-
1
-
-
33847021423
-
Constructing a systematic review for argument-based clinical ethics literature: the example of concealed medications
-
McCullough LB, Coverdale JH, Chervenak FA. Constructing a systematic review for argument-based clinical ethics literature: the example of concealed medications. J Med Philos 200732:65-76.
-
(2007)
J Med Philos
, vol.32
, pp. 65-76
-
-
McCullough, L.B.1
Coverdale, J.H.2
Chervenak, F.A.3
-
2
-
-
84923828680
-
Clinical ethics in pediatrics: a case-based textbook
-
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
-
Diekema DS, Mercurio MR, Adam MB. Clinical ethics in pediatrics: a case-based textbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
-
(2011)
-
-
Diekema, D.S.1
Mercurio, M.R.2
Adam, M.B.3
-
3
-
-
84928929027
-
Ethical dilemmas in pediatrics: cases and commentaries
-
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
-
Frankel LR, Goldworth A, Rorty MV, et al. Ethical dilemmas in pediatrics: cases and commentaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
-
(2005)
-
-
Frankel, L.R.1
Goldworth, A.2
Rorty, M.V.3
-
4
-
-
84927037878
-
Pediatric bioethics
-
New York: Cambridge University Press
-
Miller G. Pediatric bioethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
-
(2010)
-
-
Miller, G.1
-
5
-
-
7244254356
-
Parental refusals of medical treatment: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention
-
Diekema DS. Parental refusals of medical treatment: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention. Theor Med Bioeth 200425:243-64.
-
(2004)
Theor Med Bioeth
, vol.25
, pp. 243-264
-
-
Diekema, D.S.1
-
6
-
-
84902680862
-
Parental refusals of recommended medical interventions
-
In, Diekema DS, Mercurio MR, Adam MB, eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
-
Diekema DS. Parental refusals of recommended medical interventions. In: Diekema DS, Mercurio MR, Adam MB, eds. Clinical ethics in pediatrics: a case-based textbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011:14-7.
-
(2011)
Clinical ethics in pediatrics: a case-based textbook
, pp. 14-17
-
-
Diekema, D.S.1
-
7
-
-
80052335085
-
Revisiting the best interest standard: uses and misuses
-
Diekema DS. Revisiting the best interest standard: uses and misuses. J Clin Ethics 201122:128-33.
-
(2011)
J Clin Ethics
, vol.22
, pp. 128-133
-
-
Diekema, D.S.1
-
8
-
-
33845501512
-
Children, families and healthcare decision-making
-
New York: Oxford University Press
-
Ross LF. Children, families and healthcare decision-making. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
-
(1998)
-
-
Ross, L.F.1
-
9
-
-
84900568769
-
Children, ethics, and modern medicine
-
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
-
Miller RB. Children, ethics, and modern medicine. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2003.
-
(2003)
-
-
Miller, R.B.1
-
10
-
-
0003447638
-
Deciding for others: the ethics of surrogate decision making
-
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
-
Buchanan AE, Brock DW. Deciding for others: the ethics of surrogate decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
-
(1989)
-
-
Buchanan, A.E.1
Brock, D.W.2
-
11
-
-
0031158249
-
The best-interests standard as threshold, ideal, and standard of reasonableness
-
Kopelman LM. The best-interests standard as threshold, ideal, and standard of reasonableness. J Med Philos 199722:271-89.
-
(1997)
J Med Philos
, vol.22
, pp. 271-289
-
-
Kopelman, L.M.1
-
12
-
-
33847390712
-
The best interests standard for incompetent or incapacitated patients of all ages
-
Kopelman LM. The best interests standard for incompetent or incapacitated patients of all ages. J Law Med Ethics 200735:187-96.
-
(2007)
J Law Med Ethics
, vol.35
, pp. 187-196
-
-
Kopelman, L.M.1
-
13
-
-
36749041464
-
Using a new analysis of the best interests standard to address cultural disputes: whose data, which values?
-
Kopelman LM, Kopelman AE. Using a new analysis of the best interests standard to address cultural disputes: whose data, which values? Theor Med Bioeth 200728:373-91.
-
(2007)
Theor Med Bioeth
, vol.28
, pp. 373-391
-
-
Kopelman, L.M.1
Kopelman, A.E.2
-
14
-
-
84926979713
-
Using the best-interests standard in treatment decisions for young children
-
In: Miller G. ed, New York: Cambridge University Press
-
Kopelman LM. Using the best-interests standard in treatment decisions for young children. In: Miller G. ed. Pediatric bioethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010:22-37.
-
(2010)
Pediatric bioethics
, pp. 22-37
-
-
Kopelman, L.M.1
-
15
-
-
80052307309
-
The best interest standard: both guide and limit to medical decision making on behalf of incapacitated patients
-
Pope TM. The best interest standard: both guide and limit to medical decision making on behalf of incapacitated patients. J Clin Ethics 201122:134-8.
-
(2011)
J Clin Ethics
, vol.22
, pp. 134-138
-
-
Pope, T.M.1
-
16
-
-
84876308186
-
Using the best interests standard to generate actual duties
-
Kopelman LM. Using the best interests standard to generate actual duties. AJOB Prim Res 20134:11-14.
-
(2013)
AJOB Prim Res
, vol.4
, pp. 11-14
-
-
Kopelman, L.M.1
-
17
-
-
8744279531
-
Return to the best interests of the child
-
In: Gaylin W, Macklin R, eds, New York: Springer
-
Macklin R. Return to the best interests of the child. In: Gaylin W, Macklin R, eds. Who speaks for the child? The problems of proxy consent. New York: Springer, 1982:265-301.
-
(1982)
Who speaks for the child? The problems of proxy consent
, pp. 265-301
-
-
Macklin, R.1
-
18
-
-
84902680852
-
Ethics and the provision of futile, harmful, or burdensome treatment to children
-
Nelson LJ, Nelson RM. Ethics and the provision of futile, harmful, or burdensome treatment to children.
-
-
-
Nelson, L.J.1
Nelson, R.M.2
-
20
-
-
84927003559
-
Contributions of ethical theory to pediatric ethics: pediatricians and parents as co-fiduciaries of pediatric patients
-
In: Miller G, ed., New York: Cambridge University Press
-
McCullough LB. Contributions of ethical theory to pediatric ethics: pediatricians and parents as co-fiduciaries of pediatric patients. In: Miller G, ed. Pediatric bioethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010:11-21.
-
(2010)
Pediatric bioethics
, pp. 11-21
-
-
McCullough, L.B.1
-
21
-
-
0022021461
-
Parental discretion and children's rights: background and implications for medical decision-making
-
Schoeman F. Parental discretion and children's rights: background and implications for medical decision-making. J Med Philos 198510:45-61.
-
(1985)
J Med Philos
, vol.10
, pp. 45-61
-
-
Schoeman, F.1
-
22
-
-
7244242367
-
The not unreasonable standard for assessment of surrogates and surrogate decisions
-
Rhodes R, Holzman IR. The not unreasonable standard for assessment of surrogates and surrogate decisions. Theor Med 200425:367-85.
-
(2004)
Theor Med
, vol.25
, pp. 367-385
-
-
Rhodes, R.1
Holzman, I.R.2
-
23
-
-
0030060442
-
Neonatal and pediatric critical care: ethical decision making
-
Cooper R, Koch KA. Neonatal and pediatric critical care: ethical decision making. Crit Care Clin 199612:149-64.
-
(1996)
Crit Care Clin
, vol.12
, pp. 149-164
-
-
Cooper, R.1
Koch, K.A.2
-
24
-
-
80052511797
-
Best interest of the child: surrogate decision making and the economics of externalities
-
DeMarco JP, Powell DP, Stewart DO. Best interest of the child: surrogate decision making and the economics of externalities. J Bioeth Inq 20118:289-98.
-
(2011)
J Bioeth Inq
, vol.8
, pp. 289-298
-
-
DeMarco, J.P.1
Powell, D.P.2
Stewart, D.O.3
-
25
-
-
7244241342
-
Parental refusals of medical treatment on religious grounds: pediatric ethics and the children of Christian Scientists
-
In, May L, Sistare C, Schonsheck J, eds, Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press
-
Kipnis K. Parental refusals of medical treatment on religious grounds: pediatric ethics and the children of Christian Scientists. In: May L, Sistare C, Schonsheck J, eds. Liberty, Equality and Plurality. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press, 1997:268-80.
-
(1997)
Liberty, Equality and Plurality
, pp. 268-280
-
-
Kipnis, K.1
|