From teleconnection to telecoupling: taking stock of an emerging framework in land system science

Journal of Land Use Science

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 131-153

  Friis, Cecilie ^a   Nielsen, Jonas Østergaard ^a   Otero, Iago ^a   Haberl, Helmut ^a,b   Niewöhner, Jörg ^a   Hostert, Patrick ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

Author keywords

globalization; interdisciplinary work; land systems; land use change; teleconnection; telecoupling

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; GLOBALIZATION; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; LAND USE CHANGE; LAND USE PLANNING;

EID: 84960272345     PISSN: 1747423X     EISSN: 17474248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1747423X.2015.1096423     Document Type: Article

References (119)

1. W.N.Adger,, H.Eakin,, & A.Winkels, (2009). Nested and teleconnected vulnerabilities to environmental change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(3), 150–157. doi:10.1890/070148
2. A.Appadurai, (1996). Modernity at large. Cultural dimensions of globalisation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
3. R.Aspinall, (2006). Editorial. Journal of Land Use Science, 1(1), 1–4. doi:10.1080/17474230600743987
4. J.Bair, (2005). Global capitalism and commodity chains: Looking back, going forward. Competition & Change, 9(2), 153–180. doi:10.1179/102452905X45382
5. I.Baird,, & J.Fox, (2015). How land concessions affect places elsewhere: Telecoupling, political ecology, and large-scale plantations in Southern Laos and Northeastern Cambodia. Land, 4(2), 436–453. doi:10.3390/land4020436
6. P.Blaikie,, & H.Brookfield, (1987). Land Degradation and Society. London: Methuen.
7. P.Bourdieu, (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (Vol. 16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. P.Bourdieu, (1984). Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.
9. C.Brannstrom,, & J.M.Vadjunec, (2013). Land change science, political ecology and sustainability: Synergies and divergences. New York, NY: Routledge.
10. M.Brockhaus,, K.Obidzinski,, A.Dermawan,, Y.Laumonier,, & C.Luttrell, (2012). An overview of forest and land allocation policies in Indonesia: Is the current framework sufficient to meet the needs of REDD+? Forest Policy and Economics, 18, 30–37. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2011.09.004
11. M.M.Caldas,, D.Goodin,, S.Sherwood,, J.M.Campos Krauer,, & S.M.Wisely, (2015). Land-cover change in the Paraguayan Chaco: 2000–2011. Journal of Land Use Science, 10(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/1747423X.2013.807314
12. N.H.Carter,, A.Viña,, V.Hull,, W.J.McConnell,, W.Axinn,, D.Ghimire,, & J.Liu, (2014). Coupled human and natural systems approach to wildlife research and conservation. Ecology and Society, 19(3). doi:10.5751/ES-06881-190343
13. E.Challies,, J.Newig,, & A.Lenschow, (2014). What role for social–ecological systems research in governing global teleconnections? Global Environmental Change, 27, 32–40. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.015
14. T.N.Chase,, R.A.Pielke,, & R.Avissar, (2006). Teleconnections in the earth system. In M. G. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
15. N.M.Coe,, P.Dicken,, & M.Hess, (2008). Global production networks: Realizing the potential. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3), 271–295. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbn002
16. D.K.Davis, (2005). Potential forests: Degradation narratives, science, and environmental policy in protectorate Morocco, 1912–1956. Environmental History, 10(2), 211–238. doi:10.1093/envhis/10.2.211
17. D.K.Davis, (2009). Historical political ecology: On the importance of looking back to move forward. Geoforum, 40, 285–286. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.01.001
18. M.G.De Molina,, & V.M.Toledo, (2014). The social metabolism. A socio-ecological theory of historical change (Vol. 3). Dordrecht: Springer.
19. J.A.Dearing,, A.K.Braimoh,, A.Reenberg,, B.L.Turner,, & S.V.D.Leeuw, (2010). Complex land systems: The need for longterm perspectives to assess their future. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 21.
20. R.S.DeFries,, J.A.Foley,, & G.P.Asner, (2004). Land-use choices: Balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(5), 249–257. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0249:LCBHNA]2.0.CO;2
21. H.Eakin,, R.DeFries,, S.Kerr,, E.F.Lambin,, J.Liu,, P.J.Marcotullio,, & K.Zimmerer, (2014). Significance of telecoupling for exploration of land-use change. In K.C.Seto & A.Reenberg (Eds.), Rethinking global land use in an Urban Era. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. H.Eakin,, A.Winkels,, & J.Sendzimir, (2009). Nested vulnerability: Exploring cross-scale linkages and vulnerability teleconnections in Mexican and Vietnamese coffee systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 12(4), 398–412. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2008.09.003
23. E.C.Ellis,, & N.Ramankutty, (2008). Putting people in the map: Anthropogenic biomes of the world. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6(8), 439–447. doi:10.1890/070062
24. K.-H.Erb,, F.Krausmann,, V.Gaube,, S.Gingrich,, A.Bondeau,, M.Fischer-Kowalski,, & H.Haberl, (2009). Analyzing the global human appropriation of net primary production — Processes, trajectories, implications. An introduction. Ecological Economics, 69(2), 250–259. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.07.001
25. K.-H.Erb,, F.Krausmann,, W.Lucht,, & H.Haberl, (2009). Embodied HANPP: Mapping the spatial disconnect between global biomass production and consumption. Ecological Economics, 69(2), 328–334. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.025
26. E.E.Evans-Pritchard, (1940). The Nuer, a description of the modes of livelihood and political institutions of a Nilotic people. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
27. M.Fischer-Kowalski, (1998). Society's metabolism: The intellectual history of materials flow analysis, part I, 1860–1970. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(1), 61–78. doi:10.1162/jiec.1998.2.1.61
28. M.Fischer-Kowalski,, & H.Haberl, (2007). In M.Fischer-Kowalski, & H.Haberl (Eds.), Socioecological transition and global change: Trajectories of social metabolism and land use. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
29. M.Fischer-Kowalski,, F.Krausmann,, & I.Pallua, (2014). A sociometabolic reading of the Anthropocene: Modes of subsistence, population size and human impact on earth. The Anthropocene Review, 1(1), 8–33. doi:10.1177/2053019613518033
30. J.A.Foley,, R.DeFries,, G.P.Asner,, C.Barford,, G.Bonan,, S.R.Carpenter,, & P.K.Snyder, (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734), 570–574. doi:10.1126/science.1111772
31. C.Folke,, T.Hahn,, P.Olsson,, & J.Norberg, (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
32. J.Fox,, J.-C.Castella,, & A.D.Ziegler, (2013). Swidden, rubber and carbon: Can REDD+ work for people and the environment in Montane Mainland Southeast Asia? Global Environmental Change. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.011
33. C.Friis,, & J.Ø.Nielsen, (2014). Exploring the potential of the telecoupling framework for understanding land change. Berlin: IRI THESys.
34. R.D.Garrett,, X.Rueda,, & E.F.Lambin, (2013). Globalization’s unexpected impact on soybean production in South America: Linkages between preferences for non-genetically modified crops, eco-certifications, and land use. Environmental Research Letters, 8(4), 044055. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044055
35. N.I.Gasparri,, & Y.L.P.De Waroux, (2014). The coupling of South American soybean and cattle production frontiers: New challenges for conservation policy and land change science. Conservation Letters. doi:10.1111/conl.12121
36. N.I.Gasparri,, T.Kuemmerle,, P.Meyfroidt,, D.W.Y.Le Polain,, & H.Kreft, (2015). The emerging soybean production frontier in Southern Africa: Conservation challenges and the role of south-south telecouplings. Conservation Letters. doi:10.1111/conl.12173
37. H.Geist,, & E.Lambin, (2002). Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience, 52(2), 143–150. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:PCAUDF]2.0.CO;2
38. B.S.Gentry,, T.Sikor,, G.Auld,, A.J.Bebbington,, T.A.Benjaminsen,, C.Hunsberger,, & C.Upton, (2014). Changes in land-use governance in an Urban Era. In K.C.Seto & A.Reenberg (Eds.), Rethinking globalisation in an urban age (pp. 239–271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. G.Gereffi,, J.Humphrey,, & T.Sturgeon, (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104. doi:10.1080/09692290500049805
40. S.Gingrich,, & F.Krausmann, (2008). Der soziale metabolismus lokaler produktionssysteme: Reichraming in der oberösterreichischen Eisenwurzen 1830–2000. Vienna: IFF.
41. GLP. (2005). Global land project. Science plan and implementation strategy. Retrieved from http://www.globallandproject.org/arquivos/report_53.pdf
42. B.Güneralp,, K.C.Seto,, & M.Ramachandran, (2013). Evidence of urban land teleconnections and impacts on hinterlands. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(5), 445–451. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.08.003
43. H.Haberl,, K.-H.Erb,, F.Krausmann,, S.Berecz,, N.Ludwiczek,, J.Martínez-Alier,, … A.Schaffartzik, (2009). Using embodied HANPP to analyze teleconnections in the global land system: Conceptual considerations. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 109(2), 119–130. doi:10.1080/00167223.2009.10649602
44. H.Haberl,, K.H.Erb,, F.Krausmann,, V.Gaube,, A.Bondeau,, C.Plutzar,, … M.Fischer-Kowalski, (2007). Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth’s terrestrial ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(31), 12942–12947. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704243104
45. H.Haberl,, M.Fischer-Kowalski,, F.Krausmann,, J.Martinez-Alier,, & V.Winiwarter, (2011). A socio-metabolic transition towards sustainability? Challenges for another great transformation. Sustainable Development, 19(1), 1–14. doi:10.1002/sd.410
46. U.Hannerz, (2001). Center – periphery relationships. In N.J.Smelser & P.B.Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1610–1613). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
47. J.Henderson,, P.Dicken,, M.Hess,, N.Coe,, & H.W.C.Yeung, (2002). Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy, 9(3), 436–464. doi:10.1080/09692290210150842
48. T.Kastner,, K.-H.Erb,, & H.Haberl, (2015). Global human appropriation of net primary production for biomass consumption in the European Union, 1986–2007. Journal of Industrial Ecology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/jiec.12238
49. T.Kastner,, A.Schaffartzik,, N.Eisenmenger,, K.-H.Erb,, H.Haberl,, & F.Krausmann, (2014). Cropland area embodied in international trade: Contradictory results from different approaches. Ecological Economics, 104, 140–144. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.003
50. K.Knorr-Cetina,, & U.Bruegger, (2002). Global microstructures: The virtual societies of financial markets. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 905–950. doi:10.1086/ajs.2002.107.issue-4
51. F.Krausmann, (2004). Milk, manure, and muscle power. Livestock and the transformation of preindustrial agriculture in central Europe. Human Ecology, 32, 735–772. doi:10.1007/s10745-004-6834-y
52. F.Krausmann,, M.Fischer-Kowalski,, H.Schandl,, & N.Eisenmenger, (2008). The global sociometabolic transition. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(5–6), 637–656. doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00065.x
53. F.Krausmann,, S.Gingrich,, N.Eisenmenger,, K.-H.Erb,, H.Haberl,, & M.Fischer-Kowalski, (2009). Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century. Ecological Economics, 68, 2696–2705. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.007
54. F.Krausmann,, H.Haberl,, N.B.Schulz,, K.-H.Erb,, E.Darge,, & V.Gaube, (2003). Land-use change and socio-economic metabolism in Austria – Part I: Driving forces of land-use change: 1950–1995. Land Use Policy, 20(1), 1–20. doi:10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00048-0
55. F.Krausmann,, H.Schandl,, & R.P.Sieferle, (2008). Socio-ecological regime transitions in Austria and the United Kingdom. Ecological Economics, 65(1), 187–201. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.009
56. C.A.Kull, (2002). Madagascar aflame: Landscape burning as peasant protest, resistance, or a resource management tool? Political Geography, 21(7), 927–953. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00054-9
57. E.F.Lambin,, & H.Geist, (2006). Land-use and land-cover change. Local processes and global impacts. Berlin: Springer.
58. E.F.Lambin,, & P.Meyfroidt, (2011). Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(9), 3465–3472. doi:10.1073/pnas.1100480108
59. C.Lévi-Strauss, (1963). Structural anthropology. New York, NY: Basic Books.
60. J.Liu, (2014). Forest sustainability in China and implications for a telecoupled world. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 1(1), 230–250. doi:10.1002/app5.17
61. J.Liu,, T.Dietz,, S.R.Carpenter,, M.Alberti,, C.Folke,, E.Moran,, … W.W.Taylor, (2007). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317(5844), 1513–1516. doi:10.1126/science.1144004
62. J.Liu,, V.Hull,, M.Batistella,, R.DeFries,, T.Dietz,, F.Fu,, … C.Zhu, (2013). Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society, 18(2). doi:10.5751/ES-05873-180226
63. J.Liu,, V.Hull,, E.Moran,, H.Nagendra,, S.Swaffield,, & B.L.Turner, (2014). Applications of the telecoupling framework to land-change science. In K.C.Seto & A.Reenberg (Eds.), Rethinking global land use in and urban age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. J.Liu,, & W.Yang, (2013). Integrated assessments of payments for ecosystem services programs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(41), 16297–16298. doi:10.1073/pnas.1316036110
65. B.Mansfield,, D.K.Munroe,, & K.McSweeney, (2010). Does economic growth cause environmental recovery? Geographical explanations of forest regrowth. Geography Compass, 4(5), 416–427. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00320.x
66. G.E.Marcus, (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24(1), 95–117. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
67. S.A.Marston, (2000). The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 24(2), 219–242. doi:10.1191/030913200674086272
68. S.A.Marston,, J.P.Jones,, & K.Woodward, (2005). Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(4), 416–432. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00180.x
69. J.Martinez-Alier, (2002). The environmentalism of the poor. A study of ecological conflicts and valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
70. J.Martinez-Alier,, G.Kallis,, S.Veuthey,, M.Walter,, & L.Temper, (2010). Social metabolism, ecological distribution conflicts, and valuation languages. Ecological Economics, 70, 153–158. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.024
71. M.Mauss, (1954). The gift; forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
72. P.Meyfroidt,, & E.F.Lambin, (2009). Forest transition in Vietnam and displacement of deforestation abroad. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(38), 16139–16144. doi:10.1073/pnas.0904942106
73. P.Meyfroidt,, E.F.Lambin,, K.-H.Erb,, & T.W.Hertel, (2013). Globalization of land use: Distant drivers of land change and geographic displacement of land use. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(5), 438–444. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.04.003
74. P.Meyfroidt,, T.K.Rudel,, & E.F.Lambin, (2010). Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(49), 20917–20922. doi:10.1073/pnas.1014773107
75. S.C.Moser,, & J.A.F.Hart, (2015). The long arm of climate change: Societal teleconnections and the future of climate change impacts studies. Climatic Change, 1–14. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1328-z
76. D.Müller,, & D.K.Munroe, (2014). Current and future challenges in land-use science. Journal of Land Use Science, 9(2), 133–142. doi:10.1080/1747423X.2014.883731
77. D.Müller,, Z.Sun,, T.Vongvisouk,, D.Pflugmacher,, J.Xu,, & O.Mertz, (2014). Regime shifts limit the predictability of land-system change. Global Environmental Change, 28, 75–83. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.003
78. D.K.Munroe,, K.McSweeney,, J.L.Olson,, & B.Mansfield, (2014). Using economic geography to reinvigorate land-change science. Geoforum, 52, 12–21. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.005
79. D.C.Nepstad,, D.McGrath,, C.Stickler,, A.Alencar,, A.Azevedo,, B.Swette,, … L.Hess, (2014). Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science, 344(6188), 1118–1123. doi:10.1126/science.1248525
80. D.C.Nepstad,, C.M.Stickler,, & O.T.Almeida, (2006). Globalization of the Amazon soy and beef industries: Opportunities for conservation. Conservation Biology, 20(6), 1595–1603. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00510.x
81. G.A.Olson, (1991). The social scientist as author: Clifford Geertz on ethnography and social construction. Journal of Advanced Composition, 11(2), 245–268.
82. A.Ong,, & S.J.Collier, (2005). Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
83. M.Ostwald,, V.Wibeck,, & P.Stridbeck, (2009). Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of land-use change among small-scale farmers – illustrations from the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Land Use Science, 4(3), 157–171. doi:10.1080/17474230903036642
84. I.Otero,, G.Kallis,, R.Aguilar,, & V.Ruiz, (2011). Water scarcity, social power and the production of an elite suburb: The political ecology of water in Matadepera, Catalonia. Ecological Economics, 70(7), 1297–1308. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.09.011
85. S.G.Perz, (2007). Grand theory and context-specificity in the study of forest dynamics: Forest transition theory and other directions. The Professional Geographer, 59(1), 105–114. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00594.x
86. S.Qureshi,, & D.Haase, (2014). Compact, eco-, hybrid or teleconnected? Novel aspects of urban ecological research seeking compatible solutions to socio-ecological complexities. Ecological Indicators, 42, 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.017
87. A.Reenberg,, & N.A.Fenger, (2011). Globalizing land use transitions: The soybean acceleration. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 111(1), 85–92. doi:10.1080/00167223.2011.10669524
88. A.Reenberg,, T.Langanke,, S.B.P.Kristensen,, & T.S.Colding, (2010). Globalisation of agricultural landscapes a land systems approach. In J.Primdahl & S.Swaffield (Eds.), Globalisation and agricultural landscapes. Change patterns and policy trends in developed countries (pp. 31–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
89. R.R.Rindfuss,, B.Entwisle,, S.J.Walsh,, L.An,, N.Badenoch,, D.G.Brown,, & P.H.Verburg, (2008). Land use change: Complexity and comparisons. Journal of Land Use Science, 3(1), 1–10. doi:10.1080/17474230802047955
90. R.R.Rindfuss,, S.J.Walsh,, B.L.Turner,, J.Fox,, & V.Mishra, (2004). Developing a science of land change: Challenges and methodological issues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(39), 13976–13981. doi:10.1073/pnas.0401545101
91. P.Robbins, (2012). Political ecology: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
92. X.Rueda,, & E.F.Lambin, (2013). Linking globalization to local land uses: How eco-consumers and gourmands are changing the Colombian coffee landscapes. World Development, 41, 286–301. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.018
93. M.D.Sahlins, (1972). Stone age economics. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
94. S.Sassen,, & A.Van Roekel-Hughes, (2008). Deciphering the global: Its spaces, scales and subjects. Social Thought & Research, 29, 3–18. doi:10.2307/23250060
95. A.Schaffartzik,, H.Haberl,, T.Kastner,, D.Wiedenhofer,, N.Eisenmenger,, & K.-H.Erb, (2015). Trading land: A review of approaches to accounting for upstream land requirements of traded products. Journal of Industrial Ecology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/jiec.12258
96. A.Schaffartzik,, C.Plank,, & A.Brad, (2014). Ukraine and the great biofuel potential? A political material flow analysis. Ecological Economics, 104, 12–21. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.026
97. M.Scheffer,, & S.R.Carpenter, (2003). Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: Linking theory to observation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18(12), 648–656. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.09.002
98. J.W.Seaquist,, E.L.Johansson,, & A.N.Kimberly, (2014). Architecture of the global land acquisition system: Applying the tools of network science to identify key vulnerabilities. Environmental Research Letters, 9(11), 114006. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/114006
99. S.Seitzinger,, U.Svedin,, C.Crumley,, W.Steffen,, S.Abdullah,, C.Alfsen,, & L.Sugar, (2012). Planetary stewardship in an urbanizing world: Beyond city limits. Ambio, 41(8), 787–794. doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0353-7
100. K.C.Seto,, & A.Reenberg, (2014). Rethinking global land use in an urban era. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
101. K.C.Seto,, A.Reenberg,, C.G.Boone,, M.Fragkias,, D.Haase,, T.Langanke,, & D.Simon, (2012). Urban land teleconnections and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(20), 7687–7692. doi:10.1073/pnas.1117622109
102. R.-P.Sieferle, (1997). Rückblick auf die Natur. Eine Geschichte des Menschen und seiner Umwelt. München: Luchterhand.
103. R.-P.Sieferle,, F.Krausmann,, H.Schandl,, & V.Winiwarter, (2006). Das Ende der Fläche: Zum gesellschaftlichen Stoffwechsel der Industrialisierung. Köln: Böhlau.
104. T.Sikor,, G.Auld,, A.J.Bebbington,, T.A.Benjaminsen,, B.S.Gentry,, C.Hunsberger,, & C.Upton, (2013). Global land governance: From territory to flow? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(5), 522–527. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.006
105. S.L.Star, (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391. doi:10.1177/00027649921955326
106. M.Strathern, (1995a). The relation: Issues of complexity and scale. Prickly Pear Pamphlet, 6, 5–31.
107. M.Strathern, (1995b). Shifting contexts: Transformations in anthropological knowledge, the uses of knowledge. London: Routledge.
108. E.Swyngedouw, (2004). Social power and the urbanization of water. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
109. E.Swyngedouw,, & M.Kaika, (2014). Urban political ecology. Great promises, deadlock … and new beginnings? Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica, 60, 459–481.
110. B.L.Turner,, R.E.Kasperson,, P.A.Matson,, J.J.McCarthy,, R.W.Corell,, L.Christensen,, & A.Schiller, (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8074–8079. doi:10.1073/pnas.1231335100
111. B.L.Turner,, E.F.Lambin,, & A.Reenberg, (2007). The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(52), 20666–20671. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704119104
112. B.L.Turner,, & P.Robbins, (2008). Land-change science and political ecology: Similarities, differences, and implications for sustainability science. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 295–316. doi:10.1146/annurev.environ.33.022207.104943
113. N.Van Vliet,, O.Mertz,, A.Heinimann,, T.Langanke,, U.Pascual,, B.Schmook,, & A.D.Ziegler, (2012). Trends, drivers and impacts of changes in swidden cultivation in tropical forest-agriculture frontiers: A global assessment. Global Environmental Change, 22(2), 418–429. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.009
114. P.H.Verburg,, K.-H.Erb,, O.Mertz,, & G.Espindola, (2013). Land system science: Between global challenges and local realities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(5), 433–437. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.08.001
115. I.Wallerstein, (1974). The modern world-system. New York, NY: Academic Press.
116. J.Weinzettel,, E.G.Hertwich,, G.P.Peters,, K.Steen-Olsen,, & A.Galli, (2013). Affluence drives the global displacement of land use. Global Environmental Change, 23(2), 433–438. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.010
117. E.Wolf, (1982). Europe and the people without history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
118. O.R.Young,, F.Berkhout,, G.C.Gallopin,, M.A.Janssen,, E.Ostrom,, & S.Van Der Leeuw, (2006). The globalization of socio-ecological systems: An agenda for scientific research. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 304–316. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.004
119. Y.Yu,, K.Feng,, & K.Hubacek, (2013). Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1178–1186. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.006