bill A. A method for near-continuous determination of aqueous humor flow; effects of anaesthetics, temperature and indomethacin. Exp Eye Res. 1984;39(4):435-453. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835 (84) 90044-7 PMID: 6389166
56. Yun H, Lathrop KL, Yang E, Sun M, Kagemann L, Fu V, et al. A laser-induced mouse model with longterm intraocular pressure elevation. PLoSONE. 2014;9(9):e107446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107446 PMID: 25216052