Climate and land use changes will degrade the configuration of the landscape for titi monkeys in eastern Brazil

Global Change Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 2003-2012

  Gouveia, Sidney F ^a   Souza Alves, João Pedro ^b   Rattis, Ludmila ^c   Dobrovolski, Ricardo ^d   Jerusalinsky, Leandro ^e   Beltrão Mendes, Raone ^a   Ferrari, Stephen F ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SERGIPE   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^d FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF BAHIA   (Brazil)

^e Chico Mendes Institute for the Conservation of Biodiversity   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Callicebus; Forest fragmentation; Functional landscape metrics; Metapopulation; Primate conservation; Species distribution modelling

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; LAND USE CHANGE; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; METAPOPULATION; PRIMATE; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

BRAZIL;

CALLICEBUS; CALLICEBUS PERSONATUS; PRIMATES;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAZIL; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FORECASTING; FOREST; HAPLORHINI;

ANIMALS; BRAZIL; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; FORECASTING; FORESTS; HAPLORHINI; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84960873987     PISSN: 13541013     EISSN: 13652486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13162     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Aleixo A, Albernaz AL, Grelle CEV, Vale MM, Rangel TFLVB (2010) Mudanças Climáticas e a Biodiversidade dos Biomas Brasileiros: Passado, Presente e Futuro. Natureza & Conservação, 08, 194-196.
2. Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos, 71, 355-366.
3. Araújo MB, Alagador D, Cabeza M, Nogués-Bravo D, Thuiller W (2011) Climate change threatens European conservation areas. Ecology Letters, 14, 484-492.
4. Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Mandujano S (2009) Conceptualization and measurement of habitat fragmentation from the primates' perspective. International Journal of Primatology, 30, 497-514.
5. Banks-Leite C, Pardini R, Tambosi LR et al. (2014) Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot. Science, 345, 1041-1045.
6. Bateman BL, Murphy HT, Reside AE, Mokany K, VanDerWal J (2013) Appropriateness of full-, partial- and no-dispersal scenarios in climate change impact modelling. Diversity and Distributions, 19, 1224-1234.
7. Bicca-Marques JC, Heymann E (2013) Ecology and behavior of titi monkeys, (genus Callicebus). In: Evolutionary biology and Conservation of Titis, Sakis and Uacaris (eds Veiga LM, Barnett AA, Ferrari SF, Norconk MA), pp. 196-207. Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology (No. 65), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
8. Brook BW, Sodhi NS, Bradshaw CJA (2008) Synergies among extinction drivers under global change. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23, 453-460.
9. Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG et al. (2002) Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conservation Biology, 16, 909-923.
10. Collingham IC, Huntley B (2000) Impacts of habitat fragmentation and patch size upon migration rates. Ecological Applications, 10, 131-144.
11. Elith J, Leathwick JR (2009) Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40, 677-697.
12. Fielding A, Bell J (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation, 24, 38-49.
13. Finney C (2015) Comment on "Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot". Science, 247, 731.
14. Flato G, Marotzke J, Abiodun B et al. (2013) Evaluation of climate models. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, et al.), pp. 741-853. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
15. Garcia RA, Cabeza M, Rahbek C, Araujo MB (2014) Multiple dimensions of climate change and their implications for biodiversity. Science, 344, 486-497.
16. Goldani A, Carvalho GS, Bicca-Marques JC (2006) Distribution patterns of neotropical primates (Platyrrhini) based on parsimony analysis of endemicity. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 66, 61-74.
17. Gottschalk TK, Reiners TE (2015) Forest conversion can help to mitigate impacts of climate change on common forest birds. Annals of Forest Science, 72, 335-348.
18. Grelle CEV, Alves MAS, Bergallo HG, Geise L, Rocha CFD, Van Sluys M, Caramaschi U (2005) Prediction of threatened tetrapods based on the species- area relationship in Atlantic forest. Journal of Zoology, 265, 359-364.
19. Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters, 8, 993-1009.
20. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 135, 147-186.
21. Hanski I, Ovaskainen O (2000) The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature, 404, 755-758.
22. Hershkovitz P (1990) Titis, New World monkeys of the genus Callicebus (Cebidae, Platyrrhini): a preliminary review. Fieldiana Zoology, New Series, 55, 1-109.
23. Hijmans RJ (2014) raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version 2.3-12. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster (accessed 15 March 2015).
24. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25, 1965-1978.
25. Hilário RR (2013). Determinantes ambientais da densidade de Callicebus coimbrai em fragmentos Florestais no Nordeste Brasileiro. PhD Thesis. Univerisdade Federal da Paraíba, Brazil. 190p.
26. Hill JK, Thomas CD, Huntley B (1999) Climate and habitat availability determine 20th century changes in butterfly's range margin. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 266, 1197-1206.
27. Hirsch A, Dias LG, de Martins LO, Campos RF, Resende NAT, Landau EC (2002) Database of Georreferenced Occurrence Localities of Neotropical Primates. Department of Zoology/UFMG, Belo Horizonte. Available at: http://www.icb.ufmg.br/~primatas/home_bdgeoprim.htm (accessed 21 August 2014).
28. IONIA (2009) Globcover land cover. Available at: http://ionia1.esrin.esa.int (accessed 16 February 2013).
29. Iverson LR, Prasad A, Schwartz MK (1999) Modeling potential future individual tree-species distributions in the eastern United States under a climate change scenario: a case study with Pinus virginiana. Ecological Modeling, 115, 77-93.
30. Jerusalinsky L (2013) Distribuição geográfica e conservação de Callicebus coimbrai Kobayashi & Langguth, 1999 (Primates - Pitheciidae) na Mata Atlântica do nordeste do Brasil. PhD Thesis. Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Brazil. 230p.
31. Jerusalinsky L, Oliveira MM, Pereira RF, Santana V, Bastos PC, Ferrari SF (2006) Preliminary evaluation of the conservation status of Callicebus coimbrai Kobayashi & Langguth, 1999 in the Brazilian State of Sergipe. Primate Conservation, 21, 25-32.
32. Keith DA, Akçakaya HR, Thuiller W et al. (2008) Predicting extinction risks under climate change: coupling stochastic population models with dynamic bioclimatic habitat models. Biology Letters, 4, 560-563.
33. Kujala H, Moilanen A, Araújo MB, Cabeza M (2013) Conservation planning with uncertain climate change projections. PLoS ONE, 8, e53315.
34. Loyola RD, Kubota U, Fonseca GAB, Lewinsohn TM (2009) Key Neotropical ecoregions for conservation of terrestrial vertebrates. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18, 2017-2031.
35. Loyola RD, Lemes P, Brum FT, Provete DB, Duarte LDS (2014) Clade-specific consequences of climate change to amphibians in Atlantic Forest protected areas. Ecography, 37, 65-72.
36. Marmion M, Luoto M, Heikkinen RK, Thuiller W (2009) The performance of state-of-the-art modelling techniques depends on geographical distribution of species. Ecological Modelling, 220, 3512-3520.
37. Marques ELN, Beltrão-Mendes R, Ferrari SF (2013a) Primates, Pitheciidae, Callicebus barbarabrownae Hershkovitz, 1990: new localities for the critically endangered titi monkey in the São Francisco basin, state of Sergipe, Brazil. Check List, 9, 113-115.
38. Marques ELN, Jerusalinsky L, Rocha JCAG, Santos PM, Beltrão-Mendes R, Ferrari SF (2013b) Primates, Pitheciidae, Callicebus coimbrai Kobayashi and Langguth, 1999: new localities for an endangered titi monkey in eastern Sergipe, Brazil. Check List, 9, 696-699.
39. McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ene E (2012) FRAGSTATS v4: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical and Continuous Maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available at: http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html (accessed 15 March 2015).
40. MMA (2002) Brazilian Vegetation Cover by Biomes. Available at: http://mapas.mma.gov.br/mapas/aplic/probio/datadownload.htm (accessed 30 June 2014).
41. Nepstad D, Soares-Filho BS, Merry F et al. (2009) The end of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science, 326, 1350-1351.
42. Nychka D, Furrer R, Sain S (2014) fields: Tools for spatial data. R package version 7.1. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=fields (accessed 15 March 2015).
43. Opdam P, Wascher D (2004) Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biological Conservation, 117, 285-297.
44. Peterson AT, Papeş M, Soberón J (2008) Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling. Ecological Modelling, 213, 63-72.
45. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190, 231-259.
46. Printes RC, Rylands AB, Bicca-Marques JC (2011) Distribution and status of the Critically Endangered blond titi monkey Callicebus barbarabrownae of northeast Brazil. Oryx, 45, 439-443.
47. Printes RC, Jeruzalinsky L, Sousa MC, Rodrigues LRR, Hirsch A (2013) Zoogeography, genetic variation and conservation of the Callicebus personatus group. In: Evolutionary Biology and Conservation of Titis, Sakis and Uacaris (eds Veiga LM, Barnett AA, Ferrari SF, Norconk MA), pp. 43-50. Cambridge Studies in Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology (No. 65), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
48. R Development Core Team (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
49. Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP, Martensen AC, Ponzoni FJ, Hirota MM (2009) The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 142, 1141-1153.
50. Salazar LF, Nobre CA, Oyama MD (2007) Climate change consequences on the biome distribution in tropical South America. Geophysical Research Letters, 34, 1-16.
51. Soares-Filho B, Rajão R, Macedo M et al. (2014) Cracking Brazil's Forest Code. Science, 344, 363-364.
52. SOS Mata Atlântica (2014) Atlas dos Remanescentes Florestais da Mata Atlântica - Período 2012-2013. Relatório Técnico. São Paulo, Fundação SOS Mata Atlântica - Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia.
53. Souza RA, De Marco P (2014) The use of species distribution models to predict the spatial distribution of deforestation in the western Brazilian Amazon. Ecological Modelling, 291, 250-259.
54. Swab RM, Regan HM, Matthies D, Becker U, Bruun HH (2014) The role of demography, intra-species variation, and species distribution models in species' projections under climate change. Ecography, 38, 221-230.
55. Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araújo MB (2005) Niche properties and geographical extent as predictors of species sensitivity to climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 14, 347-357.
56. VanDerWal J, Falconi L, Januchowski S, Shoo L, Storlie C (2014) SDMTools: tools for processing data associated with species distribution modelling exercises. - R package, ver. 1.1-20, Available at: http://www.rforge.net/SDMTools/. (accessed 15 March 2015).
57. Veiga LM, Sousa MC, Jerusalinsky L et al. (2008a) Callicebus coimbrai. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.Version 2014.2.
58. Veiga LM, Printes RC, Ferrari SF, Kierulff CM, de Oliveira MM, Mendes SL (2008b) Callicebus melanochir. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.Version 2014.2.
59. Veiga LM, Ferrari SF, Kierulff CM, de Oliveira MM, Mendes SL (2008c) Callicebus personatus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.2.www.iucnredlist.org.
60. Veiga LM, Kierulff CM, de Oliveira MM, Mendes SL (2008d) Callicebus nigrifrons. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.3. www.iucnredlist.org.
61. Veiga LM, Printes RC, Rylands AB, Kierulff CM, de Oliveira MM, Mendes SL (2008e) Callicebus barbarabrownae. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.3. www.iucnredlist.org.
62. Vos CC, Verboom J, Opdam PF, Ter Braak CJ (2001) Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices. The American Naturalist, 157, 24-41.
63. Walther GR, Post E, Menzel A et al. (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature, 416, 389-395.
64. Weyant J, Azar C, Kainuma M et al. (2009) Report of 2.6 Versus 2.9 Watts/m2 RCPP Evaluation Panel. IPCC Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland.