Effective Task Training Strategies for Instructional Robots

Robotics: Science and Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages

  Sauppé, Allison ^a   Mutlu, Bilge ^a  

^a University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MACHINE DESIGN;

ASSEMBLY TASKS; HUMANLIKE ROBOTS; INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY; NONVERBALS; PERFORMANCE; ROBOTS SYSTEM; TASK TRAININGS; TRAINING STRATEGY; USER PERFORMANCE; USERS' EXPERIENCES;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 84960305778     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2330765X     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.15607/RSS.2014.X.002     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. L. Alfieri, P.J. Brooks, N.J. Aldrich, and H.R. Tenenbaum. Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1):1–18, 2011.
2. S. Andrist, E. Spannan, and B. Mutlu. Rhetorical robots: making robots more effective speakers using linguistic cues of expertise. In Proc. HRI’13, pages 341–348, 2013.
3. E. Bicho, W. Erlhagen, L. Louro, and E. Costa e Silva. Neuro-cognitive mechanisms of decision making in joint action: A human–robot interaction study. Human Movement Science, 30(5):846–868, 2011.
4. N. Blaylock, J. Allen, and G. Ferguson. Managing communicative intentions with collaborative problem solving. In Kuppevelt J.C.J. and R.W. Smith, editors, Current and New Directions in Discourse and Dialogue, pages 63–84. Springer, 2003.
5. J.-D. Boucher, U. Pattacini, A. Lelong, G. Bailly, F. Elisei, S. Fagel, P.F. Dominey, and J. Ventre-Dominey. I reach faster when I see you look: gaze effects in human–human and human–robot face-to-face cooperation. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 6, 2012.
6. M.E. Foster, M. Giuliani, A. Isard, C. Matheson, J. Ober-lander, and A. Knoll. Evaluating description and reference strategies in a cooperative human-robot dialogue system. In Proc. IJCAI’09, pages 1818–1823, 2009.
7. V. Gallese and A. Goldman. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(12):493–501, 1998.
8. B. Gonsior, D. Wollherr, and M. Buss. Towards a dialog strategy for handling miscommunication in human-robot dialog. In Proc. RO-MAN’10, 2010.
9. J. Gray, C. Breazeal, M. Berlin, A. Brooks, and J. Lieberman. Action parsing and goal inference using self as simulator. In Proc. RO-MAN’05, 2005.
10. B.J. Grosz and S. Kraus. Collaborative plans for complex group action. Artificial Intelligence, 86(2):269–357, 1996.
11. B.J. Grosz and C.L. Sidner. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3): 175–204, 1986.
12. G. Hirst, S. McRoy, P. Heeman, P. Edmonds, and D. Horton. Repairing conversational misunderstandings and non-understandings. Speech Communication, 15(3): 213–229, 1994.
13. J. Hoey, P. Poupart, C. Boutilier, and A. Mihailidis. POMDP models for assistive technology. In Proc. AAAI 2005 Fall Symposium, 2005.
14. C.-M. Huang and B. Mutlu. Robot behavior toolkit: generating effective social behaviors for robots. In Proc. HRI’12, pages 25–32, 2012.
15. T. Kanda, R. Sato, N. Saiwaki, and H. Ishiguro. A two-month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human–robot interaction. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5):962–971, 2007.
16. T. Koulouri and S. Lauria. Exploring miscommunication and collaborative behaviour in HRI. In Proc. SIGDIAL’09, 2009.
17. J.R. Landis and G.G. Koch. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1):159– 174, 1977.
18. M.K. Lee, S. Kiesler, J. Forlizzi, S. Srinivasa, and P. Rybski. Gracefully mitigating breakdowns in robotic services. In Proc. HRI’10, 2010.
19. M.N. Nicolescu and M.J. Mataric. Linking perception and action in a control architecture for human-robot domains. In Proc. HICSS’03, 2003.
20. C.M. Reigeluth, M.D. Merrill, B.G. Wilson, and R.T. Spiller. The elaboration theory of instruction: A model for sequencing and synthesizing instruction. Instructional Science, 9(3):195–219, 1980.
21. P. Seedhouse. The relationship between context and the organization of repair in the l2 classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 37 (1):59–80, 1999.
22. M. Staudte and M.W. Crocker. Visual attention in spoken human-robot interaction. In Proc. HRI’09, pages 77–84, 2009.
23. J. Sweller. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2):257–285, 1988.
24. F. Tanaka and J.R. Movellan. Behavior analysis of children’s touch on a small humanoid robot: Long-term observation at a daily classroom over three months. In Proc. RO-MAN’06, 2006.
25. R. Tanaka and T. Kimura. The use of robots in early education: a scenario based on ethical consideration. In Proc. RO-MAN’09, 2009.
26. C. Torrey, A. Powers, M. Marge, S.R. Fussell, and S. Kiesler. Effects of adaptive robot dialogue on information exchange and social relations. In Proc. HRI’06, pages 126–133, 2006.
27. C. Torrey, A. Powers, S.R. Fussell, and S. Kiesler. Exploring adaptive dialogue based on a robot’s awareness of human gaze and task progress. In Proc. HRI’07, 2007.
28. J.G. Trafton, N.L. Cassimatis, M.D. Bugajska, D.P. Brock, F.E. Mintz, and A.C. Schultz. Enabling effective human-robot interaction using perspective-taking in robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, 35(4):460–470, 2005.
29. C.J. Zahn. A reexamination of conversational repair. Communications Monographs, 51(1):56–66, 1984.