An explanatory evo-devo model for the developmental hourglass

F1000Research

Volumn 3, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Akhshabi, Saamer ^a   Sarda, Shrutii ^b   Dovrolis, Constantine ^a   Yi, Soojin ^c  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b Bldg 142   (United States)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; DEVELOPMENTAL GENE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; NONHUMAN; POPULATION MODEL; PREDICTION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EID: 85027720335     PISSN: 20461402     EISSN: 1759796X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.4583.2     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Raff RA: The shape of life: genes, development, and the evolution of animal form. University of Chicago Press. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996; 11(10): 441-442.
2. Richardson MK, Keuck G: Haeckel's ABC of evolution and development. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002; 77(4): 495-528.
3. Davidson EH: The regulatory genome: gene regulatory networks in development and evolution. Academic Press, 2nd edition. 2010.
4. Duboule D: Temporal colinearity and the phylotypic progression: a basis for the stability of a vertebrate Bauplan and the evolution of morphologies through heterochrony. Dev Suppl. 1994; 1994(Supplement): 135-142.
5. Rasmussen N: A new model of developmental constraints as applied to the Drosophila system. J Theor Biol. 1987; 127(3): 271-299.
6. Roux J, Robinson-Rechavi M: Developmental constraints on vertebrate genome evolution. PLoS Genet. 2008; 4(12): e1000311.
7. Irie N, Kuratani S: Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals vertebrate phylotypic period during organogenesis. Nat Commun. 2011; 2: 248.
8. Irie N, Sehara-Fujisawa A: The vertebrate phylotypic stage and an early bilaterian-related stage in mouse embryogenesis defined by genomic information. BMC Biol. 2007; 5(1): 1.
9. Kalinka AT, Varga KM, Gerrard DT, et al.: Gene expression divergence recapitulates the developmental hourglass model. Nature. 2010; 468(7325): 811-814.
10. Levin M, Hashimshony T, Wagner F, et al.: Developmental milestones punctuate gene expression in the Caenorhabditis embryo. Dev Cell. 2012; 22(5): 1101-1108.
11. Quint M, Drost HG, Gabel A, et al.: A transcriptomic hourglass in plant embryogenesis. Nature. 2012; 490(7418): 98-101.
12. Domazet-Lošo T, Tautz D: A phylogenetically based transcriptome age index mirrors ontogenetic divergence patterns. Nature. 2010; 468(7325): 815-818.
13. Hazkani-Covo E, Wool D, Graur D: In search of the vertebrate phylotypic stage: a molecular examination of the developmental hourglass model and von Baer's third law. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2005; 304(2): 150-158.
14. Galis F, Metz JA: Testing the vulnerability of the phylotypic stage: on modularity and evolutionary conservation. J Exp Zool. 2001; 291(2): 195-204.
15. Cruickshank T, Wade MJ: Microevolutionary support for a developmental hourglass: gene expression patterns shape sequence variation and divergence in Drosophila. Evol Dev. 2008; 10(5): 583-590.
16. Comte A, Roux J, Robinson-Rechavi M: Molecular signaling in zebrafish development and the vertebrate phylotypic period. Evol Dev. 2010; 12(2): 144-156.
17. Hall BK: Phylotypic stage or phantom: is there a highly conserved embryonic stage in vertebrates? Trends Ecol Evol. 1997; 12(12): 461-463.
18. Kalinka AT, Tomancak P: The evolution of early animal embryos: conservation or divergence? Trends Ecol Evol. 2012; 27(7): 385-393.
19. Piasecka B, Lichocki P, Moretti S, et al.: The hourglass and the early conservation models--co-existing patterns of developmental constraints in vertebrates. PLoS Genet. 2013; 9(4): e1003476.
20. Richardson MK, Minelli A, Coates M, et al.: Phylotypic stage theory. Trends Ecol Evol. 1998; 13(4): 158.
21. Bininda-Emonds OR, Jeffery JE, Richardson MK: Inverting the hourglass: quantitative evidence against the phylotypic stage in vertebrate development. Proc Biol Sci. 2003; 270(1513): 341-346.
22. Peter IS, Faure E, Davidson EH: Predictive computation of genomic logic processing functions in embryonic development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(41): 16434-16442.
23. Graveley BR, Brooks AN, Carlson JW, et al.: The developmental transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 2011; 471(7339): 473-479.
24. Xiang D, Venglat P, Tibiche C, et al.: Genome-wide analysis reveals gene expression and metabolic network dynamics during embryo development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011; 156(1): 346-356.
25. Waterhouse RM, Tegenfeldt F, Li J, et al.: OrthoDB: a hierarchical catalog of animal, fungal and bacterial orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41(Database issue): D358-D365.
26. Li L, Stoeckert CJ Jr, Roos DS: OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 2003; 13(9): 2178-2189.
27. Richardson MK, Hanken J, Gooneratne ML, et al.: There is no highly conserved embryonic stage in the vertebrates: implications for current theories of evolution and development. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1997; 196(2): 91-106.
28. Riedl R, Jefferies RP: Order in living organisms: a systems analysis of evolution. Wiley New York. 1978; 283-293.
29. Arthur W: Mechanisms of morphological evolution: a combined genetic, developmental, and ecological approach. Wiley New York. 1984
30. Tian X, Strassmann JE, Queller DC: Dictyostelium development shows a novel pattern of evolutionary conservation. Mol Biol Evol. 2013; 30(4): 977-984.
31. Beutler B: Inferences, questions and possibilities in Toll-like receptor signalling. Nature. 2004; 430(6996): 257-263.
32. Csete M, Doyle J: Bow ties, metabolism and disease. Trends Biotechnol. 2004; 22(9): 446-450.
33. Doyle JC, Csete M: Architecture, constraints, and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(Suppl 3): 15624-15630.
34. Tieri P, Grignolio A, Zaikin A, et al.: Network, degeneracy and bow tie. Integrating paradigms and architectures to grasp the complexity of the immune system. Theor Biol Med Model. 2010; 7: 32.
35. Akhshabi S, Dovrolis C: The evolution of layered protocol stacks leads to an hourglass-shaped architecture. ACM SIGCOMM. 2011; 41(4): 206-217.
36. Dovrolis C, Yi S, Akhshabi S, et al.: An evo-devo model for the developmental hourglass: code and data. ZENODO. 2014.