Engaging in a decentred world: Overflows, ambiguities and the governance of climate change

Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 64-80

  Irwin, Alan ^a   Horst, Maja ^b  

^a Copenhagen Business School ^*  (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84960207585     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203797693     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE.
2. Black, J. 2002. Critical Reflections on Regulation. CARR Discussion Paper DP 4. London: Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics.
3. Bodmer, W. 2010. Public understanding of science: The BA, the Royal Society and COPUS, Notes and Records of the Royal Society 64(suppl.1).
4. Bucchi, M. 2008. Of deficits, deviations and dialogues: Theories of public communication of science. In: M. Bucchi and B. Trench (eds) Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. London and New York: Routledge, pp57-76.
5. Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. and Barthe, Y. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Crang, M. and Thrift, N., eds. 2000. Thinking Space. London: Routledge.de Beauvoir, S. 1948/1976. The Ethics of Ambiguity. New York: Citadel.
7. Dean, M. 1999. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: SAGE.
8. European Commission 2002. Science and Society Action Plan, http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/ss_ap_en.pdf (accessed 11 September 2015).
9. Felt, U. and Fochler, M. 2008. The bottom-up meanings of the concept of public participation in science and technology, Science and Public Policy 35(7): 489-499.
10. Felt, U., rapporteur, and Wynne, B., chairman. 2007. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/european-knowledge-society_en.pdf (accessed 11 September 2015).
11. Hagendijk, R. and Irwin, A. 2006. Public deliberation and governance: Engaging with science and technology in contemporary Europe, Minerva 44(2): 167-184.
12. Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J., Rowe, G., Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W., Murdock, G. and O’Riordan, T. 2007. The GM Debate: Risk, Politics and Public Engagement. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
13. Horst, M. 2008. In search of dialogue: Staging science communication in consensus conferences. In: D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele and S. Shunke (eds) Communicating Science in Social Context: New Models, New Practices. Dordrecht: Springer, pp259-274.
14. Horst, M. 2010. Collective closure? Public debate as the solution to controversies about science and technology, Acta Sociologica 53(3): 195-211.
15. Horst, M. 2012. Deliberation, dialogue or dissemination: Changing objectives in the communication of science and technology in Denmark. In: B. Schiele, M. Claessens and S. Shunke (eds) Science Communication in the World: Practices, Theories and Trends. Dordrecht: Springer, pp95-108.
16. Horst, M. and Irwin, A. 2010. Nations at ease with radical knowledge: On consensus, consensusing and false consensusness, Social Studies of Science 40(1): 105-126.
17. House of Lords. 2000. Science and Society. London: The Stationery Office.
18. Irwin, A. 1995. Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.
19. Irwin, A. 2006. The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the ‘new’ scientific governance, Social Studies of Science 36(2): 299-320.
20. Irwin, A. and Michael, M. 2003. Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge. Maidenhead and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
21. Irwin, A. and Wynne, B., eds. 1996. Misunderstanding Science? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Irwin, A., Jensen, T. E. and Jones, K. E. 2013. The good, the bad and the perfect: Criticizing engagement practice, Social Studies of Science 43(1): 119-136.
23. Jasanoff, S. 2003. Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science, Minerva 41(3): 223-244.
24. Jasanoff, S. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25. Jones, K. E. and Irwin, A. 2010. Creating space for engagement? Lay membership in contemporary risk governance. In: B. M. Hutter (ed.) Anticipating Risks and Organising Risk Regulation in the 21st Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp185-207.
26. Kalundborg Municipality 2011. Borgertopmode om klimatilpasninger, www.kalundborg.dk/Borger/Veje-_teknik_og_milj%C3%B8/Klima/Klimatilpasning/Borgertopm%C3%B8de.aspx(accessed 11 September 2015).
27. Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S. and Tutton, S. 2007. Shifting subject positions: Experts and lay people in public dialogue, Social Studies of Science 37: 385-411.
28. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: SAGE.
29. Leach, M., Scoones, I. and Wynne, B., eds. 2005. Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement. London and New York: Zed Books.
30. Lindblom, C. E. 1968. The Policy-Making Process. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
31. Lynch, M. 1993. Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Lyngse, L. 2011a. Skal sommerhusene eller industrien drukne?, Teknologidebat 2, www.teknologidebat.dk/issue/article/skal-sommerhusene-eller-industrien-drukne (accessed 11 September 2015).
33. Lyngse, L. 2011b. I fremtiden ma vi sejle til Fotex, Teknologidebat 2.
34. Marres, N. 2005. Issues spark a public into being: A key but often forgotten point of the Lippmann-Dewey debate. In: B. Latour and P. Weibel (eds) Making Things Public. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Marres, N. 2007. The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy, Social Studies of Science 37: 759-780.
36. Phillips Report 2000. The BSE Inquiry: Vol 1. London: The Stationery Office.
37. Teknologiradet 2011a. Citizen summit in Kalundborg, www.tekno.dk/article/kalundborg (accessed 11 September 2015).
38. Teknologiradet 2011b. Deltagernes oplevelse af borgertopmodet, www.teknologidebat.dk/issue/article/deltagernes-oplevelse-af-borgertopm%C3%B8det (accessed 11 September 2015).
39. Urry, J. 2011. Climate Change and Society. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
40. Wynne, B. 1992. Public understanding of science research: New horizons or hall of mirrors?, Public Understanding of Science 1: 37-43.
41. Wynne, B. 1995. Public understanding of science. In: S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen and T. Pinch (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: SAGE, pp361-388.
42. Wynne, B. 2006. Public engagement as a means of restoring trust: Hitting the notes but missing the music?, Community Genetics, 9: 211-220.
43. Wynne, B. 2007. Public participation in science and technology: Performing and obscuring a political-conceptual category mistake, East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 1(1): 1-13.