Juvenile salmon and steelhead occupancy of stream pools treated and not treated with restoration structures, Entiat river, Washington

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 166-174

  Polivka, Karl M ^a   Steel, E Ashley ^a   Novak, Jenni L ^b  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b Cascadia Conservation District   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; HABITAT RESTORATION; HABITAT SELECTION; JUVENILE; SALMONID FISHERY; SEASONAL VARIATION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

ENTIAT RIVER; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS; ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 84961320088     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: 12057533     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2014-0228     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Beechie, T.J., Liermann, M., Beamer, E.M., and Henderson, R. 2005. A classification of habitat types in a large river and their use by juvenile salmonids. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 134: 717–729. doi:10.1577/T04-062.1.
2. Bernhardt, E.S., Palmer, M.A., Allan, J.D., Alexander, G., Barnas, K., Brooks, S., Carr, J., et al. 2005. Synthesizing U.S. River restoration efforts. Science, 308: 636–637. doi:10.1126/science.1109769.
3. Bernhardt, E.S., Sudduth, E.B., Palmer, M.A., Allan, J.D., Meyer, J.L., Alexander, G., Follastad-Shah, J., Hassett, B., Jenkinson, R., Lave, R., Rumps, J., and Pagano, L. 2007. Restoring rivers one reach at a time: results from a survey of U.S. river restoration practitioners. Restor. Ecol. 15: 482–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00244.x.
4. Bilby, R.E., Fransen, B.R., Bisson, P.A., and Walter, J.K. 1998. Response of juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to the addition of salmon carcasses to two streams in southwestern Washington, U.S.A. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55(8): 1909–1918. doi:10.1139/f98-094.
5. Bjornn, T.C., and Reiser, D.W. 1991. Habitat requirements of salmonids in streams. In Influences of forest and rangeland management on salmonid fishes in their habitats. Edited by W.R. Meehan. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 19, Bethesda, Md. pp. 83–138.
6. Bond, N.R., and Lake, P.S. 2003a. Characterizing fish–habitat associations in streams as the first step in ecological restoration. Aust. Ecol. 28: 611–621. doi:10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.t01-1-01317.x.
7. Bond, N.R., and Lake, P.S. 2003b. Local habitat restoration in streams: Constraints on the effectiveness of restoration for stream biota. Ecol. Manage. Restor. 4: 193–198. doi:10.1046/j.1442-8903.2003.00156.x.
8. Bradford, M.J., and Higgins, P.S. 2001. Habitat-, season-, and size-specific variation in diel activity patterns of juvenile chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58(2): 365–374. doi:10.1139/f00-253.
9. Coe, H., Kiffney, P.M., and Pess, G.R. 2006. A comparison of methods to evaluate the response of periphyton and invertebrates to wood placement in large Pacific coastal rivers. Northw. Sci. 80: 298–307.
10. Coe, H., Kiffney, P., Pess, G.R., Kloehn, K., and Mc Henry, M. 2009. Periphyton and invertebrate response to wood placement in large Pacific coastal rivers. River Res. Appl. 25: 1025–1035. doi:10.1002/rra.1201.
11. Davidson, S.L., and Eaton, B.C. 2013. Modeling channel morphodynamic response to variations in large wood: Implications for stream rehabilitation in degraded watersheds. Geomorphology, 202: 59–73. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph. 2012.10.005.
12. Everest, F.H., and Chapman, D.W. 1972. Habitat selection and spatial interaction by juvenile chinook salmon and steelhead trout in two Idaho streams. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 29(1): 91–100. doi:10.1139/f72-012.
13. Godaire, J., Russell, K., and Bountry, J. 2009. Entiat tributary assessment, Chelan County, Washington. US Bureau of Reclamation, Technical Service Center, Denver, Colo.
14. Gowan, C., and Fausch, K.D. 1996. Long-term demographic responses of trout populations to habitat manipulation in six Colorado streams. Ecol. Appl. 6: 931–946. doi:10.2307/2269496.
15. Hamlet, A.F. 2011. Assessing water resources adaptive capacity to climate change impacts in the Pacific Northwest Region of North America. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15: 1427–1443. doi:10.5194/hess-15-1427-2011.
16. Hearn, W.E. 1987. Interspecific competition and habitat segregation among stream-dwelling trout and salmon: A review. Fisheries, 12: 24–31. doi:10.1577/1548-8446(1987)012<0024:ICAHSA>2.0.CO;2.
17. Hilderbrand, R.H., Lemly, A.D., Dolloff, C.A., and Harpster, K.L. 1997. Effects oflarge woody debris placement on stream channels and benthic macroinvertebrates. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54(4): 931–939. doi:10.1139/f96-334.
18. Hill, J., and Grossman, G. 1993. An energetic model of microhabitat use by rainbow trout and rosyside dace. Ecology, 74: 685–698. doi:10.2307/1940796.
19. Hillman, T.W., Griffith, J.S., and Platts, W.S. 1987. Summer and winter habitat selection by juvenile Chinook salmon in a highly sedimented Idaho stream. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 116: 185–195. doi:10.1577/1548-8659(1987)116<185:SAWHSB>2.0.CO;2.
20. Hillman, T.W., Chapman, D.W., Spaulding, J., and Griffith, J.S. 1989. Summer and winter ecology of juvenile Chinook salmon and steelhead trout in the Wenatchee River, Washington. Don Chapman Consultants, Inc. Report to Chelan County Public Utility District, Wenatchee, Wash.
21. Honea, J.M., Jorgensen, J.C., McClure, M.M., Cooney, T.D., Engie, K., Holzer, D.M., and Hilborn, R. 2009. Evaluating habitat effects on population status: influence of habitat restoration on spring-run Chinook salmon. Freshw. Biol. 54: 1576–1592. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02208.x.
22. Hughes, N. 1998. A model of habitat selection by drift-feeding stream salmonids at different scales. Ecology, 79: 281–294. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0281:AMOHSB]2.0.CO;2.
23. Kail, J., Hering, D., Muhar, S., Gerhard, M., and Preis, S. 2007. The use of large wood in stream restoration: experiences from 50 projects in Germany and Austria. J. Appl. Ecol. 44: 1145–1155. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01401.x.
24. Kirk, T., Kerr, P., and Riddle, H. 1995. Draft initial watershed assessment, water resources inventory area 46, Entiat River watershed. Washington Department of Ecology Open File Report 95-02, Olympia.
25. Scheuerell, M.D., Hilborn, R., Ruckelshaus, M.H., Bartz, K.K., Lagueux, K.M., Haas, A.D., and Rawson, K. 2006. The Shiraz model: A tool for incorporating anthropogenic effects and fish–habitat relationships in conservation planning. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63(7): 1596–1607. doi:10.1139/f06-056.
26. Miller, J.R., and Kochel, R.C. 2010. Assessment of channel dynamics, in-stream structures and post-project channel adjustments in North Carolina and its implications to effective stream restoration. Environ. Earth Sci. 59: 1681–1692. doi:10.1007/s12665-009-0150-1.
27. Miller, S.W., Budy, P., and Schmidt, J.C. 2010. Quantifying macroinvertebrate responses to in-stream habitat restoration: Applications of meta-analysis to river restoration. Restor. Ecol. 18: 8–19. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00605.x.
28. Mills, J.S., Dunham, J.B., Reeves, G.H., McMillan, J.R., Zimmerman, C.E., and Jordan, C.E. 2012. Variability in expression of anadromy by female Oncorhynchus mykiss within a river network. Environ. Biol. Fish. 93: 505–517. doi:10.1007/s10641-011-9946-4.
29. Morley, S.A., Garcia, P.S., Bennett, T.R., and Roni, P. 2005. Juvenile salmonid (Oncorhynchus spp.) use of constructed and natural side channels in Pacific Northwest rivers. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62(12): 2811–2821. doi:10.1139/f05-185.
30. Mullan, J.W. 1987. Status and propagation of chinook salmon in the mid- Columbia River through 1985. US Fish and Wildlife Service Biol. Rep. 89(3):1–111.
31. Mullan, J.W. 1989. Growth, survival, and production of salmon and steelhead in a controlled section of Icicle Creek, Washington. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Leavenworth, Wash.
32. Narum, S.R., Hatch, D., Talbot, A.J., Moran, P., and Powell, M.S. 2008. Iteroparity in complex mating systems of steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). J. Fish Biol. 72: 45–60. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01649.x.
33. Opperman, J.J., and Merenlender, A.M. 2004. The effectiveness of riparian restoration for improving instream fish habitat in four hardwood-dominated California streams. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 24: 822–834. doi:10.1577/M03-147.1.
34. Pess, G.R., Liermann, M., McHenry, M.L., Peters, R.J., and Bennett, T.R. 2012. Juvenile salmonid response to the replacement of engineered logjams (ELJs) in the Elwha River. River Res. Appl. 28: 872–881. doi:10.1002/rra.1481.
35. Peven, C.M., Whitney, R.R., and Williams, K.R. 1994. Age and length of steelhead smolts from the mid-Columbia River Basin, Washington. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 14: 77–86. doi:10.1577/1548-8675(1994)014<0077:AALOSS>2.3.CO;2.
36. Pfister, C.A. 1995. Estimating competition coefficients from census data: a test with field manipulations of tidepool fishes. Am. Nat. 146: 271–291. doi:10. 1086/285798.
37. Polivka, K.M. 2010. Population ecology and effectiveness monitoring of smallscale instream habitat restoration structures in the Entiat River. In Upper Columbia Regional Technical Team 2010 Analysis Workshop Synthesis Report. Edited by M.B. Ward, J. Morgan, and C. Baldwin. Prepared for the Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board by the Upper Columbia Regional Technical Team and Terraqua, Inc., Wenatchee, Wash., UCSRB.
38. Roni, P., Beechie, T.J., Bilby, R.E., Leonetti, F.E., Pollock, M.M., and Pess, G.R. 2002. A review of stream restoration techniques and a hierarchical strategy for prioritizing restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 22: 1–20. doi:10.1577/1548-8675(2002)022<0001:AROSRT>2.0.CO;2.
39. Roni, P., Hanson, K., and Beechie, T. 2008. Global review of the physical and biological effectiveness of stream habitat rehabilitation techniques. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 28: 856–890. doi:10.1577/M06-169.1.
40. Roni, P., Pess, G., Beechie, T., and Morley, S. 2010. Estimating changes in coho salmon and steelhead abundance from watershed restoration: How much restoration is needed to measurably increase smolt production? N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 30: 1469–1484. doi:10.1577/M09-162.1.
41. Roper, B.B., Scarnecchia, D.L., and La Marr, T.J. 1994. Summer distribution of and habitat use by chinook salmon and steelhead within a major basin of the South Umpqua River, Oregon. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 123: 298–308. doi:10.1577/1548-8659(1994)123<0298:SDOAHU>2.3.CO;2.
42. Rosenfeld, J.S., and Boss, S. 2001. Fitness consequences of habitat use for juvenile cutthroat trout: energetic costs and benefits in pools and riffles. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58(3): 585–593. doi:10.1139/f01-019.
43. Rosenfeld, J.S., Porter, M., and Parkinson, E. 2000. Habitat factors affecting the abundance and distribution of juvenile cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki) and coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57(4): 766–774. doi:10.1139/f00-010.
44. Rosenfeld, J.S., Leiter, T., Lindner, G., and Rothman, L. 2005. Food abundance and fish density alters habitat selection, growth, and habitat suitability curves for juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62(8): 1691–1701. doi:10.1139/f05-072.
45. Smokorowski, K.E., and Pratt, T.C. 2007. Effect of a change in physical structure and cover on fish and fish habitat in freshwater ecosystems — a review and meta-analysis. Environ. Rev. 15: 15–41. doi:10.1139/a06-007.
46. Sogard, S.M., Williams, T.H., and Fish, H. 2009. Seasonal patterns of abundance, growth and site fidelity in juvenile steelhead in a small coastal California stream. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 138: 549–563. doi:10.1577/T08-172.1.
47. Spina, A.P., Allen, M.A., and Clarke, M. 2005. Downstream migration, rearing abundance, and pool habitat associations of juvenile steelhead in the lower main stem of a south-central California stream. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 25: 919–930. doi:10.1577/M04-105.1.
48. Stewart, G.B., Bayliss, H.R., Showler, D.A., Sutherland, W.J., and Pullin, A.S. 2009. Effectiveness of engineered in-stream structure mitigation measures to increase salmonid abundance: A systematic review. Ecol. Appl. 19: 931–941. doi:10.1890/07-1311.1. PMID:19544735.
49. Testa, S.,, Shields, F.D., Jr., and Cooper, C.M. 2011. Macroinvertebrate response to stream restoration by large wood addition. Ecohydrology, 4: 631–643. doi:10.1002/eco.146.
50. Ward, M.B., Morgan, J., and Baldwin, C. 2010. Upper Columbia Regional Technical Team 2010 Analysis Workshop Synthesis Report. Prepared for the Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board by the Upper Columbia Regional Technical Team and Terraqua, Inc., Wenatchee, Wash.
51. Whiteway, S.L., Biron, P.M., Zimmermann, A., Venter, O., and Grant, J.W.A. 2010. Do in-stream restoration structures enhance salmonid abundance? A metaanalysis. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 67(5): 831–841. doi:10.1139/F10-021.
52. Young, K.A. 2001. Habitat diversity and species diversity: Testing the competition hypothesis with juvenile salmonids. Oikos, 95: 87–93. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706. 2001.950110.x.
53. Young, K.A. 2004. Asymmetric competition, habitat selection and niche overlap in juvenile salmonids. Ecology, 85: 134–149. doi:10.1890/02-0402.