PES in a nutshell: From definitions and origins to PES in practice-Approaches, design process and innovative aspects

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 6, Issue , 2013, Pages 2-11

  Sattler, Claudia ^a   Matzdorf, Bettina ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ CENTRE FOR AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE RESEARCH ZALF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Innovative PES; PES classification; PES definitions; PES design phases; PES history

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890118556     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Balderas Torres A., MacMillan D.C., Skutsch M., Lovett J.C. Payments for ecosystem services and rural development: landowners' preferences and potential participation in western Mexico. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 6:2-11.
2. Baumol W.J. On taxation and the control of externalities. Am. Econ. Rev. 1972, 62:307-322.
3. Baylis K., Peplow S., Rausser G., Simon L. Agri-environmental policies in the EU and United States: a comparison. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65:753-764.
4. Bohlen P.J., Lynch S., Shabman L., Clark M., Shukla S., Swain H. Paying for environmental services from agricultural lands: an example from the northern Everglades. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7:46-55.
5. Bonneville Environmental Foundation, 2013. Our Water Solutions: Water Restoration Certificates-Restore Your Water Footprint and Leave a Lasting Legacy. Available at: http://www.b-e-f.org/business/products/wrcs.
6. Braat LC, de Groot R The ecosystem service agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 1:4-15.
7. Claassen R., Cattaneo A., Johansson R. Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: U.S. expereince in theory and practice. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65:737-752.
8. Coase R.H. The nature of the firm. Economica, N.S. 1937, 4(16):386-405.
9. Coase, R.H., 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Available at: http://www.sfu.ca/(allen/CoaseJLE1960.pdf.
10. Conniff, R., 2012. What's Wrong With Putting a Price on Nature? Available at: http://e360.yale.edu/feature/ecosystem_services_whats_wrong_with_putting_a_price_on_nature/2583/.
11. Corbera E., González Soberanisc C., Brown K. Institutional dimensions of payments for ecosystem services: an analysis of Mexico's carbon forestry programme. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:743-761.
12. Costanza R., Cumberland J.H., Daly H., Goodland R., Norgaard R.B. An Introduction to Ecological Economics 1997, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
13. Costanza R. Stewardship for a "full" world. Current History, January 2008 2008, 30-35.
14. Daly H.E., Farley J. Ecological Economics. Principles and Applications 2010, Island Press, Washington, D.C. second ed.
15. Dobbs T.L., Pretty J. Case study of agri-environmental payments: the United Kingdom. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65:765-775.
16. Duraiappah A.K. Markets for ecosystem services. A Potential Tool for Multilateral Environmental Agreements 2006.
17. Derissen S., Latacz-Lohmann U. What are PES? A review of definitions and an extension. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 6:2-11.
18. Eigenraam, M., Strappazzon, L., Lansdell, N., et al., 2006. EcoTender: Auction for Multiple Environmental Outcomes. Available at: http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au/about-us/publications/economics-and-policy-research/2006-publications/ecotender-auction-for-multiple-environmental-outcomes.
19. Engel S., Pagiola S., Wunder S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65:663-674.
20. Engel S., Palmer C. Payments for environmental services as an alternative to logging under weak property rights: the case of Indonesia. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65:799-809.
21. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), 2005. Tar-Pamlico Basin Agricultural Management Strategy Reduces Instream Nutrients. Available at: http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/nps/success319/upload/2006_01_16_NPS_Success319_state_nc_tar-2.pdf.
22. Ferraro P.J. Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65:810-821.
23. Fauzi A., Anna Z. The complexity of the institution of payment for environmental services: A case study of two Indonesian PES schemes. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 6:2-11.
24. Gartner, T., 2010. Habitat Credit Trading. PERC Report 28 (1). Available at: http://perc.org/articles/habitat-credit-trading.
25. Gómez-Baggethun E., de Groot R., Lomas P.L., Montes C. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:1209-1218.
26. Gutman, P., 2003. From Goodwill to Payments for Environmental Services. A Survey of Financing Options for Sustainable Natural Resource Management in Developing Countries. Available at: http://assets.panda.org/downloads/fin_alt.pdf?bcsi_scan_EC783A0C3C997A81=0&bcsi_scan_filename=fin_alt.pdf.
27. Huber-Stearns H.R., Goldstein J.H., Duke E.A. Intermediary roles and payments for ecosystem services: a typology and program feasibility application in Panama. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 6:2-11.
28. Herzon I., Mikk M. Farmers' perceptions of biodiversity and their willingness to enhance it through agri-environment schemes: a comparative study from Estonia and Finland. J. Nat. Conserv. 2007, 15:10-25.
29. Jack B.K., Kousky C., Sims K.R.E. Designing payments for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 2008, 105:9465-9470.
30. Kemkes R.J., Farley J., Koliba C.J. Determining when payments are an effective policy approach to ecosystem service provision. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:2069-2074.
31. Kinzig A.P., Perrings C., Chapin F.S., Polasky S., Smith V.K., Tilman D., Turner B.L. Paying for ecosystem services-promise or peril. Science 2011, 334:603-604.
32. Kosoy N., Corbera E. Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:1228-1236.
33. Kroeger T., Casey F. An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 64:321-332.
34. Landell-Mills N., Porras I. Silver Bullet or Fool's Gold? A Global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services and their Inpacts on the Poor., Instruments for Sustainable Private Sector Forestry Series Edition 2002, IIED, London.
35. Lockie S. Market instruments, ecosystem services, and property rights: assumptions and conditions for sustained social and ecological benefits. Land Use Policy 2013, 31:90-98.
36. Lurie S., Bennett D., Duncan S., Gosnell H., Lewis Hunter M., Morzillo A.T., Moseley C., Nielsen-Pincus M., Parker R., White E.M. PES marketplace development at the local scale: The Eugene Water and Electric Board as a local watershed services marketplace driver. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 6:2-11.
37. Marsh, G.P., 1864. Man and Nature: Or, Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action.
38. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. Synthesis.
39. Muradian R., Corbera E., Pascual U., Kosoy N., May P.H. Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:1202-1208.
40. Muñoz Escobar M., Hollaender R., Pineda Weffer C. Institutional durability of payments for watershed ecosystem services: lessons from two case studies from Colombia and Germany. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 6:2-11.
41. Martin-Ortega J., Ojea E., Roux C. Payments for Water Ecosystem Services in Latin America: a literature review and conceptual model. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 6:2-11.
42. Norgaard R.B. Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:1219-1227.
43. Nsoh W., Reid C.T. Privatisation of biodiversity: who can sell ecosystem services?. Environ. Law Manage. 2013, 25:12-20.
44. Pagiola, S., 2007. Guidelines for Pro-Poor Payments for Environmental Services. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEEI/Resources/ProPoorPES-2col.pdf.
45. Pagiola S. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65:712-724.
46. Pagiola S., Bishop J., Landell-Mills N. Selling Forest Environmental Services: Market Mechanisms for Conservation and Development 2002, Earthscan, London.
47. Pascual U., Muradian R., Rodríguez L.C., Duraiappah A. Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: a conceptual approach. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:1237-1244.
48. Petheram L., Cambell B.M. Listening to the locals on payments for environmental services. J. Environ. Manage. 2010, 91:1139-1149.
49. Pigou A.C. The Economics of Welfare 1920, Macmillan, London.
50. Pirad R. Market-based instruments for biodiversity and ecosystem services: a lexicon. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 19-20:59-68.
51. Profita, C., 2013. Growing Forests For Health Care. Available at: http://www.opb.org/news/blog/ecotrope/growing-forests-for-health-care/.
52. Rawlins M.A., Westby L. Community participation in payment for ecosystem services design and implementation: an example from Trinidad. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 6:2-11.
53. Robertson M.M. The neoliberalisation of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum 2004, 35:361-373.
54. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovation 2003, Free Press, New York. fifth ed.
55. Ropke I. The early history of modern ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 50:293-314.
56. Ropke I. Trends in the development of ecological economics from late 1980s to the early 2000s. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 55:262-290.
57. Say, J.B., 1829. Cours complet d'économie politique practique, Paris.
58. Smeltzer L.R., Carr A.S. Electronic reverse auctions. Promises, risks and conditions for success. Ind. Marketing Manage. 2003, 481-488.
59. Sokulsky, J., 2012. Program Design: How Do You Build it? Available at: http://www.conference.ifas.ufl.edu/aces/presentations/1%20Monday/C-D/Workshop/pm/YES/1%20-J.%20Sokulsky.pdf.
60. Schomers S., Matzdorf M. Payments for ecosystem services: a review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 6:2-11.
61. Sattler C., Trampnau S., Schomers S., Meyer C., Matzdorf M. Multi-classification of payments for ecosystem services: how do classification characteristics relate to overall PES success?. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 6:2-11.
62. Suhardiman D., Wichelns D., Lestrelin G., Hoanh C.T. Payments for ecosyst. services in Vietnam: market-based incentives or state control of resources?. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 6:2-11.
63. Tallis H., Goldman R., Uhl M., Brosi B. Integrating conservation and development in the field: implementing ecosystem service project. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7(1):12-20.
64. Vatn A. An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:1245-1252.
65. Whitten S.M., Reeson A., Windle J., Rolfe J. Designing conservation tenders to support land holder participation: a framework and case study assessment. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 6:2-11.
66. Wunder S., 2005. Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts. CIFOR Occational Paper No. 42: 1-24.
67. Wunder S., Engel S., Pagiola S. Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countires. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65:834-852.
68. WWF (World Wildlife Fund), 2007. Ecosystem Services and Payments for Ecosystme Services: Why Shold Businesses Care? Available at: http://assets.panda.org/downloads/business_brochure_1.pdf.