A comparison of methods to evaluate the response of periphyton and invertebrates to wood placement in large pacific coastal rivers

Northwest Science

Volumn 80, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 298-307

  Coe, Holly J ^a   Kiffney, Peter M ^a   Pess, George R ^a  

^a ALASKA FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 40049105597     PISSN: 0029344X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abbe, T. B., D. R. Montgomery and C. Petroff. 1997. Design of stable in-stream wood debris structures for bank protection and habitat restoration: an example from the Cowlitz River, WA. In Wang, S.Y., E.J. Langendoen, and F.D. Shields (editors), Proceedings of the Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering, University of Mississippi, MS. Pp. 809-815.
2. Aloi, J. E. 1990. A critical review of recent freshwater periphyton field methods. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47:656-670.
3. Anderson, N., J. Sedell, L. M. Roberts and F. J. Triska. 1978. The role of aquatic invertebrates in processing of wood debris in coniferous forest streams. The American Midland Naturalist 100:64-82.
4. Benke, A., T. Van Arsdall, and D. M. Gillespie. 1984. Invertebrate productivity in a subtropical blackwater river: the importance of habitat and life history. Ecological Monographs 54:25 63.
5. Bilby, R. E., and P. A. Bisson. 1998. Function and distribution of large woody debris. In Naiman, R.J. and R.E. Bilby, editors. River Ecology and Management: Lessons from the Pacific Coastal Ecoregion. Springer-Verlag, Inc., NY.
6. Bond, N. R., S. Sabater, A. Glaister, S. Roberts and K. Vanderkruk. 2006. Colonisation of introduced timber by algae and invertebrates, and its potential role in aquatic ecosystem restoration. Hydrobiologia 556:303-316.
7. Braccia, A., and D. Batzer. 2001. Invertebrates associated with wood debris in a southeastern U.S. forested floodplain stream. Wetlands 21:18-31. (Pubitemid 32325137)
8. Brooks, S. S., M. A. Palmer, B. J. Cardinale, C. M. Swan and S. Ribblett. 2002. Assessing stream ecosystem rehabilitation: limitations of community structure data. Restoration Ecology 10:156-168.
9. Clinton, S. M., N. B. Grimm and S. G. Fisher. 1996. Response of a hyporheic invertebrate assemblage to drying disturbance in a desert stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15:700-712. (Pubitemid 27052761)
10. Crispin, V., H. House and D. Roberts. 1993. Changes in in-stream habitat, large wood debris, and salmon habitat after the restructuring of a coastal Oregon stream. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 43:96-102.
11. Dall, P. C. 1979. A sampling technique for littoral stone dwelling organisms. Oikos 33:106-112.
12. Diez, J. R., S. Larranaga, A. Elosegi and J. Pozo. 2000. Effect of removal of wood on streambed stability and retention of organic matter. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19:621-632.
13. Dudley, T. L., and N. H. Anderson. 1982. A survey of invertebrates associated with wood debris in aquatic habitats. Melanderia 39:1-21.
14. Gortz, P. 1998. Effects of stream restoration on the macroin-vertebrate community in the River Esrom, Denmark. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8:115-130.
15. Lamberti, G. A., and V. H. Resh. 1985. Comparability of introduced tiles and natural substrates for sampling lotic bacteria, algae and macroinvertebrates. Freshwater Biology 15:21-30.
16. Larson, M. G., D. B. Booth, and S. A. Morley. 2001. Effectivenss of large woody debris in stream rehabilitation projects in urban basins. Ecological Engineering 18:211-226.
17. Lassonen, P., T. Muotka and I. Kivijarvi. 1998. Recovery of macroinvertebrate communities from stream habitat restoration. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8:101-113. (Pubitemid 28173973)
18. Magoulick, D. 1998. Effect of wood hardness, condition, texture and substrate type on community structure of stream invertebrates. The American Midland Naturalist 139:187-200. (Pubitemid 28242628)
19. Moerke, A. H., K. J. Gerard, J. A. Latimore, R. A. Hellenthal and G. A. Lamberti. 2004. Restoration of an Indiana, USA, stream: bridging the gap between basic and applied lotic ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23:647-660.
20. Munn, M. D., M. L. McHenry and V. Sampson. 1998. An assessment of stream habitat and nutrients in the Elwha River Basin: implications for restoration. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 98-4223.
21. Peters, R. J., B. R. Missildine and D. L. Low. 1998. Seasonal fish densities near river banks treated with various stabilization methods: First year report of the flood technical assistance project. USFWS. Western WA office, Aquatic Resources Division. Lacey, WA.
22. Pohl, M. 1999. The dams of the Elwha River, Washington: Downstream impacts and policy implications. Ph.D. Dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
23. Reeves, G. H., D. B. Hohler, F. H. Hansen, F. H. Everest, J. R. Sedell, T.L. Hickman and D. Shively. 1997. Fish habitat restoration in the Pacific Northwest: Fish Creek of Oregon. In Williams, J. E., C. A. Wood and M. P. Dombeck, editors. Watershed restoration: principles and practices. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
24. Roemer, S. C., K. D. Hoagland and J. R. Rosowski. 1984. Development of a freshwater periphyton community as influenced by diatom mucilages. Canadian Journal of Botany 62:1799-1813.
25. Roni, P., and T. P. Quinn. 2001. Density and size of juvenile salmonids in response to placement of large woody debris in western Washington and Oregon streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:282-292. (Pubitemid 32265483)
26. Roni, P., A. H. Fayram and M. A. Miller. 2005. Monitoring and evaluating instream habitat enhancement and restoration. In Roni, P., editor. Methods for Monitoring Stream and Watershed Restoration. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
27. Sedell, J. R., R. J. Steedman, H. A. Regier and S. V. Gregory. 1991. Restoration of human impacted land-water ecotones. In Holland, M.M., P.G. Risser and R.J. Naiman, editors. Ecotones: The role of landscape boundaries in the management and restoration of changing environments. Chapman and Hall, London.
28. Slaney, P. A., B. O. Rublee, C. J. Perrin and H. Goldberg. 1994. Debris structure placements and whole-river fertilization for salmonids in a large regulated stream in British Columbia. Bulletin of Marine Science 55:1160-1180.
29. Tank, J. L., and M. J. Winterbourn. 1996. Microbial activity and invertebrate colonization of wood in a New Zealand forest stream. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 30:271-280.
30. Tuchman, M. L., and D. W. Blinn. 1979. Comparison of attached algal communities on natural and artificial substrata along a thermal gradient. British Phycological Journal 14:243-254.
31. Wallace, J. B., J. R. Webster and J. L. Meyer. 1995. Influence of log additions on physical and biotic characteristics of a mountain stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52:2120-2137.
32. Wondzell, S. M., and P. A. Bisson. 2003. Influence of wood and aquatic biodiversity. In Gregory, S., K. Boyer and A. Gurnell, editors. The Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.