(Why) Does Evolution Favour Embryogenesis?

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 562-573

  Rensing, Stefan A ^a,b  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BROWN ALGA; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EVOLUTION; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; PHAEOPHYTA; PLANTS;

EID: 84960971017     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.02.004     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Haeckel E. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen 1866, Verlag Georg Reimer.
2. Ryan J.F., Baxevanis A.D. Hox, Wnt, and the evolution of the primary body axis: insights from the early-divergent phyla. Biol. Direct 2007, 2:37.
3. Manuel M. Early evolution of symmetry and polarity in metazoan body plans. C. R. Biol. 2009, 332:184-209.
4. Hudry B., et al. Molecular insights into the origin of the Hox-TALE patterning system. Elife 2014, 3:e01939.
5. Srivastava M., et al. The Trichoplax genome and the nature of placozoans. Nature 2008, 454:955-960.
6. Lanna E. Evo-devo of non-bilaterian animals. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2015, 38:284-300.
7. Riesgo A., et al. The analysis of eight transcriptomes from all poriferan classes reveals surprising genetic complexity in sponges. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2014, 31:1102-1120.
8. Ereskovsky A.V., et al. Oscarella lobularis (Homoscleromorpha, Porifera) regeneration: epithelial morphogenesis and metaplasia. PLoS ONE 2015, 10:e0134566.
9. Adamska M., et al. Wnt and TGF-beta expression in the sponge Amphimedon queenslandica and the origin of metazoan embryonic patterning. PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e1031.
10. Srivastava M., et al. The Amphimedon queenslandica genome and the evolution of animal complexity. Nature 2010, 466:720-726.
11. Fairclough S.R., et al. Premetazoan genome evolution and the regulation of cell differentiation in the choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta. Genome Biol. 2013, 14:R15.
12. Levin T.C., et al. The Rosetteless gene controls development in the choanoflagellate S. rosetta. Elife 2014, 3:e04070.
13. ten Hove C.A., et al. Building a plant: cell fate specification in the early Arabidopsis embryo. Development 2015, 142:420-430.
14. van der Graaff E., et al. The WUS homeobox-containing (WOX) protein family. Genome Biol. 2009, 10:248.
15. Luo A., et al. The expression and roles of parent-of-origin genes in early embryogenesis of angiosperms. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5:729.
16. Kaplan D.R., Cooke T.J. Fundamental concepts in the embryogenesis of dicotyledons: a morphological interpretation of embryo mutants. Plant Cell 1997, 9:1903-1919.
17. Frobisch N.B., et al. Deep-time evolution of regeneration and preaxial polarity in tetrapod limb development. Nature 2015, 527:231-234.
18. Ratcliff W.C., et al. Experimental evolution of an alternating uni- and multicellular life cycle in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:2742.
19. Niklas K.J. The evolutionary-developmental origins of multicellularity. Am. J. Bot. 2014, 101:6-25.
20. Butterfield N.J. Probable proterozoic fungi. Paleobiology 2005, 31:165-182.
21. Laan L., et al. Evolutionary adaptation after crippling cell polarization follows reproducible trajectories. Elife 2015, 4:e09638.
22. Ratcliff W.C., et al. Experimental evolution of multicellularity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:1595-1600.
23. Fairclough S.R., et al. Multicellular development in a choanoflagellate. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:R875-R876.
24. de Mendoza A., et al. Transcription factor evolution in eukaryotes and the assembly of the regulatory toolkit in multicellular lineages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:E4858-E4866.
25. Abedin M., King N. The premetazoan ancestry of cadherins. Science 2008, 319:946-948.
26. Lang D., Rensing S.A. The evolution of transcriptional regulation in the Viridiplantae and its correlation with morphological complexity. Evolutionary Transitions to Multicellular Life 2015, 301-333. Springer. I. Ruiz-Trillo, A.M. Nedelcu (Eds.).
27. Lang D., et al. Genome-wide phylogenetic comparative analysis of plant transcriptional regulation: a timeline of loss, gain, expansion, and correlation with complexity. Genome Biol. Evol. 2010, 2:488-503.
28. Parfrey L.W., Lahr D.J. Multicellularity arose several times in the evolution of eukaryotes (response to DOI 10.1002/bies.201100187). Bioessays 2013, 35:339-347.
29. Abedin M., King N. Diverse evolutionary paths to cell adhesion. Trends Cell Biol. 2010, 20:734-742.
30. Moody L.A., et al. ARABIDILLO gene homologues in basal land plants: species-specific gene duplication and likely functional redundancy. Planta 2012, 236:1927-1941.
31. Herve C., et al. Arabinogalactan proteins have deep roots in eukaryotes: identification of genes and epitopes in brown algae and their role in Fucus serratus embryo development. New Phytol. 2016, 209. 1428-1241.
32. Gehring W.J. The evolution of vision. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2014, 3:1-40.
33. Miller W.T. Tyrosine kinase signaling and the emergence of multicellularity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1823:1053-1057.
34. Stajich J.E., et al. Insights into evolution of multicellular fungi from the assembled chromosomes of the mushroom Coprinopsis cinerea (Coprinus cinereus). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:11889-11894.
35. Ingram G.C., Waites R. Keeping it together: co-ordinating plant growth. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9:12-20.
36. Cock J.M., et al. The Ectocarpus genome and the independent evolution of multicellularity in brown algae. Nature 2010, 465:617-621.
37. Lim W.A., Pawson T. Phosphotyrosine signaling: evolving a new cellular communication system. Cell 2010, 142:661-667.
38. Ringrose J.H., et al. Deep proteome profiling of Trichoplax adhaerens reveals remarkable features at the origin of metazoan multicellularity. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:1408.
39. Qi X., et al. Phylogeny and evolutionary history of glycogen synthase kinase 3/SHAGGY-like kinase genes in land plants. BMC Evol. Biol. 2013, 13:143.
40. Bittner T., et al. Identification and characterization of two wheat Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3/SHAGGY-like kinases. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 13:64.
41. Lee J.H., et al. Early sexual origins of homeoprotein heterodimerization and evolution of the plant KNOX/BELL family. Cell 2008, 133:829-840.
42. Frank M.H., Scanlon M.J. Transcriptomic evidence for the evolution of shoot meristem function in sporophyte-dominant land plants via concerted selection of ancestral gametophytic and sporophytic genetic programs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32:3033.
43. Niklas K.J., Kutschera U. The evolution of the land plant life cycle. New Phytol. 2010, 185:27-41.
44. Sakakibara K., et al. KNOX2 genes regulate the haploid-to-diploid morphological transition in land plants. Science 2013, 339:1067-1070.
45. Mosquna A., et al. Regulation of stem cell maintenance by the Polycomb protein FIE has been conserved during land plant evolution. Development 2009, 136:2433-2444.
46. Okano Y., et al. A polycomb repressive complex 2 gene regulates apogamy and gives evolutionary insights into early land plant evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:16321-16326.
47. Horst N.A., et al. A single homeobox gene triggers phase transition, embryogenesis and asexual reproduction. Nat. Plants 2016, 2:15209.
48. Breuninger H., et al. Differential expression of WOX genes mediates apical-basal axis formation in the Arabidopsis embryo. Dev. Cell 2008, 14:867-876.
49. Sakakibara K., et al. WOX13-like genes are required for reprogramming of leaf and protoplast cells into stem cells in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Development 2014, 141:1660-1670.
50. Hay A., Tsiantis M. KNOX genes: versatile regulators of plant development and diversity. Development 2010, 137:3153-3165.
51. Penny D., et al. The relative ages of eukaryotes and akaryotes. J. Mol. Evol. 2014, 79:228-239.
52. Ramesh M.A., et al. A phylogenomic inventory of meiotic genes; evidence for sex in Giardia and an early eukaryotic origin of meiosis. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:185-191.
53. Cavalier-Smith T. Origins of the machinery of recombination and sex. Heredity 2002, 88:125-141.
54. Niklas K.J., et al. Did meiosis evolve before sex and the evolution of eukaryotic life cycles?. Bioessays 2014, 36:1091-1101.
55. Gramzow L., Theissen G. A hitchhiker's guide to the MADS world of plants. Genome Biol. 2010, 11:214.
56. Pires N.D., et al. Recruitment and remodeling of an ancient gene regulatory network during land plant evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:9571-9576.
57. Schmidt A., et al. Plant germline formation: common concepts and developmental flexibility in sexual and asexual reproduction. Development 2015, 142:229-241.
58. Radoeva T., Weijers D. A roadmap to embryo identity in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19:709-716.
59. Schmidt A., et al. Apomictic and sexual germline development differ with respect to cell cycle, transcriptional, hormonal and epigenetic regulation. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10:e1004476.
60. Paciorek T., Bergmann D.C. The secret to life is being different: asymmetric divisions in plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13:661-669.
61. Hable W.E. Rac1 signaling in the establishment of the fucoid algal body plan. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5:690.
62. Hable W.E., Kropf D.L. Sperm entry induces polarity in fucoid zygotes. Development 2000, 127:493-501.
63. Bogaert K.A., et al. Photopolarization of Fucus zygotes is determined by time sensitive vectorial addition of environmental cues during axis amplification. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6:26.
64. Bayer M., et al. Paternal control of embryonic patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 2009, 323:1485-1488.
65. Guitton A.E., Berger F. Control of reproduction by Polycomb Group complexes in animals and plants. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2005, 49:707-716.
66. Dupuy L., et al. Coordination of plant cell division and expansion in a simple morphogenetic system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:2711-2716.
67. Johnson K.L., et al. AtDEK1 is essential for specification of embryonic epidermal cell fate. Plant J. 2005, 44:114-127.
68. Perroud P.F., et al. Defective Kernel 1 (DEK1) is required for three-dimensional growth in Physcomitrella patens. New Phytol. 2014, 203:794-804.
69. Anantharaman V., et al. Comparative genomics uncovers novel structural and functional features of the heterotrimeric GTPase signaling system. Gene 2011, 475:63-78.
70. Klopper T.H., et al. Untangling the evolution of Rab G proteins: implications of a comprehensive genomic analysis. BMC Biol. 2012, 10:71.
71. Eklund D.M., et al. Physcomitrella patens: a model to investigate the role of RAC/ROP GTPase signalling in tip growth. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61:1917-1937.
72. Ito K., et al. Conserved function of Rho-related Rop/RAC GTPase signaling in regulation of cell polarity in Physcomitrella patens. Gene 2014, 544:241-247.
73. Thole J.M., et al. Prenylation is required for polar cell elongation, cell adhesion, and differentiation in Physcomitrella patens. Plant J. 2014, 78:441-451.
74. Wu C.I., Li W.H. Evidence for higher rates of nucleotide substitution in rodents than in man. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1985, 82:1741-1745.
75. Li W.H., et al. Rates of nucleotide substitution in primates and rodents and the generation-time effect hypothesis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1996, 5:182-187.
76. Scofield D.G., Schultz S.T. Mitosis, stature and evolution of plant mating systems: low-Phi and high-Phi plants. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2006, 273:275-282.
77. Lanfear R., et al. Taller plants have lower rates of molecular evolution. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:1879.
78. Yue J.X., et al. Genome-wide investigation reveals high evolutionary rates in annual model plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10:242.
79. Hazkani-Covo E., et al. In search of the vertebrate phylotypic stage: a molecular examination of the developmental hourglass model and von Baer's third law. J. Exp. Zool. B: Mol. Dev. Evol. 2005, 304:150-158.
80. Kalinka A.T., et al. Gene expression divergence recapitulates the developmental hourglass model. Nature 2010, 468:811-814.
81. Domazet-Loso T., Tautz D. A phylogenetically based transcriptome age index mirrors ontogenetic divergence patterns. Nature 2010, 468:815-818.
82. Quint M., et al. A transcriptomic hourglass in plant embryogenesis. Nature 2012, 490:98-101.
83. Akhshabi S., et al. An explanatory evo-devo model for the developmental hourglass. F1000Res 2014, 3:156.
84. Cheng X., et al. A 'developmental hourglass' in fungi. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32:1556-1566.
85. Zuckerkandl E., Pauling L. Molecules as documents of evolutionary history. J. Theor. Biol. 1965, 8:357-366.
86. Schuergers N., et al. Cyanobacteria use micro-optics to sense light direction. Elife 2016, 5:e12620.
87. Gavelis G.S., et al. Eye-like ocelloids are built from different endosymbiotically acquired components. Nature 2015, 523:204-207.
88. Tam T.H., et al. Conserved regulatory mechanism controls the development of cells with rooting functions in land plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2015, 112:E3959-E3968.
89. Bower F. The Origin of Land Flora: A Theory Based Upon the Facts of Alternation 1908, MacMillan.
90. Bürglin T.R., Affolter M. Homeodomain proteins: an update. Chromosoma 2015, Published online October 13, 2015. 10.1007/s00412-015-0543-8.