Borderline viability: Controversies in caring for the extremely premature infant

Clinics in Perinatology

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 799-814

  Leuthner, Steven R ^a  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Ethics; Extreme prematurity; Periviable; Viability

Indexed keywords

AGEISM; APGAR SCORE; FAMILY CENTERED CARE; FAMILY COUNSELING; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; NEWBORN ASSESSMENT; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; PARENTAL AUTONOMY; PERINATAL CARE; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREMATURE LABOR; PREMATURITY; PROGNOSIS; RESUSCITATION; REVIEW; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; FETAL WELL BEING; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; NEWBORN; PARENT; STANDARDS;

DECISION MAKING; FETAL VIABILITY; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT, EXTREMELY PREMATURE; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTENSIVE CARE, NEONATAL; PARENTS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 84911008144     PISSN: 00955108     EISSN: 15579840     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2014.08.005     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Allen M.C., Donohue P.K., Dusman A.E. The limit of viability: neonatal outcome of infants born at 22 to 25 weeks' gestation. NEngl J Med 1993, 329:1597-1601.
2. Hack M., Fanaroff A.A. Outcomes of extremely immature infants - a perinatal dilemma. N Engl J Med 1993, 329:1649-1650.
3. Yellin P.B., Fleischman A.R. DNR in the DR?. JPerinatol 1995, 15:232-236.
4. Pinkerton J.V., Finnerty J.J., Lombardo P.A., et al. Parental rights at the birth of a near-viable infant: conflicting perspectives. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997, 177:283-290.
5. Kaempf J.W., Tomlinson M., Arduza C., et al. Medical staff guidelines for periviability pregnancy counseling and medical treatment of extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 2006, 117(1):22-29.
6. Nuffield Council on Bioethics Critical care and decisions in fetal and neonatal medicine: ethical issues 2006, Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London, Available at:. http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/go/ourwork/neonatal/introduction.
7. Wilkinson A.R., Ahluwalia J., Cole A., et al. Management of babies born extremely preterm at less than 26 weeks of gestation: a framework for clinical practice at the time of birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009, 94(1):f2-f5.
8. Jeffries A.L., Kirpalani H.M., Canadian Paediatric Society Fetus and Newborn Committee Counselling and management for anticipated extremely preterm birth. Paediatr Child Health 2012, 17(8):443. Available at:. http://www.cps.ca/en.
9. Kattwinkel J., Perlman J.M., Aziz K., American Heart Association, et al. Neonatal resuscitation: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Pediatrics 2010, 126(5):e1400-e1413.
10. MacDonald H., American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn Perinatal care at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 2002, 110(5):1024-1027.
11. Verloove-Vanhorick S.P. Management of the neonate at the limits of viability: the Dutch viewpoint. BJOG 2006, 113(Suppl 3):13-16.
12. Raju T.N., Mercer B.M., Burchfield D.J., et al. Periviable birth: executive summary of a Joint Workshop by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. JPerinatol 2014, 34(5):333-342.
13. Lui K., Bajuk B., Foster K., et al. Perinatal care at the borderlines of viability: a consensus statement based on a NSW and ACT consensus workshop. Med J Aust 2006, 185(9):495-500.
14. Swiss Society of Neonatologists. Guidelines. Recommendation for the care of infants born at the limit of viability (GA 22-26 weeks). Available at: Accessed September 23, 2014. http://www.neonet.ch/Infants_born_at_the_limit_of_viability_-_english_final.pdf.
15. Moriette G., Rameix S., Azria E., Groupe de réflexion sur les aspects éthiques de la périnatologie, et al. Very premature births: dilemmas and management, second part: ethical aspects and recommendations. Arch Pediatr 2010, 17(5):527-539. [in French].
16. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: neonatal resuscitation. Pediatrics 2006, 117:e978-e988.
17. Pignotti M.S., Donzelli G. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability: an international comparison of practical guidelines for the treatment of extremely preterm births. Pediatrics 2008, 121(1):e193-e198.
18. Wilkinson D.J. Gestational ageism. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2012, 166(6):567-572.
19. Children and infants-case discussion: the messenger case. Available at: Accessed September 23, 2014. http://www.msu.edu/course/hm/546/messenger.htm.
20. Lantos J.D., Meadow W.L. Neonatal bioethics; the moral challenges of medical innovation 2006, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (MD).
21. Miller v HCA, Inc. 118 S.W. 3d 758 (Tex. 2003).
22. Montalvo v Borkovec. 647 N.W. 2d 413 (Wis.App. 2002).
23. Sayeed S.A. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Pediatrics 2005, 116:e576-e585.
24. Preston v Meriter Hospital. 678 N.W. 2d 347 (Wis.App. 2004).
25. Robertson J.A. Extreme prematurity and parental rights after baby doe. Hastings Cent Rep 2004, 34(4):32-39.
26. Maternal fetal medicine: principles & practices 2004, 321-322. Saunders, Philadelphia. 5th edition. R.K. Creasy, R. Resnick, J. Iams (Eds.).
27. Robinson H.P. Sonar measurement of fetal crown-rump length as means of assessing maturity in first trimester of pregnancy. Br Med J 1973, 4(5883):28-31.
28. Chervenak F.A., Skupski D.W., Romero R., et al. How accurate is fetal biometry in the assessment of fetal age?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998, 178(4):678-687.
29. Donovan E.F., Tyson J.E., Ehrenkranz R.E., et al. Inaccuracy of Ballard scores before 28 weeks' gestation. JPediatr 1999, 135:147-152.
30. Mercurio M.R. Physicians' refusal to resuscitate at borderline gestational age. JPerinatol 2005, 25:685-689.
31. Tyson J.E., Parikh N.A., Langer J., National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, et al. Intensive care for extreme prematurity: moving beyond gestational age. NEngl J Med 2008, 358(16):1672-1681.
32. Singh J., Fanaroff J., Andrews B., et al. Resuscitation in the "gray zone" of viability: determining physician preferences and predicting infant outcomes. Pediatrics 2007, 120(3):519-526.
33. Lee H.C., Subeh M., Gould J.B. Low Apgar score and mortality in extremely preterm neonates born in the United States. Acta Paediatr 2010, 99(12):1785-1789.
34. Lagatta J., Yan K., Hoffman R. The association between 5-min Apgar score and mortality disappears after 24 h at the borderline of viability. Acta Paediatr 2012, 101(6):e243-e247.
35. Meadow W., Reimshisel T., Lantos J. Birth weight-specific mortality for extremely low birth weight infants vanishes by four days of life: epidemiology and ethics in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics 1996, 97(5):636-643.
36. Meadow W., Lee G., Lin L., et al. Changes in mortality for extremely low birth weight infants in the 1990s: implications for treatment decisions and resource use. Pediatrics 2004, 113:1223-1229.
37. Donohue P.K., Boss R.D., Shepard J., et al. Interventions at the border of viability; perspective over a decade. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009, 163(10):902-906.
38. Broitman E., Ambalavanan N., Higgins R.D., et al. Clinical data predict neurodevelopmental outcome better than head ultrasound in extremely low birth weight infants. JPediatr 2007, 151(5):500-505.
39. Meadow W., Frain L., Ren Y., et al. Serial assessment of mortality in the neonatal intensive care unit by algorithm and intuition: certainty, uncertainty, and informed consent. Pediatrics 2002, 109(5):878-886.
40. Meadow W., Lagatta J., Andrews B., et al. Just in time: ethical implications of serial pre- dictions of death and morbidity for ventilated premature infants. Pediatrics 2008, 121(4):732-740.
41. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment: a report on the ethical, medical, and legal issues in treatment decisions 1983, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
42. Position of the American Academy of Neurology on certain aspects of the care and management of the persistent vegetative state patient. Adopted by the Executive Board, American Academy of Neurology, April 21, 1988, Cincinnati, Ohio. Neurology 1989, 39:125-126.
43. Truog R.D., Brackett S.E., Burns J.P., et al. Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: the ethics committee of the society of critical care medicine. Crit Care Med 2001, 29(12):2332-2348.
44. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Guidelines on forgoing life-sustaining medical treatment. Pediatrics 1994, 93:532-536.
45. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association Code of medical ethics: current opinions and annotations, 2006-2007 edition 2006, American Medical Association, Chicago.
46. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn, Bell E.F. Noninitiation or withdrawal of intensive care for high-risk newborns. Pediatrics 2007, 119:401-403.
47. Berlinger N., Jennings B., Wolf S.M. The Hastings Center guidelines for decisions on life-sustaining treatment and care near the end of life: revised and expanded second edition 2013, Oxford University Press, New York.
48. Dickenson D.L. Are medical ethicists out of touch? Practitioner attitudes in the US and UK towards decisions at the end of life. JMed Ethics 2000, 26(4):254-260.
49. Feltman D.M., Du H., Leuthner S.R. Survey of neonatologists' attitudes toward limiting life-sustaining treatments in the neonatal intensive care unit. JPerinatol 2012, 32(11):886-892.
50. Costeloe K., Hennessy E., Gibson A.T., EPICure Study Group, et al. The EPICure study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 2000, 106:659-671.
51. Batton D. Resuscitation of extremely low gestational age infants: an advisory committee's dilemmas. Acta Paediatr 2010, 99(6):810-811.
52. Janvier A., Barrington K.J., Aziz K., et al. Ethics ain't easy: do we need simple rules for complicated ethical decisions?. Acta Paediatr 2008, 97(4):402-406.
53. Janvier A., Barrington K.J., Aziz K., et al. CPS position statement for prenatal counselling before a premature birth: simple rules for complicated decisions. Paediatr Child Health 2014, 19(1):22-24.
54. Meadow W., Lantos J. Moral reflections on neonatal intensive care. Pediatrics 2009, 123(2):595-597.
55. Turillazzi E., Fineschi V. How old are you? newborn gestational age discriminates neonatal resuscitation practices in the Italian debate. BMC Med Ethics 2009, 10:19.
56. Janvier A., Leblanc I., Barrington K.J. The best-interest standard is not applied for neonatal resuscitation decisions. Pediatrics 2008, 121(5):963-969.
57. Meadow W. Ethics at the margins of viability. Neoreviews 2013, 14:e588.
58. Andrews B., Lagatta J., Chu A., et al. The nonimpact of gestational age on neurodevelopmental outcome for ventilated survivors born at 23-28 weeks of gestation. Acta Paediatr 2012, 101:574-578.
59. Carbajal R., Rousset A., Danan C., et al. Epidemiology and treatment of painful procedures in neonates in intensive care units. JAMA 2008, 300(1):60-70.
60. Wilkinson D.J. Death or disability? The 'carmentis machine' and decision-making for critically ill children 2013, P125-P145. Oxford University Press, Oxford (UK).
61. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics 1995, 95:314-317.
62. Leuthner S.R. Decisions regarding resuscitation of the extremely premature infant and models of best interest. JPerinatol 2001, 21:193-198.
63. Brody H., Bartholome W.G. In the best interest of. Hastings Cent Rep 1988, 18:37-40.
64. Ross L.F. Children, families, and health care decision making 1998, Clarendon Press, Oxford (UK).
65. Kopelman L.M. The best-interests standard as threshold, ideal, and standard of reasonableness. JMed Philos 1997, 22:271-289.
66. Coggon J. Best interests, public interest, and the power of the medical profession. Health Care Anal 2008, 16:219-232.
67. Buchanan A.E., Brock D.W. Deciding for others: the ethics of surrogate decision making 1989, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (United Kingdom).
68. Kipnis K. Harm and uncertainty in newborn intensive care. Theor Med Bioeth 2007, 28(5):393-412.
69. Wilkinson D.J. Alife worth giving? The threshold for permissible withdrawal of life support from disabled newborn infants. Am J Bioeth 2011, 11(2):20-32.
70. Curran A.L., Sharples P.M., White C., et al. Time costs of caring for children with severe disabilities compared with caring for children without disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001, 43(8):529-533.
71. Carter B.S., Leuthner S.R. Decision-making in the NICU: strategies, statistics, and "satisficing". Bioethics Forum 2002, 18(3-4):7-15.
72. Harrison H. Parents and handicapped infants. NEngl J Med 1983, 309(11):664-665.
73. Harrison H. The principles for family-centered care and the pediatrician's role. Pediatrics 2003, 112(3):691-696.
74. Janvier A., Lorenz J.M., Lantos J.D. Antenatal counseling for parents pacing an extremely preterm birth: limitations of the medical evidence. Acta Paediatr 2012, 101:800-804.
75. Hayward M.F., Murphy R.O., Lorenz J.M. Message framing and perinatal decisions. Pediatrics 2008, 122(1):109-118.
76. Schumacher R.E. Myth: neonatology is evidence-based. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2011, 16:288-292.
77. Streiner D.L., Saigal S., Burrows E., et al. Attitudes of parents and health care professionals toward active treatment of extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 2001, 108:152-157.
78. Saigal S., Feeny D., Rosenbaum P., et al. Self-perceived health status and health-related quality of life of extremely low birth-weight infants at adolescence. JAMA 1996, 276:453-459.
79. Saigal S., Rosenbaum P.L., Feeny D., et al. Parental perspectives of the health status and health-related quality of life of teen-aged children who were extremely low birth weight and term controls. Pediatrics 2000, 105:569-574.
80. Feeny D., Furlong W., Saigal S., et al. Comparing directly measured standard gamble scores to HUI2 and HUI3 utility scores: group- and individual-level comparisons. Soc Sci Med 2004, 58:799-809.
81. Harrison H. Making lemonade: a parent's view of 'quality of life' studies. JClin Ethics 2001, 12:239-250. when life gives you lemons.
82. Patrick D.L., Danis M., Southerland L.I., et al. Quality of life following intensive care. JGen Intern Med 1988, 3(3):218-223.
83. Schmitt S.K. Costs of newborn care in California: a population-based study. Pediatrics 2006, 117:154-160.
84. Stolz J., McCormick M. Restricting access to neonatal intensive care: effect on mortality and economic savings. Pediatrics 1998, 101:344.
85. Lantos J.D., Mokalla M., Meado W. Resource allocation in neonatal and medical ICUs. Epidemiology and rationing at the extremes of life. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997, 156:185-189.
86. Camosy C. Too expensive to treat? Finitude, tragedy, and the neonatal ICU 2010, P189-P191. Wm. B. Eerdmans Press, Grand Rapids (MI).
87. Hack M. Chronic conditions, functional limitations, and special health care needs of school-aged children born with extremely low birth weight in the 1990's. JAMA 2005, 294:318-325.
88. Camosy C.C. Just distribution of health-care resources and the neonatal ICU. Pediatr Rev 2011, 32(5):205-207.
89. Leuthner SR, Lorenz JM. Can rule-based ethics help in the NICU? Available at: Accessed June 2, 2014. http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/2008/10/pdf/ccas2-0810.pdf.
90. Lantos J., Meadow W. Re: 'Decisions about life-sustaining measures in children: in whose best interests?'. Acta Paediatr 2012, 101(4):337.