Neuro-cognitive mechanisms of decision making in joint action: A human-robot interaction study

Human Movement Science

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 846-868

  Bicho, Estela ^a   Erlhagen, Wolfram ^a   Louro, Luis ^a   Costa e Silva, Eliana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Decision making; Dynamic neural fields; Joint action; Motor planning

Indexed keywords

ACTION RESEARCH; ARCHITECTURE; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MODEL; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR SYSTEM; NEUROSCIENCE; ROBOTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; VISION; WORKLOAD;

ANTICIPATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; BRAIN; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; GOALS; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MIRROR NEURONS; MOTOR SKILLS; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROBOTICS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 79958189370     PISSN: 01679457     EISSN: 18727646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.08.012     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Amari S. Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral-inhibitory type neural fields. Biological Cybernetics 1977, 27:77-87.
2. Bicho E., Louro L., Erlhagen W. Integrating verbal and nonverbal communication in a dynamic neural field architecture for human-robot interaction. Frontiers in Neurorobotics 2010, 4. 10.3389/fnbot.2010.00005.
3. Bicho E., Louro L., Hipolito N., Erlhagen W. A dynamic neural field architecture for flexible and fluent human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on cognitive systems 2008, 179-185. University of Karlsruhe, Germany.
4. Bicho, E., Louro, L., Hipolito, N., & Erlhagen, W. (2009). A dynamic field approach to goal inference and error monitoring for human-robot interaction. In K. Dautenhahn (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 international symposium on new frontiers in human-robot interaction. AISB 2009 Convention (pp.31-37) Edinburgh; Heriot-Watt University.
5. Bicho E., Mallet P., Schöner G. Target representation on an autonomous vehicle with low-level sensors. The International Journal of Robotics Research 2000, 19:424-447.
6. Blakemore S.J., Decety J. From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2001, 2:561-567.
7. Brass M., Bekkering H., Prinz W. Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica 2001, 106:3-22.
8. Caggiano V., Fogassi L., Rizzolatti G., Thier P., Casile A. Mirror neurons differentially encode the peripersonal and the extrapersonal space in monkey. Science 2009, 324:403-406.
9. Cuijpers, R., & Erlhagen, W. (2008). Implementing Bayes' rules with neural fields. In V. Kurkov (Ed.), ICANN 2008, part II. LNCS 5164 (pp. 228-237). Springer Verlag.
10. Cuijpers R.H., van Schie H.T., Koppen M., Erlhagen W., Bekkering H. Goals and means in action observation: A computational approach. Neural Networks 2006, 19:311-322.
11. di Pellegrino G., Fadiga I., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Rizzolatti G. Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research 1992, 91:176-180.
12. Dominey, P. F., & Warneken, F. (in press). The basis of shared intention in human and robot cognition. New Ideas in Psychology. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.006.
13. Erlhagen W., Bicho E. The dynamic neural field approach to cognitive robotics. Journal of Neural Engineering 2006, 3:R36-R54.
14. Erlhagen W., Mukovskiy A., Bicho E. A dynamic model for action understanding and goal-directed imitation. Brain Research 2006, 1083:174-188.
15. Erlhagen W., Mukovskiy A., Bicho E., Panin G., Kiss C., Knoll A., et al. Goal-directed imitation for robots: A bio-inspired approach to action understanding and skill learning. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 2006, 54:353-360.
16. Erlhagen, W., Mukovskiy, A., Chersi, F., & Bicho, E. (2007). On the development of intention understanding for joint action tasks. In 6th IEEE international conference on development and learning (pp. 140-145). Imperial College London.
17. Erlhagen W., Schöner G. Dynamic field theory of movement preparation. Psychological Review 2002, 109:545-572.
18. Ferguson M.J., Bargh J.A. How social perception can automatically influence behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:33-39.
19. Flash T., Hogan N. The coordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model. Journal of Neuroscience 1985, 5:1688-1703.
20. Fogassi L., Ferrari P.F., Gesierich B., Rozzi S., Chersi F., Rizzolatti G. Parietal lobe: From action organization to intention understanding. Science 2005, 308:662-667.
21. Fong T., Nourbakhsh I., Dautenhahn K. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 2003, 42:143-166.
22. Gold J.I., Shadlen M.N. Banburismus and the brain: The relationship between sensory stimuli, decisions, and reward. Neuron 2002, 36:299-308.
23. Grossberg S. Contour enhancement, short term memory and constancies in reverberating neural networks. Studies in Applied Mathematics 1973, 52:217-257.
24. Hamilton A.F., Grafton S.T. Action outcomes are represented in human inferior frontoparietal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18:1160-1168.
25. Hard B.M., Lozano S.C., Tversky B. Hierarchical encoding of behavior: Translating perception into action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135:588-608.
26. Hassin R.R., Aarts H., Ferguson M.J. Automatic goal inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2005, 41:129-140.
27. Hoffman G., Breazeal C. Cost-based anticipatory action selection for human-robot fluency. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 2007, 23:952-961.
28. Kersten D., Yuille A. Bayesian models of object perception. Current Opinion in Neurobiolgy 2003, 13:1-9.
29. Körding K.P., Wolpert D.M. Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:319-326.
30. Laing C.R., Tray W.C., Gutkin B., Ermentrout G.B. Multiple bumps in a neural model of working memory. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 2002, 63:62-97.
31. Lommertzen, J., Costa e Silva, E., Cuijpers, R., & Meulenbroek, R. (2008). Collision-avoidance characteristics of grasping: Early signs in hand and arm kinematics. In Anticipatory behavior in adaptive learning systems (ABiALS 2008) post-conference proceedings, Munich, Germany (pp. 188-208).
32. Meulenbroek R., Rosenbaum D., Jansen C., Vaugham J., Vogtn S. Multijoint grasping movements: Simulated and observed effects of object location, object size and initial aperture. Experimental Brain Research 2001, 2:219-234.
33. Newman-Norlund R.D., Noordzij M.L., Meulenbroek R.G.J., Bekkering H. Exploring the basis of joint action: Coordination of actions, goals and intentions. Social Neuroscience 2007, 2:48-65.
34. Newman-Norlund R.D., van Schie H.T., van Zuijlen A.M.J., Bekkering H. The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nature Neuroscience 2007, 10:817-818.
35. Otero N., Saunders J., Dautenhahn K., Nehaniv C.L. Teaching robot companions: The role of scaffolding and event structuring. Connection Science 2008, 20:111-134.
36. Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2004, 27:169-192.
37. Rizzolatti G., Fogassi L., Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews 2001, 2:661-670.
38. Rosenbaum D., Meulenbroek R., Vaugham J., Jansen C. Posture-based motion planning: Applications to grasping. Psychological Review 2001, 108:709-734.
39. Schöner G. Dynamical systems approaches to cognition. The Cambridge handbook of computational psychology 2008, 101-125. Cambridge University Press. R. Sun (Ed.).
40. Schöner G., Kopecz K., Erlhagen W. The dynamic neural field theory of motor programming: Arm and eye movements. Self-organization, computational maps and motor control 1997, 271-310. Elsevier Science. P. Morasso, V. Sanguineti (Eds.).
41. Sebanz N., Bekkering H., Knoblich G. Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:70-76.
42. Silva, R., Bicho, E., & Erlhagen, W. (2008). Aros: An anthropomorphic robot for human-robot interaction and coordination studies. In 8th Portuguese conference on automatic control (Controlo 2008) (pp. 819-826). 21-23 July, Vila Real, Portugal.
43. Thomaz A.l., Breazeal C. Teachable robots: Understanding human teaching behaviour to built more effective robot learners. Artificial Intelligence 2008, 172:716-737.
44. van Schie H.T., van Waterschoot B.M., Bekkering H. Understanding action beyond imitation: Reversed compatibility effects of action observation in imitation and joint action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:1493-1500.
45. Vaugham, J., Rosenbaum, D., & Meulenbroek, R. (2006). Modeling reaching and manipulation in 2- and 3-d workspaces: The posture-based model. In Proceedings of ICDL 2006 (pp. cd-rom). June 3, Bloomington.
46. Westphal G., von der Malsburg C., Würtz R.P. Feature-driven emergence of model graphs for object recognition and categorization. Applied pattern recognition 2008, 155-199. Springer Verlag. A. Kandel, H. Bunke, M. Last (Eds.).
47. Wilmzig C., Schneider S., Schöner G. The time course of saccadic decision making: Dynamic field theory. Neural Networks 2006, 19:1059-1074.
48. Wilson H.R., Cowan J.D. A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue. Kybernetik 1973, 13:55-80.
49. Wilson M., Knoblich G. The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin 2005, 131:460-473.