The zone of parental discretion: An ethical tool for dealing with disagreement between parents and doctors about medical treatment for a child

Clinical Ethics

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 1-8

  Gillam, Lynn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Best interests; Children; Harm Principle; Parental refusal of treatment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84961243374     PISSN: 14777509     EISSN: 1758101X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1477750915622033     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Buchanan E and Brock W. Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
2. Beauchamp TL and Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
3. Baines P. Death and best interests. Clin Ethics 2008; 3: 171-175.
4. Kopelman LM. Using the best interests standard in treatment decisions for young children. In: Miller G (ed.) Pediatric Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
5. Salter EK. Deciding for a child: a comprehensive analysis of the best interest standard. Theor Med Bioeth 2012; 33: 179-198.
6. Diekema DS. Parental refusals of medical treatment: the Harm Principle as threshold for state intervention. Theor Med 2004; 25: 243-264.
7. Feinberg J. Harm to Others. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.
8. Ross LF. Children, Families, and Health Care Decision Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
9. McDougall RJ and Notini L. Overriding parents' medical decisions for their children: a systematic review of normative literature. J Med Ethics 2014; 40: 448-452.
10. Gold H, Hall G and Gillam L. Role and function of a paediatric clinical ethics service: experiences at the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne. J Paediatr Child Health 2011; 47: 632-636.
11. McDougall R, Delany C, Spriggs M, et al. Collaboration in clinical ethics consultation: a method for achieving "balanced accountability". Am J Bioeth 2014; 14: 47-48.
12. Degrazia D. Value theory and the best interests standard 1. Bioethics 1995; 9: 50-61.
13. Binik A. On the minimal risk threshold in research with children. Am J Bioeth 2014; 14: 3-12.
14. Singh J, Fanaroff J, Andrews B, et al. Resuscitation in the gray zone of viability: determining physician preferences and predicting infant outcomes. Pediatrics 2007; 120: 519-526.
15. Leuthner SR. Borderline viability: controversies in caring for the extremely premature infant. Clin Perinatol 2014; 41: 799-814.
16. Seri I and Evans J. Limits of viability: definition of the gray zone. J Perinatol 2008; 28: S4-S8.
17. Rachels J. Active and passive euthanasia. N Engl J Med 1975; 292: 78-80.
18. Takala T. Acts and omissions. In: Ashcroft RE, Dawson A, Draper H, et al (eds) Principles of Health Care Ethics, 2nd ed. Wiley: Chichester, 2007.
19. Blustein J. Doing the best for one's child: satisficing versus optimizing parentalism. Theor Med Bioeth 2012; 33: 199-205.
20. Kopelman LM. The best interests standard as threshold, ideal, and standard of reasonableness. J Med Philos 1997; 22: 271-289.
21. Lyons B. Children, best interests and the courts: a response to Bridgeman. Clin Ethics 2010; 5: 188-194.