The IRIS repository: Advancing research practice and methodology

Advancing Methodology and Practice: The IRIS Repository of Instruments for Research into Second Languages

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 1-21

  Marsden, Emma ^a   Mackey, Alison ^b   Plonsky, Luke ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84960479558     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203489666     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Amir, Y., & Sharon, I. (1990). Replication research: A “must” for the scientific advancement of psychology. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 5 (4), 51–69.
2. Borg, S. (2013). Teacher research in language teaching: A critical analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York: Routledge.
4. Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Cohen, A. D., & Macaro, E. (2010). Research methods in second language acquisition. In E. Macaro (Ed.), The Bloomsbury companion to second language acquisition (pp. 107–133). New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
6. Cumming, A. (2012). Comparative research, research syntheses, and adopting instruments in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21 (3), 298–299.
7. Darley, R., Reynolds, D., & Wickham, C. (2014). Open access journals in humanities and social sciences. London: British Academy.
8. Freese, J. (2007). Replication standards for quantitative social science: Why not sociology? Sociological Methods & Research, 36 (2), 153–172.
9. Gass, S. (2009). A survey of SLA research. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 3–28). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
10. Handley, Z. (2014). Constructing an evidence-base for future CALL design with ‘engineering power’: The need for more basic research and instrumental replication. EUROCALL Review, 22 (2), 46–56.
11. Handley, Z., & Marsden, E. (2014). Linking CALL and SLA: Using the IRIS database to locate research instruments. In S. Jager, L. Bradley, E. J. Meima, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL Design: Principles and Practice: Proceedings of the 2014 EUROCALL Conference, Groningen, The Netherlands (pp. 1–6). Dublin: Research-publishing.net.
12. King, J., & Marsden, E. (2013). The instruments for research into second languages (IRIS) digital repository. The Language Teacher, 37 (2), 35–38.
13. Klein, R., Ratliff, K., Vianello, M., Adams Jr., R., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. & Nosek, B. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “Many Labs” replication project. Social Psychology 45 (3), 142–152.
14. Leow, R. P., & Hama, M. (2013). Implicit learning in SLA and the issue of internal validity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 545–557.
15. Leung, J. H. C., & Williams, J. N. (2012). Constraints on implicit learning of grammatical form-meaning connections. Language Learning, 62, 634–662.
16. Leung, J. H. C., & Williams, J. N. (2014). Crosslinguistic differences in implicit language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 733–755.
17. Macaro, E., Handley, Z., & Walter, C. (2012). A systematic review of CALL in English as a second language: Focus on primary and secondary education. Language Teaching, 45, 1–43.
18. Mackey, A. (2015). Methodological practice and progression in second language research. AILA Review, 80–97.
19. Makel, M., & Plucker, J. (2014). Facts are more important than novelty: Replication in the education sciences. Educational Researcher, 43 (6), 304–316.
20. Makel, M., Plucker, J., & Hegarty, B. (2012). Replications in psychology research: How often do they really occur? Perspectives in Psychological Science, 7 (6) 537–542.
21. Marsden, E., & Mackey, A. (2013, June). IRIS and replication. Paper presented at the 9th International Symposium on Bilingualism, Singapore.
22. Marsden, E., & Mackey, A. (2014). IRIS: A new resource for second language research. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4 (1), 125–130.
23. Marsden, E., & Morgan-Short, K. (ongoing). A multi-site replication study: Does attending to form affect comprehension? Project funded by a Language Learning small grant.
24. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2007). Morphological processes in language comprehension. In G. Gaskell (Ed.), Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 175–193). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50 (3), 417–528.
26. Norris, J., and Ortega, L. (Eds.) (2006). Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
27. O’Grady, W. (2015). Processing determinism. Language Learning 65 (1), 6–32.
28. Oliver, R., Philp, J., & Mackey, A. (2008). The impact of teacher input, guidance and feedback on ESL children’s task-based interaction. In J. Philp, R. Oliver, & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language acquisition and the younger learner: Child’s play? (pp. 131–148). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
29. Osborne, R. (2013). Why open access makes no sense. In N. Vincent & C. Wickham (Eds.), Debating open access (pp. 96–105). London: The British Academy.
30. Philp, J., & Iwashita, N. (2013). Talking, tuning in and noticing: Exploring the benefits of output in task-based peer interaction. Language Awareness, DOI:10.1080/09658416.2012.758128
31. Philp, J., Oliver, R., & Mackey, A. (2006). The impact of planning time on children’s taskbased-interactions. System 34 (4), 547–565.
32. Piwowar, H. A., & Vision, T. J. (2013). Data reuse and the open data citation advantage. Peer J 1:e175 https://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.175
33. Plonsky, L. (2012). Replication, meta-analysis, and generalizability. In G. Porte (Ed.), Replication research in applied linguistics (pp. 116–132). New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Plonsky, L. (2013). Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 655–687.
35. Plonsky, L., & Gonulal, T. (2015). Methodological synthesis in quantitative L2 research: A review of reviews and a case study of exploratory factor analysis. Language Learning, 65, Supp. 1, 9–36.
36. Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is ‘big’? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912.
37. Polio, C., & Gass, S. (1997). Replication and reporting: A commentary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 (4), 499–508.
38. Porte, G. (Ed.). (2012). Replication research in applied linguistics research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Porte, G. (2015, March). Commentary on replication research in applied linguistics research. Discussant’s colloquium paper at the American Association of Applied Linguistics. Toronto, Canada.
40. Porte, G., & Richards, K. (2012). Replication in second language writing research. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21 (3), 284–293.
41. Research Councils UK. (2013). RCUK policy on open access and supporting guidance. Accessed June 25, 2015, from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk
42. Santos, T. (1989). Replication in applied linguistics research. TESOL Quarterly, 23 (4), 699–702.
43. Schmidt, S. (2009). Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13 (2), 90–100.
44. Spinner, P. (2011). Review article: Second language acquisition of Bantu languages: A (mostly) untapped research opportunity. Second Language Research, 27, 418–430.
45. Trofimovich, P. (2015). Rewarding open science [Editorial]. Language Learning, 65, 3.
46. Van Patten, B. (2015, March). Replication research in instructed SLA. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Toronto, Canada.
47. Vincent, N., & Wickham, C. (Eds.). (2013). Debating open access. London: The British Academy.
48. Wagner, A. B. (2010). Open access citation advantage: An annotated bibliography. Issues in Science, Technology & Librarianship. 60: Winter. Retrieved from http://www.istl.org/10-winter/article2.html
49. Wicherts, J., Bakker, M., & Molenaar, D. (2011). Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results PLoS One, 6, 11, e26828.