Toward the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Rehabilitation Set: A Minimal Generic Set of Domains for Rehabilitation as a Health Strategy

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 97, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 875-884

  Prodinger, Birgit ^a,b,c   Cieza, Alarcos ^c,d,e   Oberhauser, Cornelia ^e   Bickenbach, Jerome ^a,b,c   Üstün, Tevfik Bedirhan ^b   Chatterji, Somnath ^b   Stucki, Gerold ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LUCERNE   (Switzerland)

^b WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

^c SWISS PARAPLEGIC RESEARCH   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Environment; Health; Health information systems; International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; Reference standards; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSULTATION; DEPENDENT VARIABLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDEPENDENT VARIABLE; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REHABILITATION CARE; SECONDARY ANALYSIS; ACUTE DISEASE; AGED; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLASSIFICATION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; DISABLED PERSON; ENVIRONMENT; HEALTH STATUS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; REHABILITATION; SELF HELP DEVICE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOCIAL WORK; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; AGED; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELF-HELP DEVICES; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOCIAL WORK;

EID: 84961233751     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: 1532821X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.030     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. 1 World Health Organization, World report on disability. 2011, World Health Organization, Geneva.
2. 2 World Health Organization, International classification of functioning, disability and health. 2001, World Health Organization, Geneva.
3. 3 Blas, E., Kurup, A.S., Equity, social determinants and public health programmes. 2010, World Health Organization, Geneva.
4. 4 Bickenbach, J.E., Monitoring the United Nation's Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: data and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. BMC Public Health, 11(Suppl 4), 2011, S8.
5. 5 World Health Organization, Global disability action plan 2014-2012: better health for people with disability. 2014, World Health Organization, Geneva.
6. 6 Mayo, N.E., Poissant, L., Ahmed, S., et al. Incorporating the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) into an electronic health record to create indicators of function: proof of concept using the SF-12. J Am Med Inform Assoc 11 (2004), 514–522.
7. 7 Stallinga, H.A., Roodbol, P.F., Annema, C., Jansen, G.J., Wynia, K., Functioning assessment vs. conventional medical assessment: a comparative study on health professionals’ clinical decision-making and the fit with patient's own perspective of health. J Clin Nurs 23 (2014), 1044–1054.
8. 8 Rauch, A., Escorpizo, R., Riddle, D.L., Eriks-Hoogland, I., Stucki, G., Cieza, A., Using a case report of a patient with spinal cord injury to illustrate the application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health during multidisciplinary patient management. Phys Ther 90 (2010), 1039–1052.
9. 9 Mayo, N.E., Nadeau, L., Levesque, L., Miller, S., Poissant, L., Tamblyn, R., Does the addition of functional status indicators to case-mix adjustment indices improve prediction of hospitalization, institutionalization, and death in the elderly?. Med Care 43 (2005), 1194–1202.
10. 10 Francescutti, C., Frattura, L., Troiano, R., et al. Towards a common disability assessment framework: theoretical and methodological issues for providing public services and benefits using ICF. Disabil Rehabil 31:Suppl 1 (2009), S8–S15.
11. 11 Hollenweger, J., Moretti, M., Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Children and Youth version in education systems: a new approach to eligibility. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 91:13 Suppl 1 (2012), S97–S102.
12. 12 Cieza, A., Oberhauser, C., Bickenbach, J., et al. The English are healthier than the Americans: really?. Int J Epidemiol 44 (2015), 229–238.
13. 13 Kostanjsek, N., Good, A., Madden, R.H., et al. Counting disability: global and national estimation. Disabil Rehabil 35 (2013), 1065–1069.
14. 14 Conti-Becker, A., Doralp, S., Fayed, N., et al. A comparison of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health to the disability tax credit. Can J Occup Ther 74:3 Suppl (2007), 281–287.
15. 15 Cieza, A., Oberhauser, C., Bickenbach, J., Chatterji, S., Stucki, G., Towards a minimal generic set of domains of functioning and health. BMC Public Health, 14, 2014, 218.
16. 16 Stucki, G., Cieza, A., Melvin, J., The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a unifying model for the conceptual description of the rehabilitation strategy. J Rehabil Med 39 (2007), 279–285.
17. 17 ICF Research Branch. ICF Core Sets in clinical practice, 2015 Available at: http://www.icf-core-sets.org/ Accessed May 15, 2015.
18. 18 Breiman, L., Random forests. Mach Learn 45 (2001), 5–32.
19. 19 Yuan, M., Lin, Y., Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 68 (2006), 49–67.
20. 20 Meier, L., Van De Geer, S., Bühlmann, P., The group Lasso for logistic regression. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 70 (2008), 53–71.
21. 21 Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J., The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. 2009, Springer, New York.
22. 22 Gertheiss, J., Hogger, S., Oberhauser, C., Tutz, G., Selection of ordinally scaled independent variables with applications to international classification of functioning core sets. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 60 (2011), 377–395.
23. 23 Gertheiss, J., Tutz, G., Penalized regression with ordinal predictors. Int Stat Rev 77 (2009), 345–365.
24. 24 Bostan, C., Oberhauser, C., Stucki, G., Bickenbach, J., Cieza, A., Biological health or lived health: which predicts self-reported general health better?. BMC Public Health, 14, 2014, 189.
25. 25 Schulz, A., Israel, B., Williams, D., Parker, E., Becker, A., James, S., Social inequalities, stressors and self reported health status among African American and white women in the Detroit metropolitan area. Soc Sci Med 51 (2000), 1639–1653.
26. 26 Ware, J.E., Kosinski, M., Dewey, J.E., Gandek, B., How to score version 2 of the SF-36® Health Survey. 2000, Quality Metric Inc., Lincoln.
27. 27 R Development Core Team, R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2013, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
28. 28 Grill, E., Ewert, T., Chatterji, S., Kostanjsek, N., Stucki, G., ICF Core Sets development for the acute hospital and early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 27 (2005), 361–366.
29. 29 Grill, E., Strobl, R., Mueller, M., Quittan, M., Kostanjsek, N., Stucki, G., ICF Core Sets for early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. J Rehabil Med 43 (2011), 131–138.
30. 30 Scheuringer, M., Stucki, G., Huber, E.O., et al. ICF Core Set for patients with musculoskeletal conditions in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 27 (2005), 405–410.
31. 31 Wildner, M., Quittan, M., Portenier, L., et al. ICF Core Set for patients with cardiopulmonary conditions in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 27 (2005), 397–404.
32. 32 Ewert, T., Grill, E., Bartholomeyczik, S., et al. ICF Core Set for patients with neurological conditions in the acute hospital. Disabil Rehabil 27 (2005), 367–373.
33. 33 Grill, E., Hermes, R., Swoboda, W., Uzarewicz, C., Kostanjsek, N., Stucki, G., ICF Core Set for geriatric patients in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 27 (2005), 411–417.
34. 34 Jacucci, E., Shaw, V., Braa, J., Standardization of health information systems in South Africa: the challenge of local sustainability. Inf Technol Dev 12 (2006), 225–239.
35. 35 World Health Organization, Building bridges between diseases, disabilities and assistive devices: linking the GBD, ICF and ISO 9999. 2010, World Health Organization, Geneva.
36. 36 Bauer, S., Elsaesser, L.J., Scherer, M., Sax, C., Arthanat, S., Promoting a standard for assistive technology service delivery. Technol Disabil 26 (2014), 39–48.
37. 37 Federici, S., Scherer, M.J., Borsci, S., An ideal model of an assistive technology assessment and delivery process. Technol Disabil 26 (2014), 27–38.
38. 38 The British Standards Institution, Information and documentation—Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies—Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval. ISO 25964-1:2011(E). 2011, The British Standards Institution, London.
39. 39 International Organization for Standardization, Health informatics - Capacity-based eHealth architecture roadmap. Part 2: Architectural components and maturity model. PD ISO/TR 14639-2:2014. 2014, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (Switzerland).
40. 40 World Health Organization. Model Disability Survey. Available at: http://www.who.int/disabilities/data/mds/en/. Accessed November 4, 2014.
41. 41 Rastall, P., Wooldridge, D., Carpenter, I., Hoogewerf, J., Prodinger, B., Perspectives of patients with long term health conditions. Annex 10 to SemanticHealthNet Deliverable D3.3 of March 31, 2015. SemanticHealthNet. 2015 Available at: http://www.semantichealthnet.eu/index.cfm/deliverables/ Accessed August 21, 2015.
42. 42 Grimby, G., Tennant, A., Tesio, L., The use of raw scores from ordinal scales: time to end malpractice?. J Rehabil Med 44 (2012), 97–98.