Designing sustainable recovery network of end-of-life products using genetic algorithm

Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Volumn 53, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 559-570

  Dehghanian, Farzad ^a   Mansour, Saeed ^a  

^a AMIRKABIR UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Analytical hierarchy process (AHP); Genetic algorithm; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Recovery networks; Scrap tires; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); DECISION MAKERS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL BENEFITS; ECONOMICAL IMPACT; END-OF-LIFE; END-OF-LIFE PRODUCTS; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES; FUTURE GENERATIONS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA); LOGISTICS NETWORK; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING MODELS; MULTI-OBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM; PARETO OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; RECOVERY NETWORK; RECOVERY NETWORKS; RECYCLING PLANT; SCRAP TIRES; SOCIAL IMPACT; TRADE-OFF INFORMATION;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; COMPUTER SYSTEM RECOVERY; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; LIFE CYCLE; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; SCRAP METAL REPROCESSING; STRATEGIC PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TIRES;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; GENETIC ALGORITHM; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING; NETWORK DESIGN; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GENETIC ALGORITHM; LAW; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; RECYCLING; SOCIAL ASPECT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 67650751037     PISSN: 09213449     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Altiparmak F., Gen M., Lin L., and Paksoy T. A genetic algorithm approach for multi-objective optimization of supply chain networks. Computers & Industrial Engineering 51 (2006) 197-216
2. Aman, L., 2006. LCA of utilization of used tyres. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute. Available from: http://www.etrma.org/pdf/LCA_of_the_utilisation_of_used_tyres_2006-02-06.pdf.
3. Ahluwalia P.K., and Nema A.K. A life cycle based multi-objective optimization model for the management of computer waste. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 51 (2007) 792-826
4. Beukering P.J.H., and Janssen M.A. Trade and recycling of used tires in Western and Eastern Europe. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 33 (2001) 235-265
5. Bloemhof-Ruwaard J.M., Krikk H., and Van Wassenhove L.N. OR models for eco-eco closed-loop supply chain optimization. Reverse logistics: quantitative models for closed-loop supply chains. 1st ed. vol. 1 (2004), Springer, Berlin-Heiderberg
6. Carter C.R., and Jennings M.M. Logistics social responsibility: an integrative framework. Journal of Business Logistics 23 1 (2002) 145-180
7. Castka P., and Balzarova M.A. ISO 26000 and supply chains-on the diffusion of the social responsibility standard. International Journal of Production Economics 111 (2008) 274-286
8. Chiu C.T., Hsu T.H., and Yang W.F. Life cycle assessment on using recycled materials for rehabilitating asphalt pavements. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52 (2008) 545-556
9. Clift R. Metrics for supply chain sustainability. Clean Technology and Environmental Policy 5 (2003) 240-247
10. Corti A., and Lombardi L. End life tyres: alternative final disposal processes compared by LCA. Energy 29 (2004) 2089-2108
11. Cowell S.J., and Parkinson S. Localisation of UK food production: an analysis using land area and energy as indicators. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 94 (2003) 221-236
12. De Brito MP, 2003. Managing reverse logistics or reversing logistics management? Ph.D. thesis, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM).
13. Deb K., Pratap A., Agarwal S., and Meyarivan T. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary computations 6 (2002) 182-197
14. Deb K. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms (2001), Wiley
15. Ferrao P., et al. A management system for end-of-life tyres: a Portuguese case study. Waste Management 28 (2008) 604-614
16. Finnveden G., and Ekvall T. Life cycle assessment as a decision-support tool-the case of recycling versus incineration of paper. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 24 (1998) 235-256
17. Fleischmann M., Krikke H.R., Dekker R., and Flapper S.D.P. A characterisation of logistics networks for product recovery. Omega 28 (2000) 653-666
18. Fleischmann M., Van Nunen J.A.E.E., and Grave B. Integrating closed-loop supply chains and spare-parts management at IBM. Interfaces 33 6 (2003) 44-56
19. Goedkoop M, Spriensma R, 2001. Eco-indicator 99-a damage oriented method for life cycle assessment, Methodology report, 3rd ed., Available from: www.pre.nl.
20. ISO/TMB/WG/SR, 2006. Participating in the Future International Standard ISO 26000 on Social Responsibility. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
21. Jang J.V., Yoo T.S., Oh J.H., and Iwasaki I. Discarded tire recycling practices in the United States, Japan and Korea. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 40 (2004) 281-299
22. Kromer S, Kreipe E, Reichenbach D, Stark R, 1999. Life cycle assessment of a car tire, Continental AG, P.O. Box 169, 30001, Hannover, Germany.
23. Krozer J., and Vis J.C. How to get LCA in the right direction. Journal of Cleaner Production 6 (1998) 41-53
24. Linton J.D., Klassen R., and Jayaraman V. Sustainable supply chains: an introduction. Journal of Operations Management 25 (2007) 1075-1082
25. Ministry of Housing, 2000. Spatial planning and the environment, Eco-indicator 99 manual for designers-a damage oriented method for life cycle assessment, Netherlands; October 2000.
26. Powell J., Craighill A., and Brisson I. The life cycle assessment and valuation of waste management options: a U.K. study. Proceedings of the air and waste management association's 89th annual meeting and exhibition (1996)
27. PRé Consultants B.V. Life cycle assessment of an average European car tire (2001), Amersfoort, The Netherlands
28. Quariguasi Frota Neto J., Bloemhof-Ruwaard J.M., Van Nunen J.A.E.E., and Van Heck E. Designing and evaluating sustainable logistics networks. International Journal of Production Economics 111 (2008) 195-208
29. Saaty T.L. The analytical hierarchy process, planning, priority setting, resource allocation (1980), McGraw-Hill, New York
30. Samadian F, 2006. Tire recycling report, Iran Ministry of Mining and Industry, Central library [in Persian].
31. Steuer R.E., and Piercy C.A. A regression study of the number of efficient extreme points in multiple objective linear programming. European Journal of Operational Research 162 2 (2005) 484-496
32. Sunthonpagasit N., and Duffey M.R. Scrap tires to crumb rubber: feasibility analysis for processing facilities. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 40 (2004) 281-299
33. Sunthonpagasit N, Hickman HL, 2003. Manufacturing and utilizing crumb rubber from scrap tires, Municipal Solid Waste management, November/December, Available from: http://www.mswmanagement.com/msw.html.
34. Thierry M., Salomon M., Van Nunen J.A.E., and Van Wassenhove E.L. Strategic issues in product recovery management. California Management Review 37 2 (1995) 114-135
35. UNCTAD, 1996. A statistical review of international trade in tire and tire-related rubber waste for the period 1990-1994. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Papers on Commodity Resources, Trade and Environment, No. 1.
36. Veleva V., and Ellenbecker M. Indicators of sustainable production: framework and methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production 9 (2001) 519-549
37. WBCSD. Corporate social responsibility (1999), World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva
38. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). Our common future (1987), Oxford University Press, Oxford-New York
39. White L., and Lee G.J. Operational research and sustainable development: tackling the social dimension. European Journal of Operational Research 193 3 (2009) 683-692