Effect of product recovery and sustainability enhancing indicators on the location selection of manufacturing facility

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 67, Issue , 2016, Pages 517-532

  Govindan, Kannan ^a   Garg, Kiran ^b   Gupta, Seema ^b   Jha, P C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELHI   (India)

Author keywords

Analytical Hierarchical Process; Extended Producer Responsibility; Factor analysis; Sustainable development; Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; FACTOR ANALYSIS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; LOCATION; MANUFACTURE; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; PLANNING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHICAL PROCESS; EXTENDED PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY; MANUFACTURING FACILITY; MANUFACTURING FIRMS; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUE; QUANTITATIVE CRITERIA; SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING; TECHNIQUE FOR ORDER PREFERENCE BY SIMILARITY TO IDEAL SOLUTIONS;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT; COST ANALYSIS; DECISION ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR; FACILITY LOCATION; FACTOR ANALYSIS; INDUSTRIAL LOCATION; LOCATION DECISION; MANUFACTURING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PRIORITIZATION; RECOVERY PLAN; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84961589841     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.035     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. S.H. Amin, and G. Zhang An integrated model for closed-loop supply chain configuration and supplier selection: Multi-objective approach Expert Syst. Appl. 39 8 2012 6782 6791
2. S.H. Amin, and G. Zhang A proposed mathematical model for closed-loop network configuration based on product life cycle Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 58 5-8 2012 791 801
3. S.H. Amin, and G. Zhang A multi-objective facility location model for closed-loop supply chain network under uncertain demand and return Appl. Math. Model. 37 6 2013 4165 4176
4. A. Awasthi, and G. Kannan Green supplier development program selection using NGT and VIKOR under fuzzy environment Comput. Ind. Eng. 91 2016 100 108
5. G. Banias, C. Achillas, C. Vlachokostas, N. Moussiopoulos, and S. Tarsenis Assessing multiple criteria for the optimal location of a construction and demolition waste management facility Build. Environ. 45 10 2010 2317 2326
6. M. Brandenburg, K. Govindan, J. Sarkis, and S. Seuring Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions Eur. J. Oper. Res. 233 2 2014 299 312
7. G. Büyüközkan, and Ç. Berkol Designing a sustainable supply chain using an integrated analytic network process and goal programming approach in quality function deployment Expert Syst. Appl. 38 11 2011 13731 13748
8. L. Calder Sustainability and the triple bottom line Aust. Age. Agenda 2013 36 37
9. C.R. Carter, and D.S. Rogers A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 38 5 2008 360 387
10. M. Cattafi, M. Gavanelli, M. Milano, and P. Cagnoli Sustainable biomass power plant location in the Italian Emilia-Romagna region ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (TIST) 2 4 2011 33
11. A. Chaabane, A. Ramudhin, and M. Paquet Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme Int. J. Prod. Econ. 135 1 2012 37 49
12. L. Chen, J. Olhager, and O. Tang Manufacturing facility location and sustainability: A literature review and research agenda Int. J. Prod. Econ. 149 2014 154 163
13. D. Choudhary, and R. Shankar An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India Energy 42 1 2012 510 521
14. F. Ciliberti, P. Pontrandolfo, and B. Scozzi Investigating corporate social responsibility in supply chains: A SME perspective J. Clean. Prod. 16 15 2008 1579 1588
15. J.M. Cruz The impact of corporate social responsibility in supply chain management: Multicriteria decision-making approach Decis. Support Syst. 48 1 2009 224 236
16. K. Das, and A.H. Chowdhury Designing a reverse logistics network for optimal collection, recovery and quality-based product-mix planning Int. J. Prod. Econ. 135 1 2012 209 221
17. L.Q. Dat, D.T. Truc Linh, S.Y. Chou, and V.F. Yu Optimizing reverse logistic costs for recycling end-of-life electrical and electronic products Expert Syst. Appl. 39 7 2012 6380 6387
18. F. Dehghanian, and S. Mansour Designing sustainable recovery network of end-of-life products using genetic algorithm Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 53 10 2009 559 570
19. K. Devika, A. Jafarian, and V. Nourbakhsh Designing a sustainable closed-loop supply chain network based on triple bottom line approach: A comparison of metaheuristics hybridization techniques Eur. J. Oper. Res. 235 3 2014 594 615
20. Y. Dou, and J. Sarkis A joint location and outsourcing sustainability analysis for a strategic offshoring decision Int. J. Prod. Res. 48 2 2010 567 592
21. H. Elkafi, C. Surti, and C. Searcy A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140 1 2012 69 82
22. EPI Environmental performance index summary for policy makers 2010 Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, Yale University and Center for International Earth Science Information Network, Columbia University
23. ̄. Ertuʇrul, and N. Karakaşoʇlu Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 39 7-8 2008 783 795
24. M. Eskandarpour, P. Dejax, J. Miemczyk, and O. Péton Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review Omega 54 2015 11 32
25. J. Fahy A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment? Int. Bus. Rev. 11 1 2002 57 77
26. R.Z. Farahani, M. SteadieSeifi, and N. Asgari Multiple criteria facility location problems: A survey Appl. Math. Model. 34 7 2010 1689 1709
27. D. Farzad, and S. Mansour Designing sustainable recovery network of end-of-life products using genetic algorithm Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 53 10 2009 559 570
28. H. Fauzi, G. Svensson, and A.A. Rahman Triple bottom line as sustainable corporate performance: A proposition for the future Sustainability 2 5 2010 1345 1360
29. A. Feldmann, and J. Olhager Plant roles: Site competence bundles and their relationships with site location factors and performance Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 33 6. 2013
30. K. Ferdows Shaping global operations J. Glob. Compet. Gov. 3 1 2009 13 148
31. I. Fernández, and M.C. Ruiz Descriptive model and evaluation system to locate sustainable industrial areas J. Clean. Prod. 17 1 2009 87 100
32. K. Govindan, and A. Chaudhuri Interrelationships of risks faced by third party logistics service providers: A DEMATEL based approach Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 2016
33. K. Govindan, and M.B. Jepsen Supplier risk assessment based on trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and ELECTRE TRI-C: A case illustration involving service suppliers J. Oper. Res. Soc. 67 2 2015 339 376
34. K. Govindan, and M.B. Jepsen ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250 1 2016 1 29
35. K. Govindan, P.C. Jha, and K. Garg Product recovery optimization in closed-loop supply chain to improve sustainability in manufacturing Int. J. Prod. Res. 2015 1 24
36. K. Govindan, M. Kaliyan, D. Kannan, and A.N. Haq Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process Int. J. Prod. Econ. 147 2014 555 568
37. K. Govindan, D. Kannan, and M. Shankar Evaluation of green manufacturing practices using a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with PROMETHEE Int. J. Prod. Res. 53 21 2015 6344 6371
38. K. Govindan, D. Kannan, and K.M. Shankar Evaluating the drivers of corporate social responsibility in the mining industry with multi-criteria approach: A multi-stakeholder perspective J. Clean. Prod. 84 2014 214 232
39. K. Govindan, R. Khodaverdi, and A. Vafadarnikjoo Intuitionistic fuzzy based DEMATEL method for developing green practices and performances in a green supply chain Expert Syst. Appl. 42 20 2015 7207 7220
40. K. Govindan, R. Khodaverdi, and A. Jafarian A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach J. Clean. Prod. 47 2013 345 354
41. K. Govindan, K.M. Shankar, and D. Kannan Application of fuzzy analytic network process for barrier evaluation in automotive parts remanufacturing towards cleaner production - A study in an Indian scenario J. Clean. Prod. 114 2016 199 213
42. K. Govindan, H. Soleimani, and D. Kannan Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future Eur. J. Oper. Res. 240 3 2015 603 626
43. A. Gunasekaran, and B. Kobu Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: A review of recent literature (1995-2004) for research and applications Int. J. Prod. Res. 45 12 2007 2819 2840
44. J.F. Hair Multivariate Data Analysis 2006 Pearson Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, NJ
45. S.L. Hart, and M.B. Milstein Creating sustainable value Acad. Manag. Exec. 17 2 2003 56 67
46. A.A. Hervani, M.M. Helms, and J. Sarkis Performance measurement for green supply chain management Benchmark.: Int. J. 12 4 2005 330 353
47. W. Ho, X. Xu, and P.K. Dey Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202 1 2010 16 24
48. C. Hsueh Improving corporate social responsibility in a supply chain through a new revenue sharing contract Int. J. Prod. Econ. 151 2014 214 222
49. C.L. Hwang, and K. Yoon Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications 1981 Springer Berlin, Heidelberg
50. D. Kannan, A.B.L. de Sousa Jabbour, and C.J.C. Jabbour Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company Eur. J. Oper. Res. 233 2 2014 432 447
51. D. Kannan, A. Diabat, M. Alrefaei, K. Govindan, and G. Yong A carbon footprint based reverse logistics network design model Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 67 2012 75 79
52. S.Y. Lee Drivers for the participation of small and medium-sized suppliers in green supply chain initiatives? Supply Chain Manag. 13 3 2008 185 198
53. C.N. Liao, and H.P. Kao An integrated fuzzy TOPSIS and MCGP approach to supplier selection in supply chain management Expert Syst. Appl. 38 9 2011 10803 10811
54. C. Lujie, J. Olhager, and O. Tang Manufacturing facility location and sustainability: A literature review and research agenda Int. J. Prod. Econ. 149 2014 154 163
55. A. Mardani, E.K. Zavadskas, K. Govindan, A. Amat Senin, and A. Jusoh VIKOR technique: A systematic review of the state of the art literature on methodologies and applications Sustainability 8 1 2016 37
56. R. Mitra Framing the corporate responsibility-reputation linkage: The case of Tata Motors in India Public Relat. Rev. 37 2011 392 398
57. L. Ocampo, E. Clark, and K.V. Tanudtanud Strategic responses decision model in developing a sustainable manufacturing strategy 2014 International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment and Management (HNICEM) 2014 IEEE 1 5
58. T. Özcan, N. Çelebi, and S. Esnaf Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methodologies and implementation of a warehouse location selection problem Expert Syst. Appl. 38 8 2011 9773 9779
59. E. Özceylan, and T. Paksoy A mixed integer programming model for a closed-loop supply-chain network Int. J. Prod. Res. 51 3 2013 718 734
60. M.S. Pishvaee, S.A. Torabi, and J. Razmi Credibility-based fuzzy mathematical programming model for green logistics design under uncertainty Comput. Ind. Eng. 62 2 2012 624 632
61. M.S. Pishvaee, J. Razmi, and S.A. Torabi Robust possibilistic programming for socially responsible supply chain network design: A new approach Fuzzy Sets Syst. 206 2012 1 20
62. Z. Qinghua, and J. Sarkis Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises J. Oper. Manag. 22 3 2004 265 289
63. A. Ramudhin, A. Chaabane, and M. Paquet Carbon market sensitive sustainable supply chain network design Int. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Manag. 5 1 2010 30 38
64. C. Reich-Weiser, and D.A. Dornfeld A discussion of green house gas emission tradeoffs and water scarcity within the supply chain J. Manuf. Syst. 28 1 2009 23 27
65. T.L. Saaty The Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980 McGraw-Hill New York
66. T.L. Saaty How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process Interfaces 24 6 1994 19 43
67. J. Sarkis The adoption of environmental and risk management practices: Relationships to environmental performance? Ann. Oper. Res. 145 1 2006 367 381
68. L. Shen, K. Mathiyazhagan, D. Kannan, and W. Ying Study on analysing the criteria's for selection of shipping carriers in Chinese shipping market using analytical hierarchy process Int. J. Shipp. Transp. Logist. 7 6 2015 742 757
69. W.J. Stevenson Production/Operations Management 4th edn 1993 Richard D. Irwin Inc. Homewood
70. C.S. Tang, and S. Zhou Research advances in environmentally and socially sustainable operations? Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223 3 2012 585 594
71. S. Terouhid, R. Rie, and M. Fard Towards sustainable facility location - A literature review J. Sustain. Dev. 5 7 2012 18 34
72. G.T. Tsoulfas, and C.P. Pappis Environmental principles applicable to supply chains design and operation J. Clean. Prod. 14 2006 1593 1602
73. K. Tweed Sustainability practices are really risk management 2010 http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/sustainability-is-really-riskmanagement
74. S. Vachon, and R.D. Klassen Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain Int. J. Prod. Econ. 111 2 2008 299 315
75. S.V. Walton, R.B. Handfield, and S.A. Melnyk The green supply chain: Integrating suppliers into environmental management processes J. Supply Chain Manag. 34 2 1998 2
76. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) Our Common Future 1987 Oxford University Press New York 8
77. Z. Wua, and M. Pagell Balancing priorities: Decision-making in sustainable supply chain management J. Oper. Manag. 29 2011 577 590
78. L. Xu, D.T. Kumar, K.M. Shankar, D. Kannan, and G. Chen Analyzing criteria and sub-criteria for the corporate social responsibility-based supplier selection process using AHP Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 68 1-4 2013 907 916
79. M. Yurdakul, and Y.T. Ic Development of a performance measurement model for manufacturing companies using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches Int. J. Prod. Res. 43 21 2005 4609 4641