Global patterns in the implementation of payments for environmental services

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2016, Pages

  Ezzine De Blas, Driss ^a   Wunder, Sven ^b   Ruiz Pérez, Manuel ^c   Del Pilar Moreno Sanchez, Rocio ^d  

^a CIRAD   (France)

^b CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH   (Peru)

^c UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^d Conservation Strategy Fund ^*  (Colombia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFERENTIATION; MARKET; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; STRESS; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84961275791     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149847     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ferraro PJ, Kiss A. Direct Payments to Conserve Biodiversity. Science policy forum. 2002; 298: 1718-1719.
2. Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological economics. 2008; 65: 663-674.
3. Coase RH. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics. 1960; 3 (1): 1-44.
4. Wunder S. Payments for environmental services: Some nuts and bolts. CIFOR. 2005; Occasional Paper no. 42. http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf-files/OccPapers/OP-42.pdf.
5. Wunder S. Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics. 2015; 117: 234-243.
6. Gómez-Baggethun E, De Groot R, Lomas P, Montes C. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics. 2010; 69: 1209-1218.
7. Sommerville MM, Jones JPG, Milner-Gulland EJ. A revised conceptual framework for payments for environmental services. Ecology and Society. 2009; 14(2): 34. Online at: Http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art34/. Muradian et al., 2010
8. Muradian R, Corbera E, Pascual U, Kosoy N, May PH. Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics. 2010; 69: 1202-1208.
9. Farley J, Constanza R. Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global. Ecological Economics. 2010; 69: 2060-2068.
10. Van Noordwijk M, Leimona B, Jindal R, Villamor GB, Vardhan M, Namirembe S, et al. Payments for environmental services: Evolution toward efficient and fair incentives for multifunctional landscapes. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2012; 37:389-420.
11. Tacconi L. Redefining payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics. 2012; 73(1): 29-36.
12. Pagiola S, Agostini P, Gobbi J, De Haan C, Ibrahim M, Murgueitio E, et al. Paying for Biodiversity Conservation Services in Agricultural Landscapes. World Bank; 2004. Environment Department Paper No.96. Washington D.C., USA.
13. Pattanayak SK, Wunder S, Ferraro PJ. Show Me the Money: Do Payments Supply Environmental Services in Developing Countries? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. 2010; 4(2):254-274.
14. Grieg-Gran M, Porras IT, Wunder S. How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World Development. 2005; 33(9):1511-27.
15. Porras I, Grieg-Gran M, Neves N. All that glitters: A review of payments for watershed services in developing countries. International Institute for Environment and Development. 2008; Natural Resource Issues no.11 London UK
16. OECD-Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Paying for biodiversity. Enhancing the cost-effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services. OECD; 2010. Paris, France.
17. Wunder S, Engel S, Pagiola S. Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics. 2008; 65: 834-852.
18. Neef A, Thomas D. Rewarding the upland poor for saving the commons? Evidence from Southeast Asia. International Journal of the Commons. 2009; 3(1):1-15.
19. Porras I, Chacón-Cascante A, Robalino J, Oosterhuis F. PES and other Economic Beasts: Assessing PES within a Policy Mix in Conservation. 9th International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics, Istanbul, June 14-17, 2011.
20. Hamm P, King LP, Stuckler D. Mass Privatization, State Capacity, and Economic Growth in Post-Communist Countries. American Sociological Review. 2012; 77: 295.
21. Megginson WL, Netter JM. From State To Market: A Survey Of Empirical Studies On Privatisation. Journal of Economic Literature. 2001; 39:321-389.
22. Massimo F. The Great Divestiture: Evaluating the Welfare Impact of the British Privatizations, 1979-1997. MIT Press; 2004. Boston, USA.
23. Sattler C, Matzdorf B. PES in a nut shell: From definitions and origins to PES in practice-Approaches, design process and innovative aspects. Ecosystem Services. 2013; 6:2-11.
24. Wunder S, Albán M. Decentralized payments for environmental services: The cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador. Ecological Economics. 2008; 65:685-698.
25. Perrot-Maître D. The Vittel payments for ecosystem services: A "perfect" PES case? International Institute for Environment and Development. 2006; London, UK.
26. Nelson F. Developing Alternative Frameworks for Community-based Conservation: Piloting Payments for Environmental Services (PES) in Tanzania's Simanjiro Plains. USAID; 2008. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf-docs/Pnadt596.pdf.
27. Dobbs TL, Pretty J. Case study of agri-environmental payments: The United Kingdom. 2008; Ecological economics 65: 765-775.
28. Bennett MT. China's sloping land conversion program: Institutional innovation or business as usual? Ecological Economics. 2008; 65:699-711.
29. Claassen R, Cattaneo A, Johansson R. Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: U.S. experience in theory and practice. Ecological economics. 2008; 65: 737-752.
30. Pagiola S. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Ecological Economics. 2008; 65:712-724.
31. Muñoz-Piña C, Guevara A, Torres JM, Braña J. Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: Analysis, negotiations and results. Ecological Economics. 2008; 65: 725-736.
32. Honey-Rosés J, Baylis K, Ramirez MI. A Spatially Explicit Estimate of Avoided Forest Loss. Conservation Biology. 2011; 25(5):1032-1043.doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01729.x PMID: 21902720
33. Frost PGH, Bond I. The CAMPFIRE programme in Zimbabwe: Payments for wildlife services. Ecological Economics. 2008; 65:776-787.
34. Brouwer R, Tesfaye A, Pauw P. Meta-analysis of institutional-economic factors explaining the environmental performance of payments for watershed services. Environmental Conservation. 2010; 38 (4): 380-392.
35. Sattler C, Trampnau S, Schomers S, Meyer C, Matzdorf B. Multi-classification of payments for ecosystem services: How do classification characteristics relate to overall PES success? Ecosystem Services. 2013; 6:31-45.
36. Hejnowicz AP, Raffaelli DG, Rudd MA, White PCL. Evaluating the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services programmes using a capital asset framework. Ecosystem Services. 2014; 9: 83-97.
37. Cooper H. Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step by step approach. Applied Social Research Methods Series. 2010; Sage Publications.
38. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2011; Version 5.1.0. Editors: Julian PT Higgins and Sally Green. http://handbook.cochrane.org/
39. Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation. The Collaboration for Environmental Evidence. 2013; http://www.environmentalevidence.org/.
40. Schomers S, Matzdorf B. Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries. Ecosystem Services. 2013; 6:16-30.
41. Miteva DA, Pattanayak SK, Ferraro PJ. Evaluation of biodiversity policy instruments: What works and what doesn't? Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2012; 28(1):69-92.
42. Samii C, Lisiecki M, Kulkarni P, Paler L, Chavis L. Effects of payment for environmental services and decentralized forest management on deforestation and poverty in low and middle income countries: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews; 2014. Oslo: The Campbell Collaboration.
43. Osborne T. Carbon Capital: The Political Ecology of Carbon Forestry and Development in Chiapas. Energy and Resources Group; 2010. University of California Berkeley, Mexico, Berkeley.
44. Armsworth PR, Acs S, Dallimer M, Gaston KJ, Hanley N, Wilson P. The cost of policy simplification in conservation incentive programs. Ecology Letters. 2012; 15(5):406-414.doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248. 2012.01747.x PMID: 22385501
45. Moxey A, White B. Result-oriented agri-environmental schemes in Europe: A comment. Land Use Policy. 2014; 39:397-399.
46. Jack BK, Kousky C, Sims KRE. Designing payments for ecosystem services: Lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008; 105(28):9465-9470.
47. Wunder S. When payments for environmental services will work for conservation. Conservation Letters. 2013; 6(4):230-37.
48. Wunder S, Nelson H, Nikolakis W. Lessons in the design of payments for environmental services: Theory and experience. In Forests and Globalization: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Development, edited by Innes J. and Nikolakis W.; 2014. London & New York: EARTHSCAN AT Routledge.