Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: U.S. experience in theory and practice

Ecological Economics

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 737-752

  Claassen, Roger ^a   Cattaneo, Andrea ^b   Johansson, Robert ^c  

^a ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b OECD   (France)

^c U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

Agri environmental policy; Benefit cost targeting; Competitive bidding; Conservation policy; Conservation Reserve Program; Environmental Quality Incentives Program

Indexed keywords

AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; CONSERVATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY;

EID: 43049148514     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.032     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Babcock B.A., Lakshminarayan P.G., Wu J., and Zilberman D. The economics of a public fund for environmental amenities: a case study of CRP contracts. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78 (1996) 961-971
2. Babcock B.A., Lakshminarayan P.G., Wu J., and Zilberman D. Targeting tools for the purchase of environmental amenities. Land Economics 73 (1997) 325-339
3. Barbarika A. Conservation reserve program: program summary and enrollment statistics as of August 2001. Farm Service Agency (2001), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 60 pp.
4. Berg N.A., and Grey R.J. Soil Conservation in America: What Do We Have to Lose? (1984), American Farmland Trust, Washington D.C.
5. Braden J., and Segerson K. Information problems in the design of nonpoint-source pollution policy. In: Russell C.S., and Shogren J.F. (Eds). Theory, Modeling, and Experience in the Management of Nonpoint-Source Pollution (1993), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
6. Browning E. On the marginal welfare cost of taxation. American Economic Review 77 (1987) 11-23
7. Cason T., and Gangadharan L. Auction design for voluntary conservation programs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 (2004) 1211-1217
8. Caswell M., and Zilberman D. The effects of well depth and land quality on the choice of irrigation technology. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68 (1986) 798-811
9. Caswell M., Fuglie K., Ingram C., Jans S., and Kascak C. Adoption of agricultural production practices: lessons learned from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Area Studies Project. Agricultural Economic Report vol. 792 (2001), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC 110 pp.
10. Cattaneo A. The pursuit of efficiency and its unintended consequences: contract, withdrawals in the environmental quality incentives program. Review of Agricultural Economics 25 (2003) 449-469
11. Cattaneo A., Claassen R., Johansson R., and Weinberg M. Flexible conservation measures on working land: what challenges lie ahead?. Economic Research Report vol. 5 (2005), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC 52 pp.
12. Choe C., and Fraser I. A note on imperfect monitoring of agri-environmental policy. Journal of Agricultural Economics 49 2 (1998) 250-258
13. Claassen R. Emphasis Shifts in U.S. Agri-Environmental Policy. Amber Waves 1 5 (2003) 39-44
14. Claassen R., Hansen L., Peters M., Breneman V., Weinberg M., Cattaneo A., Feather P., Gadsby D., Hellerstein D., Hopkins J., Johnson P., Morehart M., and Smith M. Agri-environmental policy at the crossroads. Agricultural Economic Report vol. 794 (2001), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC 66 pp.
15. Cooper J., and Keim R. Incentive payments to encourage farmer adoption of water quality protection practices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78 (1996) 54-64
16. Crosswhite W., and Sandretto C. Trends in resource protection policies in agriculture. Agricultural Resources Situation and Outlook Report vol. 23 (1991), Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC 49 pp.
17. Dosskey M. Toward quantifying water pollution abatement in response to installing buffers on cropland. Environmental Management 28 (2001) 577-598
18. Feather P., and Hellerstein D. Calibrating benefit function transfer to assess the conservation reserve program. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 1 (1997) 151-162
19. Feather P., Hellerstein D., and Hansen L. Economic valuation of environmental, benefits and the targeting of conservation programs: the case of the CRP. Agricultural Economic Report vol. 778 (1999), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC 56 pp.
20. Giannakas K., and Kaplan J. Policy design and conservation compliance on highly erodible lands. Land Economics 81 (2005) 20-33
21. Goldstein J. Whose Land is it Anyway? Private Property Rights and the Endangered Species Act. Choices (1996) 2nd Quarter
22. Heimlich R. Productivity and erodibility of U.S. cropland. Agricultural Economics Report vol. 604 (1989), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington D.C 47 pp.
23. Heimlich R., and Bills N. An improved soil erosion classification: update, comparison and extension. Soil Conservation: Assessing the National Resources Inventory vol. 2 (1986), National Academy Press, Washington D.C. 1-20
24. Heimlich R., and Claassen R. Agricultural conservation policy at a crossroads. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 27 (1998) 95-107
25. Heimlich R., and Claassen R. Conservation Choices for a New Millennium. Choices (1999) 4th Quarter
26. Hopkins J., and Johansson R. Beyond environmental compliance: sustainable business practices and the bottom line for farmers. Amber Waves 2 2 (2004) 30-37
27. Isik M., and Khanna M. Stochastic technology, risk preferences, and adoption of site-specific technologies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 58 (2003) 305-317
28. Johansson R.C. Watershed nutrient trading under asymmetric information. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 31 (2002) 221-232
29. Johansson R.C., and Kaplan J. A carrot and stick approach to environmental improvement: marrying agri-environmental payments and water quality regulations. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 31 (2004) 91-104
30. Khanna M. Sequential adoption of site-specific techniques and its implications for nitrogen productivity: a double selectivity model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83 (2001) 35-51
31. Khanna M., Isik M., and Zilberman D. Cost-effectiveness of alternative green payment policies for conservation technology adoption with heterogeneous land quality. Agricultural Economics 27 (2002) 157-174
32. Kirwin B., Lubowski R., and Roberts M. How cost-effective are land retirement auctions? Estimating the difference between payments and willingness to accept in the conservation reserve program. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87 (2005) 1239-1247
33. Latacz-Lohmann U., and Van der Hamsvoot C. Auctioning conservation contracts: a theoretical analysis and an application. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 (1997) 407-418
34. Leathers N., and Harrington L. Effectiveness of conservation reserve programs and land 'slippage' in southwestern Kansas. Professional Geographer 52 (2000) 83-93
35. Lichtenberg E. Land quality, irrigation development, and cropping patterns in the northern high plains. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71 (1989) 187-194
36. Lichtenberg E. Cost-responsiveness of conservation practice adoption: a revealed preference approach. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 29 (2004) 420-435
37. Lubowski R., Plantinga A., and Stavins R. Determinants of Land-Use Change In the United States, 1982-1997. Discussion Paper 03-47 (2003), Resources for the Future 48 pp.
38. Moxey A., White B., and Ozanne A. Efficient contract design for agri-environmental policy. Journal of Agricultural Economics 50 (1999) 187-202
39. Osborn C.T. The conservation reserve program: status, future, and policy options. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 48 (1993) 272-279
40. Ozanne A., Hogan T., and Colman D. Moral hazard, risk aversion, and compliance monitoring in agri-environmental policy. European Review of Agricultural Economics 28 (2001) 329-347
41. Reichelderfer K., and Boggess W.G. Government decision making and program performance: the case of the conservation reserve program. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70 (1988) 1-11
42. Ribaudo M.O. Reducing soil erosion: off-site benefits. Agricultural Economic Report vol. 561 (1986), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC 62 pp.
43. Ribaudo M.O. Policy explorations and implications for nonpoint source pollution control: discussion. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 (2004) 1220-1221
44. Ribaudo M.O., Colacicco D., Langner L., Piper S., and Schaible G. Natural resources and natural resource users benefit from the conservation reserve program. Agricultural Economic Report vol. 627 (1990), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC 55 pp.
45. Roberts M., and Bucholtz S. Slippage in the conservation reserve program or spurious correlation: a comment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87 (2005) 244-250
46. Sandretto C. Crop residue management. agricultural resources and environmental indicators, 1996-97. Agriculture Handbook vol. 705 (1997), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service 155-174
47. Sheriff G. Efficient waste? Why farmers over-apply nutrients and the implications for policy design. Review of Agricultural Economics 27 (2005) 542-557
48. Shoemaker R. Agricultural land values and rents under the conservation reserve program. Land Economics 65 (1989) 131-137
49. Shortle J., and Dunn J. The relative efficiency of agricultural source water pollution control policies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68 (1986) 668-677
50. Smith K., and Weinberg M. Measuring the success of conservation programs. Amber Waves 2 (2004) 14-19
51. Soule M.J., Tegene A., and Wiebe K.D. Land tenure and the adoption of conservation practices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82 (2000) 993-1005
52. Sullivan P., Hellerstein D., Hansen L., Johansson R., Koenig S., Lubowski R., McBride W., McGrananhan D., Roberts M., Vogel S., and Bucholtz S. The conservation reserve program: economic implications for rural America. Agricultural Economic Report vol. 834 (2004), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC 55 pp.
53. U.S. Congress. Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act. Public Law (1996) 104-127
54. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (USDA-ERS). Environmental Quality Incentives Program Data. Online document (2006). http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/eqip last accessed March 2, 2006
55. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency (USDA-FSA). Conservation Reserve Program Signup 20. Environmental Benefits Index (1999)
56. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency (USDA-FSA). Conservation Reserve Program Signup 26. Environmental Benefits Index (2003)
57. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). Environmental Quality Incentives Program: Benefit Cost Analysis (2003)
58. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Section 319 National Monitoring Program Projects Home Page. Online document (2005). http://www.bae.ncsu.edu/programs/extension/wqg/319index.htm last accessed March 2, 2006
59. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Case Study: Load Reductions and Allocations. Online document (2006). http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/models/allocation/loads.htm last accessed March 2, 2006
60. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). TMDL Modeling Toolbox. Online document (2006). http://www.epa.gov/athens/wwqtsc/Toolbox-overview.pdf last accessed March 2, 2006
61. U.S. General Accounting Office (USGAO). Agricultural Conservation: USDA Needs to Better Ensure Protection of Highly Erodible Cropland and Wetlands. GAO Report No. 03-418 (2003)
62. Wu J. Slippage effects of the conservation reserve program. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82 (2000) 979-992
63. Wu J., and Boggess W. The optimal allocation of conservation funds. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38 (1999) 302-321
64. Wu J., Zilberman D., and Babcock B. Environmental and distributional impacts of conservation targeting strategies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41 (2001) 333-350