Periphyton and invertebrate response to wood placement in large Pacific Coastal rivers

River Research and Applications

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1025-1035

  Coe, Holly J ^a   Kiffney, Peter M ^a   Pess, George R ^a   Kloehn, Kris K ^b   McHenry, Michael L ^c  

^a NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^c Elwha Fisheries Office   (United States)

Author keywords

Invertebrate community; Large rivers; Meiofauna; Periphyton biomass; Wood

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; HABITAT RESTORATION; HUMAN ACTIVITY; INVERTEBRATE; MEIOFAUNA; PERIPHYTON; REINTRODUCTION; RIVER SYSTEM; TAXONOMY; WOOD;

AVES; CHIRONOMIDAE; INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 70349737569     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rra.1201     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abbe TB, Brooks AP, Montgomery DR. 2003. Wood in river rehabilitation and management. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 1-26.
2. Abbe TB, Montgomery DR. 1996. Large woody debris jams, channel hydraulics and habitat formation in large rivers. Regulated Rivers-Research & Management 12: 201-221. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099.-1646(199603)12:2/3<201:AID-RRR390>3.3.CO;2-1
3. Abbe TB, Montgomery DR, Petroff C. 1997. Design of stable in-stream wood debris structures for bank protection and habitat restoration: an example from the Cowlitz River, WA. In Proceedings of the Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision, Wang SY, Langendoen EJ, Shields FD (eds). Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering: University of Mississippi, Mississippi; 809-815.
4. Abbe TB, Pess GR, Montgomery DR, Fetherston K. 2002. Integrating engineered log jam technology into reach-scale river restoration. In Restoration of Puget Sound Rivers, Montgomery DR, Bolton S, Booth DB (eds). University of Washington Press: Seattle, WA; 443-482.
5. Aloi JE. 1990. A critical review of recent freshwater periphyton field methods. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47: 656-670.
6. Benke AC, Henry RL, Gillespie DM, Hunter RJ. 1985. Importance of snag habitat for animal production in southeastern streams. Fisheries 10: 8-13. DOI: 10.1577/1548-8446(1985)010<0008:IOSHFA>2.0.CO;2
7. Benke A, Van Arsdall T, Gillespie DM. 1984. Invertebrate productivity in a subtropical blackwater river: the importance of habitat and life history. Ecological Monographs 54: 25-63. DOI: 10.2307/1942455
8. Benke AC, Wallace JB. 2003. Influence of wood on invertebrate communities in streams and rivers. American Fisheries Society Symposium 37: 149-177.
9. Bilby RE, Bisson PA. 1998. Function and distribution of large woody debris. In River Ecology and Management: Lessons from the Pacific Coastal Ecoregion, Naiman RJ, Bilby RE (eds). Springer-Verlag, Inc.: New York, NY; 325-346.
10. Bilby RE, Heffner JT, Fransen BR, Ward JW, Bisson PA. 1999. Effects of immersion in water on deterioration of wood from five species of trees used for habitat enhancement project. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19: 687-695. DOI: 10.1577/1548-8675(1999)019<0687:EOIIWO>2.0.CO;2
11. Bond NR, Lake PS. 2005. Ecological restoration and large-scale ecological disturbance: the effects of drought on the response by fish to a habitat restoration experiment. Restoration Ecology 13: 39-48. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00006.x
12. Bond NR, Sabater S, Glaister A, Roberts S, Vanderkruk K. 2006. Colonisation of introduced timber by algae and invertebrates, and its potential role in aquatic ecosystem restoration. Hydrobiologia 556: 303-316. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-005-1251-9
13. Braccia A, Batzer DP. 2001. Invertebrates associated with woody debris in a southeastern US forested floodplain wetland. Wetlands 21: 18-31.
14. Brooks AP, Howell T, Abbe TB, Arthington AH. 2006. Confronting hysteresis: wood based river rehabilitation in highly altered riverine landscapes of south-eastern Australia. Geomorphology 79: 395-422. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.035
15. Brooks SS, Palmer MA, Cardinale BJ, Swan CM, Ribblett S. 2002. Assessing stream ecosystem rehabilitation: Limitations of community structure data. Restoration Ecology 10: 156-168. DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.2002.10117.x
16. Coe HJ, Kiffney PM, Pess GR. 2006. A comparison of methods to evaluate the response of periphyton and invertebrates to wood placement in large Pacific Coastal rivers. Northwest Science 80: 298-307.
17. Crispin V, House H, Roberts D. 1993. Changes in instream habitat after the restructuring of a coastal Oregon stream. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 43: 96-102. DOI: 10.1577/1548-8675(1993)013<0096:CIIHLW>2.3.CO;2
18. Dall PC. 1979. Sampling technique for littoral stone dwelling organisms. Oikos 33: 106-112. DOI: 10.2307/3544518
19. Diez J, Larrangaga S, Elosegi A, Pozo J. 2000. Effect of removal of wood on streambed stability and retention of organic matter. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 621-632. DOI: 10.2307/1468121
20. Dudley TL, Anderson NH. 1982. A survey of invertebrates associated with wood debris in aquatic habitats. Melanderia 39: 1-21.
21. Fetherston KL, Naiman RJ, Bilby RE. 1995. Large woody debris, physical process, and riparian forest development in montane river networks of the Pacific-Northwest. Geomorphology 13: 133-144. DOI: 10.1016/0169-555X(95)00033-2
22. Golladay SW, Hax CL. 1995. Effects of an engineered flow disturbance on meiofauna in a north Texas prairie stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 14: 404-413. DOI: 10.2307/1467206
23. Golladay SW, Sinsabaugh RL. 1991. Biofilm development on leaf and wood surfaces in a boreal river. Freshwater Biology 25: 437-450. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1991.tb01387.x
24. Gortz P. 1998. Effects of stream restoration on the macroinvertebrate community in the river Esrom, Denmark. Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 115-130. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099.-0755(199801/02)8:1<115::AID-AQC263>3.3.CO;2-C
25. Grimm NB, Fisher SG. 1989. Stability of periphyton and macroinvertebrates to disturbance by flash floods in a desert stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 8: 293-307. DOI: 10.2307/1467493
26. Gurnell A, Tockner K, Edwards P, Petts G. 2005. Effects of deposited wood on biocomplexity of river corridors. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3: 377-382. DOI: 10.2307/3868587
27. Hakenkamp CC, Morin A. 2000. The importance of meiofauna to lotic ecosystem functioning. Freshwater Biology 44: 165-175. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2000.00589.x
28. Hoffmann A, Hering D. 2000. Wood-associated macroinvertebrate fauna in Central European streams. International Review of Hydrobiology 85: 25-2548. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2632(200003)85:1<25::AID.-IROH25>3.3.CO;2-I
29. Hyatt TL, Naiman RJ. 2001. The residence time of large woody debris in the Queets River, Washington, USA. Ecological Applications 11: 191-202. DOI: 10.2307/3061066
30. Laasonen P, Muotka T, Kivijarvi I. 1998. Recovery of macroinvertebrate communities from stream habitat restoration. Aquatic ConservationMarine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 101-113. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099.-0755(199801/02)8:1<101::AID-AQC251>3.0.CO;2-4
31. Larson MG, Booth DB, Morley SA. 2001. Effectiveness of large woody debris in stream rehabilitation projects in urban basins. Ecological Engineering 18: 211-226. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-8574(01)00079-9
32. Latterell JJ, Naiman RJ. 2007. Sources and dynamics of large logs in a temperate floodplain river. Ecological Applications 17: 1127-1141. DOI: 10.1890/06-0963
33. Maser C, Tarrant RF, Trappe JM, Franklin JF. 1988. From the forest to the sea: a story of fallen trees. USDS Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-229, Portland, Oregon.
34. Munn MD, McHenry ML, Sampson V. 1998. An assessment of stream habitat and nutrients in the Elwha River Basin: implications for restoration. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 98-4223 Tacoma, Washington, USA.
35. Nilsen H, Larimore R. 1973. Establishment of invertebrate communities on log substrates in the Kaskaskia River, Illinois. Ecology 52: 366-374. DOI: 10.2307/1934344
36. O'Connor NA. 1991. The effects of habitat complexity on the macroinvertebrates colonizing wood substrates in a lowland stream. Oecologia 85: 504-512.
37. O'Connor NA. 1992. Quantification of submerged wood in a lowland Australian stream system. Freshwater Biology 27: 387-395. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1992.tb00548.x
38. Peters RJ, Missildine BR, Low DL. 1998. Seasonal fish densities near river banks treated with various stabilization methods: first year report of the flood technical assistance project. USFWS. Western WA office, Aquatic Resources Division. Lacey, WA.
39. Pohl M. 1999. The dams of the Elwha River, Washington: downstream impacts and policy implications. Ph.D. Dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.
40. Reeves GH, Hohler DB, Hansen FH, Everest FH, Sedell JR, Hickman TL, Shively D. 1997. Fish habitat restoration in the Pacific Northwest: Fish Creek of Oregon. In Watershed Restoration: Principles and Practices, Williams JE, Wood CA, Dombeck MP (eds). American Fisheries Society: Bethesda, Maryland; 335-359.
41. Roni P, Beechie TJ, Bilby RE, Leonetti FE, Pollock MM, Pess GR. 2002. A review of stream restoration techniques and a hierarchical strategy for prioritizing restoration in Pacific northwest watersheds. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22: 1-20. DOI: 10.1577/15488675(2002)022<0001:AROSRT>2.0.CO;2
42. Roni P, Fayram AH, Miller MA. 2005. Monitoring and evaluating instream habitat enhancement and restoration. In Methods for Monitoring Stream and Watershed Restoration, Roni, P. (ed). American Fisheries Society: Bethesda, Maryland; 210-236.
43. Roni P, Quinn TP. 2001. Density and size of juvenile salmonids in response to placement of large woody debris in western Oregon and Washington streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 282-292. DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-58-2-282
44. Schmid-Araya JM, Hildrew AG, Robertson A, Schmid PE, Winterbottom J. 2002. The importance of meiofauna in food webs: evidence from an acid stream. Ecology 83: 1271-1285. DOI: 10.2307/3071942
45. Scholz O, Boon PI. 1993. Biofilm development and extracellular enzyme-activities on wood in billagongs of south-eastern Australia. Freshwater Biology 30: 359-368. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1993.tb00820.x
46. Slaney PA, Rublee BO, Perrin CJ, Goldberg H. 1994. Debris structure placements and whole-river fertilization for salmonids in a large regulated stream in British Columbia. Bulletin of Marine Science 55: 1160-1180.
47. Steinman AD, Lamberti GA. 1996. Biomass and pigments of benthic algae. In Methods in Stream Ecology, Hauer FR, Lamberti GA (eds). Academic Press: San Diego, CA; 295-313.
48. Swan CM, Palmer MA. 2000. What drives small-scale spatial patterns in lotic meiofauna communities? Freshwater Biology 44: 109-121. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2000.00587.x
49. Tank J, Winterbourn M. 1996. Microbial activity and invertebrate colonisation on wood in a New Zealand stream. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 30: 271-280.
50. Triska FJ. 1984. Role of large wood in modifying channel morphology and riparian areas of a large lowland river under pristine conditions: a historical case study. Vehandlungen-Internationale Vereinigung fur Theorelifche unde Angewandte Limnologie 22: 1876-1892.
51. Wallace JB, Benke AC. 1984. Quantification of wood habitat in sub-tropical coastal-plain streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 41: 1643-1652.
52. Wallace JB, Webster JR, Meyer JL. 1995. Influence of log additions on physical and biotic characteristics of a mountain stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52: 2120-2137.
53. Wondzell SM, Bisson PA. 2003. Influence of wood and aquatic biodiversity, In The Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers, Gregory S, Boyer K, Gurnell A (eds). American Fisheries Society: Bethesda, MD; 249-263.